The Evils of Judeocentrism
by Piotr Bein, independent researcher
March 28, 2012, version continually updated at author’s convenience
Copyright Piotr Bein 2012
a. Date convention: x.y.z, where x = day, y = month, z = year, for example, 24.3.1999 = March 24, 1999.
b. Bold emphases in quotes are added and “[…]” denotes omission of secondary text in a quote.
Extreme Zionists are one of sub-groups that espouse Jewish tribalism, both religious and secular, based on Jewish racism against non-Jews (goyim). They form a vital operational, part of the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC) – a global web of powerful individuals and organizations who advocate for, support and carry out radical Israel-first and Judeocentric policies. JPC includes e.g. Zionist Christians and moderate Jews.
At the Holocaust conference in December 2006, Iran’s president had allegedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. He had actually said “this regime that is occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time”, meaning a downfall of a totalitarian state, similar to the demise of the Soviet system, rather than forceful removal of Israel. Nevertheless, Wiesenthal Centre’s rabbi Marvin Hier acted up on CNN about a total Holocaust coming up. Earlier, Hier discredited himself by supporting a spin about Iran’s alleged law requiring visible marking of Jews and Christians. Typically, the Zionist propagandists remain unswayed, while the condemnation and bad consequences fall on their critics.
A few years forward (September 2012), Ahmadinedjad supposedly vistits New York… and the truth comes out, carefully kept away from the mainstream merdia. Amidst Judeocentric hoopla and preps for a war with Iran by Israel and Judeocentric lackeys USrael and EU, Iran’s president sincerely and touchingly embraces a large group of Orthodox Jews in the capital of Jewish Diaspora, NYC! Israeli leaders meet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in NYC — reads an idiotic youtube title… but it follows from the translation of the elderly Rabbi’s address (and Ahmadinejad’s nodding) that it is an Orthodox Jewish sect like Neturei Karta. Indeed a moron placed the video on youtube with a wrong title. The meeting obviously takes place in 2007! These strongly anti-Zionisy Jews true to Hebrew Old Testament, the Torah, believe that Diaspora Jews should be loyal to their host countries while awaiting the salvation from Messiah (Moshiah). They condemn the creation, existence and crimes of the Zionist entity in Palestine and around the world.
The Jews in the video are neither Israeli, leaders of any Israeli flock, nor in any way associated with the Zionists or the Zionist entity in occupied Palestine. Neturei Karta is well known for their anti-Zionist hutzpahs staged in the USA and Israel. They also participated in the Holo-hoax conference in Tehran, where they embraced Ahmadinejad as sincerely. The Jewish translator explains in the video that many of the Orthodox Jewish leaders have perished during WWII in Zionist hands. Today, most of the Jewish sects and secular Jews are in the hands of the Lubavitch sect who also have a great influence on global politics for the benefit to Zionists and the banksters.
Judging from the knee-jerk reactions of radical Zionists to events such as the Holocaust conference in Tehran, they fear debate and exposure. What might be their fears? The Holocaust is perphaps the most abused case in modern history. Most of the history books are useless, as they have been dostorted by a Judeocentric view, that has been served both out of fear of the truth and as a means of continuing control of non-Jewish and Jewish minds. This essay presents some points that by no means exhaust the vast, covered up and distorted subject of Judeocentrism. Many excellent works exist on the subject, pushed to the fringes of publication and internet, e.g. Pinay‘s work.
To expose the misrepresentations and myths, I wished to share some material on radical Zionist deception that I assembled while working on research papers for the International Comparative Genocide Research (ICGR) project. The essay is edited and expanded from Zionist fears series emailed to my lists. I intended to update this brochure with events and reflections since then – there‘s so much evil originating with the JPC. Instead, I elected to revisit the text and add to it key developments and observations.
Zionist collusion in the Shoah
The Tehran conference, too, insulted intelligence, history and the memory of Holocaust victims. It missed positions regarding non-Jewish victims of the Holocaust. In genocide scholarship Holocaust means the totality of German Nazi crimes on more than 20 groups, wheras Shoah means the WWII Jewish tragedy, estimated at 4-6 million Jewish victims. There were many more millions of Russian, Polish and other Slav victims. Shoah victimized mainly the impoverished, Eastern European Jews unwanted by Zionists in Palestine, whereas Holocaust of Poles targeted the whole group, starting with the “head” of the nation, its intelligentsia.
Shoah is the biggest tabu that drives extreme Zionists to irrational behaviour. The WWII Allied governments yielded to Zionist propaganda and lobbying while the radical Zionist leadership sacrificed millions of Jews to Shoah, for the sake of a new Jewish state. Some rabbis and others have documented and publicized this tragedy. Based on multiple sources, the website of Jews-not-Zionists states that “Zionist leaders openly withheld support, both financially and otherwise, to save their fellow brothers and sisters from a cruel death. The leaders of the Zionist movement co-operated with Hitler and his cohorts on many occasions and in many ways.”
From the publisher’s foreword to the book by rabbi Shonfeld: “The essays published in the book constitute but a small part of a serious accusation that shows Zionist leaders as war criminals who contributed to the annihilation of 6 million of our brothers […] Zionist attitude that Jewish blood is an annointing oil required by the drive-wheel of the Zionist state is not a thing of the past, but persists to date.”
Shonfeld quoted Eliezer Livneht, who admitted that the Zionists rescued “only those Jews who could be transferred to Israel. Emigration limits served as a political factor in our battle for the promised land and opened doors to the establishment of the state. Our programs served this goal and therefore we were prepared to endanger and sacrfice lives.” Naming Israel’s first minister of the interior Yitzhak Greenbaum, and World Jewish Congress’ president Nachum Goldmann, Shonfeld alleged that WWII-time Zionist leaders followed this policy, The leaders usurped the representation of all Jews, and controlled funds and information flow. Therefore they are responsible for inaction in preventing Shoah and rescuing Jews doomed to death. For example, the chairman of the Committee for Rescue of Jews, Greenbaum remained silent about Shoah and sabotaged all efforts by groups trying to help the Jews. Rabbi Weissmandl has investigated only some of the cases in his suppressed book Min HaMetzar.
More recently, a Jewish American statesman, Stuart Eizenstat, said that attempts to influence Roosevelt towards protecting Jews in Europe was futile because “the Jewish community was not yet organized enough to influence the political system, nor did it have much inclination to do so in view of its problematic position […] and did not effectively lobby the American political system”. US treasury secretary, a prominent Jew known from an objective assessment of post-WWI allegations of pogroms in Poland, Henry Morgenthau persuaded Roosevelt to create a War Refugee Board in 1944, devoted to the rescue of Jews. Unfortunately, “Jews in senior positions in the administration and in Congress did nothing to encourage the president to make public statements or take actions to protect Jewish civilians the administration knew were being slaughtered.”
Excuses that the harsh reality of Shoah dictated the “pragmaticism” of the Nazi-Zionist collaboration, are groundless. Two books document that the radical Zionists embraced the Nazi ideology already in 1933.
Beside colluding in the Shoah, the extreme Zionists allegedly falsified the number of victims. Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss of Neturei Karta, the publisher of Shonfeld’s book, said at the time of the Holocaust conference in Tehran (12.12.2006): “We don’t want to deny the killing of Jews in World War II, but Zionists have given much higher figures for how many people were killed […] They have used the Holocaust as a device to justify their oppression.” Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League branded Weiss’ group “Jews who hate Jews” and accused them of selling themselves as props for anti-Semitic groups worldwide.
To bomb or not to bomb
The Zionist plan against their Jewish brethren would explain why the Zionist elites in the West and the Allies remained deaf to the intelligence on the Nazi death camps and the appeals of the Polish government-in-exile to find “means offering the hope that Germany might be effectively restrained from continuing to apply her methods of mass extermination”. Articles abound on an alleged failure of the Allies to act, for example: “In 1944 the Americans and British had the ability to pin-point bomb the Birkenau cremation buildings or rail-lines leading to camp, but after military studies of air photos and spy reports concluded that inmates were not being executed, no American or British leader ordered bombing of Birkenau because they believed executions were not occurring.”
The article admits that pre-bombing studies have disappeared, but presumes the reason for absence of bombing orders: “in 1944 the American and British military completed independent studies using air photos and spy reports about whether it was necessary to bomb Birkenau, and although both studies disappeared after 1944, they must have concluded that no mass murders were occurring at Birkenau because bombing was not ordered by Roosevelt, Churchill, or the military.”
The British government letters suggest something else. The British military has been willing to bomb, subject to obtaining detailed target information (“It is particularly necessary to have some photographic cover”), but the War Department politically overruled the military decision-makers 12 days later (“such an effort, even if practicable, might provoke even more vindictive action by the Germans”). The article does not support its thesis that the government has had no reasons to believe in genocide at Birkenau. The War Department’s letter mentions only efficient use of resources of the strained British forces, i.e. it implies that Birkenau would be a target, but not of the highest priority at the time.
The article presumes further: “although a few individual members of Jewish groups who had heard the mass-murder rumors, sent letters to other members of their groups to consider bombing, not one official Jewish organization anywhere in the world asked that Birkenau be bombed, because they knew from escaped inmates and spies, and from contacts with the highest levels of the U.S. and British governments, that mass murders were not occurring.”
The War Department letter mentions the War Refugees Board, but the article contradicts Eizenstat’s and Wikipedia’s representations about Morgenthau’s actions, by writing: “Morgenthau knew of the unsubstantiated stories of Birkenau mass murders, but he acted like he did not believe them because he did not even discuss the possible bombing of Birkenau or any other camp during his many meetings with President Roosevelt.” The article ignores other facts. The Polish Underground has been sending reports to the West about the ghettos, and about the death camps when the Endlösung (Final Solution) began after Nazi attack on the USSR in June 1941. The founder of Polish intelligence and resistance among Poles in KL Auschwitz, captain Witold Pilecki, who volunteered to go to the death camp, filed detailed reports about nearby Birkenau as well.
Jan Karski, an eyewitness of the beginning of the Endlösung in the Bełżec death camp, and a Polish Underground courier, had risked his life and had taken the message about Holocaust to the West. Only Karski was in a position to complain about the inaction of Western Allies in a 1978 interview for the glaringly biased, anti-Polish movie Shoah by Claude Lantzmann. Karski said bitterly after Shoah release: “Nobody else could be interviewed about any of this. But it would prove that the allied governments […] forsook the Jews.” Instead, Shoah shows Karski’s testimony about the suffering of Warsaw Jews and desperate requests for Western help from Jewish underground leaders, even though “I described the tragedy and passed on the Jewish requests to four members of the British War Cabinet […] to President Roosevelt and three key members of the American government, the Apostolic Office in Washington, Jewish leaders in the USA, prominent writers and political commentators”. Both quotes of Karski are from a book by the former leader of the Polish Underground.
Have not the Allies known or been informed about the plight of Jews in German Nazi ghettos and concentration camps in conquered Poland? The answer is so embarassing that the Zionist propaganda goes to great lengths to cover it up, including ugly blames of Polish collusion with the Nazis, a thing the Zionist elites have done themselves. The radical Zionists redirect their guilt onto Poles, by educating Israeli youth in the spirit of Polonophobic hatred.
Geoffrey Wastenays, a Canadian in WWII air force and intelligence, maintains that bombing far-away targets in Poland has not been feasible. Stefan Pągowski adds that bombing railways has been ineffective: Germans have operated repair units already during an air raid. Regardless, the Western Allies could have acted together with the Soviets (airfields closer to Poland) and with Polish Underground forces, who were capable, for example, of entering a camp in Nazi uniforms and vehicles and taking 16 important Poles out. The Polish will and capability were there, but a political order from the Allies was missing.
Wars of ideas
Scholarly work on the influence of subversive ideas on society’s collective mind are needed to prevent intellectual, psychological and physical mass violence, and to stop crimes that begin with the ideas, for example, the tragedy of Shoah with Zionist collusion, or the recent, genocidal sanctions imposed on Iraqi people with a great role played by radical, pro-Israel groups. Radical Jewish influence of the major Western media silences the whistleblower: “Survival in public life requires that you know all about it, but never refer to it. A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the Jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you. It’s a phenomenal display not of wickedness, really, but of fierce ethnocentrism, a sort of furtive racial superpatriotism.”
A University of California psychology professor posits that some 20th century universalist movements, established and led to advance Jewish particularism, have harmed Western societies, causing anti-Semitism. From the beginning Zionists used anti-Semitism to pursue their goals. One of the founders of Zionism recognized sub-ordination of Jewish suffering to building a Jewish state: “I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth […] The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews.”
This policy culminated in preposterous claims in 1919 that 6 million Jews faced death in countries overtaken by WWI. Over time, New York Times publicized the figure, together with the “extermination” and “holocaust” claims. It was part of an early 20th century Zionist promotion of Jewish political and financial interests. Jewish groups raised vast sums in the US for starving Polish and Russian Jews, and then diverted much of the money to Zionist and Communist institutions, including banks, labor unions, and agricultural communes.
In 20th century alone, the intellectual warfare has embraced Marxism (and its derivatives Bolshevism and Communism), Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of sociology, Franz Boas’s school of anthropology, multi-culturalism and Third World immigration, with social and cultural diversity as a common thread. The most serious charge of The Culture of Critique is dishonesty of the Jewish intellectual movements: “While attempting to promote the brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of Gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in others“: patriotism, racial loyalty, social structures and Christian morality, including sexual restraint.
If MacDonald is right, concludes Hornbeck in his review of MacDonald’s work, his thesis explains why in less than half a century Western whites as a race have become apologetic, ashamed and unsure of their history and of their claim to ancestral lands: “Such speed suggests there has been something more than natural change.” MacDonald reflects that by not emulating the Judeocentric model, Europeans throughout the Western world “place themselves in a position of enormous vulnerability in which their destinies will be determined by other peoples, many of whom hold deep historically conditioned hatreds toward them. Europeans’ promotion of their own displacement is the ultimate foolishness—an historical mistake of catastrophic proportions.”
The Culture of Critique focuses on 20th century and the USA, but previous movements in which Jews have played a key role, for example the French Revolution for “liberty, eqality and brotherhood”, lead to similar conclusions. A Russian Jew, who became University of California at Berkeley professor of history, observed that the most important factor in the 20th century history had been the rise of the Jews in the West and the Middle East, and their rise and decline in Russia. MacDonald added: “Jews not only became an elite in all these areas, they became a hostile elite—hostile to the traditional people and cultures of all three areas they came to dominate.”
Jewish idea warfare has led to horrendous consequences to non-Jews and Jews, despite the bevevolent slogans, but MacDonald doesn’t analyse the connection. Radical Jewish ideas of Bolshevism and Communism, supported by Jewish financiers and implemented largely by the most extreme of Jews who have orchestrated the Soviet regime and dominated its terror apparatus, have eclipsed the Nazi genocide of Slavs, Jews and more than twenty other groups. While the perpetrators of anti-Jewish, WWII crimes have been called to repent and pay multi-billion dollar compensations, neither the leaders of Israel nor of the Jewish Diaspora have officially deplored Jewish Bolshevik and Communist terror.
The ideas of “humanitarian intervention” in the Balkans, and the “wars on terror” that have followed are traceable to radical Jewish groups, too. Post-modern warfare utilizes the ideas together with the instruments of propaganda, military power, diplomacy, economic and financial sanctions, covert action with own intelligence and special forces as well as local and hired extremists and terrorists, and financial, legalistic and so-called non-governmental organization (NGO) machanisms, in order to occupy and subjugate nations.
Judeocentrism behind universalist façade
MacDonald quotes professor Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief […] that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social” issues.” In a radical Jewish speak that welcomes the decline of the Gentiles who constitute an imagined potential Nazi threat to the continuity of Jews, former president of Brandeis University, professor Earl Raab approves of diversity in the USA: “We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”
These beliefs have historical background. German-Jewish immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) substituted biological explanations for human diversity with a social-environmental one. MacDonald found that the majority of Boasians were “all Jews with strong Jewish identities” who pursued “perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies”. By 1926, Boasians headed major US university anthropology departments, providing intellectual support for open immigration, integration, and racial cross-marriage. They provided justification for wasteful government programs, by arguing that the disadvantages of non-whites due to white oppression could be eliminated by changing the racial environment.
A 1908 play The Melting Pot by Israel Zangwill (who disapproved Jewish intermarriage) braced the pro-immigration effort. The Statue of Liberty, France’s tribute to American political traditions, was changed several decades later into a symbol of immigration, with the Jewish poet, Emma Lazarus’s sonnet attached to the base of the statue. While the US immigration policy still maintained a white majority, the core US Jewish organizations urged that “Americanism is the spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to people of all races, all religions, all nationalities” (American Jewish Committee, 1948), and that “our national experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in the diversity of our peoples” (American Jewish Congress, 1952). Jews also led immigration advocacy in England, France, Australia and Canada, and strongly opposed Quebec independence, according to MacDonald. Hornbeck notes: “It would not be surprising if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.”
The US “civil rights” transformation followed Boasian philosophy, too. Almost single-handedly, Jews launched the desegregation movement. Boasian views dominate US policy dogma that immigrants bring qualities that whites lack. MacDonald quotes an American Jewish Congress lawyer: “many of these [civil rights] laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into being by Jewish voters.” According to MacDonald, Jews of every political faction favored high immigration, even when they disagreed on other issues. In an attempt to undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them permeable to alien cultural influences, the Boasians glorified “ethnographies of idyllic [Third World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived traits that were attributed to Western culture”. At the same time, the Boasians criticized “American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality)”.
To open the West to immigrants, the Frankfurt School discredited racial solidarity and tradition. The Nazis closed down this institution, founded in Frankfurt by a Jewish millionaire. Most of its staff, who had strong Jewish identities, regrouped at the University of California, and their chief, Max Horkheimer revealed the goal: “Research would be able here to transform itself directly into propaganda”. The French-Jewish “deconstructionist” Jacques Derrida later supported the same idea: “to deconstruct the workings of strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies […] the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the metaphysics of native land and native tongue […] to disarm the bombs […] of identity that nation-states build to defend themselves against the stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants”.
The American Jewish Committee funded promotion of the School’s 1950 book The Authoritarian Personality by T.W. Adorno, and Jewish academia eagerly absorbed its message summarized by MacDonald: “behavior that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary strategy is conceptualized as pathological in Gentiles”. The School exalted nonconformist lifestyle and sexuality that blossomed in the 1960s countercultural revolution: “rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status, family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism.”
Judeocentrism has skewed historiography. In contrast to their discredited Gentile counterparts, “Jewish historians who have been reasonably accused of bringing an ethnocentric bias to their writing nevertheless are able to publish their work with prestigious mainstream academic and commercial publishers, and they often obtain jobs at prestigious academic institutions.”
Historically, the bulk of world Jewry have developed on Polish lands under unmatched autonomy, almost saving them from extinction in the anti-Semitic Europe, and forming Jewish identity that led to the creation of the Jewish state in Palestine. Without Polish tolerance, there might have been no Israel. In the most tragic event in modern Jewish history, Poles saved the targets of Shoah despite a death penalty, while confronted with Nazi persecution similar to one against Jews. Ingratefully, extreme Zionists focus on Poles. Jan Thomas Gross’ fraudulent WWII and post-WWII historiography, and misrepresentations of earlier Polish-Jewish relations have defamed Poles most severely. Demonization of a group preceeds a major attack. The Poles are concerned and disappointed, more so that the Zionist extremists silence the moderate Jew, the “self-hating anti-Semite”.
“In contrast to the tiny Jewish communities in Western Europe, which had to conform to the language and culture of their host nations, the Jews in Poland were able to develop a modern national identity, out of which grew the full-blown Jewish nationalism, upon which the State of Israel was founded.” Zionist precursors in Poland advocated the creation of Eretz Israel by buying land from Palestinians, or by championing folkism and autonomy after Israel Zangwill’s imperative, “Build Jerusalem in each particular country and in Palestine”. After 18th century partitions of Poland between Prussia, Russia and Austria, the defeats of Polish independence struggle meant to Zionists that a Jewish state on Polish lands, Judeopolonia, or a Jewish-Polish federation would be feasible, and Zionist Jews sided with Poland’s adversaries.
Poles didn’t harbour anti-Semitic hatred present elsewhere in Europe, but Zionism added to animosity. Contrary to stereotypes, economic rivalry, not Catholic Church teachings, fueled pre-WWII Polish-Jewish antagonisms, and Polish peasants’ acceptance of the blood libel had little to do with religion or ethnicity. Any conflation of Polish Catholic nationalism with fascism and Nazism is as demonstrably false. Even the most right-wing Poles almost universally repudiated Nazism.
In order to enlist Western support to Zionist ends while thwarting Polish independence, international Zionist propaganda screamed “Pogroms!”. Foreign governments disproved it. Had these “excesses” been real pogroms, “the number of victims would have run into the thousands instead of amounting to about 280.” Poland had to fight six wars simultaneously to consolidate after the partitions. Jews sided with Bolsheviks, whom the Poles hated. Most of the Jewish victims were armed and died in combat. Real pogroms in Ukraine killed thousands civilians, but Jewish propaganda suppressed the facts and blew mutual excesses in Poland out of proportion, to prevent Polish independence.
Negative Jewish influence on Polish society has persisted through the Communist times and is still active. This brochure presents some of the anti-Polonisms and their connection to Jewish real estate mega-claims and possible renewed plans for Judeopolonia, likely within German concept of Mitteleuropa. This form of violence against the will of Polish and other Slav majority is possible because Jewish propaganda – from academia to popular culture, from textbooks to encyclopedias – suppresses the reasons for objections to Jewish return: that Jewish Bolshevism and Communism (Żydokomuna in Polish) have severely harmed the Slavs, and that extreme Jews significantly influence Slav and global affairs.
Amnesia about Żydokomuna, post-WWII equation of Nazism with the worst evil, condemnation of European ethnocentrism, and the identification of Jews as the chosen people who had experienced a unique and exceptional Holocaust, contributed to the creation of the Holocaust Religion and Industry. The Judeocentric Holocaust culture has created sacred dogmas guarded by “anti-Semite”, “hater”, “fascist” and “Nazi sympathizer” labelling, or personal ruin and imprisonment in the worst cases. “In fact, of course, the creation and maintenance of the culture of the Holocaust and the special moral claims of Jews and Israel might be more fairly viewed the intended result of Jewish ethnic activism.”
Jews have orchestrated the Soviet-imposed Eastern European governments. The majority of the Jewish leaders of the Polish Communist Party have spoken better Yiddish than Polish, which has reminded the Poles of the German and Russian languages of the Nazi and Soviet atrocious occupiers. The Jewish Communist elites have killed tens of thousands and imprisoned and tortured hundreds of thousands Polish patriots and Catholic clergy. After purges of Communist Jews and the fall of Communism later, many Jews from the Soviet satellites emigrated, often pretending to gullible Western public to be victims of Communism. Nowadays, their descendants in Israel seek Polish citizenship. Poles are outraged and plainly scared.
Stalin’s right hand in Poland, Jakub Berman urged in 1946: “Jews now have the opportunity to grasp the totality of Poland’s state life and to control it, without occupying visible positions”, by forming shadow government positions, adopting Polish names, and concealing their ancestry. Berman named similar strategy to control the propaganda and central institutions of the industry, banks, commerce and co-operatives: “we must sit behind the backs of Poles, but control everything.” A US reporter in Warsaw wrote that Jews assumed Polish names.
Within integration of Jewish goals with the Soviet policy, Berman considered that influx of Jews would continue, since prior to German invasion of the USSR, there were “concentrations of Polish Jews”, mainly intelligentsia and former merchants: “in Kharkov 36,200, Kiev 17,300, Moscow 53,000, Leningrad 61,000, in Western republics 184,730”. Berman foresaw that, “In keeping with the principles of Soviet policy […] these professionals will staff the most important spheres of Poland’s life, and the Jewry will be allocated to the main urban centres.” He reassured that “the USSR is a great friend and protector of the Jewish nation” and although “the old Jewish politics didn’t work”, the new thrust integrates “the Jewish national goals with the Soviet policy” by creating “a power apparatus from representatives of Jewish population in Poland.”
Similar to the case of Jewish mass crimes in the USSR, Western media ignore a tabu in Poland: Żydokomuna terror against Polish patriots, Catholics and clergy. In 1944-1956, the regime killed 40,000 to 70,000 Poles in the new Poland, deported 100,000 to the Gulag, and imprisoned at least 668,000 Poles, not counting those intermittently intimidated with jailing. About 300 concentration and slave labour camps processed at least 250,000 victims. By comparison, 400-700 Jews were killed in Poland between July 1944 and January 1947. In former Eastern Poland (now USSR), Poles were also terrorized; just in the Nowogród region, the Soviets killed 3,000 and arrested 13,000 Polish underground soldiers, and sent more than 20,000 people to the Gulag between 1944 and 1947. A former insider of the regime cited 80,000 to 200,000 Polish Gentiles and about 1,600 Jews killed under Żydokomuna.
Bolshevism and Communism
Marxism supported 20th century’s most destructive movements: Bolshevism and Communism. Jewish masses leaned to the left, by the expectations that Communism would help combat anti-Semitism and dissolve Gentile loyalties, while Jewish particularism would remain intact. Western Jewish bankers financed the Bolshevik Revolution, the Soviet regime and its stupendous economic development efforts. Jews were prominent among the Bolsheviks, and the majority of Jews in the USSR participated and sympathized with the Revolution. Jews were the Revolution‘s visible leaders and public face, particularly overrepresented in the secret police.
In the 1930s, the secret police NKVD “was one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions”. Jews directed the Gulag in 1930-1938, the worst period of the Soviet terror that claimed millions of lives. Stalin was a disposable façade behind his deputy in the Communist party, Lazar Kaganovich, and his cousin Lavrenti Beria, the head of the secret service, both Khazar Jews. Kaganovich ordered the destruction of the majestic Church of Christ the Saviour in Moscow, and the genocide on Ukrainian farmers. In Bela Kun’s short-lived 1919 Communist government of Hungary, 95% of the leaders were Jews. In the 1956 Hungarian uprising Communism was so closely associated with Jews that the rioting resembled a pogrom.
Early USSR stopped tsarist Russia’s anti-Semitism. “It was Communism which toppled the hated Czars, Communism which removed Jewish disabilities and proscribed anti-Semitism and Communism which, in its early days at least, opened the doors to Jewish advancement.” Jews became the elite, whose domination of the Soviet regime and eradication of Christianity assured Jewish development in a “classless” society. Before 1917, a million out of some five million Russian Jews emigrated. Among those who stayed were Narodniki who subordinated Jewish issues to the liberation from tsarist oppression, Bundists who fused the Marxist revolutionary cause with a call for Jewish “national-cultural autonomy”, and Zionists who argued for own homeland. Jewish Marxists frequently disagreed about whether to plant their Communist state in Russia or Palestine.
The first law passed after the Communists seized power made anti-Semitism a crime punishable by death, but the Russian civil war saw frequent anti-Jewish violence. Lenin, a half-Jew, found anti-Semitism abhorrent, but was hostile toward Judaism: “In 1919 Soviet authorities abolished Jewish community councils, which were traditionally responsible for maintaining synagogues. They created a special Jewish section of the party, whose tasks included propaganda against Jewish clergy and religion.” In 1922, the Soviet state banned Zionist activities, as they did any other nationalistic tendencies. Propaganda argues this ban proves Soviet Communism was anti-Semitic, but it has resulted from an anti-Zionist doctrinal dispute between like-minded Marxists.
After WWII, when Russians began taking their country over, Stalin encouraged anti-Semitism. Jews became suspects, had their opportunities limited and were barred from some institutions. Stalin acknowledged that “under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the death penalty”, but, having survived the Shoah, Jews became a target of the Soviet regime because of “excessive nationalism” of Yiddish authors. By 1948 “it became clear that Stalin had decided to liquidate the remnants of Soviet Yiddish culture”, and trials and executions of 1952 followed. Soviet “anti-cosmopolitan campaign” and charges that Jews constituted a “fifth column” signalled that Stalin would tolerate anti-Semitism and even pogroms. Stalin closed most of the 5,000 synagogues that survived since the Bolshevik Revolution. By 1994, 43% Soviet Jews (1.2 million) emigrated, and by 2002, only 230,000 Jews remained in the Russian Federation. Being only 0.16% of the total population, they were nevertheless overrepresented in the elite, and six of the seven oligarchs who controlled the Soviet economy and media in the the 1990s were Jews.
Jewish Communists preached universalism, but preserved a secular Jewish identity. MacDonald observes that also the kernel of US Communists was Jewish. As in the Soviet counterparts, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist world-view, typical of Jewish wars of ideas, didn’t interfere with a strong, Jewish group identity. In 1946 the Communist Party of the USA resolved also to support Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, among the multitude of religious and ethnic groups, Communism reassured only the Jews of a place for their group. Despite the official equality, “very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire Soviet era.” Some Jewish leaders saw Jewish particularism as an elitist position within humanity, indispensable to the survival of humankind. French Communist leader Charles Rappoport stated: “The Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and human community in history […] The disappearance of the Jewish people would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man into a wild beast.”
MacDonald cautions against “surface declarations of a lack of Jewish identity” and agrees with Joseph Sobran, who has said “They want to pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no such interests”. MacDonald notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence of American Jews in a language denounceable as “anti-Semitic” if used by Gentiles. Jewish theologian Eugene Borowitz said that “most Jews claim to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy camouflage.” MacDonald: “Always to think in terms of “friends or foe” is no insignificant matter.”
The American Jewry, who are largely successors of the European Ashkenazim, has preserved an identity base common with the Sephardic Jews, who descend from Middle Eastern, Semitic tribes. The Ashkenazim descend from the Khazars whose elites have converted to Judaism in 8th century Asia, amidst their Christian and Moslem neighbours. Unlike elsewhere in Europe, Ashkenazim have not integrated with Eastern European Slavs. Tsarist Russia have had reasons to deeply mistrust the descendants of her Khazar adversaries. In the 18th-19th centuries the tsars have driven Jews to Russia’s Western borderlands (the Pale of Settlement) that are now Poland, Ukraine, Byelorussia and the Baltic states.
The Slav hosts have become anti-Semitic, but more for Jewish exploitation and enslavement than racial-religious reasons, contrary to popular beliefs. The Jews were land estate managers, tax collectors, peddlers, tavern keepers and money lenders on territories of a ruler. In exchange for financing his needs, a ruler has granted the Jews protection and priviledges, becoming the participants in the scheme, together with the landlords.
The Jewish identity is ideologically grounded in the Talmudic contempt for non-Jews. An empirical proof of this thesis is the fact that the Sephardim have been expelled from Southern Spain for economic reasons, and for siding with the enemies of the Spaniards. Ashenazim tended to atagonize their hosts in Eastern Europe. MacDonald quotes Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-Gentile relations on Jews: “They may have become so odious and so hostile to mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle.”
Under rabbinical leadership, if a member disobeyed the group strategy, he was severely punished, including torture and death. The terror of the Soviet and Communist systems stems from the same rabbinical tradition, according to Israel Shahak. Lenin’s Communists strictly enforced “democratic centralism”, since most of the original party founders were the Ashkenazim from Russia. In order to make Communism work in post-WWII Poland, Stalin relocated a few hundred thousand Jews from Soviet cities. Recently, the modus operandi of the descendants of the ancient Khazars escalated to global ambitions. The power of Jewish identity and its terror are observable in the activities of the Zionist Power Configuration (ZPC) that includes the American pro-Israel Lobby.
Zionist Power Configuration/Judeocentric Power Complex
Sociology professor James Petras concludes that US policy conforms with Israel’s goal for Middle East hegemony, including its wars, colonization and oppression. Ruthless pursuit of the policy re-affirms MacDonald’s conclusions on Judeocentrism at the expense of Gentiles. Termed a “Zionist power configuration” (ZPC), the pro-Israel structure pentrates key power centres, and comprises “interrelated formal and informal groupings, operating at the international, national, regional, and local levels“. ZPC suppresses any unsupportive or critical media reporting on Israel. ZPC can finish careers of dissident politicians, while journalists and academics are banished for stepping out of line.
In the ZPC network, the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), America’s most powerful political lobby, hosts the highest-ranking US and Israeli officials at its annual conferences. US politicians and congressmen attend to show support. The Lobby would give a dissident politician negative press and no financial support for electoral campaigns. Lobby-dependent colleagues would veto his bill on domestic matters. A former US senator revealed that US congressmen support Israel out of “fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done.” The Lobby’s terror by intimidation, financial manipulation and smearing of critics discourages anyone from anti-Israelism.
Concurrent with a US majority dissent of the American public against Middle East policy and against the assaults on democracy and civil liberties, the Lobby faces a declining support from US Christian Zionists. They finally realize that Jewish neocons have manipulated Christian sectarian belief that Jews will trigger the Second Coming of Christ. The alliance with the Gentile fanatics, many of them rabid anti-Semites, is similar to the Zionist-Nazi alliance that eventually exterminated millions of poor and Orthodox Jews in the name of racial purity of a future German empire and physical and ideological fitness of settlers for Israel.
Petras’s critique belongs to the intellectual-political war that The Israel Lobby has started in March 2006, precipitating a worldwide debate. Interestingly, my own contribution to Professor Scherrer’s ICGR project has gained a boost from the Mearsheimer and Walt publication, after some participants of ICGR’s seminar in Hiroshima have strongly criticized my drafts as being „anti-Semitic“, only to read similar conclusions in the said work shortly after the seminar.
Petras connects the ZPC to mass crimes and notes that the ZPC is not confined to the Israel Lobby, as they both “have a world-historic impact on the present and future of world peace and social justice.” Petras refutes a popular belief that US wars in the Middle East serve Big Oil. US oil interests prefer stability and normal relationships and have dealt comfortably and profitably with Iraq until the US attack on Iraq in 1991. Aside from the temporary gain from high oil prices, the wars mean big losses longer-term. Owing to US sanctions that prevent US Big Oil to do business there, Iranians let contracts to competitors.
Through the media, institutional pressure and other means, the Lobby censures the critique, intimidates the critic, and warns others not to follow. Partly due to the Lobby’s influence and control of the debates, the US media rank 53rd in the world in press freedom, according to Reporters Sans Frontieres. The Lobby “strives to ensure that public discourse portrays Israel in a positive light, by repeating myths about its founding and by promoting its point of view in policy debates. The goal is to prevent critical comments from getting a fair hearing in the political arena. Controlling the debate is essential to guaranteeing US support, because a candid discussion of US-Israeli relations might lead Americans to favour a different policy.”
Mearsheimer and Walt received virulent critique from the Lobby, which confirmed the following thesis in their paper: “Silencing sceptics by organising blacklists and boycotts – or by suggesting that critics are anti-semites – violates the principle of open debate on which democracy depends […] Israel’s backers should be free to make their case and to challenge those who disagree with them, but efforts to stifle debate by intimidation must be roundly condemned.”
The Israel Lobby contains nothing that “any moderately well read student of the topic wouldn’t have known long ago”, but states some dangerous truths. Previous critiques include Alfred Lilienthal’s 1978 study The Zionist Connection. In 1985, former US congressman Paul Findley published They Dare To Speak Out, about AIPAC’s influence on the US government and civic life. The Lobby destroyed his political career. Andrew and Leslie Cockburn’s 1991 Dangerous Liaison described the US-Israeli covert relationship. J.J. Goldberg’s 1997 book Jewish Power surveyed public involvement of American Jews in US politics. Recently, former president Carter’s book had criticized the persecution of Palestinians as apartheid. The author was virulently smeared by the extreme Jews.
I argue in Judeocentrics and Mass Crimes that a more fitting term than ZPC is Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC), since Judeocentrism has been spreading its conquests for ages. Take the crypto-Jewish Christian sect, the Frankists.
Shabbataians and Frankists
Like the crypto-Jewish Dönmeh, a sect of radical Jewish converts to Islam in Turkey, the Frankists descended from 18th century cult by Baruchyah Russo, who was believed to have God’s soul of the 17th century false messiah Shabbatai Zevi. Hassidic Jews descend from Shabbataians, as do many other non-Jewish sects and quasi-religious groups involved in global politics. Shabbataism isn‘t“an “archeological” curiosity […] a number of secret Shabbataian religious communities exist to date! The views of 17th and 18th century Shabbataians are present in the concepts of other Judaic fractions (Jewish Messianists and Protestant Judeo-Christians), but also in secular concepts of so-called Holocaust Religion.”
A Polish Jew, Jacob Frank declared (1755) himself Shabbatai’s successor, joined Dönmeh, and set up a sect that was baptised (1759) into Christianity under the patronage of Polish Church and aristocracy. Having learned the real goals of Frankists, some of the clergy turned against the Frankists. Frankists sought in Poland the place for their messianic kingdom, pre-dating the Zionists, who seek Jewish homeland in Palestine. Frank petitioned the Polish king and Church for land for his sect. To this end, he managed to convince 15 thousand Frankists to receive Catholic baptism. Frank taught that Polish lands are the messianic kingdom promised to Frankists (the new Biblical Jacob), who are confronted by the Polish gentry (Esau, Jacob’s rival). The new Esau must forego his heirdom for the chosen nation (the Frankists).
Frank recognized baptism as necessary for acquiring the gentry status and ruling over Poland. Christians supported Frank’s baptism efforts, the signs of the Second Coming of Christ – they believed. Today, the support by Christian Zionists is similarly motivated. Frankist conversion to Christianity generally meant a change of the baptised person’s name to a Polish translation or after the godparents‘ name. Jews massively changed names after WWII under Żydokomuna who have murdered Polish patriots in numbers comparable to the multitude of Polish intelligentsia murderd by the Jew-dominated Soviet and Nazi terror combined.
Protected by the Catholic Church, some Protestant clergy, rulers of Denmark and Poland, and the emperors of Russia, Austro-Hungary and Ottoman Turkey, by 1770’s Frank set up a covert network of followers in all of Europe. Personally involved in many political intrigues, he infiltrated influential positions with Shabbataians. Similar to obtaining influence over Poland through baptism and gentry status, Shabbataians in Russia became tsarist trustees and initiators of local Masonry. In Austria and the Third Reich, they represented the financial might of the Oppenheimers that was independent of the Habsburgs. Adam Weishaupt, a Catholicism-hating convert, a pupil of the Jesuits and a rabbi’s son, headed Frank’s covert network. Weishaupt founded (1.5.1776) a Shabbataian Masonic organization Illuminati to establish a new world order and religion.
A revolution was to spread over the world from Munich, but the conspiracy was uncovered and the Shabbataians transferred the bulk of their activities to infiltrated France. They entered the executive of the Jacobin Club, the most influential political club in the development of the French Revolution, notorious for its implementation of the Reign of Terror. Later, Shabbataians infiltrated covert anarchist, socialist and communist groups in all of Europe. “Often secularized, Shabbataism became one of the destructive revolutionary forces of the last 200 years, responsible for many a political crime. Shabbataians’ fingerprints are left e.g. on the Turkish masscre of Armenians and on the occultist Nazi circles”.
Frank warred with rabbis who believed that Jews mustn’t precipitate Messiah’s arrival nor emigrate to Palestine. Frankists hold similar beliefs as do Illuminati, Bolsheviks and Communists, whose leaders have been disproportionately Jewish. The powerful Frankist Jews believe their reincarnate King will restore Biblical Israel and destroy Gentiles and their religions. Total evil and suffering, incl. anti-Semitism, will precipitate the “Redemption”.
The revolutionary group in Ottoman Turkey, Young Turks have had as intimate relationship with Dönmeh as did Hitler’s Nazis with Frankists: Hitler’s Hungarian Jewish patron Moses Pinkeles (Ignatius Trebitsch-Lincoln) and Adam Alfred Rudolf Glauer (Rudolf Glandeck Freiherr von Sebottendorf) who helped Hitler to power. To Frankists, the Messiah would have to be crypto-Jewish tormenter of other Jews.
Jacob Frank exchanged his wife and daughter for sexual favours to gain converts and influence. To gain politically, he accused Jews of ritual human sacrifice, and appealed to Moslem and Christian leaders. Frankists have corrupted Gentiles with Communist, Masonic and Illuminati leaders, who inoculated government, education and the press with Frank’s mythologies, and implemented them. “Frank’s ultimate goal was to destroy life on Earth, and the means to accomplish that end today exist. The Nazis and the Communists, the latter under crypto-Jewish leadership, inflicted terrible harm to humanity. For the Frankist Jews, there is still worse evil yet to be done”. Frankists provided revolutionaries nonstop, through Marxists to modern Zionists. They have been subverting Christian and Muslim religions and societies, while strictly adhering to a code of silence about their faith in the abolition of all law.
Shabbataians’ Masonic cover, the Thule Society, had influence on the Nazis. The members were interested in racism and combating Jews and Communists. The Frankists waged war against Jews by denouncing the Talmud and accusing Orthodox Jews of ritual sacrifice of Christian children. As bearers of the old order, Orthodox Jews were an obstacle to Frankists’ new order, as were any other religious or secular groups espousing status quo.
In a study of Nazism’s roots, German-Jewish historian Dietrich Bronder names a substantial part of the Nazi leadership as having Jewish roots, or being related to Jewish families; some of them (Hitler, Hess, Göring, Himmler, Rosenberg , Frank and Haushofer were members of, or had ties with, Thule:
- Adolf Hitler, his deputy Rudolf Hess and field marshal and minister Hermann Göring;
- NSDAP leader Gregor Strasser, propaganda minister Dr. Josef Goebbels, Alfred Rosenberg (Nazi ideologue in racial theory, persecution of the Jews, Lebensraum, abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, and author of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the Jewish World Politics”, 1923), Dr. Hans Frank (Governor-General in occupied Poland, instituted a reign of terror on Poles and Jews) and Heinrich Himmler (one of the most powerful Nazis, head of SS, interior minister overseeing concentration camps and all internal and external police and security forces, incl. Gestapo);
- Ministers: von Ribbentrop (friend of Zionist Chaim Weizmann, the first head of the State of Israel), Funk and von Keudell;
- Field commanders: Globocznik (the destroyer of Jews), Jordan and Wilhelm Kube;
- SS leaders active in the destruction of Jews: Reinhard Heydrich, Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski and von Keudell II;
- Hitler’s bankers and pre-1933 supporters: Ritter von Stauss (vice-president of Nazi parliament) and von Stein; field marshall and minister of foreign affairs Milch, and his deputy Gauss; physicists and party colleagues Philipp von Lenard and Abraham Esau; old party colleagues Hanffstaengel (foreign press chief , later an advisor to Roosevelt) and prof. Haushofer (geo-strategist).
Hennecke Kardel maintains that all of the above were members of Thule and that Bronder’s list is incomplete. Indeed, missing is e.g. Eichmann.
Mark Weber documents the collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich. Until 1940-1941, German backing for Zionism was limited to support for a “Jewish homeland” in Palestine under British control, rather than a sovereign Jewish state, for fears of an advantage to international Jewry and to placate Arabs. Weber concludes: “In spite of the basic hostility between the Hitler regime and international Jewry, for several years Jewish Zionist and German National Socialist interests coincided. In collaborating with the Zionists for a mutually desirable and humane solution to a complex problem, the Third Reich was willing to make foreign exchange sacrifices, impair relations with Britain and anger the Arabs. Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany.” Hitler repeatedly stated that support for the emigration would help remove Jews from Germany.
According to the founder of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, anti-Semitism is a natural response by Gentiles to Jewish behavior and attitudes; Zionism rejected Jewish assimilation in Europe and offered a welcome “final solution of the Jewish question”. Embracing the quest for a Jewish homeland, the Nazis worked with Zionists for what each group perceived its national interest. Nazi parliament adopted (September 1935) “Nuremberg laws” that prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans, in effect proclaiming Jews an alien minority. The Zionist Jüdische Rundschau (17.9.1935) welcomed the new laws: “Germany […] is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress […] it is again possible to establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry.” Zionists in Germany and abroad echoed these views, e.g.: the head of the Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community; president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress.
After the Wansee conference (January 1942), a Nazi policy was instituted against Jews unwilling to emigrate to Palestine, fulfilling Zionist sacrifice of Jewish suffering for the creation of a homeland.. Before, crypto-Jewish Nazis fuelled German anti-Semitism to precipitate the emigration from ghettos. International Zionist elites colluded in extermination of the Jews.
Some Judeocentrics believe that God’s soul dwells in the Rothschild dynasty, making one of them the Jewish King. Rothschilds planned to buy Palestine from Ottoman sultans who ruled it, and whom the Rothschilds indebted for that purpose. When this failed, Palestine was to be conquered, with a view on world domination, through downfall of the Turkish Empire, and a “conflict of nations for the possession of Palestine and dominion of the East and the world”, i.e. “a general Asiatic, European, and African struggle, with Jerusalem as the objective”. The plot evaded Christian and Muslim retaliation to Rothschilds’ purchase of the Holy Land. By tiring the world with wars, Judeocentrics could emerge as the ones proposing eternal peace, while taking Palestine. The “Rothschild formula” is also manifest in the destructive policies of the Federal Reserve, US dominant financial power that is “entirely private-owned, although it seeks to give the appearance of a governmental institution. It has the right to print and issue money, the traditional prerogative of monarchs. It is set up to provide financing for wars. It functions as a money monopoly having total power over all the money and credit of the people.”
Banker Mayer Amschel Rothschild allegedly wanted (1770) to adapt Lucifer worship (Illuminati, “the Enlightened Ones”) towards world domination, and to impose it “upon what would remain of the human race” after an orchestrated cataclysm. He presented (1773) a plan to, “Make the Goyim destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest. Call it The New Order. Appoint a Dictator”. Rothschild financed and charged Weishaupt with infiltrating Freemasons in order to implement the satanic plan under the guise of world peace in which governments and religions would be gradually weakened and eventually destroyed, by antagonizing the masses divided into opposing camps.
Rothschild’s alleged 18th century plan named its tools: Freemasons, terror, media, demoralisation and economic-political manipulation. Spingola cites two sources for the plan: W.G. Carr’s Pawns in the Game and Ken Matto, former US Congressional candidate. The latter link appears to be corrupted, while Carr does not indicate a source, a frequent flaw in his work. Carr also refers to an alleged letter (15.8.1871) a top US Illuminati, Albert Pike wrote to Illuminati’s worldwide revolutionary program director, Giusseppe Mazzini, about three world wars. The causation of the wars is accurate, albeit it could have been a forgery for the first two wars. However, it would be an unusual accomplishment even in Carr times to predict that WWIII (present war on terror, of which Cheney said it would have no end) was to exploit the antagonisms between Zionists and the Islamic world, unless Carr knew more than he divulged in his books.
Carr’s reference to the alleged Pike plan of three world wars was traced back to the original source, with a negative result. Freemasons condemn Carr’s work as “antisemitic” and a “conspiracy theory”: “provides no documentation but has been widely quoted by later conspiracy theorists” such as Myron Fagan. JPC routinely label anti-Semite and conspiracy theorist the explorers of Judeocentric conspiracies. Research on a covered-up and emotional topic may be imperfect, but others reach similar conclusions, e.g. Bjerknes above on Judeocentric cause of major upheavals, Irving on Jewish bankers manipulating Churchill to perform in WWII as pre-planned, Makow on Illuminati, or Pinay on Freemasonry. G.E. Griffin and Mullins chronicle the Rothschild forces behind US historical developments; in addition, Des Griffin reveals the power of the bankers’ enclave City of London over British politics. Antony Sutton describes how the banker Jewry aided the Nazis and financed the Bolsheviks, most of whom were extreme Jews.
Consequently, it appears likely that Illuminati became the instrument of the House of Rothschild towards a One World Government, and it’s them who fomented every war and revolution since then. Rothschild’s banker-agents Jacob Schiff and Paul Moritz Warburg were sent to the USA to get influence of political parties, Congress, Senate and Presidents to achieve control over the financial and tax system. While consolidating a financial control over 19th century Europe and America, the bankers realized they needed a series of world wars to build NWO. Schiff and his co-conspirators created the Council on Foreign Relations to control US politics and influence world affairs for NWO.
It suffices to listen to recent US presidents’ and other VIP speeches on the NWO, examine the history and goals of the European Union (whose proponent was Mazzini), analyse the “war on terror” and previous world wars, consider the series of “financial crises”, assess “AH1N1 pandemic” of 2009 and the cover-up by the global institutions of the Fukushima nuclear disaster (bigger than Chernobyl) – to conclude that a One World Government is in the making, with a powerful secret group behind it, commandeering the media, international politics, world religions, finance and institutions such as UN, WHO, NATO, international tribunals and NGOs. A 1960s lecture by “an Establishment insider” is also congruent with the alleged Rothschild plan. A balanced assessment of the controlling elites is a motivational movie Thrive! by Foster Gamble (with some “conspiracy theorists” cited or interviewed). Only one thing seems debatable among the NWO “conspiracy theorists” – whether Rothschilds (alternatively, together with other elitist clans) commandeer the Illuminati or vice versa. I believe that the former is true, with the Talmudic rabbinate of terror also at the helm, as the Jewish bankers have a history of symbiosis with them.
Money and blood
Propaganda says “Israel’s interesta and America’s interests are the same”. Former chief of staff to secretary of state Colin Powell, with whom he has quit in January 2005 over criticism of the Bush administration and has ever since been condemning the lies on Iraqi WMD, refuted: “No two countries in history and no two countries in the future history […] will ever have coincidental national interests all the time”. Money coerces the coincidence . Petras cites Richard Cohen’s Washington Post publication that attributed, respectively, 60% of the Democrat Party’s and 35% of the Republican Party’s fundraising to Jewish-funded Political Action Committees (PACs). US supports Israel’s goals. No other US lobby including Big Business and Irish separatists, has ever comparably influenced US politics.
The influence on the US centers of power and media produces a fiftyfold return on every dollar the Lobby spends. The “finacial return” on pro-Israeli investment milks the US taxpayer to the tune of: the largest direct foreign aid ($3 billion annually to a wealthy country); tens of billions more in loans, loan guarantees, waved loans and preferential funding arrangements; economic and military aid cash transfers; transfer of state-of-the-art technology and weapons; US guarantee for Israel’s access to oil; and, the sale of Israeli bonds that pay below-market interest. Israel can then finance settlements in the occupied Palestine and wage regional wars of agression, under a worn-out, Holocaust victimization rationale. At the same time, the JPC demonize the victimized Muslims as “Islamo-fascists”, a repetition of post-WWII radical Jewish propaganda that “Nazified” their political opponents and victims in the Communist bloc.
Petras believes that despite the small percentage of Jews in the US population, the Lobby’s power lies in the high proportion of Jewish families (25 – 30% according to Forbes) among US wealthiest and most influential: “They include billionaires with enormous influence, and along with all others comprising the pro-Israeli Lobby, have created a “tyranny of Israel over the US” with consequences grave enough to threaten world peace and stability, the global economy, and the very future of democracy in this country.”
The US has supported Israel’s aggression since 1967. Some observers, including Pentagon experts, see the war in Iraq as out of control and economically and politically harmful to the USA. Since 1990, the “UN-led” economic embargo, traceable to advocacy by the US pro-Israel Lobby, has killed more than 3.5 million Iraqi civilians. This is in addition to Iraqi civilians killed in Gulf War 1, and at least 655,000 killed by the Coalition forces, mercenary “contractors” and death squads that instigated “ethnic civil war”, itself a killer in Gulf War 2. Israel’s terror in Palestine and Lebanon, and the wars in Iraq are reminiscent of Żydokomuna’s WWII and post-WWII terror, which Poland experienced concurrently with the German Nazi terror (planned and cooordinated with the Soviets): creating conditions of life aimed at biological attrition of the target population, destruction of a substantial part of its intelligentsia and of the nation’s cultural and sustenance base – all being counts of genocide, according to the Genocide Convention.
The pro bellum camp is also certain about their mission of “regime change” in Iran, ostensibly justified by “Iranian nuclear threat”, as “Iraqi WMD” had been before. In its “Iran memo” the Lobby called for economic and financial sanctions to let the Iranian regime collapse. At the largest ever, 2007 annual policy conference of AIPAC, vice-president Cheney characterized Iran as the leader of a global terror movement that threatens American and Israeli people: “The leader of this movement speak openly and specifically of building a totalitarian empire covering the Middle East, extending into Europe and reaching across to the islands of Indonesia […] We’re fighting that war on our own terms and we will prevail.” The Democratic speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi said: “Iran must not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. It threatens the security of Israel, the stability of the region and the safety of the world”, while Israel confronting that challenge “makes courageous choices for peace”. Evangelist John Hagee, having re-cycled the lie of Iranian “nuclear Holocaust” threat, proclaimed that the “sleeping giant of Christian Zionism has awoken!”, as if a nuclear stand-off with Iran was a Christian invitation to the Second Coming.
The struggle between the neocons and the realists will determine “whether we will face a terrible war theater in the Middle East with tremendous global repercussions”. Even the most hawkish US policy gurus realize things went too far. In his new book Second Chance, Zbigniew Brzezinski expressed a grave concern for the future of the Empire, if America expands the “war on terror” into Iran: “if we do get into that larger conflict, then I’m afraid the era of American global preeminence will prove to be historically very, very short.” Henry Kissinger proposed an extensive diplomatic deal with Iran.
Imperial existence notwithstanding, even if US-Israel did not use nuclear warheads on Iranian targets, bunker-busters and anti-armour ammunition built of uranium metal would be applied, adding thousands of tonnes of radioactive-toxic pollution to that from bombed nuclear facilities and industrial plants. Previous US and Israeli wars testify to this real nuclear threat: Yom Kippur, 1991 and 2003 Iraq, 1994-1995 and 1999 Balkans, Afghanistan and 2006 Lebanon. The radioactive dust would spread in the atmosphere, threatening millions around the globe with low-level nuclear radiation that has already claimed more than 60 million cancer victims, not counting over 3 million foetal and infant deaths deaths, and a 10% decline in health of the general population, since the beginning of the nuclear era.
Jewish history proves that their command and control structures are readily adaptable to a variety of political and social conditions. In 1859, an elder of Zion, rabbi Reichhorn spoke at a Prague grave of rabbi Symeon ben Juhuda. Reichorn addressed an association of international Jewish leaders, on how “to exploit our enemies’ mistakes”, at a moment when Jews “have achieved such a power, such a splendid success”. By then, “in all of Europe” Jews had total control over money, while rulers were in debts for militarisation: “We must lend the capital on collaterals of railways, tax administration, forests and any dominions […] we need to acquire land holdings […] Under the guise of fundraising for the poor, we need to transfer the whole tax burden onto land owners; as soon as we become landlords, the entire Christian labour will provide us with unusually lucrative profits.”
Islam was not a target. Reichhorn identified the enemy, the Christian Church, and suitable warfare utilizing “baptized Jews as steps to climb to new heights, yet unknown to us, because the converts remain loyal to us and despite the baptism of body, their soul and mind nearly always remain Jewish”. The elder envisioned that Jews “should infect [the Church] with freethinking, skeptism, disbelief and schism, while fuelling all quarrels and dissensions between various Christian sects […] Let’s start from priests, let’s pronounce an open war against them, by surrounding them with suspicions and jeers, by watching them closely and revealing scandals from their private lives.” Observers of Jewish-Christian relations in Poland, know how it is done now: smear a priest as a pedofile, Communist collaborator or homosexual.
Machiavellian tactics also suited youth education under the pretext of civilizational progress that implies equality of all religions: “it would fully suffice for deletion of religion from Christian school curricula. Jews are capable of securing teching positions in all of these Christian schools and educational instituions. Religious upbringing will be marginalized to education by family at home, but because most Christian families will not have the time, the religious zeal will naturally start to dwindle, until it vanishes.”
Economic instruments, a subject intimately known to European Jews, were to be fully exploited: “Being government collateral property taken over by us for the unending loans, expropriated Church land will fall into our hands […] Any speculative commerce and its profits should always be ours, as it is Jews’ in-born right, so to say. First we should take over the trading of alcohol, butter, grains and leather, which will give us control of the whole farming and rural economy. We can always deliver grains to all consumers, but should some discontents arise among the masses due to high prices and resulting destitution, we coud readily blame the governments and could incite some commotion, as every revolution, every turmoil augments our capital and brings us closer to our goal.”
In acquiring positions of power, Reichhorn repeatedly stressed that “in-born Jewish cunning and shrewdness” will be instrumental against the “natural but deadly adversaries”, the Christians. For government positions, “cunning and sycophancy by all kinds of Jewish proponents from miscellaneous classes will help us reach positions of real influence and power […] that imply honour, power, priviledges and profits flowing from them, while Christians can keep meagerly rewarded positions of knowledge and labour.” He recounted vocations worth Jewish pursuit: “While going hand-in-hand with shrewdness and pettifoggery that from childhood are implanted in us and praised as virtues, the law profession […] can greatly help elevate us to power and influence on relations between […] the Christians.” Other disciplines, for example, “political economy can very easily stupify and prove that black is white”.
Legalistic instruments had a place in the elder’s strategy of conquest of Gentiles: “We no longer need laws that protect us, since the so-called progress of civilization has granted them to us […] a benign bankruptcy law adopted on humanitarian grounds would in our hands become a more lucrative business than the limitless California gold mines of old. Jews should head all speculation firms, but without taking any risks posed by the abuse of national laws.” The elder identified the same principal instruments of power that the JPC uses: “If gold is the prime wordly power, then the press undeniably comes second, but what could press accomplish without money? […] Step by step we will remove Christians from any influence and will dictate the world what it should believe, respect, loath and curse.”
There was also place for Jewish victimhood that in our times became the Holocaust Industry built on the Holocaust Religion, shrewdness and greed, with the stick of “anti-Semitism” held by the Jewish-friendly media: “We will repeat Israel’s funeral wailing and grievance against oppression that has strangled us for so long! […] Then our adversarties will step out one by one with attacks against our pursuit, but stupid rabble will be on our side. With the press in our hands we will be able to change justice into injustice, elevate blasphemy to a true worship, shake the until-now untouchable institution of family and divide its members into independent elements […] We will be able to uproot everything our enemies have believed in […] to ruin credit, stir upsetting passions, declare an open war on everything and everyone, impose fame or crush into the abyss of shame whomever and whatever we wish!”
Group solidarity and disguised universalism were to promote Jewish causes: “When even only one [Israelite] marches forward, let him pull also others along, and, should he slip, let all rush to help him […] in our interest we should strive to participate, even to lead reforms that arise as an order of the day, i.e. the betterment of the material well-being of the working classes and the poor. We should thus opt to participate in the movement, albeit only on the surface; for actually our efforts will politically direct the whole current of the reforms.”
Cunning and turmoil were helpful towards the ultimate goals of material enrichment and world rule: “The masses by themselves are stupid and they always let be blindly motivated and led by screamers; and who except a Jew can make a better noise and mislead? […] Therefore, our people lead in the press and on podiums in all Christian nations. The more groups and meetings, the more reasons for dissatisfaction and the more laziness in the face of work there are. The order will eventually be upset and entrusted to those who hold the money […] Any movement aimed at change enriches us, by ruining small estates that must get into debts [Therefore] we should support any dissatisfaction and consequent upheaval, as they make us richer and accelerate the moment we achieve our sole goal […] our rule on earth.”
Even if the speech was a hoax, the predictions are remarkable and similar to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or Rothschild’ NWO plan. Extreme Jews pursue Judeocentric goals ruthlessly. Terror in Palestine and Iraq echoes Trotsky’s proclamation against Russians: “We should turn [Russia] into a desert populated with white niggers, whom we will oppress so much that even the worst Eastern despots have never dreamt of […] We will shed rivers of blood […] that will surpass all defeats of capitalist wars […] The biggest Western bankers will cooperate with us. Shall we win the revolution, we will establish a Zionist rule on its cemetery remains and will become such a power that the whole world will fall on its knees. We will show what total power means. Through terror and bloodbath, we will sink Russian intelligentsia into complete stupor, idiocy and debasement […] The sons of Odessa, Orsha, Khomel and Vinnitsa! [the largest concentrations of Jews in Russia] How splendidly and joyfully they can hate everything Russian! With what a zeal they annihilate Russian intelligentsia – officers, engineers, teachers, clergy generals, academics and writers!”
US neocons are former leftists who abandoned Communism that had turned against Israel and transformed US conservatism into a movement that supports Israel. But neocons are not ex-leftists: “By displacing traditional forms of conservatism, neoconservatism has actually solidified the hold of the left on political and cultural discourse in the United States. The deep and continuing chasm between neocons and more traditional American conservatives […] indicates that this problem is far from being resolved.” Neocon Judeocentrism has produced effective networks. In alliance with the organized American Jewish community, it is intimately connected to Israel’s extreme Zionists.
To broaden the political support, the pro-Israelis manipulate US Judeo-Christians (the Christian Right or Christian Zionists) who believe in Israel as a sign of Jesus’s “second coming”. “Evangelicalism” had been urging for a Jewish state in Palestine even before Zionists organized in 1895. Zionists have funded an American pastor Cyrus Scofield to add hundreds of new pages to the old Authorized King James Version of the Bible by 1908, and later have “transplanted their agenda into many Christian denominations amidst the ashes of the two world wars”. The Christian fanatics are “increasingly seen as willful enablers of the annihilation of nations and tribes, including the Iraqis and Palestinians.”
The neocons in the USA first rose to prestigeous positions in the academia, media and think tanks, and then to the highest government positions, aggressively redirecting US policy towards global hegemony. In Norman Podhoretz’s Commentary, the American Jewish Committee’s publication, and in Irving Kristol’s The Public Interest, the two neocon gurus have promoted and published views advancing Jewish interests, many written by astute academics. While refuting the Trockyist traditions of neoconservatism, MacDonald defines the movement as “a complex interlocking professional and family network centered around Jewish publicists and organizers flexibly deployed to recruit the sympathies of both Jews and non-Jews in harnessing the wealth and power of the United States in the service of Israel. As such, neoconservatism should be considered a semicovert branch of the massive and highly effective pro-Israel lobby”.
Jim Lobe characterized the neocons as “a small, tighly-knit clan whose incestuous familial and personal connections, both within and outside the Bush administration, have allowed them grab control of the future of American foreign policy.
MacDonald finds the work of Jewish intellectual guru, Leo Strauss, relevant to the covert aspects. Similar to Plato and Machiavelli, Strauss advocated that elitist philosophers should pursue the common good, by deceptively espousing the popular religious and political values. Stephen Holmes presents the Straussian model as “the sedated masses, the gentlemen rulers, the promising puppies, and the philosophers who pursue knowledge, manipulate the gentlemen, anesthetize the people, and housebreak the most talented young”. MacDonald reacts to it: “an alarmingly accurate description of the present situation in the United States and elsewhere in the Western world. Given Strauss’s central concern that an acceptable political order be compatible with Jewish survival, it is reasonable to assume that Strauss believed that the aristocracy would serve Jewish interests.”
Implementation of the Judeocentric rule is not easy in a liberal society that seeks secular rational foundations and “dispenses with noble lies and pious frauds”.” Strauss believed that if no real threat existed, it should be made up, since a political system could only be stable if it was united against an external threat. “Theats” recently used against Gentiles by Judeocentric elites include WMD and Islam, often in combination. The scares of “suicide bombers” and Iran’s plans to “wipe Israel off the map”, perhaps convincing to Israelis, are less so to Gentiles and moderate Jews.
Strauss also believed that the leaders can use religion, the glue that binds society together, to manipulate the masses, while secularism needs to be suppressed, as it leads to dissent. The radical Zionists co-opted millions of Christian fundamentalists on the threat of failure of the Second Coming if Israel does not have its way. “Television ministers and leaders of the Fundamental churches […] know that Scofield was a liar, an adulterer and a crook, but if the truth were known, it would cost them financially […They] are not living as poor people, most of them have an annual income of half a million dollars or more.”
For the purpose of managing the masses, Strauss differentiated between a commonplace language directed at outsiders, and an internal esoteric language for ingroup use. MacDonald concludes in The Culture of Critique that earlier Judeocentric movements also espoused this dichotomy: “Jewish interests always remain in the background if one cares to look a little deeper. The most common rhetoric used by Jewish intellectual and political movements has been the language of moral universalism and the language of science – languages that appeal to the educated elites of the modern Western world.” MacDonald adds in his essay on neocons that “the language of moral universalism (e.g., advocating democracy as a universal moral imperative) goes hand in hand with a narrow Jewish moral particularism (altering governments that represent a danger to Israel).”
MacDonald interprets Strauss’s moral universalism as a neocon ideology for the masses that is attractive because of Western democratic and egalitarian traditions. But the Judeocentric goal would fail “without the esoteric message that the proposition nation must be managed and manipulated by a covert, Jewish-dominated elite”. MacDonald observes that the neocons are “deeply involved in deception, manipulation and espionage on issues related to Israel and the war in Iraq”. Their egalitarian message belies their status: “Their public pronouncements advocating a democratic, egalitarian ideology have not prevented them from having strong ethnic identities and a strong sense of their own ethnic interests; nor have their public pronouncements supporting the Enlightenment ideals of egalitarianism and democracy prevented them from having a thoroughly anti-Enlightenment ethnic particularist commitment to the most nationalistic, aggressive, racialist elements within Israel – the Likud Party, the settler movement, and the religious fanatics.”
In his book, Petras documents that prominent neocons have been associated with pro-Israel organizations. Intellectuals and politicians close to the Israeli Likud Party extremists have advocated and orchestrated Gulf War 2, the imminent attack on Iran, and plans for wars with Syria and Lebanon. Even the Jew-sympathetic Wikipedia documents Jewish domination of the Project for the New American Century, PNAC, the seed of “US” policy of wars of agression. Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon said to Knesset (3.10.2001): “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
The extensive list of hardline Zionists behind PNAC is a who-is-who in US policy. Zionists Paul Wolfowitz, David Wurmser and Stephen Hadley designed and pushed the invasion of Iraq. A Jewish intellectual connected to the Bush administration, Dr. Philip Zelikow who oversaw the 9/11 Commission, publicly stated that the Iraq attack was launched in the interests of Israel. Jewish Diaspora – thousands of dedicated professionals, philanthropists and key individuals in key segments of business and media, is also committed to Israel, including Wall Street, the major banks and the Federal Reserve. The Israel Lobby gives special prominence to supportive Gentile clergy, academics and journalists. According to MacDonald, the Jewish-led intellectual movements have been successful, because their Jewishness was hidden by recruiting Gentiles for visible positions, while the cohesive and determined Jewish minority outcompeted the disorganized resistance of the majority.
To MacDonald’s penetrating observations on Judeocentric intellectuality, Petras adds a concerned critique of ZPC policies: “The reason that criticism and action directed against Israel and the ZPC is of central importance today in any discussion of US foreign policy, especially (but not exclusively) of Middle East policy and US domestic policymaking is that they play a decisive role and have a world-historic impact on the present and future of world peace and social justice.” [Petras’ emphasis]. The policies violate international laws and standards and norms of behaviour: the UN Charter, the Hague Regulations and Geneva Conventions regarding the conduct of war, use of torture and treatment of prisoners. The wars destroy infrastructure and historical sites, plunder resources and establish puppet-run regimes.
Pro-Israel policy also erodes American democracy and freedom. The USA Patriot Act has emerged as a product of 9/11; other repressive laws and practices have followed. The emerging power of a national security police state means tyranny once a president usurps dictatorship. Under Michael Chertoff, a Jew, the US Department of Homeland Security, a child of the “war on terror”, reminds us of Żydokomuna security institutions. Legislation such as the Military Commissions Act have eroded democracy and civil liberties. The Act authorizes torture and makes anyone an “enemy combatant” at the will of the US government, without regard for constitutional rights, including those of the US citizens. A strange companion is an anti-Semitism act that enables the US government to track down “anti-Semites” anywhere in the world. At the same time, the US government does nothing about hate-inspiring anti-Polonisms that American universities generate, and American publishing houses and media disseminate world-wide.
The major media feature disciples of the US-Israeli executioner, who call their victim, the resistance fighters in oppressed countries, “incurable psychopaths”, “Islamo-fascists”, “terrorists” or such threat to be destroyed. We recognize here the Straussian idea of a commonplace language in the service of the elites. In agreement with Strauss’s thoughts (and with rabbi Reichhorn’s thoughts in 1859), the propagandists can count on an amazingly short attention span of the public, with the corporate media’s help, no doubt.
Only Israel benefits from Bush’s war agenda. Prominent US officials and the dominant corporate media freely label all criticism of Israel anti-Semitic, while Israeli intelligence is allowed to operate in America, including penetration of US military bases and government agencies. Iraq, Iran and Syria are the principal obstacles to Israel’s expansionist plans to seize Palestinian lands, in a long-term goal for Eretz Israel. Powerful Zionists like Paul Wolfowitz and senator from AIPAC, Joe Lieberman, have fabricated the lies about Iraq’s WMD in a planned war for Israel’s security and hegemony, beginning with the overthrow of Hussein, followed by regime change in Syria, Lebanon, Iran and even Saudi Arabia, according to Petras. Bush’s wars harm US economy and the costs exceed any future benefits, while US security has been jeopardized and the nation’s status has been compromised. America became a pariah state, particularly in the eyes of the Moslems. Americans, too, revile Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld.
Petras notes that the conquest of Iraq and Afghanistan and Israeli subjugation of Palestinians are a “process of destruction, degradation, and exploitation followed by efforts to “reconstruct” a colonized military, police, and political structure willing and able to repress and contain anti-colonial resistance.” Empire building and colonization demolish a nation then terrorize the people into submission and kill the ones who resist.
The uncovering of US-sanctioned torture in Iraq has revealed an international network of US and Israeli death squads who kill, kidnap and torture “suspects” and sympathizers of resistance. Assassinations have targeted academics and teachers, senior army personnel, journalists and other professionals. The squads make life intolerable outside the fortified Green Zone in Baghdad for “coalition” officials and the puppet “interim government”. The squads comprise US and UK special units, follow the practice of Mossad, and aim at removing opposition while violating international law. US-Israeli divide and conquer strategy has destroyed the cultural identity of Iraqis and separated them from the oil resources. Partition of Iraq resembles the 1990s breakup of Yugoslavia where the US (beside Germany, Croat neo-fascism and radical Islam) have played a destructive role while the JPC has contributed with the intellectual idea of “humanitarian intervention” and propaganda.
The Gaza Strip and the West Bank are “Israeli-directed killing fields targeting Palestinian civilians helpless to stop it beyond their courageous acts of desperation with crude weapons and their bodies against tanks, F-16s, helicopter gunships, and illegal and immoral terror weapons like white phosphorus bombs and shells, cluster bombs that never stop killing and maiming, and experimental new weapons that don’t have publicly-known names yet.” Protracted genocide and expulsion aims to destroy the Palestinian identity and a viable independent state, and force a massive exodus. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights documents Israeli brutal actions in Gaza and the West Bank. The infrastructure affecting power, clean water and sanitation has been destroyed, and mobility restricted or denied to Palestinians. An embargo imposed on a weak economy has created an 80% unemployment. Daily killings, hostile incursions, extra-judicial assassinations, home and property demolitions, arbitrary arrests and detentions of thousands of Palestinians, ghetto-like concrete walls, and the systematic use of torture, also against women and children, maintaining the atmosphere of hopelessness and terror.
Democratically elected members of Hamas-led Palestinian Authority (PA) have been imprisoned, and Hamas civil and security facilities destroyed. Corruption of PA leadership into Israel’s partner in the destruction of Palestinians (both Moslems and Christians) brings to mind Golda Meier’s racist statement “There are no Palestinians”, and David Ben Gurion’s statement after the state of Israel has been established in 1948: “We have come and we have stolen their country […] We must do everything to insure [the Palestinians] never do return”. In 1938, Ben Gurion has written his son: “We will expel the Arabs and take their places […] with the force at our disposal.” Israel has also destabilized Lebanon, occupied its southern part and fuelled the conflict for some 40 years. Lebanon is another “scorched earth”, under Israel-approved UN and Lebanese Armed Forces that have replaced the IDF. At any time, Israel could turn a fragile ceasefire into war again. The IDF has used illegal cluster bombs and, very likely, uranium weapons in the summer 2006 attack on Lebanon. The JPC makes sure that the US supports Israel’s plans and actions in the Middle East.
Iran fully complies with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, while Israel with hundreds of advanced nuclear warheads, expresses an intention to use them. The ZPC has been pushing a US attack, claiming that Iran threatens Israel’s security. The war preparations are, in Petras’s words, “the greatest immediate threat to world peace and political stability”. Due to nuclear as well as political fallout (when the Islamic world retaliates and non-NATO states re-group), a nuclear attack on Iran, including conventional bombing of nuclear facilities, could lead to international outrage, ousting of the ruling parties in US and Israel, and a worldwide rise in “anti-Semitism”. Iran has never attacked its neighbors, except in self-defense against Iraq. Ayatollah Khomenei also condemned the development and use of nuclear weapons. To increase tensions, Western media published false reports that he threatened the US. Then the JPC lied about president Ahmadinejad’s threat “to wipe Israel off the map”.
US-Israeli actions equal the WWII Nazi crimes, Petras submits: “These are the highest crimes against humanity.” The Nuremberg Tribunal called the crime of aggression the “supreme international crime”; Nazis found guilty of it were hanged. Petras remarks that the “worst crimes are committed by those who claim to be a divinely chosen people, a people with “righteous” claims of supreme victimhood […] Righteous victimology, linked to ethno-religious loyalties and directed by fanatical civilian militarists with advanced weaponry, is the greatest threat to world peace and humanity.”
For placing anti-Israel protest ads in New York Times, the CNI Foundation has been smeared as “anti-Semitic”. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, and the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America have attacked the campaigners with “lies, innuendo, and guilt-by-association for telling the truth about our Middle East policies and for arguing that a settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict is in the national interest of the United States, and ultimately Israel.” The Foundation has even received threats of violence.
Hi-jacking the Holocaust
Jewish extremists “hi-jacked” the Holocaust, at the expense of memory of many more millions of victims of Nazis among other nations. Such strategy obstructs reconciliation of victims with villains, and, it also suits the present-day German and Croat negative revisionists, as substantial guilt is taken off their nations. Extreme Jews monopolized the term to denote the Jewish WWII tragedy, but over a century ago New York Times (10.9.1895) called the Armenian genocide “Holocaust”. Exceptionalization of the Jewish Holocaust supports the “Holocaust Industry”. Jewish authors remarked: “The difficulty with this exclusivist formula is that while Jews were singled out, so too were Gypsies, Poles, and Slavs” and “Although there have been thousands of books written about the destruction of the European Jews, few have been devoted to the more general problem of genocide per se”. Having hijacked the general term “Holocaust”, the Industry labels anti-Semite, self-hating Jew, denier, homophobic and fascist whomever argues otherwise.
Jews constitute a few percent of the victims of 20th century genocides, but receive most of the press. Shoah was neither as unique, nor of the priority to the Nazis, nor as irrational and comprehensive as radical Jewish propagandists present. Shoah didn’t claim as high a percentage of Jewish intelligentsia as the Bolshevik terror killed in Russia, nor as many as the joint Nazi-Soviet exterminations annihilated in Poland from the first months of WWII. Nearly all ethnic Poles were at Germany’s mercy in the event of Hitler’s victory. Nearly two-thirds of the world Jews were out of Germany’s reach. Endlösung did not start until Germany invaded the USSR in mid-1941. Nazi plan included tens of millions of Slavs, but the defeat of Hitler stopped the extermination. Far from all accessible Jews were killed. Thousands of German Jews were declared Aryans, and thereby spared. Finland’s (Germany’s ally) Jews were never harassed, and Bulgaria’s Jews were only pursued half-heartedly. Neutral Switzerland and Sweden were respected despite their Jewish populations. Sweden sheltered the famous escaped Danish Jews.
Political pressures and media, ranging from global press, through book and movie launches, to the Industry-run museums, promulgate the Judeocentric view. Radical Jews control the debate and its language. The Industry has hijacked WWII vicitm memory institutions for its own agenda. In many US states, children are required to learn about the murder of 5-6 million Jews in detail, while Jewish spokesman have opposed the teaching about the murdered Slavs. There is no generally-recognized term for prejudices against Slavs, only Jews (anti-Semitism); no special term for a massacre of Slavs, only Jews (pogrom); and no special term for the genocide of Slavs, only Jews (Holocaust and Shoah). Poles, for example, “never had the political, cultural, or financial resources to press their case.” While the Industry-sponsored Jewish writers in universities poison the minds with hate propaganda, persons who seek the truth are branded anti-Semites.
Following the slanders of the Polish nation, the Industry claimed 65 billion dollars for Jewish properties in Poland, and then demanded 1 billion euros for government shares and bonds of “Holocaust victims”. The claimant’s attorney warned: “This is only the beginning for the Poles.” Poles were blamed from the very beginning, even though they were victims and not guilty of the alleged WWII mass crimes on Jews and Germans. Yet, under political pressure the Industry extracted from Polish statesmen an apology for the crimes at Kielce and Jedwabne, both allegedly being typical of the Polish character.
Simon Wiesenthal’s definition of the Holocaust includes 5 million Gentiles along with 6 million Jewish victims, and Elie Wiesel restricts the term to Jews only. Judeocentric authors fear that any departure from their definition will cause Jewish deaths to be forgotten. Their propaganda has caused the opposite – the deaths of non-Jews has been virtually forgotten.
The Wiesenthal Center exploits memories of Jewish WWII suffering to raise money. Quoting Yaffa Eliach’s famous “There is no business like Shoah business”, a NYT journalist wrote: “The enormous success of the Simon Wiesenthal Center has given new meaning to what was once a macabre in-house joke.” Yad Vashem’s director charged that the Center and its head rabbi Hier are “the most extreme of those who utilize the Holocaust. The Jewish people does many vulgar things, but the Wiesenthal Center [has] raised it to a complete level: The optimum use of sensitive issues in order to raise money.”
The Centre influences US foreign policy: “Hier has accrued unprecedented clout in the Legislature, on Capitol Hill, in the city’s boardrooms and even in Hollywood.” The Center claims to promote “tolerance”, but defends Israel’s supremacist regime and its discriminatory policies against non-Jews. The Center supports Israeli policies that violate UN resolutions, and applauds Israel’s “security fence” that is illegal according to international law. While the Center denounces violence and terrorism against Jews, it has publicly honored Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir who have documented records as terrorists. In 1990, Hier advocated invasion of Iraq because of alleged Iraqi nuclear weapons. The Center claimed that Iraq was killing Iranian prisoners in German-built gas chambers and that in Iraq German firms were producing Zyklon B gas, “the chemical used by the Germans to murder millions of Jews during the Nazi Holocaust”. Absence of proof of WMD accompanied the Center’s news release before Gulf War 2.
Chutzpah and beyond
The Holocaust Industry deplores the Industry’s “corruption of history and memory in the service of an extortion racket.” Finkelstein claims that some Jews in the USA have replaced Judaism with a dogma of fund-raising for Jewish causes, and names the World Jewish Congress and its leaders, billionaire Edgar Bronfman and real estate tycoon Israel Singer who considers any Jew, even the non-European who has survived WWII, is a Holocaust survivor. Finkelstein blames Wiesel for creating “a distorted and disfigured and frankly meaningless version” of the Holocaust to “serve the interest of the US and Israel”.
According to Finkelstein, the Industry represents neither the victims of expropriations nor Jewish survivors and heirs. In the name of the Jewish victims, the Industry seized control of denationalized properties worth billions of dollars in the former East Germany. The legitimate Jewish heirs sued the Industry to return their properties. Jewish organizations collected nearly half of the German slave labor compensation fund monies, to the dismay of hundreds of thousands of former non-Jewish slaves. In the German settlement, the Industry almost certainly kept most of the monies designated for former Jewish slave-laborers.
The Holocaust Industry is “the main fomenter of anti-Semitism in Europe”, by spreading an image of greedy Jews, and it ironically denies the Shoah by overestimating the number of survivors. In 2000, Israeli government officially cited 960,000 survivors. Since the early 1990s, 10,000 were claimed to die each month, i.e. there were about 2 million survivors in 1990. Not more that a quarter could be alive from WWII in 1990. This would mean that there were 8 million survivors in May 1945, so “the Holocaust didn’t happen”. About 8 million Jews lived in Europe before WWII.
The 1967 Israeli-Arab war had spurred a sudden interest in the Holocaust, but Finkelstein countered the idea that it had arisen out of concerns that a new Holocaust could occur and remembering WWII events could stop it. Rather, the interest was a reaction to Israeli strength, and the US Jewish lobby used Holocaust to lend a moral victimhood excuse to Israeli crimes against the Palestinians. According to Novick the delay with the Holocaust becoming dominant in Western thinking stemmed from an earlier belief that attention to Jewish losses would increase anti-Semitism.
Noam Chomsky and Alexander Cockburn agreed with Finkelstein that Holocaust Literature promotes the dogmas of Shoah uniqueness and the Gentiles’ anti-Semitic hatred. Raul Hilberg commented: “I am by no means the only one who, in the coming months or years, will totally agree with Finkelstein’s breakthrough.” A professor of history called The Holocaust Industry indecent, juvenile, self-righteous, arrogant, stupid, and a “conspiracy theory”. Finkelstein responded in the second edition: “Mainstream critics allege that I conjured a “conspiracy theory” while those on the Left ridicule the book as a defense of “the banks”. None, so far as I can tell, question my actual findings.” Finkelstein’s newer book further repudiates the doctrine of Holocaust being “singular, universal, and unique” that allows Israel to claim moral dispensation.
To silence critics, the Industry charges anti-Semitism, on the tacit premise that Jews can do no wrong. Finkelstein points out that criticisms of too much Jewish influence don’t prove anti-Semitism “anymore than agreeing with the statement “White people have too much influence in the world” or “Males have too much influence in the world” proves, respectively, a racist or sexist cast of mind.” Finkelstein analyses the Industry politics: “Under the guise of seeking “Holocaust reparations,” American Jewish organizations and individuals at all levels of government and in all sectors of American society entered into a conspiracy – this is the correct word – to blackmail Europe. It was on account of “Jewish money” that the Clinton administration went along with this shakedown operation, providing – even to the detriment of U. S. national interests – crucial support for it at every juncture.” The Bush administration also supported the “new anti-Semitism scam” in order to “get Jewish money and Jewish votes”.
Against the Serbs
Before the “war on terror” in Afghanistan inaugurated the “wars without an end” following 9/11, Straussian, dichotomous language had characterized aggression against Yugoslavia from early 1990s. A PR firm Ruder Finn used the Trnopolje “death camp” hoax to sell the Bosnian-side story to Jewish organizations. Following the Holocaust Industry model, mainstream media compared Serbs to Nazis, and the Bosnian war to genocide. The firm’s director, James Harff admitted in an April 1993 interview to Jacques Merlino of French TV 2 that the firm “jumped on” the story and “convened three major Jewish organizations”: Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the American Jewish Congress.
The protest of NY Jewry unfairly swayed Western opinion against the Serbs. Military interventions in the region followed, under humanitarian guise. Spin is now served by the Albanian Lobby coaxing the US Israel Lobby, in support of ethnic hatred, cleansing, and territorial claims to Kosovo. This is done with complete silence over the facts; in small Kosovo alone, the Albanian SS Skanderbeg Division of about 9,000 men, mostly Albanian Muslims but also several hundred Albanian Catholics, killed 210 out of 550 Jews, liquidated 10-30 thousand Kosovo Serbs and an uncounted number of Gypsies, and expelled at least 100,000 Serbs.
The Albanian Lobby seeks to revise history by proclaiming that all Jews were rescued from Albania in WWII. Actually, some Jews were murdered, but the “rescue” of Jews had all to do with a small number of Jews and a refusal of the Italian occupant to implement the Endlösung. In Poland, thousands of Jews were rescued, despite Nazi death penalty for doing so.
Historian Carl Savich points out that an American Jew with Polish roots, Harvey Sarner used the “all Jews rescued” spin in his 1997 book Rescue in Albania. The book also whitewashes Albanian SS crimes in Kosovo and is silent over the fact that Hitler included Serbian Kosovo into fascist Greater Albania, creating a precedence of an “independent”, Albanians-only Kosovo. Pogroms of Kosovo Serbs in March 2004 have shown what Albanians mean by co-existence and tolerance. In just two days, the hordes destroyed more than 30 churches and monasteries, bringing the total to 150 since NATO and UN entered Kosovo in 1999.
Germany has began the break-up of Yugoslavia in the 1960s, and has been the chief champion of “independent Kosovo”, the promoter of the separation of Montenegro and the main supporter of irredentism in Vojvodina. Already in 1993, German magazine Ethnos wrote about the absence of international concensus on inclusion of Vojvodina into a future Serbia, adding that prevention of a civil war would require a maximum autonomy for this (already autonomous!) province. Even though it was “enslaved”, Vojvodina played no bloody role in the bloodshed. Kosovo Albanian extremists used both the “autonomy or blood” rhetoric and action. 3,800 Bundeswehr soldiers (a fifth of the KFOR force) did nothing in Prizren, the seat of Serbian Orthodox bishop, where the pogroms were most violent and destroyed his residence and the largest number of churches.
Sarner’s book was published just before US-, EU (Germany)- and NATO-sponsored Albanian terror campaign in Kosovo. The book supported propaganda for “humanitarian intervention”, by whitewashing the heirs of the WWII Albanian extremists. The same work appeared in 1992 as a broshure The Jews of Albania, when Enver Hoxha’s Communism collapsed and all Jews residing in Albania emigrated to Israel. Sarner played a significant role in the emigration. Savitch believes that the broshure was a “thank you” note for Albania for 300 Jewish immigrants.
According to Savich, “Sarner has paid or “subsidized” visits to Israel of “Righteous Gentiles” […] Yad Vashem has listed 118 Serbs as “Righteous Gentiles” who rescued Jews during the Holocaust while only 61 Albanians have been so honored. But Sarner conveniently doesn’t mention this. He is the chairman of ADL’s Jewish Foundation for Christian Rescuers. He has worked with Jews in Poland, Ukraine, and Albania. His primary focus is on Jewish emigration to Israel and in documenting those non-Jews who have “rescued” Jews during the Holocaust.
Perhaps Sarner’s activities explain why the percentage of Poles honored among the Righteous Gentiles fell from 40% a few years earlier to 28% (21,313 of the total) as of 1.1.2006, which belies the claims of rampant Polish anti-Semitism. Is it because rescuers are being discovered late and added to the register, diminishing the “constant” number of Poles as part of anti-Polish demonisation campaign? There are no comparably vigorous efforts to identify thousands of Polish rescuers who chose to remain anonymous.
Savitch’s findings don’t explain why extreme Jews would have an interest in the Balkans. It is hard to believe that a gain of a few hundred immigrants would be worth Jewish support for a series of bloody civil wars in the former Yugoslavia. Apart from possible appeasing of radical Islam against the Serbs, and undermining of Serbian Christian Orthodoxy through separation of Serbian religious craddle in Kosovo, Zionist interests in the Balkan conflict are obscure. Nevertheless, the dismemberment of Yugoslavia bears JPC marks.
The Jewish founder of Médecins du monde (Doctors of the World), former UN administrator of Kosovo, Bernard Kouchner wrote in his book what Bosnian Muslim president Izetbegović revealed on his deathbed in 2003: “Serbian death camps” were a hoax to gain support of the West against the Serbs. Jewish organizations were instrumental in publicizing the hoax. Predictably, Izetbegović’s premortal confession didn’t make the headlines, but perhaps the scape-goating Kouchner, an avid Serbophobe, tried to conceal another issue. Namely, with other Jewish intellectuals in France, Kouchner popularized the concept of “humanitarian intervention” just before the brutal US-NATO actions in the Balkans. A professed failure to intervene tough enough there, later partly justified more bloody interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, all supported by a dichotomous, Straussian-style rhetoric.
Also for moral-political reasons, Kouchner split from Médecins sans frontières (MSF), which he had founded earlier. He felt that MSF was giving up its principle of “witnessing”, i.e. aid workers publicizing the atrocities they observe. Western journalists in the Balkans abused a similar principle through fraudulent reporting. Based on the frauds, the JPC-friendly media established egregious human rights violations as “facts” that incriminated exclusively the Serbs, even though all warring parties, including NATO interventionists, violated human rights. The false “witnessing” made the journalists and the media co-responsible, with the politicians, for interventionism and its mass crimes.
Labeling Milošević “the Butcher of the Balkans”, “the Balkan Hitler”, and “Europe’s Saddam Hussein” resembles the demonization of Hussein in both Gulf Wars. In Gulf War 1 the media called Hussein “the Butcher of Baghdad”, “the Raper of Kuwait” and “the Middle East Hitler”. Simplifications of the complex conflicts to confronting the enemy leaders targeted Americans for support of US military actions in both regions. As brutally, Islamic states intervened against the Serbs with Western blessings, but that was kept off the record. However, the media emphasized French intellectuals’ anti-Islamic stand when this became politically opportune several years later. New York Times (23.1.2005) featured French thinkers who had supported toppling Hussein in Iraq. Kouchner was quoted as saying that Islamic terror by the Muslim fascist minority was the biggest threat, hence the unity against Muslim extremism and fascism was imperative because in contrast to the times of the Bosnian crisis, America and Europe were apart.
Kouchner supported Gulf War 2, contrary to the French public who ill-wished Bush in Iraq. Thomas Friedman, the author of the New York Times story, was astounded about the French attitude, since Europe with its numerous Muslim minority needed a victory in the “war of ideas” with Islam much more than America did. Only ten years aearlier, Kouchner and his MSF publicized in French press and on Paris walls a poster showing inmates in a “Serbian death camp” in Bosnia, to agitate defense of Balkan Muslims. The photo had an insert of an Auschwitz-like watchtower, yet another manipulation of Holocaust.
A blog explained how the “ideas” were born: “Mr. Glucksmann and his friend Bernard Kouchner developed “the right of humanitarian intervention” – a humanitarian version of President Bush’s preemptive-strike doctrine – which justified European involvement in the Kosovo war to avert ethnic cleansing.” Philosophers such as Bernard-Henri Lévy and Andre Glucksmann spent more time on moralist comments on international affairs than they did philosophising. All popular French philosophers supported Bush’s war in Iraq, unlike the prevailing French public opinion.
More light was cast on the philosophers when a professor of Swiss and German universities, Tariq Ramadan, earned the “anti-Semitic” label for joining a debate in France about Israeli-Palestinian conflict and war in Iraq: “Ramadan touched off a firestorm with a charged accusation against French Jewish intellectuals.” His opponents were Lévy, Glucksmann, Kouchner, Alain Finkelkraut and Alexander Adler. For Ramadan, these “new philosophers” were Jewish, pro-Israeli apologists.
A Pulitzer Prize laureate, the same Thomas Friedman was ahead of US-NATO generals in April 1999 when he wrote after 12 days “of surgical bombing” of Yugoslavia: “Let’s see what 12 weeks of less than surgical bombing does. Give war a chance.” He urged NATO to commit war crimes, and pressured the Yugoslav government: “Every week you ravage Kosovo is another decade we will set your country back by pulverizing you.” Infrastructure was disrupted: “NATO began its second month of bombing against Yugoslavia today with new strikes against military targets that disrupted civilian electrical and water supplies.”
According to the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research, the West leads in waging wars, and their number was the highest in 2011 since World War II. NATO countries, incl. Germany, are engaged in the majority of the conflicts as aggressors or instigate local proxies, concentrating in the Arab world and South Saharan-Africa, ostensibly due to geostrategy and natural resources. The leading position correlates with the world’s largest military budgets and exporters of military hardware being in the West. Let’s have a look at some of the “Western” conflicts with JPC fingerprints.
Pentagon will find any pretext for conquests, via overt war or by Brzezinski’s covert action announced as The policy at Obama’s inauguration. Clinton, Sarkozy and other “democratic world” JPC lackeys’ cheers accompanied the murder of Libya in 2011, leaving orders of magnitude more dead civilians than the prelude to such operations globally in 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia. A bunch of JPC-hired, assorted thugs together with NATO special forces and bombers (just like in the Balkans) beat several million Libyans standing by their sovereignty and Gaddafi. At least in Libya, the “intervention” motive was clear: Gaddafi wanted economic and financial independence from the banksters and globalists, for Libya and much of Africa.
Libya and other Arab Spring locations coincide with Greater Israel plan. “To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.”
As the “revolutions” erupted in N. Africa and the Middle East, NATO navies sailed to “evacuate their citizens”. Iran, the Biblical object of hatred expressed to-date in Purim, remains relatively immune to US state department’s colour and Twitter “revolutions” and Mossad’s Fission Field Warfare that, given limited Israeli military resources, seem ideal for the sectarian divisions. Iran must be worked out differently: US-NATO-Israeli nuclear war threats, laced with hysteria over Iran’s nuclear weapon program (bogus, according to all US intelligence agencies and IAEA).
Pretending that Myanmar has refused to accept the conditions for Western relief supplies, Germany has used the disaster for a new attack on international law. Under German presidency in 2007, the EU demanded that the states of SE Asia, incl. Myanmar, agree to EU military interventions. Transit from China through Myanmar to the Indian Ocean should facilitate trade with Europe and the Middle East, including Chinese import of raw materials, according to official rationale. But given the Tibet campaign, JPC geo-strategic goal is more likely.
German foreign ministry front NGO, Friedrich Naumann Foundation affiliated with the Free Democratic Party FDP, played a decisive role in the anti-Chinese Tibet “protests” along the route of the Beijing Olympic Torch Relay. German media aided the campaign by reporting on pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetans in Western China, incl. Chinese Muslims. The “German” pro-Tibet campaign was developed with the US State Department and the self-proclaimed Tibetan Government in Exile. US undersecretary of state and special coordinator for Tibet, Paula Dobriansky participated: “Ms Dobriansky is considered to be one of the members of the neo-conservative inner circle in the Bush Administration and ranks as a hard-liner capable of imposing policy.”
Others also use “crises” for forward deployment. After JPC’s 1999 “humanitarian intervention“ (masterminded by “US” neocons, coined by “French” philosophers, cheered by “German” Greens and a Holocaust survivor in Poland), a military operation to ostensibly prevent non-existent ethnic cleansing of Kosovo Albanians, the US military established Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo. UN and NATO “peacekeepers” took root in Kosovo, as in Bosnia before. Bondsteel doesn‘t protect any US pipelines, either; the closest one runs away from Kosovo, through the Republic of Macedonia, where US military has deployed earlier.
Pentagon saw war opportunity even in climate warming. Militarist propaganda-style, The Observer overblew well-known public information as if it leaked from Washington. The British press spread extreme Islamist lies against the Serbs, too. Despite Cheney’s assurances of “wars without end”, Pentagon inadvertently revealed its fear of GWOT running out: “The threat to global stability [by climate change] vastly eclipses that of terrorism.” Pentagon policy analysts envision nuclear wars for resources fried by mega-droughts, and famine crises and widespread rioting across the world, calling for humanitarian interventions.
NATO’s New Strategy (20.11.2010) testifies that the Pact became a vehicle for global hegemony. “The Alliance remains an essential source of stability in an unpredictable world” plagued by terrorism (“a direct threat”, as if it wasn’t a creation of NATO members ), “trafficking in arms, narcotics and people,” piracy, and cyber attacks by “foreign militaries and intelligence services, organised criminals, terrorist and/or extremist groups” (as if armies, not special police and commandos, could fight all this, while NATO protectorate Kosovo remains a prime nest for activities of this kind). Novel causes of war include environmental issues: above mentioned climate change, “health risks” (such as H1N1 “pandemic” of 2009, when armies were to force compulsory untested, harmful vaccines onto NATO country populations) as well as “water scarcity and increasing energy needs” and disruption of energy supplies.
Developed by a team under Madeleine Albright, chief JPC diplomat for “humanitarian” bombing of 1999 Yugoslavia (“the Alliance is firmly committed to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the UN, and to the Washington Treaty, which affirms the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security”), the new strategy asserts that NATO members “form a unique community of values, committed to the principles of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law” and obliges them to “further develop doctrine and military capabilities for expeditionary operations”. Such as Libya 2011?
Tsunamis, Stuxnet and Purim
Fast deployment of US and Australian troops, and military bases in the disaster zone, followed the 26.12.2004 tsunami in SE Asia. US Navy ships waited beforehand in the region with abnormally large crews. The tremor looked like a nuclear blast rather than sea-bottom tectonic slip, and media reports about the epicentre were false.
Other disasters may have been man-made, too. Technologies for influencing weather and triggering earthquakes and tsunamis exist (e.g. HAARP, nuclear charges in oceanic trenches and tectonic faults). In 2005 hurricane Katrina, New Orleans levees may have been deliberately demolished, causing disastrous flooding. A number of New Orleans residents described hearing “explosions” before the floodwaters rushed in. A National Guard worker claims he was sworn to secrecy upon finding explosives residue at the site of the break. Katrina my have been artificially strengthened to a disastrous power.
The leader of JPC’s armed arm NATO, Pentagon marshalled international help so it couldn’t arrive where and when needed in the “humanitarian pacification” of Haiti following the 2010 (HAARP?) earthquake.
The 11.3.2011 tsunami killed tens of thousands Japanese and damaged shore cities and infrastructure. Nuclear catastrophe a few times Chernobyl’s size, Fukushima followed. Hundreds of isotopes, incl. deadly plutonium and uranium, have contaminated Japan, the Pacific and the global atmosphere. Extrapolating from Chernobyl’s estimated one million cancer deaths in Europe alone in the first 20 years, Fukushima may claim several million victims to cancer over a similar period. Independents have not yet had the last word on the subject, pending more data.
Some analysts suspect US-Israeli Stuxnet virus planted in Fukushima’s control system, with earthquake/tsunami being a cover. The earthquake seems man-made and misrepresented by the media, while the tsunami has allegedly knocked out Fukushima I power supply, incl. backup and emergency, both direct current and alternating current, causing reactor meltdows and serious damage to spent fuel pools. Similar flooding and earthquake at Fukushima II has not damaged much.
Beside punishing Japan for support to Palestine and an offer to enrich uranium for Iran, or forcing economically strong Japan to its knees for efforts to break out from banksters’ yoke, a motive for the JPC to do 3/11 is not clear. Blackmail with further similar assaults is plausible. Neverteless, the allegation that an Israeli security company may have planted Stuxnet looks strong. For JPC, no number of civilian casualties is prohibitive, e.g. 9/11.
There are reasons to believe that Mossad has deployed nuclear charges in the world, to blackmail governments insubordinate to JPC policies. The author of this thesis is persecuted by JPC agents, which lends credence to his “conspiracy theories”.
Shortly after 9/11, JPC’s religious ideologues, the Chabad Lubavitch rabbinate “foretold” attack on Iraq to the day, but their rabbi had done it 10 years earlier, for the Judaic feast of Purim. Lubavitch magazine Emes News (24.10.2001) wrote that even though media don’t foresee it and state department denies plans for invasion of Iraq, those close to the Lubavitch rabbi know about his conviction about it happening regardless. IsraelNN (26.3.2003) illuminated the attack’s coincidence with sages’ teachings, noting that Jews “are the lead actors”, the goyim have “supporting roles” and “the evil-doers are props and background scenery”; God created the world for the sake of Jews “and it is our responsibility to implement the Torah.”
Exactly on Purim (19.3.2011), US, UK and France began intervention in Libya to implement UNSC Resolution 1973 in response to the Libyan civil war. The initial coalition of 10 states has expanded to 19 NATO members and associates. Germany has withdrawn forces from NATO operations against Libya but increased its forces in Afghanistan to free other states’ forces.
In the first week of attack on Libya, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), whose members also set the direction of US and global JPC policy through the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, has justified the intervention by the responsibility to protect, a UN policy of 2005: “Legally, morally, politically, and militarily it has only one justification: protecting the country’s people.” This excuse echoes JPC’s intervention rationale in the Balkans. In both cases, NATO is responsible for the deaths of far more civilians than if it had not intervened. A CFR expert commented: “There is bound to be selectivity and inconsistency in the application of the responsibility to protect norm given the complexity of national interests at stake in […] the calculations of other major powers involved in these situations.”
JPC’s willing executioners: Germany and France
German most influential foreign and military policy decision-making institution, Federal College for Security Studies (BAKS) develops models, first introduced in the US upon neocon definition of “Islamic totalitarianism”. Inevitable conflicts by young men against poverty and foreign occupation in the Islamic world and in Africa can be best confined through military interventions. Such wars are useful and necessary and BAKS models increasingly appear in analyses of other political institutions.
Bundeswehr has begun to train and supply equipment for a logistics unit of the Iraqi armed forces out of United Arab Emirates (UAE). Germany has been cooperating with UAE, its most important warfare partner in the Persian Gulf, since the 1990s, coincidental with neocon policy. Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Germany declared “strategic partnership” with UAE that is being intensified through the use of UAE air force base. France, too, was planning to set up its own base, ostensibly to train Emirati soldiers. Since the 1990s France has been the second largest arms supplier to UAE. Preparations for planned Israel-NATO war with Iran can’t be ruled out as the reason for the German-French interest. Emirati Wahhabism is JPC’s Trojan Horse in GWOT. “Influential forces” suggest French subordination to German leadership.
Critiques of German foreign policy indicate “JPC willing executioner” globally. German forces eye “peacekeeping position” in the Middle East, without doubt to aid US-Israel GWOT and pacification of Palestine. In January 2008, German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP) advised the government to consider naval deployment along Gaza Strip coast, based on “experience acquired off the coast of Lebanon” which “could serve possibly as a precedent for similar maritime missions”, for example off the coast of the Palestinian Autonomous Territory (PAT). German repressive authorities already have police units in PAT. According to DGAP, Berlin should be careful not to directly serve Tel Aviv’s interests, or else it would endanger its success in Arab countries.
Only a month after the totalitarian push of EU constitution against its members (13.12.2007), Germany’s most influential political think tank Bertelsmann Foundation demanded disempowerment of smaller EU members in foreign and security policy. Only the 7 countries with the largest military budgets would be permanent members of “EU Security Council”. A comprehensive arms program ostensibly to compete with US power, since Europeans are “more concerned about the fight against poverty than the development of global power”, called for “concerted propaganda measures and determined leadership.”
Anti-US under Chirac, Sarkozy’s France has aligned with “US” Middle Eastern and NWO policies. Sarkozy stands accused of working for Mossad: “Le Figaro last week revealed that the French leader once worked for – and perhaps still does, it hinted – Israeli intelligence as a sayan (Hebrew for helper), one of the thousands of Jewish citizens of countries other than Israel who cooperate with [Mossad case-officers].”
Sarkozy told MEPs that referendum on the EU constitution would be “dangerous” because of “a cleavage between people and governments”. A referendum “would bring Europe into danger”. UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage accused Sarkozy and British minister Gordon Brown of “an utterly cynical political plan”. “Not only does he stop his own people from having a say but he is trying to block Britain from having the referendum which our government promised”. Sarkozy was planning to use his turn at the EU’s presidency in the second half of 2008 to call for new, federal EU powers.
Sarkozy’s overt conviction that policy should be based on the same precepts as Zionist, Illuminati, Freemason, Bismark, Bolshevik, Nazi and Communist ideology, proves how far the NWO idea has advanced. Following his bombing spree in “Kosovo”, US-NATO chief commander Clark stressed no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states, except for Kosovo, of course.
While JPC cried “nuclear Iran!” despite intelligence reports, German and other NATO military specialists are appealing for a nuclear first strike policy, should the West’s global predominance and its way of living be in jeopardy, writes Klaus Naumann, Bundeswehr former inspector general, and momentary chief of NATO Military Policy, Nuclear Strategy and Arms Control Section of the Military Committee. Israel has an agreement with NATO on joint military campaign, including nuclear warfare, against Iran to “protect Israel’s right to exist”.
Naumann also chairs a German nuclear decontamination company that serves German and US governments. Nazi saga seems to have no end. Berlin also supports JPC in Afghanistan, with deployment of additional combat troops and development of paramilitary units. Berlin also wants to deploy technical relief units at the Hindu Kush. Preparations for suppression of the insurgency include training programs for Afghan troops, also child soldiers.
German Eon Corporation’s 2007 sales reached record 69 billion Euros, surpassing the GDP of smaller EU members. The environmentalists protest, as Eon produces over a third of energy from highly polluting coal, and nearly half from high-risk nuclear power. Eon signed an agreement with Siemens and the French Areva, to jointly build new British nuclear power plants and service existing ones. Since taking office last summer, French president Sarkozy has initiated numerous controversial projects with Arab countries. Eon and Siemens will profit from Sarkozy’s nuclear offensive. Siemens owns a third of the shares in the Areva NP reactor branch and the German government would like this to last.
Critiques and actions against JPC branches in allied countries such as the UK and Poland, are yet to emerge. The ties of former president of Poland, Aleksander Kwaśniewski, to KGB together with the atrocious past of his Jewish father as an NKVD agent torturing and murdering Polish patriots in Communist Poland’s security apparatus, and the attempts to purge the survivors of the Communist apparatus are only being uncovered: “Virtual Communist dynasties implanted themselves in law, journalism, medicine, academia, security, and, of course, politics during the reign of totalitarianism (1944-1990). Their members continue to dominate the nation’s cultural, political, and economic affairs, often to the detriment of the due process, fairness, justice, transparency, and democracy.”
Some of the symptoms of the JPC influence on Poland are: continuing evasion of scrutiny of VIPs with dubious Communist and Jewish background; brazen illegal claims to real estate; CIA-operated interrogation and short-term detention facility in Poland for suspected terrorists; Zionistic “Marches of the Living” in Auschwitz-Birkenau, a place of extermination for many other nations; and, ingeration into the politics of Polish diaspora that constitutes 16 million of Poles, compared to 38 million at home, many millions of whom, however, have migrated to the West for minimum-wage jobs, following IMF economic “reforms”.
Poles had experienced the JPC influence at home and abroad, at all levels, most obviously in the politics of history. A monument to the the 1943, Warsaw Ghetto Uprising was built in 1947. A monument of the 1944, Warsaw Uprising rose only after 50 years of great obstacles, and a companion museum only in 2004. The Polish Historical Society remains silent, while negative Zionist and German revisionism flourishes in the media, exhibitions, museums and memorials. This is unsettling at the time when international media promote Jews and Germans as the primary WWII victims. Polish historians followed the Zionist extremist interpretations, since the post-Communist intelligentsia had “emerged from a bare intellectual desert”.
Preposterously, Polish Diaspora is manipulated into funding Zionist revisionists. The richest Polish group in the US, New York’s Polish-Slavonic Federal Credit Union (about $1 billion in savings) was paralysed for years under American government commissioners. There was no money for Polish patriotic activities at the time, but the Union’s several thousand dollars funded Columbia University fraudulent historiographer and anti-Polonist, Jan Thomas Gross. This is an organization chaired by a neo-con with a Polish name, Alex Storozynski, a writer for Judeocentric New York Sun? Poland’s Judeocentric president Kaczyński (Kalkstein) has decorated this Zionist with the highest medal. Many Jews in Poland acquired Polish names over time, by different ways: Catholic godparents’ name for Frankists, name given by the authorities, name stolen along with the estate from Polish patriots killed in patriotic upheavals, name of a Jew’s rescuers during WW2, name assumed for camouflage in Żydokumuna times…
A devastating attack on the Polish Catholic Church, for the first time in post-Communist Poland, also bears a JPC mark. Warsaw archbishop Stanisław Wielgus was put at the bar of public opinion in the JPC-friendly, global media. Consequently, he was forced to resign for unproven co-operation with the Communist secret service, SB, the replacement for Żydokomuna’s UB. Many in the ranks that castigated Wielgus, i.e. politicians and members of parties who won the 2006 elections to local governments, had been SB agents. They politicized the Wielgus case to save own skin and to discredit their ideological enemy, the Church, creating self-serving chaos in place of truth the scrutiny was supposed to find.
Extreme Jewish circles employ Polonophobia, in order to promote the Holocaust Religion that exceptionalizes WWII Holocaust of Jews, and to justify the Holocaust Industry. In order to circumvent their collusion in Shoah, radical Zionists have “de-Germanized” the Nazis and have displaced Jewish anger and hatred unto Poles, by branding them WWII villains. Rabbi Byron Sherwin writes: “In the popular American and Israeli understanding of the Holocaust, the Poles all but replace the Germans as the perpetrators of the Holocaust, as the archenemies of the Jews throughout the thousand-year Jewish presence in Poland […This] runs sharply counter to much of historical experience.”
Polish anti-Semitism has been misrepresented. Poles exhibited anti-Jewish behaviours no more than other nations hosting Jews, but it was among Poles that Jews grew to one of the best developed minorities in Europe. Between the granting of priviledges to Jews in 1264 and the fall of Polish state in 1795, Jewish population on Polish lands grew a hundredfold while Poles multiplied only sixfold. In 1880, out of eight million world Jewry, 80% lived on the territory of former Poland. Jews themselves gave reasons to be disliked. Isolationism of the bulk of Jews and oppression and exploitation of the masses by some Jews soured the relations further, when the Jewish majority didn’t support Polish national goals. International Zionist propaganda blamed Poles with violent anti-Semitism, not much different from present-day “historiography” by JPC propagandists. Instead of Jewish claims of thousands of victims of post-WWI pogroms attributed to Poles, US and British government investigations established the number at about 300 Jews, most of them in military operations, where Polish forces fought the Bolsheviks (with whom the Jews sided). Pogroms in Ukraine killed thousands of Jews at the time, but Zionist propaganda lied about the Polish case instead, to prevent Polish independence.
During the Great Depression, Poles rejected Jewish demands for autonomy and sought to limit Jewish influence to alleviate poverty and unemployment. Jewish dominance provoked economic boycotts and sporadic acts of violence. After WWI, about half of Eastern Poland’s town population, and 25-40% in other cities, were Jews. Millions of Jews were poor, as Poles were, but educated Jews dominated the economy and professions. Just before WWII the 3 million Jews in Poland had 130 periodicals, 15 theatres, 266 elementary schools, 12 universities and 14 trade colleges. Had the Polish anti-Semitism been as serious as usually portrayed, the numbers of victims would be in the thousands, and the Jewish community would not have fluorished; “political antisemitism and anti-Jewish economic policies did not impinge on the considerable freedoms the Jews enjoyed […] The Jews were free to set up their own political organizations, to bring up their children as they saw fit, to publish a whole range of newspapers and literary works relatively free of outside interference, and to present their cause to the Sejm and before the court of public opinion.”
The 1939 Nazi defeat of Poland was not a “Jewish matter”, and Jews turned against Poles during the Soviet occupation. In the Nazi-occupied part of Poland, Jews saw in the beginning a chance of autonomy in the ghettos and co-operated with the Nazis. Poles were largely anti-Nazi, anti-Communist and anti-Soviet. Jews were drawn to Bolshevism and Communism long before Nazism came into being. Jews disproportionately participated in the Communist regime that enslaved the Polish nation and killed tens of thousands, and deported, imprisoned and tortured hundreds of thousands of patriots. More recently, Jewish-led Committee for Worker Defence betrayed the Solidarność movement by making a secret agreement to share power in future Poland with the Communist regime being ousted in 1980s. Since then, Polish polity and mainstream media resemble those under the influence of the Israel Lobby in the USA.
Negative revisionists minimize if not deny Holocaust because the evidence has been either: destroyed or gradually transferred to German “research” by the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum (a Polish research institution); still collecting dust in international archives; or not translated from documentation in Slav languages. The number of non-Jewish Holocaust victims declines, while the number of Jewish victims remains constant. Millions non-Jewish Ukrainian, Byelorussian and Polish civilians died as a result of German occupation. The “final solution” for Poles was implemented from day one of Hitler’s invasion of Poland (1.9.1939), by systematic extermination of Polish intelligentsia and butchery of civilian population. For Jews, it started with the Nazi attack on the USSR in June 1941 and was later determined at the Nazi conference in Wansee.
In July 1941, Heinrich Himmler drafted Generalplan Ost (General Plan East, GPO), the Nazi vision for re-organisation of Eastern Europe. The GPO assumed Wehrmacht would bring a vast territory up to the Ural Mountains under Nazi control, and would populate it with millions of German and Nordic stock. 51 million of the existing inhabitants would be “resettled” or killed. After liquidation of millions of Slavs, the remaining millions were to become slave labourers. GPO envisaged feeding Wehrmacht and exporting food to the Reich from the occupied territories, while pre-emptying the Eastern lands for the colonization, by starvation.
The Nazi hunger strategy had severely affected the Slavic and Jewish populations. Over the course of the war on the Eastern front, more than 3 million Soviet POWs succumbed to hunger, disease or German executions at German hands. Over half a million Polish Jews died in the ghettos, of hunger and hunger-related diseases, as a result of Nazi 1940-1942 ghettoization policies which created famine conditions among Jews awaiting re-settlement. Surviving Jews were killed in death camps when the Nazis decided to solve the “Jewish question” by extermination rather than re-settlement, and the Zionist elites colluded.
The erosion of the number of non-Jewish Holocaust victimsis is well documented. At Auschwitz-Birkenau, the Nazis destroyed evidence. The Soviets took the remaining documentation. Citizens of 21 countries perished there. The Polish Supreme National Tribunal established the total number of victims at 2.8 million, based on Rudolf Hoess testimonies and on other evidence. Incomplete documents suggest a total of 1.5 million victims, 90% Jews. Many non-Jews died when in January 1945 the Nazis evacuated the camp and marched the inmates in freezing weather, days before the Soviets “liberated” the camp. Founder of Polish intelligence and resistance among Poles in Auschwitz, captain Witold Pilecki, who volunteered to go to the death camp, claimed a minimum of 2 million victims as of mid-1943, and a 5 million total. Rudi Vrba claimed 1.76 million Jews between April 1943 and April 1944. Presently, Germans claim only 0.5 million victims.
Radical Jews do not object to drastic downward revisions, even to 1 million victims of Auschwitz-Birkenau, as long as the “certitudes” of 90% Jewish victims there, and six million in Shoah as a whole, remain. Since the 1980s system change in Poland, the number of Poles killed in Auschwitz has been reduced 16-fold, (and the number of Jews four-fold). It contradicts the findings of the Nuremberg Trials and the Chief Commission on Investigations into Nazi Crimes in Poland (GKBZH) on the murder of two million Polish citizens at Auschwitz. Often cited by the Polish media, an article claimed that only 75,000 Poles perished at Auschwitz. The Auschwitz Museum declared the GKBZH statement to be Communist propaganda. Presidents of Poland Wałęsa (1995) and Kwaśniewski (2005) quoted the lower number of Auschwitz victims.
At Auschwitz, Jedwabne and other places of German Nazi crimes in Poland and the Baltics states, new plaques announce to the visitor lower numbers of non-Jewish victims or falsify history by whitewashing the Nazis or diminishing their crimes. But at the former death camp Jasenovac (former Yugoslavia), the late neo-fascist dictator of Croatia, Franjo Tuđman’s regime dismantled the monument, and drastically revised the number of victims. At the site, Tuđman’s army damaged a Serbian Orthodox church in 1991. The church was rebuilt in 1984 from the ashes left by the fascist Ustashe in 1941. In a 1995 raid, Tuđman’s forces desecrated, plundered and destroyed the church as well as the premises of the museum and memorial centre. In January 1996, Tuđman proposed that the remains of the Ustashe perpetrators be brought to Jasenovac from other locations in an “act of reconcillation”, to rest beside the graves of their victims. Washington Post (10.3.1996) commented that this move would make Jasenovac the only place in Europe where the WWII extermination victims would be buried side by side with their oppressors. The number of non-Jewish WWII victims of Jasenovac (predominantly Serbs, some anti-Ustashe Croats, Gypsies and Jews) dwindled, while the number of Jewish victims remained unchanged at about 17,000 persons. Do international neo-Nazis collaborate with the Holocaust Industry in this regard?
David Irving went to jail for denying the Holocaust. Tuđman also denied the Holocaust, “but this did not prevent us helping him to get his own country and ethnically cleansing 560,000 Serbs, 240,000 of whom are still “missing”. Nor did it prevent him being invited to the United Kingdom’s celebration of the defeat of Nazism in Europe. Just as there are some Holocausts which may not be denied and some which may, there are clearly acceptable and unacceptable Nazis.” The Jasenovac case is an unsettling example of how revisionism and whitewashing own crimes covers up more violence. What mass violence is being prepared against Poles?
Russians seem to maneuver between the Jewish and German revisionists, to suit own goals. Russians continue keeping a lid on another genocide perpetrated on Poles: that by the Soviets before, during and after WWII. Soviets were complicit with both Germans and Jews. The former had a joint plan with the Soviets to exterminate Polish intelligentsia during joint occupation of Poland. Jews abundantly staffed the Bolshevik and later the Communist terror apparatus in USSR, Poland and other Soviet satellites. Their participation disproportionately to their numbers in respective societies is well documented. Not as well publicized is an account of their crimes.
Victims made villains
From the beginning the villains blamed the Poles for WWII and post-war crimes. Radical Jewish propaganda still reinforces the ridiculous allegations. After Germany attacked Soviet Union in mid-1941, the Nazis ordered executions of Jews on Polish lands that Soviets occupied until then under a pact with Hitler. German special units (Einsatzgruppen) made the murders look as if the Poles were the perpetrators. This Nazi deception fabricated a motive of Polish revenge on local Jews for Soviet killings of Poles by the NKVD during the Soviet occupation. The spin appeared credible because the Jews denounced Polish patriots to the NKVD, and assisted in Soviet deportations to Gulags.
Jan Gross’ books Neighbours and Fear defame Poles on alleged mass participation in this sort of German crimes against Jews. An official Polish investigation found the victims’ remains buried at the scene of the Jedwabne crime that Gross misrepresented. The number of victims could be estimated at 10-25% of Gross’ claim of 1600. The victims had no broken bones and their personal valuables had not been stolen – a contradiction of the pogrom-by-Poles thesis. Jewish religious authorities objected to site disturbance, thus interrupting the investigation and obstructing justice. Some propagandists misrepresent the investigation results as confirmation of Gross’ theses. The director of the Rabbi Donald Tam Institute for Jewish Studies at Emory University wrote in Publishers Weekly: “A government commission determined that not only did Gross get the story right but that many other cities had done precisely the same thing.”
There were Polish revenge killings of Jews, but not on the alleged scale. Yet, Polish government admitted collective guilt for Jedwabne. Anti-Polish pressures regarding “pogroms” staged by the Soviets and carried out by the Jew-dominated security apparatus in Communist Poland likewise made Polish statesmen admit national guilt for someone else’s crimes. The Soviets used the 1946 pogrom in the Polish city of Kielce for anti-Polish propaganda and to drive Jews out to Palestine. Stalin ordered Gromyko to move at the UN to recognize the state of Israel that was to serve the Soviets as a bone of contention in the Middle East. In order to supply Jews for Israel, Stalin directed NKVD to stage numerous pogroms in Soviet satellite states. A total of 711,000 Jews were expelled to the West through the iron curtain in 1945-1947. Of 16 pogroms in the Soviet bloc at the time, Kielce was and still is the most publicized.
Poles are presented as the main perpetrators at Kielce, but they were the victims of a Soviet plan. It was in Stalin’s interest to prove that first Germans and now Poles murdered Jews, and therefore the West should leave Poland to the Soviets. A hasty, Soviet-style show trial was held five days after the event in order to prove the complicity of the general Polish population. A Soviet-supervised military court was selected and it excluded members of the regime’s forces from prosecution, even though pogroms by civilians fell under the jurisdiction of a civil court. A Soviet-style investigations with tortures to extract confessions preceded the trial. Nine Poles were executed who were not even present at the crime location. Under torture, bishop Czeslaw Kaczmarek confessed a crime he did not commit. Eight days after his political show trial started on 14.9.1953, he and four other clergy were sentenced to prison.
On the day of the Kielce “pogrom”, the Nuremberg Tribunal was examining the Katyn massacre, one of many Soviet efforts to wipe out Polish leaders who could challenge Soviet rule. Soviet attorneys unsuccessfully sought to blame Germans. Moscow had to present a shocking event, Kielce, that would compensate for the lost case in Nuremberg.
Adam Michnik, the chief editor of Poland’s official daily Gazeta Wyborcza, calls Kielce the biggest Polish crime. A member of the US Council on Foreign Relations, he supported Poland’s economic shock therapy. The process privatized Polish national assets at far below market values, mostly to foreign investors. Millions of Poles lost their jobs, descending below the economic threshold necessary for biological survival. Thousands died of inadequate medical and social help. Michnik condemns any form of opression but has subscribed to the US fabrication about Iraq. Members of his family (Schechter) took part in Communist, anti-Polish terror.
Return to Europe
Absurd anti-Polonisms and charges of growing anti-Semitism in Europe abound because of preparations for Jewish re-settlement in Europe, note some observers. Jewish scrutiny left the alleged Polish crime at Jedwabne alone, until it became an opportunity for Jewish restitution claims. Poles are defamed coincidentally with multi-billion dollar claims on former Jewish properties. World Jewish Restitution Organization seeks USD 65 billion from the Polish government for real estate in Poland.
The restitution process is underway against a complex legacy of events and laws that have determined the status of properties in Poland – from Nazi and Soviet takeover in the beginning of WWII, to privatization in the post-Communist era: “Too much property has changed too many hands in too many places. The fear of a sudden social displacement could create a terrible backlash against private property ownership, the free market, and democracy in general.” Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League has warned: “What concerns me today is the zealous quest for restitution without regard for consequences.”
A wave of restitution claims could be expected after a fall of any regime that had legitimized the ownership of confiscated properties. Jewish individuals, businesses and communities who have owned properties in pre-WWII Poland have the same rights as others, so Poles shouldn’t object to a group claim. But they do because they fear a return of Jews could turn violent. Poles justify their attitude with Jewish non-assimilation, anti-Polish history of radical Jewish groups, the developments in Palestine, and the ferocity of extreme Jewish Polonophobia. Poles still bleed from the terror of Jews siding with Soviets during WWII and for long after, when Jews had dominated the regime and its security arm. Poles also perceive that powerful Jewish groups adversely influence their country. Legislation is proposed to check the ancestry of all people in power positions. Escalating attacks for anti-Semitism magnify the fears.
The “Marches of the Living” in Auschwitz-Birkenau, don’t improve Jewish relations, not only with Poles. They are rallying events for Israeli nationalists at a place of extermination of many other nations. Thanks to international Zionists, Poles, the major victim nation of Auschwitz, have been prevented from practicing their Catholic memorial rituals. Polish observers comment on the Jewish crowds bearing large Israeli flags: “yet another march of a foreign state on Polish land”, “a sign of armed aggression against Poland”, “future transfer site for millions of Israeli Jews to Poland”. Jewish armed units and Mossad provide security and IDF soldiers in uniforms stand prominently.
At the March of the Living on 5.5.2005, Ariel Sharon reminded Jewish youth, specifically the IDF soldiers present, that they “have a duty to give lessons, to recall memoirs and individual stories, in order to express the significance of the existence of the state of Israel. Always remember the victims, don’t forget the villains. Don’t forget that millions of Jews were led to death while the world stood by silently […] that many of them could not reach their fatherland, becoming victims of White Book politics of capitulation under Arab pressures.” In 2007, Israeli statesman Rafi Eitan updated the demonstration to the Iraqi-Palestinian-Iranian “crises”. Eitan, who had led the capture of Eichmann, said that some forces were again capable of producing Shoah through acts of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.
Between 1990 and 2003, immigration increased Jewish population in Germany from 33,000 to 200,000 – world’s fastest growth of Jewish population. Reportedly, growing anti-Semitism in former Soviet countries, and economic and social advantages, motivated the immigrants. German law grants the right of return to the descendants of Jewish immigrants from Germany to Palestine. German consulates in the Commonwealth of Independent States (majority of former Soviet republics) received 70 thousand applications for re-settlement visas. To rabbi Carl Feit of Yeshiwa University in New York, the return of Jews to Europe fullfils the Biblical motive of re-birth and rejuvenation of the Jewish community. Return to Palestine was also supported by Biblical references, but the majority of the present Jewish emigrants don’t really care about traditions. “Radically Orthodox Jews, mainly from New York” teach mainly secularized immigrants from Russia, the majority of whom can’t tell a church from a synagogue. This is happening while Europeans are discouraged from nationalism and religious traditions.
Historical experience with the radical Jewish groups speaks against the return because it might lead to violence. On-going anti-Polonism supports this thesis eloquently. If instead the extreme Zionists admitted to past wrongdoings and sought reconcillation as the Polish side did, the prospects for a welcome return would be better.
It is charged that Zionist propaganda about anti-Semitism and sufferings of Jews justifies violence in Palestine. To the brainwashed public, “Polish concentration camps” would be a logical consequence of alleged fierce, Polish anti-Semitism. Also severely distorted are facts about the Jedwabne massacre and the Kielce pogrom (as in Jan Gross’ books Neighbours and Fear, for example), leaving the accused Poles with little chance to correct. A group is demonized before it is assaulted. What kind of assault might the Poles expect?
An early example of anti-Polish activities of Jewish elites dates back to the time of partitions of Poland. In 1701, Jews financed the formation of the Kingdom of Prussia, using Polish Jewry’s money. The kingdom initiated occupation of Poland in 1762, while the influence of wealthy Jews increased in Prussia. They realized expulsion of the Jewish poor (Betteljuden) to Russia, from the Polish territories occupied by Prussia. Providing a strong leadership from Berlin, Prussia began to unify over 300 independent German entities. The tragedy of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe resulted from a racist reaction to an internal, very successful expansion of German Jewry since the beginning of the 18th century. Thus, the tragedy of Poles due to Prussian and Nazi expansionism and militarism can be traced back to the radical Jews of 18th century Europe.
Millions of Jews lived in Poland and its pre-WWII territories (Ukraine, Byelorussia and Lithuania). A Polish-Jewish patriot Kazimierz Sterling reminded that Zionist action for a Jewish state Judeopolonia to be located in Poland and its Eastern Borderlands started on the Russian side. At a May 1919 conference of Jewish citizens loyal to Poland, he recalled that one of the most famous Zionists, Vladimir Zhabotinski [mis-spelled “Jabotinski” in the West] had originated the idea of Judeopolonia: “Zhabotinski, a Russian-Jewish publicist […] set on proving the necessity to recognize two equal nationalities on the territory of [Poland]: Jews and Poles.” Sterling pointed out that the idea of dividing Poles with Judeopolonia was all the more dangerous that the majority of Jews in Poland spoke German-derived Yiddish, while Jews fleeing oppressive tsarist Russia spoke Russian and would unintentionally adversely affect the Polish population, should tsarist Russification policies be imposed on Poles. Zhabotinski threatened that if Poles didn’t yield to Jewish demands, the Jews would collaborate with the Russian rulers of Polish lands.
In 1902, Zionists pointed out to the German government that millions of Jews in the provinces annexed from Poland by Russia and Austria spoke Yiddish, “a popular German dialect”. In 1914, leading Zionists in Germany proposed the creation of Judeopolonia, a “buffer state” extending from the Baltic to the Black Sea, including a large area of Poland around Warsaw and Lublin (the capital of the proposed state). Six million Jews and 1.8 million Germans would rule over 8 million Poles, 5-6 million Ukrainians, 4 million Byelorussians and 3.5 million Baltic peoples. Even a filo-Semitic Bolshevik who collaborated with Jewish Bolsheviks in Poland, despised as “absurd” that the Zionists in Germany and Poland agreed to divide Poland by creating a Jewish state within the country.
Then Zionists in Germany were promised a trusteeship of the eastern territories populated by Jews, should Germany occupy the lands. After 1916 the Zionists in Germany acted as an anti-Polish lobby while continuing to stress Jewish-German interests in Poland. Most of Jewish organizations opposed the rebirth of Poland in 1918, seeking to make Poland a Jewish homeland. In order to bolster their claims, the Jews tried to convince the world that six million Jews faced death in countries overtaken by WWI.
In 1920, Polish parliament’s Jewish coalition proposed that Jewish parts of cities become “autonomous provinces”. Most of pre-WWII, unassimilated Jewry lived in former Eastern Poland that now constitute central-eastern Poland, the Baltic states (already in the EU), Ukraine and Byelorussia – the area of Judeopolonia. Poland greatly benefited from assimilated Jews, but a re-settlement might have far-reaching effects in the region. EU principles of regions, unrestricted movement of people and purchase of properties would help the Judeopolonia concept materialize in the 21st century.
The restitution campaign
Various publications pretend that Polish culpability in crimes on Jews before, during and after WWII is a fact. The public noticed in particular the intensity of defamatory attacks around the Jedwabne and Kielce crimes. Following the defamations, some extreme Jewish circles claimed a USD 65 billion restitution, and also demanded EUR 1 billion for government shares and bonds of “Holocaust victims”. The claimant’s attorney warned: “This is only the beginning for the Poles.” Details of the larger claim were not published. Presumably it concerns all pre-war Jewish properties located in present-day Poland.
An organ of the CFR approvingly cited the book by Jan Gross on alleged Polish WWII crime on Jews in Jedwabne: “the criminal reflexes of Polish society directed against Jews were not incidental occurrences.” A Polish-American researcher and author, Iwo Pogonowski replied: “In a previous article Murder Most Foul, Brumberg condemned the Polish nation and its traditions of tolerance and struggle for independence, by presenting the Poles as degenerates whose purpose was to torment Jews. The racist attitude towards the Poles is similar to that of the Nazis towards the Jews as being a congenitally criminal race.”
Pogonowski: “The purpose of publication now of such a contemptuous and slanderous attack on Poland indicates a determined support for the shakedown of Poland after Switzerland by the World Jewish Restitution Organization of the World Jewish Congress.” The WJRO collected huge sums from Germany and then obtained USD 1.25 billion from Swiss banks on the original claim of USD 32 million by the Volker Commission, a ransom paid under the threat of a boycott of all Swiss banks activity in New York.
Subsequently, Jewish organizations collected nearly half of the German Nazi slave labor compensation fund monies, to the dismay of hundreds of thousands of former non-Jewish slaves. Poland may be next in line: ”Prewar Jewish properties in Polish real estate will soon be worth many times more than they are worth now. The acquisition by the World Jewish Restitution Organization of this fabulous wealth will be possible when under the international pressure the Polish parliament or the president, by a presidential agreement, would authorize these international Jewish organizations to find and take over all pre-war Jewish properties in Poland. In support of these claims the Zionist lobby has already used threats by members of the US Congress.” The WJC called “anti-American” those Polish parliamentarians who wanted to limit the compensation.
On the occasion of honouring him by the Jedwabne city council on 15.1.2006, another Polish historian, Jerzy Robert Nowak said regarding the Jedwabne campaign: “Professor Norman Finkelstein [opinioned that…] Gross collected arguments in support of restitution claims by some extreme Jewish circles against Poland. The goal of Operation Jedwabne was to misrepresent Poland and Poles. From an actual, WWII victim that suffered the largest material destruction in Europe and a severe loss of life, the campaign’s instigators meant to re-paint us as a nation of butchers co-responsible for the Holocaust.” Nowak added: “Some German circles hostile to Poland were particularly interested in publicizing the Jedwabne case in the strongest possible anti-Polish spirit. Also in Russia, for example, the case was an occasion for virulent attacks on Poland and Poles.”
European Parliament resolution (15.6.2006) named Poland as harbouring “racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and homophobia” due to an assault on the chief rabbi of Poland Michael Schudrich, Catholic Radio Maryja’s comments, and an alleged call for violence against homosexuals. Regarding the alleged anti-Semitism, “there’s less and less” of it in Poland, said former president of the Union of Jewish Religious Communities, Jerzy Kichler. Asked about the attack on Schudrich, he – much as the rabbi himself – said that this did not mean a rise in anti-Semitism in Poland. The Polish parliament issued a counter-resolution: “cases of intolerance occurring in Poland are completely marginal. They meet with general criticism and a sharp reaction from Polish authorities, so one should not build general opinions applying to Polish society on their basis.”
An earlier comment by a Jewish activist in Poland, Marek Edelman, perceived as Nazi-like a Radio Maryja broadcast that accused Jews of “trying to force our government to pay extortion money disguised as compensation payments” for property lost in WWII. The radio commentator whom Edelman charged, said (29.3.2006) that Polish prime minister assured the director of the American Jewish Committee (16.3.2006) that Jewish property claims would be settled. References to “Judaic people” and “Holocaust Industry” were the alleged anti-Semitism. Edelman’s position echoed that of the European Jewish Congress who stated: “We call upon the Polish government to finally take a strong stance against Radio Maryja, by applying existing European laws and conventions against incitation to hate.”
The silence of the Polish government and official media on the restitution claims, was apparently replaced with allegations of “xenophobia and anti-Semitism”, lest a discourse on the restitutions, a vital issue to Polish taxpayer, would expose the Holocaust Industry.
Jedwabne-type campaigns prove that some powerful Jewish groups exploit the Shoah tragedy for political and financial gain. They also poison ethnic relations. Pogonowski: “the false accusations initiated by Gross and disseminated by Brumberg and the Council for Foreign Relations will create much bitter strife between Polish patriots on the one hand and the Jewish restitution movement and its supporters on the other […] rather than encourage people to unite and commemorate in dignity the injustices and crimes of the past.” The entertained compensation represents 15-20% of the total Polish national wealth. If WJRO administered the compensation fund, they would “become the strongest financial and political entity in Poland, capable of putting the country on the road of becoming a vassal state of Israel”. Then the turn would come for the other former Soviet satellites and republics as they recover economically and join the “international community”.
Zionist-German co-operation goes on?
Just as radical Zionists colluded with the Nazis in Shoah, the Holocaust of Jews during WWII, German and Jewish extremists might collaborate today, since their goals coincide. They would like their own nations’ crimes absolved, compensation for the crimes ducked, and their own claims based on falsified history submitted. This has already happened with Jewish defamation campaigns followed by multi-billion dollar claims to real estate in Poland, as I describe in the series. Some anti-Polish German circles publicized the Jewish spin on Jedwabne that preceded the Jewish claim.
Germans demand restitutions, too, for Germans who were re-settled from pre-WWII Eastern Germany to make room for Poles. The Poles, in turn, were re-settled from former Eastern Poland to make room for expansion of Soviet republics. German revisionists call their brethren “expelled” and press Poland to bear the costs, even though the “expelled” had up to two years to decide to move or stay in Poland, many were war criminals, and Poland had noting to do with the Allied-Soviet scheme of re-engineering post-war Europe. Germany signed an unconditional capitulation, losing all rights to the lands that the victors re-shuffled to their own designs.
Poland received a devastated, far smaller territory for Polish re-settlers than they had lived on in Eastern Poland before WWII. Just before Christmas 2006 and on the eve of German presidency of EU, after years of preparations with backing of the German government, the representatives of the “expelled” filed claims to properties left behind in Poland. To increase the restitution pressure, the revisionists have been spinning stories of hundreds of thousands if not millions of Germans killed in the “expulsion” process.
At the same time, drastic reductions of the number of victims of the German Nazi atrocities have been on-going. Radical Jews do not object, as long as the “certitudes” of 90% Jewish victims at Auschwitz-Birkenau, and six million in Shoah as a whole, remain. Since the 1980s system change in Poland, the number of Poles killed in Auschwitz has dwindled 16-fold (and the number of Jews four-fold). Often cited by the Polish media, an article claimed that only 75,000 Poles perished at Auschwitz. A German revisionist claims only a total of 0.5 million victims there.
Also the number of non-Jewish WWII victims, predominantly Serbs, of the Croat Ustashe death camp in Jasenovac have been severely reduced, while the number of Jewish victims stays unchanged at about 17,000. Do international neo-Nazis collaborate with the Holocaust Industry in this regard?
Germany owes Poland trillions of Euro for WWII loss of civilian life alone, assuming a million Euro per statistical life. Together with the Soviets, the Nazis decimated Polish intelligentsia, the “head and soul” of the nation. Material losses, injuries, pain, suffering and inhibition of national development during the Communist enslavement as a consequence of Hitler’s war should also be accounted for. Polish politics has failed to enforce any significant payment by Germany.
An indemnity is due from Jews, too, for both WWII and post-WWII damages to the Polish nation. Under an intellectual terror and threat of reprisals, Poles mustn’t mention the liability. After the fall of the USSR, Poles demand redress for Soviet crimes dating from the WWII and the post-war Communist rule. However, the efforts are politically weak and are being manipulated. The German campaign diverts Polish attention to claims against the Soviets. Soviet WWII occupation have plundered Eastern Poland, and exterminated, deported and harmed still unknown number of citizens of pre-WWII Poland, during WWII and a decade after. The Jew-dominated security apparatus of post-war Communist Poland imprisoned and tortured hundreds of thousands of Polish patriots and killed tens of thousands of them. Assuming a million Euro per statistical life, Jews owe Poles on the order of tens of billions of euros. An indemnity for helping impose Communism on the nation would be extra.
On the eve of Germany’s presidency of the EU, whistle-blowers at German-Foreign-Policy.com revealed a “large scale reordering of Europe”, an official German revisionist concept that “stands in the tradition of similar German attempts to base demands for leading power status in Europe”. The scheme sees the Germans as “settlers and bearers of culture outside the present German-speaking areas”. By eliminating national boundaries in EU, Germany can revert to the power of ethnic Germans. It is another potential for German-Jewish co-operation, as Zionist lobbying in Germany not even a century ago also emphasized that the Jews could be the carriers of culture for German civilization in Judeopolonia, a conceptual Jewish state under German protection. Return of Jews to their own EU “region” might be implemented on the basis of EU regionalism and economic centralism that undermine nation states, and bureaucratic centralism that overrides national parliaments.
If the Jewish and German restitution claims prove successful, small groups of the extremists may control a significant part of the Polish economy and public life. Meanwhile, their negative revisionist campaigns distort history to the uninformed, the younger generation in particular. Misleading of the international public opinion on Nazi crimes may threaten European security, as Germany, cleansed of its WWII sins, leads the EU and presses eastwards, economically and demographically.
A legacy of terror
Israel’s terror stems from a Talmudic contempt for non-Jews. Jews themselves lived under the terror of rabbis over a thousand years until mid-19th century, according to Israel Shahak, a Jewish defendant of the rights of Palestinians. The mechanism of this terror morphed into the Soviet terror, and Israel uses it. Extreme Jews engaged in the Communist mass violence since the Bolshevik revolution.
A Jewish professor of history cited statistical evidence of Jewish pre-eminence in decision making in Russia, US and Palestine. A bibliography of 25, mostly Jewish sources noted: “The [US] National Archives contain an almost overflowing abundance of State Department and Military Intelligence reports detailing Jewish control of the Bolshevik Revolution […] Scotland Yard and the British Foreign Office contain similar reports”. Under Lenin, Jews constituted 5.2%, 25.7% and up to 42.9% of the Communist party, central committee, and Politburo members, respectively, while only 1.77% of the population was Jewish.
To weaken nationalism, 19th century tsarist policies overpopulated Eastern Europe with Russian-speaking Jews. Conflicts with interests of host nations continued in Jewish-Soviet collaboration: “mainly in the towns, the Jews were named as the actual Soviet rulers, exploiting the people with indescribable brutality and delivering them to the NKVD […] the Jews especially worked for the Soviets, if not in responsible positions, then as agents or informants.” Because a very disproportionate number of the local Jews had sided with the Soviets in all of Eastern Europe, the Germans tried to take advantage of local anti-Communist, anti-Soviet and anti-Jewish feelings, and disguised the WWII genocide of Jews as an anti-Bolshevik crusade.
Winston Churchill publicized the role of “international and for the most part atheistical Jews” in the creation of Bolshevism and in the Russian Revolution. The crimes perpetrated by Jewish Communists, Churchill noted, instilled in Germans and Russians a desire for retribution. In the Bolshevik institutions, “the prominent, if not indeed, the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews […] The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been present in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people […] The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with villainies which are now being perpetrated.”
Western history has ignored the systematic destruction of Russia’s, and later Eastern Europe’s Christians by the Bolshevik terror. In 1918–1938, the number of churches that remained open in the USSR dwindled from 54,000 to under 500. Some 600 bishops, 40,000 priests, 120,000 monks and nuns, and millions of lay people were slain in the five decades after 1918.
Jews occupied key positions in the Bolshevik regime that created the Gulag system. Alexander Solzhenitsyn was branded an anti-Semite and liar when he wrote about the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and in subsequent Soviet purges. Yeltsin’s special assistant with unprecedented access to Soviet archives quoted Lenin that Jews made the best revolutionaries. Bolsheviks hated Christians, especially the “bourgeois enemies of the state”: tsarist army officers, aristocrats, peasant farmers and intelligentsia. The top Communist Jewish official Zinoviev stated: “we will kill our enemies in scores of hundreds […] For the blood of Lenin and Uritzky, Zinoviev and Volodarsky, let there be floods of the blood of the bourgeoisie—more blood! As much as possible!”
Jewish extremists call the critical Gentile “anti-Semite”, and the critical Jew “self-hating”. In 1942-1944, the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League engineered indictments on charges of anti-Semitism and sedition against 29 anti-Communists labelled “fascists and Nazis”. Judge Laws dismissed the case, “a travesty of justice”, because holding those people on trial without a single piece of evidence was criminal. The Communist press had been gloating that the “sedition trial” was part of the “Moscow Purge trials” then in session all over Europe.
Jewish Communism in Poland
A disproportionate number of Polish Communists were Jews: “In 1930, at its peak, 35% of the members of the party were Jewish. In Communist youth organizations, Jewish membership was even higher, while Communists of Jewish origin occupied most of the seats on the central committee […] Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years immediately after WWII, when the party leadership was totally in the hands of the pre-war Communist leadership that abhorred anti-Semitism.” Jewish Communists in Poland contributed to the sufferings of Poles and Jews alike; how much, is still unclear because Communist Jews pretended Polish ethnicity, long before the Soviets set up the post-WWII terror apparatus.
Attempts to discount the Jewish Communism cite estimates of only up to 10% of 1918-era Jews being Bolsheviks in Poland, but it was many times over the Polish participation. Jewish overall membership reached over 50%, and high-medium level functionaries 70%, influencing many supporters. The Jewish popular vote for Communism was fourfold that of the Jewish share of Poland’s pre-war population. Also, large number of Jews attacked Poles during the 1920 Polish-Bolshevik War and then during the 1939 Soviet conquest of Eastern Poland.
Some of the 300,000 surviving Jews, who returned to Poland since the end of WWII together with 175,000 Soviet Jews, created a Polish Communist puppet government, and its state security arm, the UB. A Jewish researcher wrote: “In 1945 many Poles felt (and not without reason) that Jews ran the Office of State Security […] the chief of the Office was [Jakub] Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department heads were Jews.” 75% of the UB officers in Silesia were Jews.
After Germany attacked the Soviet Union in 1941, Berman escaped from Soviet-occupied Eastern Poland to the USSR. There, he trained activists who would form a new party for Polish Communists. Since 1944, Berman became Stalin’s right hand in Poland, and between 1948 and 1956 was responsible for the UB, propaganda and ideology. He was directly responsible for terror and repressions of half a million members of WWII and post-WWII Polish underground and the Catholic clergy.
On Stalin’s orders, Berman assigned duties to various directors in the ministry, each of whom was a Jew. Berman’s apparatus killed tens of thousands of Poles in prisons. Most of the victims had previously fought the Nazis. The Communists knew that these people would oppose Soviet rule. Communist Jews were tasked with the liquidations because they had no loyalty to Poland and Stalin did not trust Poles. Berman said in late 1980s: “I was against too large a concentration of Jews in certain institutions; it wasn’t the right thing to do and it was a necessary evil that we’d been forced into when we took power”. Another Jew from the former regime, Roman Werfel said: “there were too many Jews in the security services, because we hadn’t considered the security services in that light.”
Piotr Wandycz of Yale University observed: “The average Pole could not but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the country – Berman and Minc – were both Jewish as was the dreaded security official Różański.” A Jewish author explained the much propagandized “post-WWII Polish anti-Semitism”: “Ideological anti-Semitism was much more of a force in Poland during the twentieth century, and Jews were prominent in the ruling Communist elite during the early phases of post-World War II Poland”. The Jewish influence was abnormal, given that Jews constituted about 1% of post-WWII Poland’s population, but is similar in present-day USA with its Israel Lobby.
While the perpetrators of crimes against the Jews have been called to repent and pay multi-billion dollar compensations, neither the leaders of Israel nor those of the Jewish diaspora have ever officially deplored Jewish Communist terror.
Zionist terror in Iraq
When Israel needed immigrants after WWII, extreme Zionists staged pogroms of Jews in USSR satellites (f.ex. the Kielce “pogrom”, and in the Middle East, where “the Haganah and Mossad eliminated Jews”. In early 1950s Iraq, to portray the Iraqis as anti-US and to terrorize the Jews, the Zionists planted bombs and urged Jews to flee to Israel. Naeim Giladi, a former Iraqi Jew in the Zionist underground provided proofs in his book and also quoted from a 1980 book by former CIA officer:
“Although the Iraqi police later provided our embassy with evidence to show that the synagogue and library bombings, as well as the anti-Jewish and anti-American leaflet campaigns, had been the work of an underground Zionist organization, most of the world believed reports that Arab terrorism had motivated the flight of the Iraqi Jews whom the Zionists had “rescued” really just in order to increase Israel’s Jewish population.”
Unable to publish his book in Israel, Giladi did it in the US with his own funds, to describe “what the first prime minister of Israel called “cruel Zionism””, “that Jews from Islamic lands did not emigrate willingly to Israel; that, to force them to leave, Jews killed Jews; and that, to buy time to confiscate ever more Arab lands, Jews on numerous occasions rejected genuine peace initiatives from their Arab neighbors.”
Giladi contradicts Edwin Black who in his book Banking on Baghdad made the case for a transfer of wealth to the world Jewry. Black admits post-WWII Iraq had adopted a “Nazified ideology”. Iraqis started persecuting the Jews because of outrage over the new Jewish state: “approximately 120,000 desperate Jews were airlifted from Iraq to Israel […] The speed and heartlessness of the exodus was part of a calculated Iraqi government plan to flood the fledgling Israeli state with destitute Jews. The idea was to crack Israel’s already strained infrastructure.”
To address compensation claims by Jews and other minorities after Saddam Hussein was toppled, Iraq’s Governing Council created the Iraqi Property Claims Commission. Black: “Whether or not giant sums are won in any court of law or claims tribunal, no sum of dollars or dinars can make amends for the traumatic expulsion of Iraqi Jewry from a cradle of civilization that they helped nurture.” Black wrote that “attorneys, Jewish organizations and individual claimants” were preparing “to launch a massive claim against Iraqi assets held in Washington.”
The litigations seem cynical in light of Giladi’s words in “The Jews of Iraq”: “The terrible truth is that the grenades that killed and maimed Iraqi Jews and damaged their property were thrown by Zionist Jews.”
Both the 1950s anti-Jewish terror in Iraq and the “pogroms” in post-WWII Europe served to increase emigration to Palestine. The difference is that Soviet multi-purpose policies were behind the “pogroms”, while in Iraq the radical Zionists organized and carried out the violence. The Jewish émigrés from the USSR to Palestine were the chief victims at Kielce, while the local Jewish Communist aparatchiks and members of the secret service came out unharmed, even though they were housed in the same building that the émigrés stayed in and were attacked. This might indicate collusion of Jewish Communists in the Soviet crime.
Notably, both crimes against Jews were exploited decades later to lodge restitution claims against Iraqis and Poles. A stamp of the Holocaust Industry is evident from demonizations of the alleged villains as Nazi-like in both cases, imposing automatically and unquestionably the villain-victim relation.
On February 27, 2007, twenty leaders of Jewish restitution groups will convene in Warsaw, to advance their US$ 65 billion claim against Poland. Israel Singer, the general secretary of the World Jewish Congress, will be there. Jerzy Robert Nowak, a Polish professor of history, writes today in one of the independent papers that Singer‘s participation is an “extraordinary scandal” absent in most of the media. Singer stated on 19.4.1996 that if Poland does not satisfy Jewish claims, it will be “publicly attacked and humiliated”. A Polish publicist, Stanislaw Michalkiewicz called Singer’s threat a “declaration of war against Poland”.
Even a Jewish publicist in Poland Antoni Marianowicz has objected to Singer’s demands in 23.4.1996 entry in his book: “This is simply preposterous; we in Poland have to recon with the law and wait for suitable laws, and they demand everything right away. Often they are those who lived comfortably in the US, while their families were perishing here in the Holocaust. It’s hard to imagine a more effective incitement of anti-Semitism.”
In a recent interview in a Polish main paper, Singer said: “Nobody who lost their house wants to get a piece of roof, a couple of windows and doors, but the whole house!”. The Poles are justifiably furious, for example, Nowak: “as if the Nazi occupant has not methodically destroyed Poland […] Jews have received from Germany more than US$ 100 billion in compensations […] the Poles were awarded only meagre handfulls of Deutschmarks for slave labourers”. Nowak pointed out that in the first years after WWII, Jews could recover posessions in Poland fast, owing to sympathy of Jew-dominated authorities, but th Jews usually sold the properties and left Poland. A few hundred thousand Jews mainly from the USSR immediately received apartments free of charge at the same time.
The US government has intervened on behalf of world Jewry’s restitutions. Stuart Eizenstat, former special representative of US president and secretary of state for Holocaust-era issues, outlines how the US Jewish community achieved it: “The Jewish community, considering its small size – only two to three percent of the population depending on who one defines as a Jew – has a remarkable impact on issues relevant to it in the American political system. Various interest groups influence the latter by accessing the Congress, the executive branch, and state and local governments on subjects important to their constituency.” 1967 Six-Day War marked the coming of age of the Jewish community. Since then, “the entire organized Jewish community has been Zionistic.”
Eizenstat’s involvement in the restitution process in Eastern Europe started in 1995 when he was the US ambassador in Europe, and became US special envoy for that purpose: “At that time, Edgar Bronfman, Israel Singer, the WJC and the World Jewish Restitution Organization (WJRO) had already been trying to obtain Eastern European property restitution […] They had the critically important wisdom and knowledge to use the media and political system […] The WJC and the WJRO knew that only American intervention in the former communist countries could lead to achievements. Bronfman had already obtained Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin’s support.” Later prime ministers Netanyahu and Barak didn’t give as much support to Eizenstat, presumably out of concern for “bi-lateral relationship with the new post-communist countries. Perhaps in their hearts they also wanted their Jewish communities to come to Israel rather than spend their lives in Eastern Europe.”
Singer indicated in 2003 that Jewish restitutionism is also retributionism: “Yitzhak Shamir, who has a great distaste for Poland, told me he would support the WJC claims against eastern European countries.” Singer recognized the strategic issues for the restitutionists to tackle: “The eastern European property restitution issue from which the restitution process of the 1990s started has remained a big failure […] First, these are poor countries. Second, they are used to being victims. Third, restitution would require them to admit all the other wrongs they inflicted on the Jews during and after the Holocaust. Their governments try to deal with the local Jewish communities which – except for Hungary – are extremely small and powerless and thus easier partners than the international Jewish organizations.”
So far the restitutionists disregarded the poverty of the target nation, Poland. Clinging to “victimhood” by Poles was solved with lies by “history professor” Gross on Jedwabne crime and Kielce “pogrom”. Pliable “Polish” statesmen admitted Polish guilt for both crimes committed by others, including Communist Jews in the case of Kielce.
In the beginning, writes Eizenstat, restitution efforts focused on “communal assets such as synagogues and other buildings”. The process in Poland “will eventually lead to the return of thousands of pieces of communal property” but has been slowed by “a lengthy dispute we helped mediate – between the small Polish Jewish community and the WJRO – which questioned the local community’s capacity to manage the restituted property. The international and local Jewish community will share control.”
Marianowicz above indicated the local Jews’ outrage with the claim. According to Eizenstat, WJRO also demanded at least some control over the restituted properties. While this should be an internal Jewish matter, WJRO’s move means control over a sizeable part of Polish real estate by one institution that has proven extremely hostile to Poles, like the rest of the Jewish restitution movement. Also, the Jewish restitution organizations have been accused of keeping the awards for themselves, rather than distributing them to the needy and eligible Jews.
Some ineligible Jews “had falsified their papers”. Germany paid about USD 50 billion, and until 1965 also gave to the Conference a billion dollars in present value, but the victims received only 15%: “The large chunk of the rest of it, according to Ronald Zweig, an expert on the subject, went to Jewish communities in the Arab world, such as Iraq, and institutions such as Yad Vashem in Israel.” The Conference didn’t pay the survivors: “They said there weren’t any victims anymore […] now they claim all these needy Holocaust victims have languished in poverty all these years, because the Germans gave them no money.” Some unjustly treated Shoah survivors said they “trust the German government more than they do the Jewish organizations”.
Israeli banks deny payments from accounts of Shoah victims, too. In January 2005, a Knesset committee slammed Israeli banks for “severe negligence” in handling some 9,000 accounts totaling NIS 1 billion and locating the heirs. In the first years of WWII, the banks managed to ride out mass withdrawals thanks to the funds deposited by thousands of European Jews. Some of the banks misappropriated the funds and destroyed documents. A bill proposed that a government corporation would handle the restitution of bank accounts, real estate, stocks and other assets. Money without heirs would go to humanitarian causes.
Nowak’s worst predictions come true. In 1999, he warned about an “anti-Polish alliance” of Polonophobic Jewish, German and Russian groups: “The most threatening to us may prove an alliance of very influential Jewish and German factions.” Nowak wrote today, alluding to German restitution claims filed around Christmas 2006 against Poland: “We see a clear synchronization of Jewish and German claims. Both are based on a common lie that seeks to paint WWII Poles as executioners, instead of the factual victims we have been. Some influential Ukrainian groups suddenly added their indemnity claims for Operation Wisla, which was predictable when some time ago miscellaneous Polish “apologizers” showed up.”
In Operation Wisla (1.5.1947 – 16.8.1947) that aimed at fragmentation of a minority religion, the new Communist government of Poland transported some 140,000 pre-war Polish citizens of Orthodox Christian faith, from the eastern part of the new state to former Eastern Germany. They were mainly Ukrainians and followed millions of Poles re-settled from former Eastern Poland, which the victorius Allies gave to Stalin “in exchange” for the Eastern German lands. It is unclear why Ukraine would advance claims on behalf of Ukrainians in Poland.
School curricula in the West ignore that: (1) Jews constitute only a few percent of the victims of 20th century genocide; (2) during WWII more civilian Slavs perished than Jews; (3) extreme Jews were war instigators and executioners of terror and mass violence in the Communist countries since the Bolshevik revolution; and, (4) persecution of Palestinians amounts to genocide (or apartheid, as labelled recently in the former president Carter’s book).
The process of textbook manipulation reached Poland, long after the nation had been demonized before Western opinion as Nazi co-villains, while Poles had suffered under Communism that Jews significantly helped the Soviets impose. Now Israeli and Polish Jews dictate what Polish youth should learn. A textbook commission comprised Jews from Israel, and, on the Polish side, Jews from Poland – an exceptional anomaly among more than 40 bilateral commissions of Poland with other countries. On the “Polish” side was a Polonophobic subject to an interpeilation (6.5.1992) that had resulted in a removal of his book from the education ministry’s curriculum list; he had written, for example, that only after the Soviets entered Poland (17.9.1939), “proletarian youth has acquired previously unknown chances of social advancement”.
The critic scoffs, “[Gulag’s] ice-cold abysses are full of bones of those young Poles who in 1939 have gained the Soviet chances”, and criticizes the commission’s abuse of “anti-Semitism” and “pogroms” as factually: “racial hatred […] hasn’t existed in [pre-WWII] multi-national Poland. Polish-Jewish conflicts have been political, economic or religious, not racist, and devoid of “superior nation” or “chosen people” theories; extremists have targeted the Jews for political and economic reasons. It’s the Jews who become racists by transfer of the religious notion of the “chosen nation” to politics.”
Pogroms denote organized, racist-motivated murders, which have never occurred in Poland: “Multi-national mob has caused the bloody, ruffianly events in 1918 Lvov that Polish military and workers suppressed; the bloody massacre in 1919 Pinsk has resulted from an attack by a Communist, entirely Jewish unit on a Polish military unit; the 1936 Przytyk riots have began when a young Jew shot a Polish peasant; etc.”
While the commission used “anti-Semitism” and “pogroms” abundantly, it had nothing even on Jewish anti-Polish activities since the beginning of the 20th century, nor on the causes of the “anti-Semitism”. Two years of “Polish martyrdom under Soviet occupation with major participation by the Jews somehow escapes the commission […] it’s a plain falsification of history”. The commission stressed antagonistic Polish attitudes to Jews hiding on the “Aryan side” but was silent about Zagiew who “have penetrated Jewish underground and have exposed its ties to Polish underground. Zagiew members have also operated outside the ghetto; the headquarters [in Warsaw] have housed 300 of them. From there they “hava gone to work”, i.e. pretending persecution, asking Poles to help, only to betray the helpers to Gestapo […] the files of the domestic branch of the government-in-exile contain a list of over 1200 names of Jewish colaborators. In this situation, what has the attitude of Poles to fugitive Jews been expected to be?”
The commission falsified both the roots and the aftermath of pogroms, by stating that post-WWII emigration of “the remaining Jews” was driven by the pogroms. If so, Szcześniak wondered, where have the Jewish Communists come from, and whom have the 1967-1969 “anit-Semitism” and “anti-Zionism” have targeted: “A statement about “waves of pogroms” in Poland is a rude lie by the same kind of people who have falsified Polish history, and who, beside supporting the Soviet physical terror, have also organized moral terror against Polish freedom activists, and Operation Czulent together with [Soviet secret agency] Smersh to “cleanse the country of the Home Army members”.”
The commission accomodated wishes of the Israeli side on what the Polish youth should learn. It recommended ministry subsidies to publications and academic theses, and listed 40 items of literature, all on the Jewish theme. “Teaching Polish literature in Israeli schools”, however, recommended 11 items, ten of which were on the Jewish theme and one was by an author of Jewish background: “a falsified representation of the history of both nations is preferred, with a distnct bias against Poland and Poles, who should feel guilty of all evil that befell Jews on Polish lands and elsewhere, and should repent and apologize, and …remain passive in the face of humiliations and plunder of their national assets. Israeli youth is taught bestial hatred toward Poland and Poles, but not toward the real perpetrators of the tragedies of the Jewish nation, the Germans. The latter, having paid sufficiently, are now beyond any propaganda attacks. Only the “Nazis and Poles” are left.”
Anti-Polonism and anti-Semitism
Mass education is also movies. Like Claude Lantzmann’s Shoah and Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List, Marian Marzyński’s Shtetl impresses that Poles willingly co-operated with the Nazis. How fraudulent the movie is, suffice to point out that Shtetl smears the local parish, but the Nazis have killed its wartime priest, Henryk Opiatowski for assistance to Jews.
Shtetl features Israeli students claiming, sometimes gleefully, alleged Polish involvement in Shoah. They mock Polish rescue efforts, oblivious to the fact that Poles also have fought for survival in a progressing genocide of mass murder, hunger and pauperization, and that Poles have faced death penalty for the assistance. Shtetl demonstrates the encouragement of ethnic hatred by Jews: “if the purpose of teaching about the Holocaust is to never forget how ethnic hatred can be nurtured to the point of destroying a people (and it should be), then Holocaust teaching will fail if along the way it teaches young Jewish people to hate Polish Gentiles”.
The same intellectual asks in the context of another case of Jewish Polonophobia: “Is hatred for a person simply because of his ethnicity more acceptable today, as long as the object of the hatred is a Pole rather than a Jew? And once it is decided that it is important to instill hatred against members of a given ethnic group, can there be any limit to the perpetration of lies, myths, and mischaracterizations to drive the hatred home?” There are no rules to go by and no laws to prosecute those responsible for anti-Polonisms. A working definition gives examples of anti-Semitism:
“b. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or about the power of Jews as a collective – including, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a global Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions
c. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoings committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews
d. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters during World War II (Holocaust denial)
e. Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust”.
The examples could be adapted to the anti-Polonisms as follows:
– Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Poles as such, in particular about in-bred Polish anti-Semitism, willingly aiding the Nazis, and performing pogroms.
– Accusing Poles as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoings committed by a single Polish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Poles, such as pogroms between WWI and WWII, the Jedwabne massacre perpetrated by the German Nazis and the Kielce pogrom staged by the Soviets.
– Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms or intentionality of the genocide of the Polish people at the hands of German Nazis and the Soviets and supporters, before, during and after WWII (Polish Golgotha denial).
– Accusing the Poles as a people, or Poland as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the genocide by Communist Jews on numerous nations of Eastern Europe since the Bolshevik revolution.
Critics of neoconservatism, radical Zionism, Communism, or earlier movements dominated by extreme Jews, are labeled “anti-Semite”. The label instills fear of the largely non-Semitic (Ashkenazim), extreme Jews who have devised anti-Semitism as an Orwellian “thought control” for their unscrupulous aims; the extreme Jews are anti-Semitic themselves, as their victims include the Jewish masses. As soon as they are exposed, they present themselves as victims of hatred and racial discrimination. Knesset member Eliezer Cohen proposed a bill (6.7.2004) on the establishment of an international court in Israel to prosecute anti-Semitism. The Israeli court would have jurisdiction over foreign individuals, organizations, firms and media. It could impose financial penalties and sentence to prison, and, for a murder of a Jew, to death. At the April 2004, conference sponsored by the OSCE and the German government on anti-Semitism, 55 European and North American nations agreed that “anti-Semitism” comprises the criticism of Israel.
On 16.10.2004, president Bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2004. The Anti-Defamation League welcomed it: “The targeted violence of the last two years has underscored the need for greater monitoring and highlighted the serious information deficit when it comes to anti-Semitism.” The Act lists six incidents: Malaysia prime minister said (16.10.2003) that Jews “rule the world by proxy” and that 1.3 billion Muslims “cannot be defeated by a few million Jews”; in Istanbul (15.11.2003), car bomb explosions outside two synagogues killed 24 people and wounded more than 250; in Tasmania (5.1.2004), burning out anti-Semitic slogans into the lawns of the parliament building; in St. Petersburg (15.2.2004), approximately 50 Jewish gravestones desecrated; in Toronto (19 – 21.3.2004), swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans painted in Jewish, neighborhood; in Toulon (23.3.2004), a Jewish synagogue and community centre set on fire.
