Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina

24/01/2013

Honourable Elisabeth May, when will you take your electorate seriously?

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 21:20

From: Piotr Bein
Subject: Re: Why a two degree Celsius increase in the global average temperature is a big deal
To: “MPElizabeth May” <admin@elizabethmaymp.ca>
Received: Thursday, January 24, 2013, 5:02 PM

Honorable Elisabeth May

Humanity will adapt to climate change; the prime concern, as usually, is the unequal distribution of wealth to do so  — conclusions  from my work at Environment Canada’s  Adaptation Impacts Research Group some years ago.

However, adaptation to rising nuclear, low-level radiation polluton is impossible.
You seem oblivious to this issue. In 2011, I wrote you on lack of monitoring and public data on the health effects in Canada of the radiation from Fukushima meltdowns.

With great delay, you have dismissed my concerns by referring to nuclear lobby’s deceptive propaganda on supposed safety of No. 4 spent fuel pool in Daiichi. Corium in melted-down Fukushima reactors will be emitting radiation into air, ocean water and soil for tens of years to come.

Therefore, I find your concern about climate change a red herring. To the detriment of  your reputation, you refer to the “Establishment”: World Bank and IEA among others.
The former is instrumental in subduing nations before an attack and occupation by global powers (Yugoslavia, Iraq…). The latter is not known for easing nuclear and fossil fuel dependency (controlled by the world’s mightest interests).

Islands can evacuate, but Iraqis could not: several million civilians killed since 1990 in Iraq, by UN sanctions, coalition forces, incl. Canada, and their proxies:
Christian Scherrer (editor) Iraq: Genocide by Sanctions, Penerbit Universiti Malaysia: Pulau Pinang, 2011, ISBN 978-983-861-503-7, page 73.

When are you going to treat you electorate seriously?

Regards
Piotr Bein
independent genocide researcher
PiotrBein.wordpress.com

— On Tue, 1/22/13, Elizabeth May, MP <admin@elizabethmaymp.ca> wrote:

From: Elizabeth May, MP <admin@elizabethmaymp.ca>
Subject: Why a two degree Celsius increase in the global average temperature is a big deal
To: piotrbein@yahoo.com
Received: Tuesday, January 22, 2013, 9:02 PM

Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P.
Why a two degree Celsius increase in the global average temperature is a big deal
The Hill Times
January 21, 2013

The International Energy Agency is warning that shooting past two degrees Celsius average global temperature will have “dire consequences.” And the World Bank is talking about 3.5 degrees of warming as being “devastating.” These are not environmental agencies. They are conservative, economically-oriented institutions. They are “establishment” with a capital E. Their language is increasingly alarmed, and yet nothing happens.

I think part of the problem is that even when experts understand the peril in which all human society is placed, those who are alarmed are afraid to sound “alarmist.” Translating the impact of two degrees, 3.5 degrees, and even higher levels of warming into language that is clear and unequivocal is not a project for the faint of heart. Let me try to explain two key factors in the IEA, World Bank, IPCC, and other projections.

The first is that these agencies do not yet say there is no chance of avoiding the two degree of warming threat which all countries, including Canada, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper personally in Copenhagen in 2009, have pledged to avoid. What is said is that if the collectivity of nations maintain current plans for climate action, the total impact is to allow greenhouse gases to continue to rise. On current policy trajectories, we fail miserably in our stated objectives. Only with the kind of urgent and comprehensive economic transitions undergone by nations at war can we avoid over-shooting two degrees. And even then, we are not guaranteed success.

Two degrees global average temperature warming is not a goal. It is to be avoided. It represents a level of human-caused climate impact which ensures dangerous levels of climatic destabilization. Many low-lying island states point out that at two degrees, they will be permanently inundated.

[Read rest of article…]

Share with Friends
Read Companion Blog from Elizabeth
Twitter Facebook
Flickr Youtube
Survey Get Involved
contact Blog
Website
1 – 9711 Fourth Street
Sidney, BC V8L 2Y8

Phone: 250-657-2000
Fax: 250-657-2004

elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca

Website
518 Confederation Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6

Phone: 613-996-1119
Fax: 613-996-0850

elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca

footer
You have received this correspondence due to your email to Elizabeth May, MP. We hope this correspondence resonates with the issue you wrote to her about, or is similar and of interest to you. You can choose not to receive any further email on this subject or opt out of all mailings.

Mailing Address

518 Confederation Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
Canada

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. […] PB: It is speculation – no definitive, documented and proven cause-effect for deterioration phenomena mentioned… Due to the multitude of factors, it’s more and more difficult to determine cause and effect. The perpetrators have pulled out this excuse on dozens of issues, some more obvious scientifically than chemtrails and climate change: radioactive pollution, vaccines, cancer from smoking… If there is a cause-effect, they will obfuscate and conceal it; look at Fukushima cover-up: agencies responsible for measuring radiation and protecting populations in Western countries are silent, collaborating with the perpetrators. I wrote to a green MP who looked very promising when elected to Ottawa in 2011; she responded to my Fukushima concerns with 1-year delay, sending me to a Nuclear Lobby propaganda website! […]

    Pingback by Dane Wigington: chemtrails cause positive feedback to warming, illness and species extinction? « Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina — 10/02/2013 @ 21:36

  2. […] A jest w Kanadzie niska. Nawet parlamentarzystka Elizabeth May, wybrana z wielką nadzieją po raz pierwszy z Partii Zielonych w czasie katastrofy Fukuszima, na […]

    Pingback by O tuszowaniu przez lobby A | Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina — 17/03/2013 @ 17:58

  3. […] Hello, Thank you for your reply and the interest that you have clearly shown. I’m aware of your excellent work in warning people with the issues surrounding vaccines. I got your contact details from here: https://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/honourable-elisabeth-may-when-will-you-take-your-electorat&#8230; […]

    Pingback by DOES THIS SPELL THE END? | Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina — 08/06/2013 @ 00:17

  4. […] PB: Spekulacje bez definitywnych, udokumentowanych, udowodnionych relacji przyczyna-skutek dla wymienionych pogarszających się zjawisk… Wielka liczba istniejących już czynników antropogennych, coraz trudniej określić skutki po przyczynach. Sprawcy zawsze użyli tej wymówki w dziesiątkach kwestii, wiele z nich bardziej oczywistszych naukowo niż skutki chemośladów czy zmiana klimatu: zaniczyszczenie radioaktywnością, scypionki, rak od papierosów… Jeśli istnieją związki przyczyna-skutek, uny ukryją je i zagmatwają. Np. zatajenie Fukuszimy: agencje odpowiedzialne za pomiary i ochronę radiologiczną ludności Zachodu milczą, kolaborując ze sprawcami. Napisałem w tej sprawie do ‘zielonej’ posłanki w Kanadzie, która wyglądała b. obiecująco w momencie elekcji w 2011. Odesłała mnie (po roku zwłoki) na … propagandowy portal lobby nuklearnego! […]

    Pingback by [zbiór] Ocipienie klimatu: dominujący wpływ Słońca zignorowany | Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina — 22/08/2018 @ 23:50


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: