Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina


[draft] Grassroots anti-5G under globalist assault — What to do about it

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 06:33


Piotr Bein, since 3.2.2020



Agents, useful ignorants and bullying

Arthur Firstenberg’s hijack

Shortcomings of the Appeal

Implications for campaigning

Stop 5G International press release for Jan 25th Global Day of 5G Protest

Claire Edwards’ discoveries

Genocidal globalist agenda

“Attorney” Reza Ganjavi gate-keeper

Tanja Rebel — who she is not

Roots and operations of deceptive globalist agenda

For example Rising Up! and Extinction Rebellion

How it all fits together


See also


Having deciphered deceptions and maniipulations by the globalists and their agents (mindful of it or not) among us, the grassroots’ independent thinkers don’t wish the Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (the Appeal) be used by dubiously-connected orgs  to approach local, national nor quasi-world governments.

These entities are in bed with, or could readily be corrupted by the globalists whose agenda the agents chose to support. Time is out and it’s a wrong approach, just as emphasis on health effects is, without talking loudest about the 5G enslavement weapon: total control over Humanity towards NWO, with intermediate phases — Depopulation, Cyborgization, Transhumanism.

From lessons of the past year, grassroot groups should be watchful of cooption and subjugation attempts by the globalists. As important, they should revise strategy and tactics to adjust activities to newly discovered and emerging conditions and threats. It’s clear that we should remain in distributed, dispersed independent structures for robustness and diversity — the mimic of resilient natural ecosystems, the Maker’s Creation.

Grassroot independent groups and citizens are encouraged to closely watch the potentially controlled orgs, who ostensibly self-declare a stance against 5G. Should you discover that their agitation, propaganda and actions indicate corruption of Humanity’s will, expose them. Disseminate your findings to warn and alert others, and when necessary withdraw from activity under their auspices.

On a positive note, the episode should stimulate the grassroots to revise current strategy and tactics, with a view on devising a more effective course.  Persons deemed “opposition” agents have many talents and there would be ample room to use those abilities and skills for the Common Good, once the muddy waters are cleared.


Agents, useful ignorants and bullying

In e-wrestling between the exposers and the accused referred to below, the latter ones object to the former’s vocabulary. Here is a legal definition of agent: someone or something that acts or exerts power : a moving force in achieving some result. Agents are not necessarily nefarious; the concept of an agent of influence is more relevant. Such person is a useful ignorant when he or she advances an interest harmful to Humanity, while remaining unaware about it. Some of the persons react to critique as if they were under direct or indirect control by the alien interests or powers. I call politruks the higher-level agents steering lower-level agents (from Soviet and Comintern politicheskiy rukovoditel = political handler).

In non-government and front organisations, consciousness of the leaders determines the character of the group, as ideologically non-compliant members resign or are purged. The more likely are deliberate conscious acts under direct control by politruks, the more removed a group is from genuine grassroots. The critiqued ones  blame their victims, the exposers, in a self-defence reaction. Displacing own fault onto the victim intimidates the critic and absolves the offender from examining their own behaviour. Victimisation may induce fear in the victim, even infecting the community.

Oppressor’s attack  fabricates own victimhood to justify the abuse and to manipulate the audience, perhaps even as a coping strategy and attention gainer. Abuser’s self-victimhood claims that the abuse was justified by the victim’s reprehensible behavior. Enter dehumanization (treating others as impaired mentally, malicious etc., thus scocial outliers) and diverting attention away from own abusive acys. The abuser counts on gaining and maintaining power and control over another person, but the act in itself serves to reinforce/enlarge abuser’s power in a group.

Abusers usually play victims to justify to themselves the cognitive dissonance between self-awareness and the way they treat others. In turn, victimhood expressed outwards attempts to deflect/evade negative opinion/condemnation from the audience. Unending threats of legal action serve to re-inforce the victimization effect both in- and out-wardly. A normal, honest person doesn’t need to do that to defend their stance. A letter from an attorney for couple of hundred bucks usually takes care of real offenders. Skilful attorneys can get the cost reimbursed by the offender.

I’ve been privy to a stage of victimisation of Claire Edwards, after her intellectual property (half of the Appeal) has been stolen and used by a group she would not approve of morally. She was broken down at the time, didn’t wish to deal with it anymore and rejected my offer to publish her discovery and e-conversations with her adversaries. Claire and others may have experienced byllying, a personal response under conditions of social power imbalance to the benefit of the abuser. Hostile intent and repetition over a period would also point to bullying. It is asserted in this case psychologically/emotionally by repeated verbal harassment and threats.

Some of our bullies seem arrogant and narcissistic — again, the abuser empowers himself by demeaning the victim. Some of them do it either to “reverse” being bullied by others, to act out an inflated fragile ego, or in reaction to criticism or perceived disrespect because they think too highly of themselves. Other risk factors in a potential abuser that might apply here (some evidence in discussions) include anger propensity, addiction to aggressivity, misjudging others’ actions as hostile, and self-image preservation — occuring separately or jointly. Personality disorders may also contribute.

Each personal trait alone is sufficient (for me) to reject each person, their org and initiatives, however fine they might appear to be. Unless they markedly improve, they are redundant, superfluous and don’t add value to the grassroots. When a decisive monumental course of collective action is needed to arrest the 5G roll-out, some of them obstructively argue, for example, as if they didn’t know that 5G is a weapon, Greta is a conscious fake and plant, climate change narrative is a manipulation and anthropogenic climate change is a hoax.

From own encounters with bullies, I decided not to yield and restore some balance of social power between the parties. I only regret I’ve not reacted earlier to this  obviously globalist assault, but hope others can benefit from examining the case for early detection and prevention in their own activism.


Arthur Firstenberg’s hijack

Co-creator of famous Appeal Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, Claire Edwards has alarmed that her colleague and co-author on that project, Arthur Firstenberg has hijacked it and transferred to a group serving globalist agenda. Arthur Firstenberg may have committed two transgressions of law and ethical conduct:

  • He has effectively stolen Claire Edwards intellectual property — about half the contribution to the Appeal — and is disposing of it without her consent.
  • He disposed of the signatories’ endorsement of anti-5G cause — in effect an anti-globalist ideal — by making the document available to ostensibly same cause but in the hands of people with dubious connections to globalist agenda.

Using ca. 200k signatory e-addresses he collected, Arthur keeps emailing 5G news out, some of them without stating the source properly. This opens an additional door to globalist agent provocateurs, not to mention Arthur’s  impudence of ignoring requests by signatories to have their signatures and e-addresses removed from his database.

Arthur is key to this scandalous assault on grassroots. With his submission of the Appeal without signatories’ permission, globalists would be able to use it to legitimize their activity on 5G front, with a potential to capture/derail/deflate independent national and local movements for ultimate globalist control.

Also important is Arthur’s ideology of science. A convinced quantum physicist by education, referring to a propagandist entry on RationalWiki as his source he rejects torsion field science, that he deems to be a hoax. On anthropogenic climate change, however, he quotes  politically correct sources that avoid delving into falsification of climate data by IPCCC and lack of positive proof for a correlation of atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature. This cognitive dissonace is congruent with climate ideology of some of the people at Stop 5G International.

The Appeal is now in self-appointed Stop 5G International activists’ hands. Tanja Rebel, Kate Kheel and Pernille Schriver figure as contacts on the org’s press release below. There may be other persons in the org and related or collaborating groups, such as Stop5G in Zuckerberg’s fb outlet of corporate mass control, censorship and manipulation by the ruling cabal aka military-industrial-government complex.