Violence, hatred and prejudice against any group are deplorable, but the Act treats Jews like supremacists, a fact the US state department has opposed “because it felt it would be seen as giving preferential treatment to Jews over other religious or ethnic groups”, according to AFP. Were public hearings held, perhaps the legislators would find out that many anti-Semitic incidents were hoaxes, often perpetrated by Jews to create an atmosphere of victimhood in which they can claim special favors. A French woman claimed (9.7.2004) that six youths attacked her after mistaking her for being a Jewess. She later admitted to “having made knife cut marks on herself, cut off a lock of her own hair and drawn swastikas on her body”. Closed-circuit cameras at the station where she said the attackers had left the train did not show the six. Psychology professor Kerri Dunn also claimed she was targeted, but ended up charged with vandalizing her car with racist and anti-Jewish graffiti and reporting to the police and her insurance company that the “haters” had damaged and looted the vehicle.
The Act states: “Anti-Semitism has at times taken the form of vilification of Zionism, the Jewish national movement, and incitement against Israel.” Given the evidence of radical Zionist and Israeli involvement in US global policy and genocide in the Middle East, the provision is also supremacist. Even the alleged worst enemies of Israel and Zionism, such as Iranian and Malayasian statesmen, do not deny the right of Jews to have a state.
A philanthropist billionaire George Soros assists globalization and NWO “while promoting his own financial gain” in a “clandestine, contradictory and coactive” way, but admitting he is “a capitalist who functions with absolute amorality.” He has founded and funded the Open Society Institute (OSI). Soros is partly responsible for the destruction of the Soviet bloc countries, and belongs to the most profitable currency traders in the world, attracting allegations that highly placed individuals assist his financial endeavors. “Soros is best known (and feared) for currency speculation” and he took part in “a highly profitable attack” on Malaysia’s currency. He has been blamed for the destruction of the Thai economy, and for making a billion dollars on speculation on the British pound.
Soros-philanthropist deceives the masses, using NGOs like Human Rights Watch (HRW) as opinon setters who re-assert media spin. Such manipulations make even the killings by the US- and Mossad-trained death squads look like “national liberation” and “spreading democracy”. HRW contributed to the hysteria needed in the Balkans by the US and NATO. HRW sanctified the journalistic falsehoods on “genocide” and mass rapes that “justified” the NATO attack on Bosnia in 1993. For the US-NATO attack on Yugoslavia, HRW contributed to spin on “Milošević’s” atrocities in Kosovo, contrary to HRW declarations on the rule of law. After 78 days and nights of bombing, HRW stated that only about 500 civilians perished , compared to over 2,000 actually killed in the air raids.
Soros was a major supporter of the B-92 radio station in Belgrade, and funded the Otpor movement that toppled Milošević in the October 2000 coup. His HRW fifth column also helped legitimize the capture and show trial of Milošević before a UN-NATO kangaroo tribunal in Hague. Louise Arbour, a prosecutor at that tribunal joined the board of Soros’ International Crisis Group. A “nightmare for Serb nationalists”, Nataša Kandić, a “leading rights activist” on a “quest for justice”, organized the airing of a video that “proves” Serbs were responsible for “genocide” in Srebrenica. Kandić worked for an OSI-sponsored NGO. She supported NATO bombing, and when NATO needed to have Milošević extradited, she was implicated in the hoax about a refrigeration truck with dead Kosovo Albanians.
Milošević’s death (11.3.2006) further incriminated the kangaroo tribunal when the case turned bad for the prosecution. He had no suicide motive and the remaining evidence implicated NATO country leaders. Milošević’s knowledge of their war crimes became a threat and the best solution was for the media to find the assassinated victim guilty in absentia. Two French medical experts charged the tribunal’s doctors of “a medically assisted judicial assassination”.
Arriving under German presidency, a proposal for an EU directive would outlaw denial of mass crimes. Hinting German stakes, the draft refers to crimes of the last 20 years, including war crimes and alleged genocides in Yugoslavia and in Rwanda, and extends the idea of Holocaust denial to “gross minimisation of genocide out of racist and xenophobic motives”. The crime of abusing the term and interventionist demonization based on it are not mentioned. Anti-war lawyer Christopher Black likened the Rwanda and Yugoslavia tribunals:
The leaders of the former [Hutu] regime are labelled as war criminals so that they can justify Tutsi dictatorial rule and to cover up the real role of the United States, Britain, Belgium and Uganda […] the events in Rwanda make Yugoslavia look like small potatoes ([…] possibly millions of dead and control of a whole continent).
In September 2000, under Kouchner’s UN administration of Kosovo, Soros attempted to buy Balkans’ most profitable mines at Trepca. Kouchner who cheered when the NATO bombed Yugoslavia with depleted uranium and released over 100,000 tons of carcinogens, had Trepca closed for “health reasons”. Soros invested US$150 million to control Trepca US$5 billion property. Soros was aided by a report from the International Crisis Group (ICG), a think-tank he maintains for US policy in the Balkans. “Investors” practiced similar robbery during “privatization” of Polish national assets worth tens of billions of dollars, an idea of the IMF, which was implemented by Soros’ right hand, Jeffrey Sachs. Executive Intelligence Review wrote in 1997 that Soros masterminded the reforms that enslaved Poles and drove them into poverty unheard of even under socialism.
When after 9/11, the Council on Foreign Relations sought justification for the “war on terror”, Soros strategized: “Have senior-level U.S. officials press friendly Arab and other Muslim governments not only to publicly condemn the 9/11 attacks, but also to back the rationale and goals of the U.S. anti-terror campaign. We are never going to convince the publics in the Middle East and South Asia of the righteousness of our cause if their governments remain silent. We need to help them to deflect any blow-back from such statements”. The purpose of appeasing Muslims in the Balkans became clear: “Encourage Bosnian, Albanian, and Turkish Muslims to educate foreign audiences regarding the U.S. role in saving the Muslims of Bosnia and Kosovo in 1995-99, and our long-standing, close ties to Muslims around the world.” Were the US-NATO campaigns in Bosnia and Kosovo on behalf of Muslims planned with 9/11 in mind?
 A professional engineer, Piotr Bein became an independent researcher since the 1999 NATO attack on Yugoslavia. He wrote a political travelogue To Serbia via Poland and, in Polish, NATO na Balkanach, an analysis of propaganda around the recent Balkan conflicts. He contributed research papers to the ICGR project (see the next note) on Serbian and Polish-Jewish issues. His blogs: Grypa666 (Polish) and PiotrBein (English and Polish).
 Judeocentrics and Mass Crimes; Mass Deception on Mass Violence: The Case of Serbs; (with Stefan Pągowski) Revisionism, Role Reversal and Restitutions – The Polish-Jewish Case; Dirty Uranium Weapons Cover-ups in:Christian Scherrer (ed.) Iraq: Silent Death, 2011, Penerbilt U. Sans Malaysia: Pulau Pinano, ISBN 978-983-861-504-4
 Moshe Shonfeld, TheHolocaustVictims Accuse, Neturei Karta: New York, 1977.
 Translated back to English from excerpts in Polish in: Wir, nr 2, 2004, ISSN 1710-6419.
 See sections Captive history and Anti-Polonisms.
 Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, 1983; 51 Documents, 2002.
 Stefan Korboński, Poles and Jews in World War II, Hippocrene Books: New York, 1989.
 Christian Scherrer, US-UK Engineered Genocide by Sanctions against Iraq 1990–2003 and Its Ongoing Legacy, in: Scherrer (ed.) Iraq: Genocide by Sanctions, 2011, Penerbilt U. Sans Malaysia: Pulau Pinano, ISBN 978-983-861-503-7.
 Joe Sobran, The Buchanan frenzy, in: Sobran’s, No. 3, 1996.
 Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Praeger, 1998.
 Kevin MacDonald, Separation and its Discontents, Praeger, 1998.
 Theodore Herzl, Diary, Part I, p 16.
 American Hebrew, 31.10.1919.
 Emphasis added. Stanley Hornbeck, review of The Culture of Critique, in: American Renaissance, June 1999, No. 54,
 Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century, Princeton University Press, 2004.
 See section Crypto-Zionist.
 Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski, Jews in Poland, Hippocrene Books, 1997, p 19.
 Andrzej Leszek Szcześniak, Judeopolonia, in: Encyklopedia Białych Plam, Polskie Wydawnictwo Encyklopedyczne: Radom.
 Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, Between Nazis and Soviets, Lexington Books, 2004, p 51-55, 63, 64.
 Ibid, 56, 339-340.
 US government reports by Henry Morgenthau (3.10.1919) and by Edgar Jadwin and Homer H. Johnson (31.10.1919); British government reports by Sir Stuart Samuel, (2.6.1920) – look under Fundamental Docs.
 Henry Morgenthau, All in a Life-Time, Doubleday, 1922, p 415.
 Aleksander Gella, Developement of Class Structure in Eastern Europe, U. of New York Press, 1989, p 21-22.
 Reports by Morgenthau, Jadwin and Johnson, and Samuel, op. cit.
 See section Zionist-German co-operation goes on?
 “Stalin’s Willing Executioners”? op. cit.
 See section A legacy of terror.
 Jakub Berman, speech to the Jewish Committee, 1946, in: Stanisław Żochowski O Narodowych Siłach Zbrojnych NSZ, Retro: Lublin 1994.
 Samuel Loeb Shneiderman, Between Fear and Hope, New York, 1946, cited in: Jews in Poland, op. cit., p 411.
 Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, After The Holocaust, Columbia University Press and East European Monographs, 2003.
 Michael Chęciński, Poland, Communism, Nationalism, Anti-Semitism, Karz-Cohl: New York, 1982, p 64.
 Yuri Slezkin, The Jewish Century, Princeton University Press, 2004.
 Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, Random House, 1976.
 Chaim Bermant, in: Jewish Chronicle, 30.8.1991.
 See section A legacy of terror.
 Zvi Gitelman, A Century of Ambivalence, Chapter 1: Creativity versus Repression, Indiana University Press and YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, 2001.
 Jonathan Frankel, Prophecy and Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1984; Jonathan Shapiro, The Formative Years of the Israeli Labour Party.
 Izvestia, 27.7.1918.
 Stalin, Collected Works, Vol. 13, p 30. Stalin, Collected Works, Vol. 13, p 30.
 Gitelman, op. cit., p. 147.
 Soviet Union, op. cit.
 “Stalin’s Willing Executioners”? op. cit.
 Quoted in: Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Praeger, 1998.
 Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, Pluto Press, 1994.
 See section A legacy of terror.
 Shahak, op. cit.
 The Power of Israel in the United States, op. cit.
 See section Wars of ideas.
 See section Zionistcollusion in the Shoah.
 The Israel Lobby, op. cit.
 Hugon Hajducki, Judaizm przeciwko Mojżeszowi, in: Zawsze Wierni, Nr 6 (97), 2007.
 The pastor of the Frankist converts, Fr. Gaudenty Pikulski has assembled the complaints in Złość Żydowska, 1760.
 Edward Gigilewicz, Frankiści in: Encyklopedia Białych Plam, 2000-2006, PWE: Radom.
 Hajducki, op. cit.
 Bjerknes, op. cit. p. 421‑425, 430.
 Bjerknes, op. cit. p. 425‑427; Commentary January 1971; Encyclopaedia Judaica NY: Macmillan 1971 Vol. 7 Col. 55‑71.
 Lenni Brenner, 51 Documents, Barricade, 2002; Mark Weber, Zionism And The Third Reich, 2003; http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/nazisupport.cfm
 Cited in: Weber, op. cit.
 See section Wars of ideas.
 Chicago Daily Tribune, 27.6.1880.
 G.E. Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Media, 2002, p. 217‑234.
 See section A legacy of terror.
 Des Griffin, Descent Into Slavery.
 Myron Fagan, The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations.
 E.g. Shahak, op. cit.
 Interview with John Mearsheimer, ibid.
 Scherrer, op. cit.
 Piotr Bein, Uranium Weapons Cover-ups in Our Midst, World Uranium Weapons Conference, Hamburg, October 16-19.10.2003; Piotr Bein and Kaeren Parker, UraniumWeapons Cover-ups – a Crime against Humankind, January 2003, in: monograph Politics and Environmental Policy in the 21st Century, Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade.
 European Committee on Radiation Risk, ECRR 2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk: Health Effects of Ionising Radiation Exposure at Low Doses for Radiation Protection Purposes. Regulators’ Edition, Green Audit: Aberyswyth, 2003.
 Leon Trotsky, quoted in: Młoda Gwardia, nr 6, 1991, p 55.
 Kevin MacDonald, Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement; Kevin MacDonald, Understanding Jewish Influence, Washington Summit Publishers, 2004. Essays published in Occidental Quarterly, 3(2) Summer 2003, 3(3) Fall 2003, and 4(2) Summer 2004, with the Introduction by Samuel Francis.
 Charles Carlson, Transforming Christ Followers into Christian Zionists, 5.2.2007. On Scofield, see: Joseph Canfield, Incredible Scofield and His Book.
 Shadia Drury, Leo Strauss and the American Right, Griffin, 1999.
 http://en.wikipedia.org, http://www.global-elite.org/elitewiki, www.reseauvoltaire.net, http://rightweb.irc-online.org. Wikipedia promotes the Judeocentric version of the Jedwabne and Kielce crimes, blaming Poles. It paints Poles as anti-Semitic villains, from bloodthirsty pogroms throughout Jewish existence on Polish lands, through WWII willing executions of German Nazi Endlösung, to an alleged, post-WWII “mini-Holocaust” in Communist Poland.
 The Power of Israel in the United States, op. cit.
 See section Anti-Polonism and anti-Semitism.
 See section Terror forever.
 See three sections: Philosophers, Against the Serbs and “French” philosophers.
 Norman Finkelstein, TheHolocaust Industry, Verso, 2003.
 Irving Horowitz and Richard Rubenstein, respectively, in: Isidor Wallimann and Michael Dobkowski (eds), Genocide and the Modern Age, Greenwood Press: New York, 1987, p 70, 283.
 Hannu Rautkallio, Finland and the Holocaust, Holocaust Library: New York, 1987, p 178-179, 258-259.
 Peter Novick, The Holocaust in American Life, Houghton Mifflin, 2000.
 Allan Hall, in: Scotsman, 21.6.2006.
 Michael Berenbaum (editor), A Mosaic of Victims, New York U. Press, 1990, p 21-23.
 Judith Miller, One, byOne, by One, Simon and Schuster/Touchstone: New York, 1990.
 Haaretz, 16.12.1988; reported in: David Sinai, News We Doubt You’ve Seen, Jewish Press: New York, 1988.
 LosAngelesTimesMagazine, 15.7.1990.
 Newsweek, 26.11.1990
 Response, Simon Wiesenthal Center, Spring 1991.
 Foreword to: Norman Finkelstein, The Holocaust Industry, Verso, 2003.
 Novick, op. cit., p 121-122.
 Norman Finkelstein and Ruth Birn, A Nation On Trial, Owl Books: New York, 1998.
 Quoted by Jon Wiener, in: The Nation, 11.7.2005.
 Norman Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah, U. of California Press, 2005, p 49, 62, 75, 78.
 Ibid, p 61, 82-83.
 Slavenko Terzić, Kosovo, Serbian Issue and the Greater Albania Project, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, undated.
 Bernard Kouchner, Les guerriers de la paix, Grasset, 2004.
 Douglas Kellner, quoted by: Obrad Kesić, The Business of News, in: Klaus Bittermann (editor), Serbia Must Die, Society for Nurturing Serbian Liberation Wars Tradition: Belgrade, 1996, p 148. An English translation of a German publication by TIAMAT: Berlin, 1994.
 David Peterson, 7.4.2005, http://blog.zmag.org/index.php/weblog/entry/bernard_kouchner/
 Peter Ford, in: Christian Science Monitor, 13.10.2004.
 Lee Smith, in: American Prospect, 1.3.2004.
 Thomas Friedman, in: New York Times, 6.4.1999.
 Thomas Friedman, in: New York Times, April 9 and 23, May 4 and 11, 1999.
 Jim Stone Fukushima Sabotage! ; Andrzej Szubert and Piotr Bein Join a grassroots investigation of 3/11 nuclear catastrophe – Stuxnet in Fukushima-Daiichi?
CNN News 4.10.1999.
 Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, The Sordid Past of Former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski, in: World Politics Watch, 16.11.2006,
 Larisa Alexandrovna and David Dastych, US, Britain asked Poland to join clandestine program, 7.3.2007.
 Janusz Rulka, in: Nasz Dziennik, 11.11.2006.
 Byron Sherwin, SparksAmidst the Ashes, Oxford University Press, 1997.
 Reports by Morgenthau, Jadwin and Johnson, and Samuel, op. cit.
 E.g. Michael Steinlauf, Bondage to the Dead, Syracuse U. Press: New York, 1997; Tzvi Rabinowicz, The Legacy of Polish Jewry, Thomas Yoseloff: New York, 1965; Stewart Steven, The Poles, Macmillan: New York, 1982.
 Yisrael Gutman et al. (eds), TheJews of Poland, U. Press of New England, 1989.
 Members included crypto-Zionists Adam Michnik, Bronisław Geremek (deceased) and Tadeusz Mazowiecki, who have played prominent roles in the ZPC in Poland and Europe.
 Gunnar Heinsohn, Warum Auschwitz? Rowohlt: Hamburg, 1995. Heinsohn does not mention Russian civilians.
 27.4.1942 memorandum from Dr. Erich Wetzel, director of the Central Advisory Office on Questions of Racial Policy at the National Socialist Party, titled Stellungnahme und Gedanken zum Generalplan Ost des Reichsführers SS. Signed NG 2325, this document was used in case VIII of the American Military Tribunal, the trial of an official in the SS Main Office for Race and Settlement.
 Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews, Holmes & Meier: New York, 1985.
 Konstanty Piekarski, Escaping Hell, Dundurn Press: Toronto, 1989.
 Fritjof Meier, in: Osteuropa, May 2003.
 Franciszek Piper, in: Najnowsze Dzieje Polski, No. 2, 1994.
 Neil Craig, a letter to Scotsman, 24.2.2006.
 Deborah Lipstadt, a starred review of Jan Gross’ Fear on Amazon. com.
 Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski, Jews in Poland, Hippocrene Books, 1997; Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, in: Glaukopis, Vol. 23, 2004-2005.
 Krzysztof Kakolewski, in: DziennikPolski, 3.7.2006.
 E.g., in: World Press Review, Vol. 50, No. 6, June 2003.
 Bruno Chapski, Another Case History of Democracy and Her Freedoms, 9.7.2002,
 Quoted in: ibid.
 Uwe Siemon-Netto, in: UPI, 5.6.2003.
 Julian Marchlewski, Anti–Semitism and Workers, Moscow, 1918. Quoted in: Nowak, op. cit.
 Jews in Poland, op. cit.
 TheCrucifiction of Jews Must Stop! in: American Hebrew, 31.10.1919.
 Allan Hall, in: Scotsman, 21.6.2006.
 Abraham Brumberg, in: ForeignAffairs, September – October 2002.
 Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski, An Answer to Brumberg’s Slander of Poland in Foreign Affairs, 22.8.2002.
 Interview with Jerzy Robert Nowak, in: Nasz Dziennik, 19.1.2006.
 Matthew Day, in: Scotsman, 7.4.2006.
 An Answer to Brumberg’sSlander of PolandinForeignAffairs, op. cit.
 Interview with Jerzy Robert Nowak, in: Nasz Dziennik, 19.1.2006.
 Franciszek Piper, in: Najnowsze Dzieje Polski, Nr 2, 1994.
 Fritjof Meier, in: Osteuropa, May 2003.
 Germany’s New Maps Assert Ethnic German Empire in Europe, 22.12.2006; also in German with a map.
 Jewish History, Jewish Religion, op. cit.
 Yuri Slezkin, TheJewishCentury, Princeton University Press, 2004.
 Yitzhak Arad et al. (editors), TheEinsatzgruppen Reports, Holocaust Library: New York, 1989, p 49; Stuart Kahan, The Wolf of the Kremlin, William Morrow, 1987, p 81.
 Arad, op. cit., p 47, 49, 73, 216.
 Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8.2.1920.
 Guardian, 24.1.2003.
 Dmitri Volkogonov, Lenin, Free Press, 1994, p 112.
 KrasnayaGazeta, 1.9.1918.
 Sheldon Kirshner, in: Canadian Jewish News, 5.11.1992, p 16.
 Jaff Schatz, The Generation, University of California Press, 1991, p 184-185, 213-214, 365.
 Schatz, op. cit., p 82, 96, 153, 360-361.
 E.g.: Schatz, op. cit.; John Sack, An Eye for An Eye; Arthur Bliss Lane, I Saw Poland Betrayed.
 New Republic, 14.2.1994.
 Teresa Torańska, Them, Harper and Row Publishers: New York and Cambridge, 1987, p 109 (Werfel), 321 (Berman).
 New York Review of Books, 18.8.1983, p 51.
 Walter Zenner, in: Isidor Wallimann and Michael Dobkowski (editors), Genocide and the Modern Age, Greenwood Press: New York, 1987, p 279.
 Naeim Giladi, Ben-Gurion’s Scandals, Dandelion Books, 2003.
 Wilbur Crane Eveland, Ropes of Sand, Norton & Co., 1980.
 Edwin Black, in: Jewish Week, 22.10.2004.
 Antoni Marianowicz, Polska, Żydzi i cykliści, Warszawa, 1999, p 86.
 An interview with Israel Singer (in Polish), Rzeczpospolita, 3-4.2.2007.
 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Restitution Issues and the Activism of American Jews: An Interview with Stuart Eizenstat, Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism, No. 18, 1.3.2004.
 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, Restitution: The Second Round: An Interview with Israel Singer, Post-Holocaust and Anti-Semitism, No. 14, 2.11.2003.
 Frölke, op. cit.
 Amiram Barkat, Haaretz, 19.1.2005; Yair Sheleg, Haaretz, 23.1.2005.
 Interview with Nowak, in: Nasz Dziennik, 21-22.8.1999.
 Anna Radziukiewicz, Orthodox Christianity in Poland, Wydawnictwo Arka: Bialystok, 2001, p 70.
 Jerzy Tomaszewski, Mniejszosci narodowe w Polsce w XX wieku, Warszawa, 1991, p 39.
 Jews in Poland, p 404.
 Ibid, p 420.
 Jerusalem Post, 19.7.2004; Maariv International, 21.7.2004.
 AFP, 14.7.2004.
 Theodore Spencer, in: Fortune, December 1999.
 Busaba Sivasomboon, Associated Press, 28.1.2001.
 Associated Press, 26.6.2005.
 EU plans far-reaching ‘genocide denial’ law, in: The Telegraph, 2.2.2007.
 Independent Task Force on America’s Response to Terrorism, Improving the Public Diplomacy Campaign in the War Against Terrorism, Council on Foreign Relations, 6.11.2001.
 James Petras, in: Monthly Review, Vol. 49, No. 7, December 1997.