Shortcomings of the Appeal

Apart from the moral flaws, the Appeal under present custody also needs improvement to become a more effective campaign tool. As is, the Appeal could be mental trap for inexpert users, e.g. Big Telecom could show off an “effort” to soften the technology to cause lesser bio-impact, but  retain full capability in the other aspects. This is already plain, e.g. pushing fibreoptic cables (known to harm electrosensitives), or Li-Fi as scantly tested as everything in wireless.
The Appeal is not suitable in its campaign and education functions intended by Stop 5G International, since it,
  • Reflects only the admin/contributors’ mindset (e.g. Arthur Firstenberg’s scientific/ideological bias above).
  • Presumes for itself more importance and usefullness to national/local groups than it can offer. Some groups, for example, command more advanced expertise for public education and submissions to govt etc.
  • Is not being updated, e.g. it talks about 20k satellites while officially the number more than doubled. It does not follow the deployment of stratospheric drones and baloons for 5G, an essentiall supplement to the satellite hordes.
  • Contains inaccurate and incomplete info about wireless and its bio-effects. Not-so-expert groups would uncritically copy and propagate it.
  • Misses the other aspects of 5G systems and later generations: mass control, selective cohort/individual target weapon, transhumanism… These are no less important long-term than health effects.
Why would grassroots need a central org? Even if they accepted some steering, the self-appointed team at Stop 5G International does not have the necessary cross-domain expertise. Ideological confusion and fanaticism coupled with naivete and defective moral compass are prominent among them. The org’s people are not capable of strategic direction to local groups, nor technical expertise necessary to understand the technology before it could be stopped. 

Implications for campaigning

This is also the right time to examine grassroots strategy and tactics in light of a rather meagre progress. Many activists call to put differences aside and unite against common adversary. I asked: To do what? but “managers” at Stop 5G International do not answer. Calls for unity are understandable, but now is also an opportune moment to infiltrate/capture grassroots. The Stop 5G Internationall org and the quality of some of its people open the door to infiltration and capture. Past year has shown that,
  • The above non-health issues are not prominent in local group campaigns, as the public is poorly educated and the leading activists fear being ridiculed by the ranks and file and by the wireless lobby and corporate media.
  • ICNIRP, a private club created by the the wireless lobby, and other bodies influenced or under military-industrial complex’s control (WHO, IARC…) act under a covert agenda in conflict with Humanity’s good, refusing to tighten safe limits for RF irradiation. The opposite ensues in former Soviet block;: standards are being relaxed a 100-fold to match those in the Western world.
  • Governments at all levels largely don’t care about public protests, expert conferences and appeals, nor submissions to hearings etc.
  • School and medical boards could not care less that students, patients, and staff are constattly exposed to Wi-Fi radiation, as long as their hides are covered by federal/state emission standards.
  • Seemingly non-globalist states like Russian Federation show their true colours, by declaring support for 5G roll-out and AI implementation. Despite national opposition, Putin has by presidential decree declared green light for 5G.
  • Big Telecom’s propaganda neutralises our public education efforts. At the same time, most users of wireless telecom become addicted to their gadgets and the new “lifestyle”.
  • Focus on 5G rather than on all wireless contributors to the “soup” skews activist and public attention onto the lobby’s “safe” limits from 1G thru 5G.

For grassroots strategy-setting, more useful would be a structured platform for sharing key material (vetted by specialists), and, based on local experience, approaches that work and technical submissions to hearings and legislators. Individual groups and users could peruse the material according to their needs. Groups on FB and similar platforms do not fill the bill. They are oulets of info-tech’s mass surveillance, manipulation, censorship and data harvesting. They attract desinfo and trolls. Moderators may mow down or purge whom they choose to, and may lack expertise to assess posted material.

A website/blog posting links submitted by local org sources (assumed to be guarded against the above) to their own material seems a better solution. In any case, we should keep in mind that the net could be closed down. Rather than centralised organisation schemes and communications outside of our control, we need resilient, dispersed structure: higly educated, self-directed grassroots locally diversified and independent of each other.

The globalist bullies of Reclaim the Power have infiltrated UK anti fracking protests, and later morphed, together with like Climate Camp, into Extinction Rebellion. A grassroots member warns of actions led by those people, as due to social media publicity, the groups caused intense police coverage at anti-fracking eventsThe courts used those media posts as evidence that the ENTIRE anti-fracking movement intends to commit acts of domestic terrorism. The person advises:

The only way to “train” for activism is to get out to a camp or event of your choosing and just DO IT. Remain completely autonomous in your actions and NEVER let anyone tell you what to believe or do.
Trust your gut feelings at all times. Never give your real name or address, email or phone number to anyone until you are completely sure about them.

Real activism avoids breaking the law or at least, avoids being caught doing so. Avoid telling anyone of your plans. Civil disobedience or rebellion is unashamed and indefensible sabotage by large numbers of people. Do not attend such events in public places where facial recognition or surveillance on a huge scale operates.

Stop 5G International press release for Jan 25th Global Day of 5G Protest

In plain view, the supposed grassroot org is exploiting the half-stolen Appeal in the name of world’s anti-5G activism:

The org reps, one of the agent ladies being a veteran of XR, announce delivery of the Appeal to national and covert world government branches: EU, UN, WHO. The latter ones are infamous for unquestionably pushing ICNIRP fake standards of wireless safety. Both groups of institutions keep us “thinking globally” but acting empowered only to a limited degree and only locally, while tramping on our basic rights at both levels, with barely a few current national and local exceptions.

What does Stop 5G International do, aspiring to custody of another Global Day of 5G protest? Nothing revolutionary, more of the same that has failed us to date, a status quo that maintains globalist and 5G perpetrator agenda despite mass public protests. I have participated with grassroots in Poland to stop pro-5G legislation. Such efforts are futile, e.g. deputies and senators admit privately to reporters they know of the threats to health but would vote for 5G laws anyway. And they did; Poland has 100 times worse safety limits for radio wave irradiation than under Communism!

Others around the world erxperience similar obstacles. Given that, an energetic change of strategy is in order, away from reliance on mass public appeals, letters from scientists and emphasis on the health and life effects, while the perpetrator cabal remains fuzzily defined at best, and the grassroots skip weaponization of radio waves and mass control issues for fear of public disapproval and media ridicule.

Critic Claire Edwards’ discoveries

Following her gradual discoveries in the 4th quarter of 2019, Claire Edwards’ public exposure of the globalist connection began with a post on a marginal blog. Some graphics from Claire’s alert is clearer when you first read the above text. The subject is a bit complex, so if you need to, you will find more in material further on.






Genocidal globalist agenda

Good two weeks before 25.1.2020 global day of 5G protest, Claire alerted: Stop 5G International hijacked. Under legal threats and also stigmatised by vain efforts to clarify with Stop 5G International and related people, she writes cryptically:

Arthur Firstenberg has chosen to associate the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space with a dubious self-appointed group, stop5ginternational, which was infiltrated by someone closely associated with various people at the very top of the Club of Rome/Agenda 21/2030/”sustainable development” movement, which believes in top-down control of people and resources, and depopulation. This is contrary to the aims of the stop 5G movement. This woman is central to a worldwide movement whose objectives may not be in alignment with those seeking to stop 5G and her participation in the stop 5G movement may be motivated by a desire to attract people to her own cause.

On 19.1.2020, Claire divulges the mysterious person at Stop 5G International — WorldShift’s leader Nicolya Christi. The movement carried out socio-engineering tasks of the Club of Budapest. Club of Madrid is its political (politruk) counterpart, and both stem from the Club of Rome. Stop 5G International was established by people connected to WorldShift.

Nicolya Christi infiltrated the stop 5G movement starting in June 2019. […] Her stated intention was […] to collectivise and lead the stop 5G movement via a “round table”.  She is the coordinator of the Worldshift movement, which was started by Ervin Laszlo, himself the leader of Club of Rome in Hungary and initiator of the Club of Budapest by agreement with Aurelio Peccei, founder of the Club of Rome. The Club of Budapest is the social engineering arm of Club of Rome.  “The WorldShift Network was designated as being responsible for the international projects of the Club of Budapest as well as for the coordination of the National Clubs.” 

Claire explains WorldShift agenda in recent email exchange with Stop 5G International and national activists. She assembles anti-human statements by so-called environmentalists, who support Greta’s psy-op and fraudulent climate change narrative:

  • Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs.”  – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
  • Humans on the Earth behave in some ways like a pathogenic micro-organism, or like the cells of a tumor.” – Sir James Lovelock, Healing Gaia
  • The Earth has cancer and the cancer is Man.” – Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
  • A cancer is an uncontrolled multiplication of cells; the population explosion is an uncontrolled multiplication of people. We must shift our efforts from the treatment of the symptoms to  the cutting out of the cancer. The operation will demand many apparently brutal and heartless decisions.” – Prof Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb [he was the main promoter of the eugenics agenda of the Club of Rome]
  • I don’t claim to have any special interest in natural history, but as a boy I was made aware of the annual fluctuations in the number of game animals and the need to adjust the cull to the size of the surplus population.” – Prince Philip, preface of Down to Earth
  • A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” – United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment
  • A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor
  • “… the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.” – Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind
  • One America burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshes. This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population,we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it’s just as bad not to say it.” – Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier
  • If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” – Prince Philip, Duke of  Edinburgh, patron of the World Wildlife Fund
  • I suspect that eradicating small pox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems.” – John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
  • The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing.” – Christopher Manes, Earth First!
  • The extinction of Homo Sapiens would mean survival  for millions, if not billions, of Earth-dwelling species. Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on Earth – social and environmental.” – Ingrid Newkirk, former President of PETA
  • Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” – David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club
  • Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian Religious tradition.” – Peter Singer, founder of Animal Rights

Claire reproduces WorldShift 20 Declaration:

  • “It is the responsibility of the people to choose leadership that is knowledgeable and wise
  • We base ourselves on the Club of Rome Limits to Growth in 1972
  • “We need to replace the obsolete notions of nation-states
  • We need a “whole-system shift
  • “The human community needs comprehensive structural reform
  • “We need to leave everything we know behind in order to get to where we need to go.”
  • A systemic thorough reinvention of every aspect of humanity
  • “We are at a point in time when the spiritual dimension must become paramount in issues of decision making.”
  • “All states should establish an office for the specific fulfillment of the Millennium Development Goals” [later morphed into Agenda 21/2030]
  • Capital must be protected as other property rights”
  • A new bottom line must be established which incorporates the well-being of the environment and of people as part of the social bargain of society as a limited liability entity.”
  • “We must implement a proper valuation of the natural world independent of human interests”
  • “National sovereignty must be balanced with universal norms and values.”
  • “The human future and financial markets must be sustainable”
  • We need a “Global Environment Economy”
  • “We must … partner one another through the greatest social transformation ever known.”

In short, complete revolution and destruction of existing order: the family, society, humanity, and national states and sovereignty.


“Attorney” Reza Ganjavi gate-keeper

Reza Ganjavi self-declares a very non-litigious approach. He goes out of his way to avoid litigation and find peaceful solutions… He has assisted many friends with legal related topics, and they achieved excellent results. His experience includes family history in law and numerous personal litigation cases. Reza stresses that he is not a certified attorney.

Despite the credentials, Reza proved to be a dictator on FB, delusional about other people’s “delusions” which he fabricates on the go with verbal abuse. He shoots “legal” threats from the hip. He emailed me on behalf of an unnamed  friend shortly after publication of Claire’s findings on my blog. He insisted on a phone or skype conversation. I preferred written exchange, as he mentioned legal nature of his intervention. His attempt ended up in an unproductive, abusive  tantrum.

Then I found that also with other people Reza tends to explode in a harassing, abusive, vulgar and insulting way when he does not get what he wants. Reza reacted so to a text by Bruce Cane quoted on my blog. In his text Bruce elaborates his grievance against Reza, the new admin of FB Stop5G Group, after previous admin(s) and moderators have been summarily purged on 27.9.2019, allegedly for reasons of Bruce’s libellous behaviour regarding Reza. I have requested from Reza copies of the alleged postings. Reza has not provided them to date.

Beside abusive pressure on Bruce, Reza also displayed his bullying tactics with legal threats.  It looks like he tried to create a power imbalance, a situation absolving him from duty to provide evidence to substantiate his charges about Bruce’s alleged libels. Reza displayed similar tactics when faced with my refusal to delete what he deems an unlawful publication. Reza should know that his actisim pro publico bono exposes him to scrutiny and criticism.


Tanja Rebel — who she is not

Tanja has a useful ignorant’s history in XR  (that she prefers not to recollect and renounce), and confirms in e-discussions her ideological confusion: sick, polit-correct elements of neomarxism,  climate change idiocy, Zionist Holocaust belying, and mindless sensing of “antisemitism”.

In her discussions with agents of critique, Tanja Katarina Rebel, the disposer of stolen Appeal, signs her emails with litanies of who she is not.  It’s a reavealing information. Collated from her emails to date, Tanja self-declares in her defence:


Roots and operations of deceptive globalist agenda

The fake “climate change” agenda is obvious:

Among the first signs that fake climate change and Stop5G were conflated into one campaign was this Swiss poster, marvelled over by Claire:

The climate change hysteria flows from media-distorted and -overblown, dodgy IPCC science. In the hyped-up abhorrent and repugnant craze that sucks some young people into suicide and many more into clinical depression, Greta Thunberg leads inter-generational warfare to divide and conquer masses for globalist agenda that is hidden from view. XR is a street implementer of this mental garbage; respectable mothers of families fall into the trap. So do many government officials, while their colleague members of secret societies know well what is at stake.

Supplemented with system knowledge by Shai Danon, an Israeli publicist for a better world, Claire lays out her understanding of the recent history and goals of the globalist agenda of depopulation and cyborgization. Independently, but with threads common with Claire’s, Mark Windows explains the forces underlying a capture of anti-5G movements and the connection with the Fake Green Agenda, UN and Citizen Assemblies. The latter one fools people into submission to undemocratic governance and manipulative delphi “public” meetings that steer away from public benefit. Interviews with XR protesters reveal a cognitive dissonance  as to issue formulation and vested global interests.

Hosted by Danish investigative reporter Lucas Alexander for Age Of Truth TV, Norwegian scientist and researcher of climate politics and history, Dr. Jacob Nordangård tells that Rockefellers and other elitist families are behind the orchestration of the “Climate agenda” (he calls it “depopulation plan”). The topics discussed indicate the depth of Nordangård’s research (see his books):

UN Agendas 21/2030; climate change denial; environmentalism; secret societies and think tanks: Club of Rome, Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, CFR, Federal Reserve and Population Council 1952; Rockefeller dynasty, Illuminati bloodline families and NWO elitist power structure; Greta Thunberg, Aldous Huxley and Brave New World; gender and transgender agenda, New Age movement; Sweden, feminism, microchipping; veganism; occult rituals; 5G, SmartMeters, SmartCities, EM frequerncies and radiation; HAARP, DEW, chemtrails, mind control…

From my own research for Prof. Christian Scherrer’s International Comparative Genocide Research Project, the NWO idea, plan and multi-faceted implementation began with the Rothschilds in 18th century. I conclude:

Numerous power groups are responsible for millions of fatalities in 20th century wars and genocides, but NWO-apocalyptic-messianic Judeocentrics seem to lead them all. Extreme Jews and Jewish bankers have instigated, supported and executed wars and revolutions. Judeocentrics had traded off a few hundred thousands new settlers in Israel for tens of millions dead in 20th century wars, incl. Jewish masses opposed to Zionism. Human life means nothing to them, in accord with Talmudic hatred and fanaticism. Shabbataian Frankists and Dönmeh, and Zionists are still at play in world’s power centres. They are the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC), a global web of extreme Judeocentrics and Gentile supporters, not just the Zionists, all guided by “end time” ideology.

[…] JPC elite’s beliefs in total evil and destruction of Gentiles for redemption of Jews, have been driving Judeocentrics at the helm of global politics since the 17th century. The process manipulates global Jewry, including Orthodox Jews who oppose Zionism and NWO as contrary to Torah. Judeocentric policies follow Zionist, Bolshevik, Nazi and Communist traditions, coated in new phrases and rhetoric. JPC rhetoric, history, and recent developments point to advancement of the NWO ploy…

I must have hit some truth, as the paper togethter with dozens of others from leading independent genocide researchers (which I’m not one formally) have been destroyed on Prof. Scherrer’s computer shortly before publication in Volume 1, reserved for the most significant cointributions on this ambitious project covering 20th and 21st century genocide. Inf an update I would include the “technological” genocide I’ve learned since then: abortions, nuclear pollution, GMO, Rockefeller “medicine”, Big Pharma poisoning, chemtrails, vaccinations,  wireless…


For example Rising Up! and Extinction Rebellion

An out-of-date website of Rising Up! (RU) directs to Extinction Rebellion (XR) and posts forms to pledge and join them. RU consists of former activists of Compassionate Revolution Ltd. (birthed in the Occupy movement), Earth First! Occupy, Plan Stupid, Radical Think Tank and Reclaim the Power, offering a space that can be used for actions needing collective intent. In the  UK anti-fracking protests, the Reclaim the Power instigators did not end up in courts, but the grassroots activists did, so the “Ltd.” predecessor is intriguing:

Technically Compassionate Revolution Limited is a company limited by shares; we have no intention of profiting from this venture. As “Directors” we gift our time to the “company” and we will run the “company” along gift economy lines. If we need financial support for some element of the work, for example some technology changes, we may ask members to gift donations. We have incorporated because company Directors have limited liabilities- often with devastating consequences. We believe changes to the law are vital to hold company directors responsible for the activities of their companies.

Roger Hallam, a brain behind Reclaim the Power, RU and XR explains how he saves his own skin: recruit grassroot activists who want to go to jail for the cause. RU website confirmspeople may be willing to undertake acts of defiance, some of which could be illegal […] and they may wish to share their actions with others. Our site and processes are designed to support such sharing that is done by giving individual groups the decision power, but upon advice / feedback and continual review by a strategy group who sets the date and type of mass actions,  and the broad frame and demands of these events — a scheme like the “actions” Stop 5G Int’l appointed itself to organise globally.

Hallam reveals in a summary of a “climate emergency” campaign that he would be very interested in extremely valuable key activists joining the team or starting escalations in your own locality […] contact me or other people involved in such actions to get meet face to face and discuss the nitty gritty of what is planned. 

As team leader RU website features Gail Bradbrook, a doctor of biology, an economic justice campaigner and compassionate revolutionary. According to a public document “Principles and Values” (March 2018) she was RU co-founder: The initial members of the Holding Group were decided by the former strategy group (Roger Hallam, Simon Bramwell and Gail Bradbrook) at the RU gathering in Stroud, March 2017, as Stu Basden, Gail Bradbrook, Simon Bramwell and Jay. She names XR: it’s the biggest thing we have attempted. People are hosting talks in the areas where they live and we’re asking them if they are willing to take part in processes that will lead to arrest and very short periods of time in jail.

Among key resources for nonviolent activists, Bradbrook and “Principles and Values” recommend Blueprint for Revolution by Srdja Popovic, a super-activist produced by CIA and US State Department for carrying out “non-violent revolution around the world”, from Otpor! that toppled down Slobodan Milosevic (later murdered in his cell during trial in the Hague), through colour revolutions, Arab Spring, Euromaidan and “refugee” flooding of Europe, to “anti-government” protests in Iran today. The manual for these operations was developed by U. of Massachusetts professor Gene Sharp, the founder of Albert Einstein Institute, which trained provocateurs to launch popular resistance campaigns around the world, aimed at replacing governments opposed to the dictates of Western elites.

Hallamwe all stand on the shoulders of the giants who went before us – namely Gandhi and Martin Luther Kings and the many practitioners of nonviolent struggle from around the world. Our contribution has been to systematise the approach for our western highly digitalised context.

How it all fits together

From her experience as White anglophone in Quebec under terror by the separatist, Marxist-Leninist  and paramilitary Front de libération du Québec (FLQ), augmented by the events of “solidarity with natives” protests, Canadian grassroots analyst AmazingPolly lays out the structure of revolutinoary cell network under oligarchs’ management:

marxist revolution
Polly interprets the graph starting at minute 42:00, as follows:
  • Overarching cover is Civil Society, in the triad with State and Market
  • Overarching ideology is Marxism
  • Hierarchical Core = worldwide network of super-oligarchs
  • Operative Cells = movements and groups e.g. antifa, and protesters for native, Black power, environmental etc.causes who farm out to anarchists  and other Leaderless Cells and Individual Operatives outside of the Functional Core
  • Peripheral Assistance to Operative Cells and Individual Operatives

The graph used by Polly is a subset of a larger picture of global Bankster structure of power and control. From fragmentary info I imagine it looks like this, in hierarchical order of levels, more or less:

  • The highest level (Banksters) contain Decision and Steering Functions: ideology, strategy, intelligence, technology, analysis…
  • Executive Group for global mass manipulation of conscience by ideology, religion (Bnai Brith, Chabad Lubavitch, Zionists…)
  • Special Ops — Kosher Nostra, intelligence services and special forces of selected “states” (USA, UK, Israel, Saudi Arabia….)
  • Financial/Economic Ops — global/regional banks, centtral banks, investment banks, subordinate corporations
  • Implementation Group for world-wide government bodies (UN, IAEA, NATO, WHO…), national governments (via Bilderbergers, CFR, Trilateral Commission…), top hierarchies of religions, State of Israel, Illuminati
  • Media Management (MSM and “alternative”, movies, pop culture, current spin, re-writing history)
  • NGO Management

In the graph that Polly uses, the Hierarchical Core would be subordinated to NGO Management from Bankster scheme, while Peripheral Assistance would flow from its lower levels.

  • Civil Society is Soros-controlled NGOs.
  • State is run by corrupted partiocracy/democracy.
  • Market is Corporations and their law system inserted into law-giving of State and International Institutions.
  • Peripheral Assistance are various official institutions, foundations, institutes, think tanks, government departments, intelligence services and their operatives like Antifa…
  • Super oligarchs in Hierarchical Core are lower-level bankster (Soros…) and other “movers and shakers”.


Stuart Basden co-founded XR. In RisingUp! he was Holding Group member. He was also in the XR Guardianship Team —  sort of neo-Comintern politruks. Creep Basden’s reversely racist, hateful (racially, geo-ethnically), historically belied and “gender”-wise messed up neo-marxist credo:
[…] constructed delusions that have been coded into societies and institutions around the world: 
    • The delusion of white-supremacy centres whiteness and the experience of white people, constructing and perpetuating the myth that white people and their lives are somehow inherently better and more valuable than people of colour. 
    • The delusion of patriarchy centres the male experience, and excludes/hinders female assigned people from public life (reducing them to a possession or object for ownership or consumption). Patriarchy teaches dominating and competitive behaviours, and emphasises the idea that the world is a place of scarcity, separation and powerlessness. 
    • The delusions of Eurocentrism include the notion that Europeans know what is best for the world. 
    • The delusions of hetero-sexism/heteronormativity propagate the idea that heterosexuality is ‘normal’ and that other expressions of sexuality are deviant. 
    • The delusions of class hierarchy uphold the theory that the rich elite are better/smarter/nobler than the rest of us, and make therefore better decisions. 
Most anybody could take Basden’s gibberish apart. I will not waste time here. The point is that people of this sort mobilize millions to actions on behalf of the globalists… and masses trust them! — like in the French and Bolshevik revolutions, in major wars, e.g. Spanish war and Stalin’s wars for psychopath’s domination.
Most cynical in all of this: basdens, firstenbergs, rebels, chrisitis, ganjavis, kheels… are deluded that perpetrators (“class hierarchy“) of 5G somehow don’t deceive Humanity on climate change and the globalist agenda they unwittingly support. Two characteristics strike the observer in the personalities reviewed here: ideological confusion and quest for social control. Will the grassroots fall prey of such useful idiot “revolutionaries” who believe they help liberate Humanity from the chains of the bankster NWO cabal?

See also

1 Comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: