Piotr Bein's blog = blog Piotra Beina

01/03/2014

Blood In The Streets: West Is Repeating Syrian Model In Ukraine

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:28

Blood In The Streets: West Is Repeating Syrian Model In Ukraine

Jewish Agency promises emergency assistance for Ukrainian Jews

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:26

Jewish Agency promises emergency assistance for Ukrainian Jews

Greeks look to strip immunity from neo-Nazi lawmakers

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:25

Greeks look to strip immunity from neo-Nazi lawmakers

More Israelis being denied U.S. tourist visas, report says

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:22

More Israelis being denied U.S. tourist visas, report says

Gorbachev: Bulldoze EU & US aides from Ukraine and let the people decide

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:20

Gorbachev: Bulldoze EU & US aides from Ukraine and let the people decide

Israeli press: Jewish man who trained Ukrainian protestors for months killed fighting in Kiev

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:19

Jewish man who trained Ukrainian protestors for months killed fighting in Kiev

Ukraine crisis portends apocalypse

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:18

Ukraine crisis portends apocalypse

20 years on, victims of Jewish ritual murder in infamous Hebron massacre haunted by memories

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:12

20 years on, victims of Jewish ritual murder in infamous Hebron massacre haunted by memories

Stones, bottles thrown as pro-, anti-Russian protesters clash in Crimea

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:11

Stones, bottles thrown as pro-, anti-Russian protesters clash in Crimea

‘Ukrainians to pay extreme price for regime change through austerity’

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:10

‘Ukrainians to pay extreme price for regime change through austerity’

Russia condemns rumored Saudi plans to arm Syrian rebels with anti-air missiles

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:09

Russia condemns rumored Saudi plans to arm Syrian rebels with anti-air missiles

LOL!!! Kerry says ‘Ukraine Conflict Not America Versus Russia’

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:09

LOL!!! Kerry says ‘Ukraine Conflict Not America Versus Russia’

Yanukovych blames fascists, West for Ukraine chaos

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:06

Yanukovych blames fascists, West for Ukraine chaos

​Will NATO annex Ukraine?

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:04

​Will NATO annex Ukraine?

Russian General–”What is happening in Ukraine and Syria – is Western project, a new type of war”

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:01

Russian General–”What is happening in Ukraine and Syria – is Western project, a new type of war”

Christian Soldiers Revisited

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 08:41

Christian Soldiers Revisited

W. Brytania: Izba Lordów za restytucją mienia żydowskiego w Polsce

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 08:39

W. Brytania: Izba Lordów za restytucją mienia żydowskiego w Polsce

‘Shut the f**k up, b*tch!’ Notorious far-right Ukraine leader attacks prosecutor

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 08:38

‘Shut the f**k up, b*tch!’ Notorious far-right Ukraine leader attacks prosecutor (VIDEO)

US preparing road map for Damascus attack

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 08:37

US preparing road map for Damascus attack

25/02/2014

Disastorusly deteriorating Ukraine’s economy will make her EU’s “second class” citizen

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 22:19

Newsletter 2014/02/25 – The EU’s Second Ring

BERLIN/KIEV/BERN (Own report) – In the aftermath of the
Western-oriented putsch in Kiev, German politicians are preparing
German public opinion for the disastrous deterioration of the Ukraine
economic situation. Even though it was most recently suggested that
the country could only expect a thriving development by linking up to
the EU, it is now – truthfully – being announced that Ukraine is
practically bankrupt. The CDU European parliamentarian, Elmar Brok,
predicts “difficult times” ahead: “It has never rained gold coins,
except in fairy tales.” In fact back in the fall, experts had already
indicated that, because of its out-dated industry, the Ukraine would
have to expect dramatic economic slumps if it signs the EU Association
Agreements – unemployment and poverty would dramatically rise. In a
position paper, the Berlin-based German Institute for International
and Security Affairs (SWP) is now proposing the introduction of a
special status in EU ties for the Ukraine as well as other countries,
such as Turkey. This sort of EU “second ring” would also permit the
economic integration of such countries as Switzerland, which
politically resists joining the EU. The SWP contends that these plans
could also be used for Catalonia, should it secede from Spain and
Scotland, from Britain.

more

22/02/2014

Ukrainian rabbi tells Kiev’s Jews to flee city

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 21:18
PB: How convenient! After Israeli generals have directed a coup planned by Mossad and Judeo-neocon “state dept”, with “Ukrainian” sayanim starring at Majdan, the Jews can safely leave. Any arrest, by citizens or authorities, will be branded antisemitism!

……………..

Ukrainian rabbi tells Kiev’s Jews to flee city

Fearing violence against Ukraine’s Jews, the Jewish community asks Israel for assistance with the security of the community.

Protesters stand guard in front of presidential administrative building in central Kiev, Ukraine.
Protesters stand guard in front of presidential administrative building in central Kiev, Ukraine, Saturday, Feb. 22, 2014. / Photo by AP
By Haaretz
Published 16:20 22.02.14
Ukrainian Rabbi Moshe Reuven Azman, called on Kiev’s Jews to leave the city and even the country if possible, fearing that the city’s Jews will be victimized in the chaos, Israeli daily Maariv reported Friday.”I told my congregation to leave the city center or the city all together and if possible the country too,” Rabbi Azman told Maariv. “I don’t want to tempt fate,” he added, “but there are constant warnings concerning intentions to attack Jewish institutions.”

According to the paper’s report Azman closed the Jewish community’s schools but still holds three daily prayers. He said the Israeli embassy told members of the Jewish community to avoid leaving their homes.

Edward Dolinsky, head of the umbrella organization of Ukraine’s Jews described the situation in Kiev as dire, telling Maariv “We contacted Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman requesting he assist us with securing the community.”

Protesters in the Ukrainian capital claimed full control of the city Saturday following the signing of a Western-brokered peace deal aimed at ending the nation’s three-month political crisis.

President Viktor Yanukovich is still in Ukraine, a senior security source told Reuters on Saturday following reports his residence was empty and unguarded and his Kiev offices were in the hands of protesters.

Correction (Feb. 22, 4:20 P.M.): An earlier version of this report incorrectly described Rabbi Azman as the chief rabbi of Ukraine. Azman is not the country’s chief rabbi, but one of two rabbis challenging the official chief rabbi, Yaakov Bleich, in Kiev, and like most Chabad rabbis, is aligned with the Kremlin.

Now Ukrainians can be truly free… :(

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 04:51

SEX ORGY IN A MUSEUM! – what do PUSSY RIOT & VOINA have in common? Fuck for the heir Puppy Bear!

21/02/2014

Polskę czeka Majdan

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:23

PB: Zgadzam się. Z takim zdurnieniem jak wśród polactfa, takimi zasobami do kradzieży (lasy, ziemia, Ziemie Zach.), na pewno żydo-banksteria potrzebuje jeszcze bardziej kanciatego stołu. A polactfo znów da się nabrać, jak wlaśnie dali się Ukraińcy…

……………..

Socjolog 21.02.2014 14:02

5 komentarzy

Polskę czeka Majdan

W Polsce wybuchnie kiedyś Majdan. Efekt będzie taki jak po Magdalence, Okrągłym Stole i sejmie kontraktowym, czyli powtórka z rozrywki. Wybierzcie sami. Kanapy, czy pospolite ruszenie.

 

Jaki naród taka władza – precz z partyjniakami i reketierami

Nie wiem czy celowo niektórzy zajmują się tematami zastępczymi czy są fanatykami duchowych legend. Ja bym się skupił na materialnej teraźniejszości i zorganizowaniu nam lepszej przyszłości. Na ludziach żyjących w Polsce i mannie dla ich następców. Jakie realia są każdy widzi. Jest źle i niesprawiedliwie. Zło tkwi w nas. W braku moralności w większości narodu. Dlaczegoś biedny? Boś głupi. Żeby to zmienić wystarczy krótki dekalog wprowadzić w obieg i się go trzymać.

  • Nie wspieram preferowanych partyjniaków
  • Nie trzymam pieniędzy w bankach
  • Nie płacę żadnych haraczy
  • Żądam obowiązku przeprowadzenia referendum po złożeniu wymaganych podpisów
  • Żądam zniesienia wszelkich immunitetów
  • Zniesienia progów wyborczych
  • Zniesienia dofinansowywania partii politycznych
  • Odpolitycznienia wyboru członków rad nadzorczych i ławników
  • Wprowadzenia uczciwych warunków socjalnych (szkoła, praca, emerytura, służba zdrowia)
  • Wprowadzenia sądów dla sędziów

To jest proste do osiągnięcia. Wystarczy ogólnospołeczny protest i strajk ekonomiczny. Coraz głośniej domagamy się demokracji. Zacznijmy od siebie. Jeśli promujesz mniejsze zło, wybierasz większe zło. Taki jest system. Bądź człowiekiem, a świat się zmieni. Żądaj człowieczeństwa. Nie można czegoś zmienić i iść na przód stojąc w miejscu lub w rozkroku. Musi powstać wielki ruch społeczny. Złodzieje siedzą w polityce, przestępcy w sądach, kłamcy mają tuby propagandowe. Są może dwie drogi doprowadzenia do reform. Zjednoczenia narodu pod ultimatum społecznego dekalogu (prawdziwa Solidarność, Platforma Oburzonych), albo wojna domowa. Żeby znieść reżim trzeba obalić pseudo dysydentów, sztuczne autorytety i fałszywych patriotów. Pieniądze podatników co akceptujecie na zbrodniarzy, to brak dróg i emerytur. Jako, że kolaborantów i materialistów jest w Polsce więcej niż pokornych, pierestrojki pokojowej chyba nie będzie. W Polsce wybuchnie kiedyś Majdan. Efekt będzie taki jak po Magdalence, Okrągłym Stole i sejmie kontraktowym, czyli powtórka z rozrywki. Wybierzcie sami. Kanapy, czy pospolite ruszenie.

http://3obieg.pl/ugnojone-swinie

http://3obieg.pl/podmioty-walczace-z-bezprawiem-w-prawie

http://socjolog61.neon24.pl/post/105227,obalic-rezim

http://socjolog61.neon24.pl/post/88727,wymiar-niesprawiedliwosci-zapasc-w-iii-rp

http://030267.salon24.pl/462967,niepodleglosc

http://030267.salon24.pl/452396,kabaret-moralnego-niepokoju

http://grzegorz-niedzwiecki.blog.onet.pl/2013/12/04/praktyczny-przewodnik-po-art-212-k-k/

http://grzegorz-niedzwiecki.blog.onet.pl/2013/12/03/od-swietego-mikolaja-dla-polakow/

http://www.wiadomosci24.pl/artykul/rzadza_nami_ludobojcy_279489.html

 

Disastrous consensus on Ukraine

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:17

From: Rodney Atkinson
To: The Independent
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 7:01 PM
Subject: disastrous consensus on Ukraine

Sir,

So German Foreign Minister, Frank Walter Steinmeier, who sees democratic sovereigntists in Western Europe as “threats to peace” is pleased to shake hands with openly fascist and nationalistic leaders in the Ukraine!

One of the parties (Swoboda), called to meetings in the German embassy in Kiev with Steinmeier was described by the Simon Wiesenthal Centre as one of the most anti-semitic in the world.

Whenever there is a British political and media consensus, as there is today on Ukraine, we can be sure that a geopolitical disaster is on the horizon!

Yours etc

Rodney Atkinson (01661 844788)
(Author Europe’s Full Circle)
Alderley
Meadowield Road
Stocksfield
Northumberland
NE43 7PZ

Nie płacz po Ukrainie?

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 22:47

From: “Marek Glogoczowski” <mglogo@poczta.fm>
Date: February 21, 2014 10:39:50 AM PST (CA)
Subject: Nie płacz po Ukrainie?

Cytuję z dyskusji na http://wiernipolsce.wordpress.com/2014/02/21/janukowycz-oglosil-przedterminowe-wybory-prezydenta/#comments

Adm

Daj diabłu palec, a chwyci za rękę.
Nie wierzę, by na tym się zakończyło.
Tu chodzi o całkowite podporządkowanie Ukrainy Zachodowi.
O to toczy się gra.
Gra o Ukrainę dziś, by o Rosję zagrać jutro ( już tylko regionalne mocarstwo dające się przyrównać do Hiszpanii czy Turcji) w której już jest hodowanych kilku ludzi typu Prochoruk

markglogg

21 Luty 2014

Zgadzam się z Adm. Janukowycz jest skończony – i to na własne, ewidentnie głupie życzenie. Podobnie jak Gorbaczow rozwalił kompartię ZSRR, tak Janukowycz rozwalił swą Partię Regionów: już 26 deputatów z niej uciekło. W ostatnim postanowieniu dzisiejszej Wierchownej Rady uwolniono z więzienia Julię Tymoszenko – a więc jest ktoś, kto szybko może zastąpić “pierdołę” Janukowycza i będzie to dokonane nie dopiero w grudniu br. A dzisiaj po południu ta Wierchowna Rada z “tryzubem” w godle uwolniła ze swych funkcji ministra Spraw Wewnętrznych Zacharenkę. W ramach Konstytucji Ukrainy z 2004 roku rola prezydenta jest bardzo ograniczona. Zachodniacy (reprezentowani w Kijowie przez “trzech królików” franco-szkopsko-anglopolskiego pochodzenia), obecnie biorą wszystko i jest to przygotowanie do rozwału Rosji – Obama w imieniu PANA ŚWIATA już zapowiedział, że przygoda Rosji w Syrii ma się zakończyć tak jak się kończy obecnie z Ukrainą.

Bardzo ładnie, na pozór niezrozumiałe postępowanie Janukowycza streścił mój kolega Izrael Szamir: w tekściku “NIE PŁACZ PO UKRAINIE”:

(…) Nie należy zbytnio żałować – upadek Janukowycza o nie taki zły rezultat pośredni. Niezrozumiałe, dlaczego tak bardzo za nim się wstawiamy. Bóg z nim, niech ucieka. Można mu dać polityczny azyl w Rosji, niech żyje razem z Abajewem, zrzuconym od władzy prezydentem Kirgizji, gra z nim w karty i przeklina niewdzięczny naród.

Janukowycz i jego Partia Regionów okazali się niegodnymi władcami. Janukowycz dal swemu synowi możliwość przechwytywania obcych przedsiębiorstw i wzbogacił wszystkich kapitalistów Ukrainy. Partia Regionów nie dala rady i nie próbowała realizować interesy swego elektoratu.

Technika rozpadu Ukrainy warta jest opracowania przez fachowców. Przygotowana przez Gene Sharpa taktyka składała się z kilku elementów (…)

Historia wskaże w jakim stopniu sam Janukowycz znal i rozumiał tekst rozgrywanego scenariusza. Wydaje się, że zachowywał się jak Gorbaczow w 1991 roku. Czyż nie tak jak on posyłał i wycofywał specnaz na plac bez uzbrojenia, z nieodpowiednim wyposażeniem, robiąc wszystko aby płomień nie wygasł? Jakiekolwiek były jego plany i plany organizatorów tego (ohydnego według mnie i nie tylko mnie) przedstawienia, je da się zerwać.

Poniżej e-adres pełnego tekstu mego “towarzysza broni” (‘comrade in arms’). Nie zdradzę co z niego logicznie wynika i tylko przypomnę, iż dla Romana Dmowskiego ukraiński to dialekt polskiego i że Ukraina pozostawiona sama sobie to będzie kraj chamsko-bandycki.
.
Całość na: http://www.svpressa.ru/politic/article/82651/

Independent Ukrainian TV: Kiev after Feb 19 riots

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 20:49

 

RussiaToday: Ukraine bloodshed: Kiev death toll jumps to 75

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:11

Ukraine bloodshed: Kiev death toll jumps to 75

Thierry Meyssan: After Yugoslavia, Ukraine?

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 09:07

After Yugoslavia, Ukraine?

by Thierry Meyssan

Public opinion in Western Europe is wrong to regard the Ukrainian crisis as a showdown between Westerners and Russians. In reality, Washington’s goal is not to push the country into the arms of the European Union, but to deprive Russia of its historical partners. To do this, the United States is prepared to ignite a new civil war on the continent.

Voltaire Network | Damascus | 14 February 2014

+
JPEG - 17.7 kb
Senator John McCain, who monitored the «Orange Revolution» of 2004 and supports jihadism in Syria, addresses protesters on Maidan Square, 15 December 2013 . Nazi leader Oleh Tyahnybok can be seen on his right.

After having dismembered Yugoslavia during a ten-year civil war (1990-1999), has the United States decided to destroy Ukraine in a similar way? This is what could be inferred from the maneuvers that the opposition is poised to launch during the Sochi Olympic Games.

Ukraine has been historically divided between, in the West, a population turned towards the European Union and, in the East, a population oriented towards Russia, plus a small Muslim minority in Crimea. After the country‘s independence, the government gradually crumbled. Taking advantage of the confusion, the United States organized the «Orange Revolution» (2004) [1], which brought to power a mafia clan, equally pro-Atlanticist. Moscow responded by lifting its subsidies on gas prices, but the Orange government could not rely on its Western allies to help pay the market price. Ultimately, it lost the 2010 presidential election in favor of Viktor Yanukovych, a corrupt politician, and an on again/off again pro-Russian.

On 21 November 2013, the government renounces signing the Association Agreement negotiated with the European Union. The opposition responds with protests in Kiev and in the western part of the country, which quickly take on an insurrectionary appearance. It calls for early presidential and parliamentary elections and refuses to form a government when approached by President Yanukovych and the Prime Minister resigns. The events are baptized Euromaidan, then Eurorevolution, by Radio Free Europe (run by the State Department).

The crowd control for the opposition is provided by Azatlyk, a group of young Crimean Tatars who returned from Jihad in Syria especially for the occasion [2].

The Atlanticist media champion the cause of the «democratic opposition» and condemn Russian influence. High-profile Western figures turn up to manifest their support to the protesters, including Victoria Nuland (Assistant Secretary of State and former Ambassador to NATO) and John McCain (Chairman of the Republican branch of the NED). For its part, the Russian press condemns protesters who have taken to the streets to overthrow democratically elected institutions.

Torch-lit march of 15,000 Nazis in Kiev on 1 January 2014.

At first, the movement seemed to be an attempt to orchestrate a second «Orange Revolution.» But on 1 January 2014 the power in the street changes hands. The Nazi «Freedom» party organizes a 15 000-strong torch-lit march in memory of Stepan Bandera (1909-1959), the nationalist leader who allied himself with the Nazis against the Soviets. Since this event, the capital has been covered with anti-Semitic graffiti and people are attacked on the street for being Jewish.

The pro-European opposition is made up of three political parties:

- The All-Ukrainian Union “Fatherland” (Batkivshchyna), led by the oligarch and former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko (serving a prison sentence following her convictions for embezzlement) and currently headed by lawyer and former Parliament speaker Arseniy Yatsenyuk. It stands for private property and the Western liberal model. It garnered 25.57% of the vote in the 2012 parliamentary elections.

- The Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform (Udar), of former boxing world champion Vitali Klitschko. It claims to identify with Christian Democracy and picked up 13.98% in the 2012 elections.

- The All-Ukrainian Union “Svoboda” (Freedom), led by the surgeon Oleh Tyahnybok. This political group sprang from the National Socialist Party of Ukraine. It promotes the denaturalization of Jewish Ukrainians. It won 10.45% of the vote in the 2012 parliamentary elections.

These parliamentary parties have the support of:

- The Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists, a Nazi splinter group from the former NATO stay-behind networks in the Eastern Bloc [3]. A Zionist, he calls for the denaturalization and deportation of Ukrainian Jews to Israel. He received 1.11% of the vote in 2012.

- The Ukrainian Self-Defense, a nationalist splinter group that sent its members to fight the Russians in Chechnya and Ossetia during the Georgian conflict. It got 0.08% of the vote in 2012.

In addition, the opposition has received the endorsement of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, in revolt against the Moscow Patriarchate. Ever since the Nazi Party took over the streets, the demonstrators – many of them wearing helmets and dressed in paramilitary uniforms – have erected barricades and stormed government buildings. Certain elements of the police force have also displayed great brutality, going so far as to torture detainees. A dozen protesters were killed and nearly 2,000 were wounded. The unrest spread to the western provinces of the country.

According to our information, the Ukrainian opposition seeks to import military materials acquired on parallel markets. It is obviously not possible to purchase weapons in Western Europe and bring them in without NATO’s green light.

Washington’s strategy in Ukraine would appear to be a combination of proven “color revolution” recipes with others recently concocted during the “Arab Spring” [4]. Moreover, the United States makes no effort to hide it, having dispatched two officials, Victoria Nuland (deputy to John Kerry) and John McCain (who is not only a Republican senator, but also the chairman of IRI, the Republican branch of the NED [5]) to support the protesters. Unlike Libya and Syria, Washington does not have jihadists on hand to sow chaos (except for Tatar extremists, but they are only located in Crimea). It was therefore decided to lean on the Nazis with whom the State Department worked against the Soviets and has organized in political parties since Ukraine’s independence.

The inexperienced reader may be taken aback by this alliance between the Obama administration and the Nazis. However, it must be remembered that Ukrainian Nazis were publicly honored at the White House by President Reagan, including Yaroslav Stetsko, Ukrainian Prime Minister under the Third Reich, who became the head of the anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations and a member of the World anti-Communist League [6]. One of his deputies, Lev Dobriansky, became U.S. ambassador to the Bahamas, while his daughter Paula Dobriansky served as Under Secretary of State for Democracy (sic) during the George W. Bush administration. It is the same Ms. Dobriansky who for ten years sponsored a historical research with the aim of clouding the fact that the Holodomor, the famine that hit Ukraine in 1932-33, also devastated Russia and Kazakhstan, thereby reinforcing the myth that Stalin was determined to eliminate the Ukrainian people [7].

In fact, Washington, who had supported the German Nazi party until 1939 and continued to do business with Nazi Germany until the end of 1941, never had a moral problem with Nazism, not more than it has today in providing military support to jihadism in Syria.

Western European elites, who use Nazism as a pretext to harass firebrands – as seen with the “quenelle“ controversy over French comedien Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala [8] – seem to have forgotten what it really is. In 2005, they closed their eyes to the rehabilitation of Nazism by the President of Latvia, Vaira Vike-Freiberga, as if it were something trivial [9]. On the simple strength of statements in favor of the European Union, and wrapped up in their blissful Atlanticism, they are now in cahoots their worst enemy.

Civil war could well start in the Ukraine during the Olympic Games in Sochi.

Thierry Meyssan

[1] “Washington et Moscou se livrent bataille en Ukraine“, by Emilia Nazarenko and the editorial staff, Réseau Voltaire, 1 November 2004.

[2] “Jihadists in charge of crowd control in Kiev protests”, Translation Alizée Ville, Voltaire Network, 5 December 2013.

[3] This is the cesspool that the father of the “Orange revolution” alighted from. Cf. “La biographie cachée du père du président ukrainien“, Réseau Voltaire, 18 April 2008.

[4] “Coup in Western Ukraine: the Arab Spring unleashed in Europe”, by Andrew Korybko, Oriental Review/Voltaire Network, 27 January 2014.

[5] “La NED, vitrine légale de la CIA“, by Thierry Meyssan, Odnako/Réseau Voltaire, 6 October 2010.

[6] “La Ligue anti-communiste mondiale, une internationale du crime“, by Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 12 May 2004.

[7] See: L’Holodomor, nouvel avatar de l’anticommunisme « européen », by Professor Annie Lacroix-Riz, 2008.

[8] “The Bête Noire of the French Establishment”, by Diana Johnstone, Counterpunch/Voltaire Network, 5 January 2014.

[9] “Latvian President Rehabilitates Nazism”, by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Network, 16 March 2005.

Related on VoltaireNet

What about apologizing to Ukraine, Mrs. Nuland?

 

20/02/2014

Israeli ex officer leads Ukraine protests, sayanim participate

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:59

Israeli ex officer leads Ukraine protests

Published on Feb 16, 2014

Ukrainian media have reported that a former Israeli army officer is playing a leading role in the anti-government protests in the former Soviet republic.

According to reports, the unnamed Israeli commands a group of 20 Ukrainian militants.

Four other Israelis, who had previously served in the army, were recently reported to have taken part in opposition rallies in Ukraine’s capital, Kiev.

They were born in Ukraine but migrated to Israel and joined its armed forces before returning to the European country for the demonstrations.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian media said that an Israeli tycoon provides financial support to the opposition in Ukraine, adding that Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency is one of the instigators of the unrest in the country.

Ukraine has been rocked by anti-government protests since President Viktor Yanukovych refrained from signing an Association Agreement with the European Union on November 29, 2013, in favor of closer ties with Russia.

Russia has repeatedly accused the West of meddling in the internal affairs of Ukraine and fueling the crisis in the country.

In early February, a four-minute video was posted on YouTube by an anonymous user, in which US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and US ambassador to Kiev Geoffrey Pyatt discussed which of Ukraine’s opposition leaders they would like to see in government.

UKRAINE AND YUGOSLAVIA – CIA AND GERMAN METHODS OF DESTRUCTION

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:14

to incite hatred and nationalism through television and for differences between the people to really stand out.

PB: Baer like many others: don’t dare say CIA, MI6, BND etc. are the lackeys of Judeo-banksters… In the Balkan context, I explore the J-plot against Yugoslavia and the Balkan peoples, if not Europe:

In Nazi Germany, Jewish Zionist propaganda fooled the goys into hatred and nationalism that helped the J-baksters achieve their WW2 goals:

- re-structure geopolitical power configuration with Jew-controlled US as the hegemon,

- enslave Eastern Europe into Jew-run Soviet block,

- create  false “dialectic” communism-capitalism, a pretext for banksters’ cold war, with Jews dominating/controlling both sides

- annihilate unwanted Jews (those assimilated in Europe and Orthodox Jews, both against Zi0nism)

- create “aircraft carrier Israel”

- launch foundations for a new “dialectic”: the “democratic” West (s.c. Judeo-Christians in hasbara parlour) against “terrorist” Arabs and Muslim.

Amaizingly, similar radicalisation of mindless masses by J-propaganda (extreme nationalism, antisemitism) takes place in the Arab Spring and colour revolutions — today in Ukraine (with obviously Jew-inspired hate of Poles and Russians).presently, the goal appears somewhat different, yet NWO is the ultimate aim, as in WW2. Just as mass sprouting of national states in place of imperia was a stage of pre-planned J-bankster NWO plot around WW1, so is the present dismantling of national states and sovereignities also a stage, more advanced though. Restricted are also citizen freedoms via “war on terror” in preparation for the final assault on humanity and establishment of J-bankster NWO.

The radical Ukrainians atrociously killed several hundred thousand Polish civilians in WW2 (many women, children and elderly) and served as kapos and killers in Zio-Nazi death camps in occupied Poland and elsewhere.

Isn’t it interesting that supposedly anti-antisemitic, ant-xenophobe and “let’s all be equal and peacuful” EU supports these bastards!? What better proof for who runs the world…

to incite hatred and nationalism through television and for differences between the people to really stand out.

…………………..

From: “Freenations” <freenations@freeuk.com>
Date: February 20, 2014 9:11:39 AM PST (CA)
Subject: UKRAINE AND YUGOSLAVIA – CIA AND GERMAN METHODS OF DESTRUCTION

THESE REVELATIONS BY A FORMER CIA AGENT WHO HELPED THE USA AND GERMANY TO DESTROY YUGOSLAVIA AND BLAME THE SERBS IS WORTH LISTENING TO BECASUE THE SAME THING IS HAPPENING TODAY IN THE UKRAINE. For a decade or more before the illegal recognition of croatia by the Vatican and Germany in 1991 (condemned by among others the former British Foreign Secretary David Owen) the German intelligence services undermined the State of Yugoslavia, promoted and armed Croatian and Bosnian fascists and manipulated the media to report non existent “massacres” but not report on Bosnian and Croatian massacres of Serbs!! For decades the German “political foundation” the Konrad Adenauer Foundation has been active in the Ukraine and provided funds and political support for the rioting and policeman-killing “demonstrators” on the streets of Kiev. Many of the Ukrainian revolutionaries, trying to bring down an elected Government with molotov cocktails and street violence, have blatantly fascist connections with the wartime Ukrainian Nazis who helped enthusiastically in the Jewish holocaust. Many of the latter of course fled through Rome to South America after the war – with even the American Amabassador in Berlin complaining that the Vatican was aiding the escape of murderous fascists.
Now read on:
CIA exposed by former agent – Robert Baer
October 10, 2012 [bold Italics by PB]

Over the years there have been many ex military and secret service personnel that have written books and articles that talk about their work and the objectives of their bosses. Such disclosures are always most interesting when the subject matter is close to your heart and when you feel that the public perception needs to be altered.
Robert Baer is a former senior CIA officer and the author of many works about his former employers at the time of the administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. As a senior CIA operative, he worked in the former Yugoslavia from 1991-1994 and in the Middle East . The following interview with Robert Baer was conducted by Milos Cupurdija last month in Canada and highlights some of the public misconceptions about the events that tore up Yugoslavia .

When did you arrive in Yugoslavia and what was your first job?
I first arrived by helicopter with 3 other agents on 12 January 1991 in Sarajevo . Our job was to keep an eye on the supposed Serbian terrorists who were due to attack Sarajevo .

Who were supposed to be the terrorists and why would they be expected to attack Sarajevo ?
They were given information about a group called “Serbian Supreme” and their plans to attack key buildings in Sarajevo with the desire that Bosnia would leave Yugoslavia .

Was there such a group, and what did you actually do in Sarajevo ?
Such a group never existed and we had been tricked by our central command. We were tasked with warning people and spreading panic amongst the politicians in Bosnia . Basically we just filled their heads with the idea that the Serbs will attack. Initially we were taken with the story but eventually realised that we were spreading stories and fear about a group that did not exist.

How long did this operation last and what was it called?
For me it lasted for two weeks because then I received orders to go to Slovenia on another job. The operation continued for another month after and the code name was “Istina” [Truth - PB] which is exactly what it was not.

Why did you go to Slovenia ?
There I was told that Slovenia was getting ready to declare its independence from Yugoslavia . I was given money, several million dollars with which we would finance non governmental organizations, opposition parties and politicians all of whom were prepared to spread and incite amongst the population.

Given these propaganda activities what sort of opinions did you have of the CIA and what did you’re colleagues think?
Of course you do not refuse a task given to you by the CIA especially at that time when everybody was jumpy and given to paranoia. Many agents and high ranking officers had disappeared because they had refused to work on propaganda against the Serbs in Yugoslavia . I personally was shocked at the amount of lies being perpetrated by the CIA and the US politicians. Many CIA agents worked in propaganda but were not entirely aware of what they were doing as they would be involved with just one facet of the project and only those who could piece together the whole picture knew the aims of the work and they were the politicians.

So there was only propaganda against the Serbs?
Yes and no. The propaganda was aimed to divide the republics and to ensure that the states are separated from the mother of Yugoslavia . We had to choose a sacrificial lamb that could be blamed for everything. Someone who would be responsible for the war and the violence.  Serbia was chosen because it is in some ways the successor of Yugoslavia .

Can you name the politicians from the former Yugoslavia that received money from the CIA?
Yes, although this is delicate. Stipe Mesic, Franjo Tudjman, Alija Izebegović, many advisors and members of the government of Yugoslavia, and also Serbian generals, journalists and even some military units. For a time Radovan Karadzic was paid but stopped taking the help when he realized he would be sacrificed and charged with crimes in Bosnia . He was played by the U.S. administration.

You mentioned the financing and control of the media, how did this take place?
It is already known that some CIA agents were responsible for writing the official statement that news anchors would read. Of course the news readers did not know anything as they received their instructions from their bosses who received instructions from his boss who was our (CIA) man. There was one overall task and that was to incite hatred and nationalism through television and for differences between the people to really stand out.

Srebrenica which we are all aware of. Can you say something about that situation?
Yes, from 1992 I was in Bosnia again, but this time we had to train military units representing Bosnia , the new State which only just declared it’s independence.  Srebrenica is an exaggerated story, and unfortunately many people have been manipulated by it. The numbers of the people killed…these were all part of the political marketing. My boss who had previously been in the US Senate had several times told me that there would at some point be a big con in Bosnia . A month before the supposed genocide in Srebrenica he told me that this town would be known around the world and we were instructed to inform the media. When I asked him why he said I will see. We received an order that with the newly formed Bosnian army we should attack the houses and people of Srebrenica. Of course the Serbs followed suite as they would have been incited and paid to do so also.

Who could it be responsible for the genocide in Srebrenica?
Simply the deaths in Srebrenica were due to the Bosnians, the Serbs and the Americans, us! But the blame for everything is laid at the feet of the Serbs. Unfortunately many of the victims were buried as Muslims and yet they were Serbs or other nationalities. A few years ago a friend of mine, a former CIA agent and currently working in the IMF said that Srebrenica was a product of an agreement between the U.S. government and politicians in Bosnia . Srebrenica as the city was sacrificed because after the alleged crimes of Serbs, the America had a reason to attack.

Why do you think that Yugoslavia broke up and why did your government want to have it’s role in this?
Everything is clear, people who had quietly instigated the war and loudly shouted about the peace are now the owners of the companies that exploit a variety of mineral resources and the like in that land! Simply, they made slaves of you, your people are working for free and the products are going to Germany and America , they earn! In the end you  have to pay to import what you have made yourselves and since you have no money you must take out loans. It’s the  story with the whole of the Balkans!

You have not been active in Kosovo as a CIA agent, but was there some pressure from the United States ?
Of course! Kosovo was taken for two reasons, firstly because of mineral and natural resources, and secondly, the Kosovo military base NATO! In the heart of Europe is their largest military base.
Do you have any message for the people of the former Yugoslavia ?
I have. Forget your recent past it was staged and faked. You have been manipulated and they got what they wanted and it would be stupid for you to still hate each other. You have to be stronger and to show that you are aware what has happened and who was responsible. I sincerely apologise and this is why I have for a long time now been exposing the secrets of the CIA and the White House.

Robert Baer is currently promoting his new book “The Secrets of the White House”. Here are some of his previous publications.
See No Evil: The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA’s War on Terrorism, Crown Publishing Group, January 2002, ISBN 0-609-60987-4.
Sleeping With the Devil: How Washington Sold Our Soul for Saudi Crude, Crown Publishing Group, July 2003, ISBN 1-4000-5021-9.
Blow the House Down: A Novel, Crown Publishing Group, 2006, ISBN 1-4000-9835-1.
The Devil We Know: Dealing with the New Iranian Superpower, Crown Publishing Group, September 2008 ISBN 0-307-40864-7
The Company We Keep: A Husband-and-Wife True-Life Spy Story, Crown Publishing Group, March 8, 2011

http://www.ebritic.com/?p=213256

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Robert Baer, oficir CIA: STIPE MESIĆ, FRANJO TUĐMAN I ALIJA IZETBEGOVIĆ SU BILI AGENTI CIA
Objavljeno: 15. februar 2014. u 19:53 /

Moj šef, koji je inače i bio nekada u Američkom senatu je nekoliko puta napomenuo da će biti nekakva prevara u Bosni. Mesec dana pred navodni genocid u Srebrenici mi je rekao da će taj grad biti uporište medija širom sveta i dao nam je instrukcije da zovemo medije.

Robert Baer, bivši visoki izaslanik i oficir CIA, ujedno je i autor mnogih dela u kojima je odavao informacije o CIA i o administraciji Bila Klinton i Džordža Buša, zbog čega je nekoliko puta hapšen i privođen. Lični prijatelj, Mitt Waspurh koji je radio u senatu i koji mu je davao pojedine informacije je ubijen u hotelu iz sačmare. Kao visoki operativac CIA radio je na prostoru Jugoslavije u periodu od (1991-1994) i na Bliskom istoku. Robert Baer je učestvovao  u nekoliko dokumentaraca na Nacionalnoj Geografiji optužujući vladu Buša za rat zbog nafte!
Piše: Miloš Ćupurdija
Intervju je obavljen uživo u Kanadi, tokom mog puta pre nekoliko dana.  Robert Baer trenutno promoviše svoju knjigu -The secret of White House- u Kvebeku, gde smo i razgovarali. U intervjuu smo razgovarali o pozadini rata u Jugoslaviji.
Kad ste stigli u Jugoslaviju,gde je to tačno bilo i koji Vam je bio prvi zadatak?
Stigao sam helikopterom sa još 3 agenta. Sleteli smo 12. Januara 1991 u Sarajevo . Zadatak nam je bio da pripazimo na navodne teroriste srpske nacionalnosti, koji bi trebali napasti Sarajevo .
O kojim teroristima je reč i zašto bi oni navodno trebali da izvrše te napade?
O srpskim, dati su nam fajlovi da grupa po imenu „Vrhovna Srbija“ planira izvesti bombaške napade na ključne zgrade u Sarajevu zbog želje da Bosna izađe iz tadašnje Jugoslavije.
Da li je takva grupa postojala i šta ste Vi tačno radili u Sarajevu po naradbi komande CIA?
Takva grupa nikad nije postojala! I nas je centrala prevarila. Imali smo zadatak da upozoravamo i da širimo paniku među političarima u Bosni, jednostavno punili smo im glavu da će Srbi da napadnu. U početku smo i mi prihvatili priču, ali posle smo se malo zapitali. Zašto dižemo paniku kad ta grupa oligledno ni ne postoji?
Kako i kada se završila da operacija i da li je imala neko ime?
Za mene se završila nakon 2 nedelje, dobio sam novi zadatak u Sloveniji. Inače operacija je trajala još mesec dana i imala je naziv „ISTINA“. Iako je to bilo sve samo ne to!
Kažete otišli ste u Sloveniju, kojim povodom?
Tamo  sam dobio instrukcije da je Slovenija spremna da proglasi nezavisnost, date su nam pare, nekoliko miliona dolara, uz taj novac mi smo financirali razne nevladine organizacije, opozicione stranke  i razne političare koji su raspaljivali mržnju.
Kakvo ste Vi imali mišljenje zbog te propagande od strane CIA, i šta su o tome mislisle vaše kolege?
Svakako da se zadatak ne odbija od CIA, pogotovo ne tada jer su svi bili nervozni i skloni paranoji! Mnogi agenti i visoki činovnici CIA su nestajali samo zato što su odbili da rade propagandu protiv srba u Jugoslaviji. Ja lično sam bio šokiran dozom laži naše agencije i političara! Mnogi agenti CIA su radili propagandu a da nisu ni svesni šta rade. Jednostavno svako radi delić priče, i samo onaj ko je sklopio celu priču zna pozadinu a to su političari.
Znači postojala je propaganda isključivo prema Srbima?
Da i ne. Propaganda je imala za cilj da zavadi države i da se one odvoje od matične Jugoslavije. Morali smo izabrati žrtveno jagnje koje bi bilo krivo za sve. Neko ko bi bio odgovoran za rat i nasilje. Srbije je izabrana jer je na neki način bila naslednica Jugoslavije.
Možete li nabrojati političare koji su u bivšoj Jugoslaviji bili plaćeni od strane CIA?
Da, mada je to delikatno. Stipe Mesić, Franjo Tuđman, Alija Izebegović, mnogi savetnici i članovi vlade Jugoslavije, plaćeni su i bili srpski generali, novinari pa čak i pojedine vojne formacije. Jedno vreme je plaćen bio i Radovan Karadžić ali je prestao da uzima pomoć kad je shvatio da će biti žrtvovan i optužen za zločine u Bosni. Bio je izrađen od Američke administracije.
Spomenuli ste kontrolu i financiranje medija, kako je to bilo tačno?
To se već zna, pojedini agenti CIA su bili zaduženi za pisanje zvaničnih izjava koje bi spikeri čitali na vestima. Naravno spikeri nisu ništa znali, oni su to dobili od svog šefa a on od svog koji je bio naš čovek. Postojao je jedan zadatak za sve, a to je da se kroz televiziju širi mržnja, nacionalizam  i skroz su se isticale razlike među ljudima.
Srebrenica, svi znamo za nju. Možete li reći nešto o tome ukoliko znate?
Da! Od 1992 sam u Bosni bio ponovo, ali ovog puta smo trebali da obučavamo vojne formacije koje su predstavljale Bosnu, novu državu koja samo što je proglasila nezavisnost. Srebrenica je preuveličana priča i nažalost veliki broj ljudi su izmanipulisani. Broj žrtava je jedank ubijenim srbima i drugima ali Srebrenica je politički marketing. Moj šef, koji je inače i bio nekada u Američkom senatu je nekoliko puta napomenuo da će biti nekakva prevara u Bosni. Mesec dana pred navodni genocid u Srebrenici mi je rekao da će taj grad biti uporište medija širom sveta i dao nam je instrukcije da zovemo medije. Kad sam pitao zašto, rekao je videćeš. Dobijena je naredba da sa novonastalom Bošnjačkom vojskom udarimo po kućama i civilima. Naravno to su bili građani Srebrenice. U tom trenutku sa druge strane udarili su i Srbi. Verovatno je i njih neko platio i nahuškao!
Ko bi onda mogao kriv biti za genocid u Srebrenici?
Jednostavno žrtve u Srebrenici su bile tu zbog Bosanaca, Srba i Amerikanaca tjst nas! Ali sve je prepisano Srbima. Nažalost mnoge žrtve su sahranjene kao muslimani a bili su Srbi ili druge nacionalnosti. Pre nekoliko godina je moj drug, bivši agent CIA i sadašnji čovek u MMF-u rekao da je Srebrenica proizvod dogovora između Američke vlade  i političare u Bosni. Srebrenica kao grad je žrtvovana jer je nakon tog navodnog zločina srba, Amerika imala povoda za napad.
Šta mislite generalno zašto se Jugoslavija raspala, tjst zašto je Vaša vlada imala želju da to uradi?
Sve je jasno, ljudi koji su nekad huškali na rat a ujedno i pripovedali o miru sada su vlasnici kompanija koje eksploatišu razna rudna bogatstva i slično! Jednostavno, napravili su od Vas robove, vaši ljudi rade za džabe i taj proizvod ide u Nemačku i Ameriku, oni zarađuju! A Vi još na kraju morate da otkupite i uvezete ono što ste sami napravili, pošto nemate novca, morate se zadužiti, to je čitava priča sa celim Balkanom!
Niste bili na Kosovu aktivni kao agent CIA, ali da li je i tu bilo nekog pritiska od strane Amerike?
Kako ne! Kosovo je oduzeto iz dva razloga, prvo zbog rudnih i prirodnih resursa a drugo, Kosovo je vojna baza NATO-a! U srcu Evrope je njihova najveća vojna baza.
Imate li poruku za ljude iz bivše Jugoslavije?
Imam. Neka zaborave prošlost, ona je iscenirana i lažirana.Izmanipulisani ste, oni su dobili šta su hteli i glupo je da se Vi još mrzite, morate pokazati da ste jači i da ste shvatili ko je sve napravio! Ja se iskreno izvinjavam! Zato dugo vremena i otkrivam tajne CIA i Bele kuće!

http://web-tribune.com/iza-kulisa/robert-baer-oficir-cia-stipe-mesic-franjo-tudman-i-alija-izetbegovic-su-bili-agenti-cia

WEB TRIBUNE

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Baer’s biography

Early life[edit]
Baer was born in Los Angeles , raised in Aspen, Colorado, and aspired to become a professional skier. He spent many years of his childhood with his mother in Europe before returning to the US . After a fairly poor academic performance during his first year at high school, his mother sent him to Indiana ‘s Culver Military Academy. In 1976 he graduated from the Georgetown UniversitySchool of Foreign Service (where then-future CIA director George Tenet was a classmate). While a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, he applied to the CIA’s Directorate of Operations (now the National Clandestine Service). Upon admittance to the CIA after graduating, Baer engaged in a year’s training, which included a four-month paramilitary course and several foreign language courses.
He is fluent in Arabic, Persian, French, German and his native English. He is also conversant in Russian, Tajik, and Baluch.
Career[edit]
Baer has publicly acknowledged that he worked field assignments in Madras and New Delhi, India; Beirut, Lebanon; Dushanbe, Tajikistan; Morocco; and Salah al-Din in Iraqi Kurdistan during his twenty-one years with the CIA. During the mid-1990s, Baer was sent to Iraq with the mission of organizing opposition to Iraqi president Saddam Hussein but was recalled and investigated by theFederal Bureau of Investigation for allegedly conspiring to assassinate the Iraqi leader.[3][4] While in Salah al-Din, Baer unsuccessfully urged the Clinton administration to back an internal Iraqi attempt to overthrow Hussein (organized by a group of Sunni military officers, the Iraqi National Congress’ Ahmad Chalabi, and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan’s Jalal Talabani) in March 1995 with covert CIA assistance. Baer quit the Agency in 1997 and received the CIA’s Career Intelligence Medal on March 11, 1998.
Baer wrote the book See No Evil documenting his experiences while working for the Agency. The C.I. Desk: FBI and CIA Counterintelligence As Seen From My Cubicle, by Christopher Lynch (Dog Ear Publishing), describes parts of the contentious CIA pre-publication review process for Baer’s first book. In a blurb for See No Evil Seymour Hersh said Baer “was considered perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East .” In the book, Baer offers an analysis of the Middle East through the lens of his experiences as a CIA operative.
Through his years as a clandestine officer, he gained a very thorough knowledge of the Middle East , Arab world and former Republics of the Soviet Union. Over the years, Baer has become a strong advocate of the Agency’s need to increase Human Intelligence (HUMINT) through the recruitment of agents. Baer, long a supporter of the theory that the PFLP-GC brought down Pan Am Flight 103, has recently begun to promote the theory that Iran was behind the bombing.[clarification needed]
In 2004, he told a reporter of the British political weekly New Statesman, regarding the way the CIA deals with terrorism suspects, “If you want a serious interrogation, you send a prisoner to Jordan . If you want them to be tortured, you send them to Syria . If you want someone to disappear – never to see them again – you send them to Egypt .”[1]
September 2001 attacks[edit]
Baer had expressed skepticism regarding the events of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, writing in The Guardian “[D]id bin Laden act alone, through his own al-Qaida network, in launching the attacks? About that I’m far more certain and emphatic: no.”[5] However, he later stated, “For the record, I don’t believe that the World Trade Center was brought down by our own explosives, or that a rocket, rather than an airliner, hit the Pentagon. I spent a career in the CIA trying to orchestrate plots, wasn’t all that good at it, and certainly couldn’t carry off 9/11. Nor could the real pros I had the pleasure to work with.”[6]
Iran[edit]
In June 2009, Baer commented on the disputed election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as Iranian President and the protests that accompanied it. “For too many years now, the Western media have looked at Iran through the narrow prism of Iran’s liberal middle class – an intelligentsia that is addicted to the Internet and American music and is more ready to talk to the Western press, including people with money to buy tickets to Paris or Los Angeles; but do they represent the real Iran?”[1]
Lockerbie bombing[edit]
On August 23, 2009, Robert Baer claimed that the CIA had known from the start that the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 had been orchestrated by Iran, and that a secret dossier proving this was to be presented as evidence in the final appeal by convicted Libyan bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. According to Baer, this suggests that Megrahi’s withdrawal of the appeal in return for a release on compassionate grounds was encouraged to prevent this information from being presented in court.[7]

Ukraine: a coup averted? — Yanukovich changes the chief of staff, pro-Russian paratroopers at Kiev

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 19:31

Marek Głogoczowski: oficjalne info z km.ru i obozrevatel.com
[...]  Coś poważniejszego niż “Majdan” się święci na Ukrainie – i “krwawy  Majdan” wczoraj (18.2.2014) prawdopodobnie był do tego pretekstem. Otóż w ramach “akcji antyterrorystycznej” generał Lebied’ podprowadza 500 komandosów z Diepropietrowska pod Kijów. A w tym czasie Janukowycz zmienia Szefa Sztabu. Dlaczego to zrobił? Czyżby w obawie że wojsko przygotowywało “ochronę budynków rządowych” i ubezwłasnowolnienie “niewydolnego” prezydenta? Czyli tak zwany “scenariusz egipski”? Nie zapominajmy, że główne  szkoły wojskowe na Ukrainie “po cichu” zostały opanowane przez suto płacących swym “kukłom”  Amerykanów już blisko 10 lat temu…

/////////////////////////

Official from km.ru i obozrevatel.com:

Something more serious than Majdan may be coming;  “bloody Majdan” Feb 18, 2014, may have been a pretext. In an antiterrorist move,General Lebied brought 500 paratroopers from Diepropietrovsk (eastern Ukraine, pro-Russian – PB) to outskirts of Kiev. At the same time, Yanukovich changes the chief of staff — because he fears the military have prepared a coup, a la Egypt? USrael has penetrated main military schools in Ukraine nearly 10 years ago, by installing its paid puppets…

Ukrainian policeman tells the truth about “peaceful demos”

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 19:07

Germany pushes “change” in Ukraine at all costs

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 19:04

Newsletter 2014/02/19 – At all Costs

KIEV/BERLIN (Own report) – Yesterday, the day after the German
Chancellor held deliberations with two leaders of the Ukrainian
opposition, protests in Kiev escalated into bloody confrontations.
Demonstrators, unconditionally sponsored by Germany and other western
countries for months, began, over the past few days, to arm themselves
with firearms and ammunition. Two police officers were shot to death
during yesterday’s uprising. This escalation into a bloody
confrontation followed on the heels of government compliance with a
fundamental demand of the demonstrators, just as it seemed that a
de-escalation was about to begin – to the tactical disadvantage of the
“German’s man” in Kiev, Vitali Klitschko, who has been calling for the
president to resign. Klitschko, who flew to Berlin Monday, to discuss
the next steps, threatened an even more bloody escalation and
declared, that he does not “rule out the use of force in the
evacuation of the Maidan.” One of the organizations he is relying on
is explicitly named after Nazi collaborators, who had carried out
mass-murder of Soviet Jews. Escalation strategies, such as those
currently implemented in Kiev, are not alien to German foreign policy.

more

19/02/2014

Moscow Alarmed by Reports of New Syrian Opposition Leadership

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 03:57

Moscow Alarmed by Reports of New Syrian Opposition Leadership

18/02/2014

Russia accuses US diplomats of ‘puppeteering’ Ukraine

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:07

Russia accuses US diplomats of ‘puppeteering’ Ukraine

Published time: February 18, 2014 09:06
Edited time: February 18, 2014 14:31
Kiev, February 17, 2014.(AFP Photo / Sergei Supinsky)Kiev, February 17, 2014.(AFP Photo / Sergei Supinsky)

Tags

A leading Russian Foreign Ministry official has condemned the US State Department attempts to influence the political situation in volatile Ukraine and warned that such behavior could lead to tragic results.

The United States is trying to impose a “Western vector of development” on Ukraine while camouflaging their intent with calls not to obstruct the free choice of the Ukrainian people, Russian news agencies quoted the ministry’s Aleksandr Lukashevich as saying.

The Russian diplomat called such an attitude “puppeteering”, adding that the recent statement by US State Department spokesperson Marie Harf was a typical example. In the statement, the US gave instructions regarding future actions of the Ukrainian government, Lukashevich said. Such instructions included a demand to stop all cases against the participants in the street riots, and to immediately start to form a multi-party technical government, the Russian official stated.

Such US behavior is very well known and it leads to tragic results, the Foreign Ministry representative emphasized.

Lukashevich also said that the US had apparently started “casting” for future places in the technical Ukrainian government, or at least such a conclusion could be made from a telephone conversation by a top US diplomats that had been made public on YouTube. In the clip that appeared on the internet in early February, Washington’s new top diplomat for Europe, Victoria Nuland, is heard saying “f**k the EU” while speaking with the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyat, on how to end the ongoing political crisis in Ukraine. The conversation continues with Nuland suggesting that one of Ukrainian opposition leaders, Vitaly Klichko is not fit for government work and should make way for another candidate, Arseniy Yatsenyuk.

As fresh violence erupted on Kiev’s streets on Tuesday the Russian Foreign Ministry issued another statement. It considers the crisis “a direct result of the permissiveness policy exercised by those western politicians and European structures who were from the very beginning turning a blind eye at the aggressive actions of the radical forces in Ukraine.” The ministry added that such an attitude was encouraging the radicals to escalate the violence and further provoke their opponents.

Russian diplomats again called upon the Ukrainian opposition to abandon threats and ultimatums and start a meaningful dialogue with the authorities in order to take the country out of the deep crisis.

Russian politicians have repeatedly called on their foreign colleagues to abstain from interfering in the Ukrainian political crisis. In January the upper and lower houses of the Russian parliament passed separate declarations that called the civil unrest in Kiev an organized campaign aimed at displacing lawfully elected officials. The Russian MPs also warned that the Ukrainian crisis could have grave consequences for the country’s people, statehood and territorial integrity.

President Vladimir Putin also expressed concern about the political situation in Ukraine in late January but assured that Russia would not cancel its help to the Ukrainian economy and people if Ukraine also honors the agreements.

In mid-December the Russian and Ukrainian presidents agreed on a plan under which Russia is buying $15bn of Ukrainian debt in 2-year bonds and also giving Ukraine a $3.5 billion discount on natural gas purchases on behalf of state-owned Gazprom. Ukrainians will pay $268.5 per thousand cubic meters of natural gas instead of $400, a nearly 33 percent discount.

At a recent government conference Putin spoke of the aid plan and told officials that all contracts with Ukraine must be completely fulfilled. However, the President added that Russia would wait for Ukraine to form a new government before starting to execute its obligations.

West targets Russia via Ukraine

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:00

West targets Russia via Ukraine

Ukrainians protest against rejection of EU trade deal

Ukrainians protest against rejection of EU trade deal
Mon Dec 16, 2013 4:58PM GMT
By Finian Cunningham
Related Interviews:

Wherever fruitcake US Senator John McCain turns up you can be sure that the agenda is regime change.

At the weekend, the American Vietnam veteran and former Vietcong collaborator, who somehow claims to be a war hero, was airdropped into the Ukraine to rally anti-government protesters in the capital, Kiev.

The unhinged, hawkish senator told the multitude: “The destiny you seek lies in Europe. People of Ukraine, this is your moment. The free world is with you; America is with you; I am with you.”

McCain has turned up in other countries to support anti-government causes. Most notably was his appearance in Syria a few months back where he was photographed greeting al-Qaeda-linked mercenaries, including a known kidnapper and extortionist, who have since gone on to excel in committing the worst kind of atrocities against civilians– most recently the murder of at least 80 people in the town of Adra near Damascus, aimed at framing government forces.

When the al-Qaeda mercenaries began floundering in their campaign of terror in Syria to unseat the Assad government, McCain was one of most strident voices in the US Congress calling for an all-out American bombing war based on what has since been clearly shown to be propaganda lies.

McCain is all about regime change in the service of US imperialism. His latest appearance in the Ukraine along with another American senator, Chris Murphy, underlines the real agenda of Washington, disguised in asinine language about “freedom”.

The fact that Ukrainian authorities allowed nutcase McCain into their country is a sign of impressive tolerance on their part, and it
contradicts all the Western media hype about draconian state conduct.

It also shows how deluded and arrogant McCain is that he feels he has the right to go into a foreign country with a call to sedition.

But he is not alone. McCain is just the latest in a phalanx of Western politicians and officials who have arrogated the right to intervene in the internal affairs of the former Soviet Republic.

US vice president Joe Biden and Washington’s top diplomat John Kerry have also weighed in with support for the anti-government protesters in Ukraine, as have EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, as well as French and German ministers Laurent Fabius and Guido Westerwelle.

That the US nor the EU do not give a fraction of such high-profile support for legitimate anti-regime protesters in Bahrain is proof that in the Ukraine an altogether disingenuous political agenda is unfolding.

The decision by Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich last month to postpone a trade agreement with the European Union certainly sparked huge discontent among many Ukrainians, who have staged protests in the capital for the past four weeks.

Nevertheless, the Ukrainian government made a legitimate and sovereign decision. It has sound reasons to spurn a trade pact with the EU given that Brussels is calling for austerity-imposing “reforms” such as hikes in gas prices and public spending cuts.

In other words, in return for dubious association with the EU, the people of the Ukraine are facing even greater poverty and social misery. Is it any wonder that the Kiev government decided to back off?

Furthermore, and this is the crucial telltale point, the Ukraine will be expected to cut historic cultural and economic ties with Russia.

The democratic mandate of the protesters in Kiev is questionable. Numbers could be as high as 300,000, but out of a total population of 46 million that do not represent a government-overturning mandate. Plus, the Ukrainian parliament has rejected a No Confidence Vote on Yanukovich’s administration.

Moreover, there is clear evidence that sections of anti-government demonstrations in Kiev are being externally driven by the American CIA-backed National Endowment for Democracy and other Western so-called think tanks.

The violent occupation of government buildings and property in Kiev is also a criminal challenge to the state’s authority, and yet such criminality is being openly fawned upon, thereby condoned, thereby encouraged, by Western politicians and slanted Western media coverage, which tends to denigrate the Ukrainian authorities as illegitimate and heavy-handed.

One only has to imagine the apoplectic outcry that would ensue from Washington or Brussels if say, for example, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov were to turn up to address an anti-austerity protest in New York, London, Berlin or Paris.

What Washington and European politicians are recklessly doing is clearly intended to maximize political tensions within Ukraine to the point where civil strife could erupt between the Western and Eastern parts of the country.

The matter of EU association is beside the point. It is merely a pretext for Western interference in the sovereign affairs of the Ukraine. And the real target is ultimately the West’s destabilization of Russia.

Ever since the break-up of the Soviet Union, the West has been systematically cleaving territories from Moscow’s regional influence, through garnering former Soviet states into the EU and NATO.

The recent NATO war exercises in Poland and the Baltics, along with the planned deployment of missile systems on Russia’s border, are all part of this long-term offensive dynamic by the West towards Moscow.

The intense political pressure being applied to the Ukraine by Washington and Brussels has got nothing to do with a suspended EU trade pact. It is war-like pincer movement to weaken Russia.

It is no coincidence that failed Western regime change in Syria is now being re-directed towards Russia. Verily, Western imperialist rust never sleeps.

AB/AB

Finian Cunningham (born 1963) has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in journalism. He is also a musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organisations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Originally from Belfast, Ireland, he is now located in East Africa as a freelance journalist, where he is writing a book on Bahrain and the Arab Spring, based on eyewitness experience working in the Persian Gulf as an editor of a business magazine and subsequently as a freelance news correspondent. The author was deported from Bahrain in June 2011 because of his critical journalism in which he highlighted systematic human rights violations by regime forces. He is now a columnist on international politics for Press TV and the Strategic Culture Foundation. More articles by Finian Cunningham
Related Viewpoints:

US, EU paying Ukrainian rioters, protesters

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 22:56

US, EU paying Ukrainian rioters, protesters

A protester pictured demonstrating in support of Ukraine

A protester pictured demonstrating in support of Ukraine’s integration in the EU in the center of Kiev on November 23, 2013.
Mon Feb 17, 2014 8:46PM GMT


By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Related Interviews:

A number of confirmations have come in from readers that Washington is fueling the violent protests in Ukraine with our taxpayer dollars. Washington has no money for food stamps or to prevent home foreclosures, but it has plenty of money with which to subvert Ukraine.

One reader wrote: “My wife, who is of Ukrainian nationality, has weekly contact to her parents and friends in Zhytomyr [NW Ukraine]. According to them, most protesters get an average payment of 200-300 grivna, corresponding to about 15-25 euro. As I additionally heard, one of the most active agencies and ‘payment outlets’ on EU side is the German ‘Konrad Adenauer Stiftung’, being closely connected to the CDU, i.e. Mrs. Merkel’s party.”

As I reported on February 12, “Washington Orchestrated Protests Are Destabilizing Ukraine,” Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, a rabid Russophobe and neoconservative warmonger, told the National Press Club last December that the US has “invested” $5 billion in organizing a network to achieve US goals in Ukraine in order to give “Ukraine the future it deserves.”  Nuland is the Obama regime official who was caught red-handed naming the members of the Ukrainian government Washington intends to impose on the Ukrainian people once the paid protesters have unseated the current elected and independent government.

What Nuland means by Ukraine’s future under EU overlordship is for Ukraine to be looted like Latvia and Greece and to be used by Washington as a staging ground for US missile bases against Russia.

From the responses I received to my request for confirmations of the information sent to me from Moldova, there is enough evidence that Washington fomented the violent riots for western newspapers and TV channels to investigate. But they haven’t. As we know, the “presstitutes” are enablers of Washington’s crimes and duplicities. However, the US media has reported that the Ukrainian government is paying Ukrainians to rally in favor of the government.

As Karl Marx wrote, money turns everything into a commodity that is bought and sold. I wouldn’t be surprised if some protesters are working both sides of the street.

Of course, not all of the protesters are paid. There are plenty of “gullible dupes” in the streets who think they are protesting Ukraine government corruption. I have heard from several. There is little doubt that the Ukraine government is “corrupt.” What government isn’t? Government corruption is “universal,” but it is easy to go from the frying pan into the fire. Ukrainian protesters seem to think that they can escape corruption by joining the EU. Obviously, these “gullible dupes” are unfamiliar with the report on EU corruption issued February 3 by the EU Commissioner for Home Affairs. The report says that a business-political nexus of corruption affects all 28 EU member countries and costs the EU economies $162.2 billion per annum. Clearly, Ukrainians will not escape corruption by joining the EU. Indeed, the corruption will be worse.

I have no objection to Ukrainians protesting government corruption. Indeed, such “gullible people” could benefit from the lesson they would learn once their country is in the hands of “corrupt” Brussels and Washington. What I object to is the lack of awareness on the part of the protesters that by permitting themselves to be manipulated by Washington, they are pushing the world toward a dangerous war. I would be surprised if Russia is content to have US military and missile bases in Ukraine.

It was “fools” like Nuland playing the great game that gave us World War I. World War III would be the last war. Washington’s drive to exploit every opportunity to establish its hegemony over the world is driving us all to nuclear war. Like Nuland, a significant percentage of the population of western Ukraine are “Russophobes.” I know the case for Ukrainian dislike of Russia, but Ukrainian emotions fueled with Washington’s money should not direct the course of history. No historians will be left to document how “gullible and witless” Ukrainians set the world up for destruction.

MAM/MAM

Dr Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is now available. More articles by Dr. Roberts.
Related Viewpoints:
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of Press TV.

Washington’s cloned female warmongers

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 22:48

Washington’s cloned female warmongers

Victoria Nuland - the US Assistant Secretary of State

Victoria Nuland – the US Assistant Secretary of State
Sun Feb 9, 2014 8:48AM GMT


By Finian Cunningham

What is it about America’s women diplomats? They seem so hard and cloned – bereft of any humanity or intelligence. Presumably, these women are supposed to represent social advance for the female gender. But, far from displaying female independence, they are just a pathetic copy of the worst traits in American male politicians – aggressive, arrogant and completely arrant in their views.

Take Victoria Nuland – the US Assistant Secretary of State – who was caught using obscene language in a phone call about the European Union and the political affairs of Ukraine. In her previous posting as a spokeswoman for the US State Department, Nuland had the demeanor of a robotic matron with a swivel eye.

Now in her new role of covertly rallying anti-government protesters in Ukraine, Nuland has emerged to sound like a bubblegum-chewing Mafia doll. In her leaked private conversation with the US ambassador to Kiev, the American female diplomat is heard laying down in imperious tones how a new government in Ukraine should be constituted. Nuland talks about “gluing together” a sovereign country as if it is a mere plaything, and she stipulates which members of the US-backed street rabble in Kiev should or should not be included in any Washington-approved new government in the former Soviet republic.

We don’t know who actually tapped and leaked Nuland’s private call to the US ambassador in Kiev, Geoffrey Pyatt. It could have been the Ukrainian or Russian secret services, but, regardless, it was an inspired move to reveal it. For the disclosure, which has been posted on the internet, lays bare the subversive meddling agenda of Washington in Ukrainian internal affairs. Up to now, the Americans have been piously pretending that their involvement is one of a bystander supporting democracy from afar.

But, thanks to the Nuland’s foul-mouthed indiscretion, the truth is out. Washington, from her own admission, is acting like an agent provocateur in Ukraine’s political turmoil. That is an illegal breach of international rules of sovereignty. Nuland finishes her phone call like a gangster ordering a hit on a rival, referring to incompetent European interference in Ukraine with disdain – “F…k the EU.”

What we are witnessing here is the real, ugly face of American government and its uncouth contempt for international law and norms.

Next up is Wendy Sherman, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs, who is also Washington’s top negotiator in the P5+1 nuclear talks with Iran. Sherman is another flinty-eyed female specimen of the American political class, who, like Nuland, seems to have a block of ice for a heart and a frozen Popsicle for a brain.

Again, like Nuland, Sherman aims to excel in her political career by sounding even more macho, morose and moronic than her male American peers.

Last week, Sherman was giving testimony before the US Senate foreign affairs committee on the upcoming negotiations with Iran over the interim nuclear agreement. The panel was chaired by the warmongering Democrat Senator Robert Menendez, who wants to immediately ramp up more sanctions on Iran, as well as back the Israeli regime in any preemptive military strike on the Islamic Republic.

Sherman’s performance was a craven display of someone who has been brainwashed to mouth a mantra of falsehoods with no apparent ability to think for herself. It’s scary that such people comprise the government of the most nuclear-armed-and-dangerous state in the world.

Programmed Sherman accused Iran of harboring ambitions to build nuclear weapons. “We share the same goal [as the warmonger Menendez] to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.” And she went on to repeat threadbare, risible allegations that Iran is supporting international terrorism. That is a disturbing indication of the low level of political intelligence possessed by the US chief negotiator.

“Iran also continues to arm and train militants in Lebanon, Gaza, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Bahrain. And Iran and Lebanese Hezbollah continue,” asserted Sherman without citing an iota of proof and instead relying on a stale-old propaganda narrative.

The number three in the US State Department went on to say of the interim nuclear deal with Iran: “What is also important to understand is that we remain in control over whether to accept the terms of a final deal or not. We have made it clear to Iran that, if it fails to live up to its commitments, or if we are unable to reach agreement on a comprehensive solution, we would ask the Congress to ramp up new sanctions.”

Remember that Sherman and her State Department boss John Kerry are considered “soft on Iran” by the likes of Menendez, John McCain, Lyndsey Graham, Mark Kirk, and the other political psychopaths in Washington. So, we can tell from Sherman’s callous words and mean-minded logic that the scope for genuine rapprochement between the US and Iran is extremely limited.

Sherman finished her performance before the Senate panel with the obligatory illegal threat of war that Washington continually issues against Iran: “We retain all options to ensure that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon.”

In the goldfish-bowl environment of Washington politics, perhaps such female officials are to be even more feared. The uniform monopoly of America’s political class is dictated by militarism – weapons manufacturers, oil companies and Zionist lobbyists. The only way to “succeed” in this cesspool is to be even more aggressive and imperialist than your peers.

Nuland and Sherman illustrate the cold-hearted logic at work in American robotic politics: it’s a system programmed for imperialism and war, and it doesn’t matter whether the officials are Democrat, Republic, male or female. They are all clones of a war criminal state.

SL/SL

Finian Cunningham (born 1963) has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages. He is a Master’s graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a career in journalism. He is also a musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he worked as an editor and writer in major news media organisations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Originally from Belfast, Ireland, he is now located in East Africa as a freelance journalist, where he is writing a book on Bahrain and the Arab Spring, based on eyewitness experience working in the Persian Gulf as an editor of a business magazine and subsequently as a freelance news correspondent. The author was deported from Bahrain in June 2011 because of his critical journalism in which he highlighted systematic human rights violations by regime forces. He is now a columnist on international politics for Press TV and the Strategic Culture Foundation.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of Press TV.

Roy Tov: Sochi’s War Room is Israeli

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 21:08

PB: On the basis of choosing Israeli security firm for Sochi, Roy believes in co-operation of two evil regimes: Russian and Israeli. I don’t think so; Putin is famous for courageously keeping his foes at arms reach with eye contact. The Israeli firm may spy as much on Russia as Russia will gather intelligence and make inroads into the Israeli system. Risking false-flag? Methink Israeli firm watched closely by thousands of Russian intel, security, uniformed and specnaz forces is the best guarantee that false flag will NOT happen.

………………..

Sochi’s War Room is Israeli

…  Remembering his KGB days, Putin is envious. The war room can …
email list subscriptions: subscribe@roitov.com
Tortured by the Terrorist Evo Morales Regime
+
+ +
Roi Tov
tovroy@aol.com

Roy Tov: Jewish Member of the Knesset Calls to Rebel against Zionism

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 20:42

Jewish Member of the Knesset Calls to Rebel against Zionism

…we will demand from the Ultra-Orthodox people not to pay taxes, to go out and start a popular civil rebellion, no violent, because we will not allow to a Jewish administration in the Land of Israel to transform this state into an anti-religious state and anti-Jewish state. If they [Zionists] want war, …

email list subscriptions: subscribe@roitov.com
email list unsubscriptions: unsubscribe@roitov.com
Tortured by the Terrorist Evo Morales Regime
+
+ +
Roi Tov
tovroy@aol.com

Prof. Majewska: Scypionki najbardziej zabójcze + powodujące uszkodzenia mózgu

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 20:36

From: Maria Majewska
Date: February 17, 2014 5:10:28 PM PST (CA)
Subject: zabojcze szczepienia

W zalaczeniu dwa dokumenty:
1. Zawiera 3 tabelki z wyliczeniem szczepionek, ktore sa najbardziej zabojcze.
2. Tabelka  pokazujaca ktore szczepienia powoduja najwiecej uszkodzen mozgu.

Szczepionki najbardziej zabójcze

Szczepienia uszkodzenie mozgu

Germany, Russia and the South Caucasus

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 20:08

Newsletter 2014/02/14 – Caucasian Interim Report (II)

TBILISI/BERLIN (Own report) – Eclipsed by the power struggle over the
Ukraine, Berlin is pushing to speed up the signing of two other EU
Association Agreements. The agreements to permanently associate
Georgia and Moldova to the EU should be signed in due form no later
than August and should be implemented as soon as possible. The
agreement with Georgia is considered particularly important, because
it will firmly anchor the EU in the strategically important South
Caucasus, thereby weakening Russia’s position in a highly sensitive
region: Georgia can exert its influence on the hot spots in Russia’s
North Caucasus and secondly, strategically important gas pipelines
transit this region. It is even conceivable that progress being made
in the nuclear negotiations will permit an Iranian natural gas supply
to Europe through the South Caucasus pipelines. The Berlin/Brussels
association offensive is accompanied by a massive derogatory campaign
against Russia and President Vladimir Putin, supplementing the German
European campaign for the Ukraine’s EU association.

more

Czy będzie jutro, 18 lutego, próba zamachu stanu w Kijowie?

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 10:49

From: “Marek Glogoczowski”

Date: February 17, 2014 2:04:26 PM PST (CA)
Subject: Czy będzie jutro, 18 lutego, próba zamachu stanu w Kijowie?

Czy będzie jutro, 18 lutego, próba zamachu stanu w Kijowie?

Wszystko wskazuje NATO, że jutro, we wtorek 18 lutego, nastąpi w Wierchownej Rade (Sejmie) Ukrainy próba najzwyklejszego ZAMACHU STANU w wykonaniu „partii opozycyjnych”. Ten „pucz parlamentarny” ma być wsparty atakiem z zewnątrz tłumu około tysiąca “aktywistów” “Samoobrony UPA-USA”, który ma przybyć pod mury tego niesławnego budynku, ze znakiem „tryzuba” na post-sowieckim frontonie.

Kto zna rosyjski może poczytać dzisiejsze (17.02) opublikowane przez Sekretariat Partii Regionów ostrzeżenie na ten “blisko-przyszłościowy” temat:

http://zadonbass.org/news/accent/message_76334

Do tego swego „dziejowego” zadania kijowskie bojówki UPA się aktywnie przygotowują od kilku miesięcy, w ubiegłą sobotę chodząc, w pełnym “wojennym” rynsztunku, po głównych ulicach Kijowa, bijąc nie zgadzających się z planami UPA przechodniów. Patrz filmik poniżej z 15 lutego, wskazujący, iż te bojówki są obecnie wyposażone (w tarcze, pały, kaski, granaty dymne, itd.) lepiej niż milicyjny, niedopłacony “Birkut”, który będzie miał za zadanie ochraniać budynek Wierchownej Rady. (Ciekawym, czy “Birkutowców” udało się już przekupić – lub podstawić fałszywych milicjantów – tak jak to było w Belgradzie w październiku 2000 roku, przy szturmie budynku Skupszcziny?)

Oto filmik z 15 lutego, pokazujący „pokojową działalność”, na ulicach Kijowa, gangów „samoobrony UPA”:

A tutaj znamienna wypowiedź Olega Tjagniboka („Ciągnijboka”?), na kijowskim Majdanie 17 lutego, szefa obficie sponsorowanego przez USA gangu „Swoboda UPA” (jego „mowę miłości” da się zrozumieć, bo ukraiński to po prostu dialekt polskiego, jak to zauważył Roman Dmowski).

A poniżej dowcipna rycina, z serbskiego pisemka „Danas”, wskazująca na „niewidzialną rękę”, która porusza ustami „bohaterów Majdanu”:

majdan

A co będzie jutro w Kijowie? Jak mawiają w Rossii, “ posmotrim i uvidim “.

MG, Katowice, 17.02.2014

Mossad now hiring rabbis for assassin’s spiritual needs

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 10:18

Mossad now hiring rabbis for assassin’s spiritual needs

Prominent Polish Jew Defended Poland

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 01:00

Review of The Story of One Life, by Ludwik Hirszfeld. Edited by Marta A. Balinska and William H. Schneider. 2010. University of Rochester Press.

Reviewer: Mr. Jan Peczkis

The Wide-Ranging Experiences of an Assimilated and Catholic Polish Jew and Intellectual

Ludwik Hirszfeld (Hirschfeld), who came from an assimilated Jewish family, converted to Catholicism about 1920, out of a love for Poland. (p. 412). He describes his scientific work as a serologist, and mentions many scientific personages. He then focuses on the German terror bombing of Warsaw in 1939, the Nazi German savagery directed against both Jews and Poles, his incarceration in the Warsaw Ghetto, his escape from the ghetto, and the assistance he got from Poles. This enabled him to survive the Holocaust.

This work is full of interesting information. For instance, the Nazi privations imposed upon Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto had been so great (leading to a death rate of 50,000 persons annually, or 120 per 1,000), that the Warsaw Jews would have died out in eight years–without any shootings or gas chambers. (p. 223).

A SHORT RECENT HISTORY OF POLISH JEWS

Hirszfeld’s analysis is summarized as follows, “Towards the end of the nineteenth century, masses of Russian Jews banned by the Tsar, the so-called Litvaks [Litwaks], started coming to Poland. These Jews were imbued with Russian culture. They were indifferent toward the Poles’ struggle for their own Polish culture. (unquote). (p. 326).

He continues, (quote). The Peace Treaty of Versailles recognized the Jews as a national minority, gave them special rights to establish their own schools, and put this national minority in the care of the League of Nations. This was a mistake. The minority rights guarded by international institutions did not help the Jews at all. On the contrary, they deepened the chasm between the Jews and the Poles and, what was even more detrimental for the Europeanization of the lower Jewish strata, such rights encouraged others to associate the concept of a Jew with cultural backwardness. (unquote). (p. 327).

PRE-WWII POLISH ANTI-SEMITISM: NO FINGER-POINTING

Hirszfeld comments, (quote) The young Polish nationalist movement did not want to accept the Jewish masses which, for their part, deliberately struggled to preserve their distinctiveness…A QUI LA FAUTE? [Whose fault is it?] In matters of this type, it is best not to talk about guilt. Two historically dissimilar nations lived on one soil. As a result of competition and differing customs among the lower strata, joint ties and tasks were forgotten. The sound and fruitful work done by Jewish scientists, physicians, and industrialists was regarded as penetration by alien elements. (unquote). (pp. 327-328).

Of course, Hirszfeld unambiguously condemned the numerus nullus, ghetto benches, and violence against Jews, as uncivilized conduct stemming largely from youthful bellicose nationalism. (pp. 160-161, 328-329). However, he found an element of rationality in the economic boycotts and the numerus clausus. He wrote, (quote) Anti-Semitism vented in economic boycotts is unpleasant, but the fight for markets has generally assumed more cruel forms. (unquote). (p. 160). (Quote) Rural areas did not have enough physicians, but Jewish physicians did not like to go to the countryside. Medical schools began to introduce a numerus clausus to equalize the percentage of Poles and Jews coming from cities and thus ensure medical service in rural areas. (unquote). (p. 328).

POLISH SZMALCOWNIKI AND DENOUNCERS OF JEWS IN PERSPECTIVE

While a fugitive in Aryan Warsaw, Hirszfeld experienced the danger of betrayal, and not only from certain Poles. He comments, (quote) Thousands of spies were roaming the city, Volksdeutsch, Poles, and Jews whose lives were temporarily spared in exchange for denouncing their countrymen in hiding. (unquote). (p. 276; see also p. 313).

Hirszfeld understands the odds of fugitive Jewish survivorship in Poland, and warns that survivor testimonies inevitably exaggerate the number and significance of denouncers. He quips, (quote) I saw that the Jews in hiding were looking at the stand of the people from a perspective that was understandable but incorrect. A goodhearted man could save at best one or a few Jews and not for long, especially when he had no means. One evil man, a blackmailer, or informer, could destroy thousands. Therefore, I believe that we must not generalize the fact and we must not rely on stories told by victims. Out of the 3.5 million Polish Jews, only several tens of thousands survived. Those survivors will, unfortunately, have a false picture of the whole when they think about the mob that persecuted them and robbed them of their last shirt. (unquote). (p. 317). Neo-Stalinists and other Polonophobes, take note.

Unlike those who allege Polish anti-Semitism as the main motivator of the denunciation of fugitive Jews, Hirszfeld does not. He comments, (quote) But we must not condemn all society. Many of these blackmailers were later killed by the government of underground Poland and even by local people. The guilt rests not with Polish anti-Semitism but with the German General Government, which placed a certain category of people outside the law. (unquote). (p. 318).

THE INVOLUNTARY ANTI-JEWISH ACTS OF POLES IN THE BAUDIENST

Neo-Stalinist Jan Grabowski, in his JUDENJAGD (HUNT FOR THE JEWS), makes it appear that Poles in the Baudienst were Nazi collaborators. They were not. Hirszfeld comments, (quote) A young boy of twenty…had been mobilized as a JUNAK to work in the Baudienst [Construction Battalions]. He could not avoid this, because they would have taken his parents. The Germans put these young men in barracks and drilled them for several days with lectures on how the Jews were the source of all evil in this world. They were shown pictures in which the Jew was presented as a louse or bedbug. Later, they were given a large amount of vodka. When they were half conscious, they were ordered to surround the town and catch the Jews…These young boys were actually still children who had been forced to play the role of hangman…”One fellow refused, and immediately he got a bullet in his head.” (unquote). (p. 280).

POLISH BLUE POLICE (POLICJA GRANATOWA) KILLING FUGITIVE JEWS

The author makes it obvious that the Blue Police was under strict German orders to apprehend and/or kill Jews, or acted in extreme circumstances. He writes about a German-ordered execution, (quote) The shooting was ordered for seven o’clock in the morning. Stakes were set up in the prison’s courtyard. The Jewish Monitor Service was granted the honor of binding the convicts to the stakes. Under penalty of death, the Polish police were forced to fire on command because the Germans wanted the disgrace of killing to fall on the Poles. (unquote). (p. 235). Clearly, the Germans were trying to shift the blame for their crimes unto the Poles (much as they do to this day).

In addition, Hirszfeld, based on personal experience, elaborates on the German-imposed duress faced by the Blue Police: (quote) Once, I remember Polish policemen came to the manor…Between the first and second glass of vodka, they told us how they were being forced to catch Jews and deliver them to the designated places…There are ways and means to encourage or force people to commit murder. Several policemen were killed for having had pity on Jews. The peasants often hid Jews. Once, a young Jewess was caught and forced to confess under torture where she had been hiding. The peasants who had been hiding her were killed, while the Polish police was informed that Jews were denouncing the peasants and that, in order to save their countrymen, they should kill Jews at once. (unquote). (pp. 284-285).

Hirszfeld recounts his encounters with members of the Policja Granatowa who stated that they had killed Jews, as from personal vendettas. Far from supporting it, the Polish population found this repugnant: (quote) I discussed these matters with many people: landed gentry, clergy, peasants, and policemen. Almost all were anti-Semites, but no one approved of these methods of liquidating the problem. (unquote). (p. 285). This reminds us that Polish anti-Semitism had been much more bark than bite. Whereas conventional anti-Semitic attitudes were common among Poles, murderous anti-Semitism clearly was NOT.

GREEDY POLES?

The taking of bribes for smuggled goods, by those guarding the Warsaw Ghetto, provided the much-needed perspective, (quote) The cooperation was smooth, and the bribes were distributed according to the supremacy of races: The Jew got one part, the Pole two parts, and the German seven. (unquote). (p. 192).

Poles sometimes denounced Jews for rewards. In addition, the author described German auctions of Jewish belongings, and how some Poles bought these goods of the murdered Jews. Instead of blaming Polish “greed and anti-Semitism” for this conduct, as neo-Stalinists such as Jan T. Gross do, Hirszfeld appreciated the significance of wartime demoralization: (quote) Together with the Jewish problem, it was human conscience that was being liquidated. (unquote). (p. 285).

Thievery was a common all-around occurrence in WWII and post-WWII Poland, and certainly not something aimed by Poles at Jews. While evaluating the books and scientific instruments remaining in postwar Wroclaw, Hirszfeld found that many of them had “become the prey of robbers.” (p. 354).

CHRISTIANITY, ANTI-SEMITISM, AND THE HOLOCAUST

Nowadays, Christianity and its traditional teachings about Jews are blamed for encouraging participation in the Holocaust, or at least a disinclination to empathize with Jewish suffering. Hirszfeld found the exact opposite. He came across many Poles, steeped in Catholicism, whose strong anti-Semitism was held in check by their devout Catholicism. He said, (quote) Yet, these through and through good and just people despised Jews and ascribed all evil to them…Nevertheless, they had pity for Jews and severely condemned German cruelty. They, as well as many other people from the same sphere, were a good example of the ennobling influence of the Christian culture. In spite of their antipathy for Jews and their desire to rid Poland of them, they condemned the murders committed by the occupiers. It was obvious that Poland was incapable of such actions. (unquote). (p. 283).

POLAND’S JEWISH PROBLEM–SOLVED. PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS

Poles nowadays are commonly berated for even hinting that Hitler solved Poland’s Jewish problem, even though approval of the consequences of an action is entirely different from approval of the action itself. Hirszfeld concurred, (quote) Even at that time [pre-WWII] the only way out was for some Jews to emigrate and for others to change their social structure and absorb Polish culture. That process would have required several generations and a higher emigration rate which, incidentally, was being promoted by the Polish Government. This problem was tragically solved during the war. The number of Jews in Poland who have survived…is very small…Almost all Jewish property was taken by the Germans. Now, with the Germans gone, these factories and stores will be transferred to Poles. There probably is no power that could take these assets away from the Polish owners. (unquote). (p. 329).

NAZI GERMAN GENOCIDE OF THE POLES

The nowadays-customary dichotomy of the sufferings of Poles and Jews, as by relegating Poles to spectators of the Shoah, was totally foreign to the author. (e. g, p. 330). As an intellectual, Hirszfeld was quite sensitive to the Nazi genocide of most of Poland’s intelligentsia. (p. 311, 353). He had a list of more than two thousand Polish professors, architects, and physicians murdered by the Germans. (p. 353). He also went into considerable detail about the German confiscation and destruction of Poland’s scientific institutions, libraries, and other forms of cultural genocide. (p. 179, 341). He was especially galled by the fact that German scientists took part in the pillage. (p. 341). According to a quoted ARMIA KRAJOWA (A. K.) brochure, there was not a single spot in German-occupied Poland that did not go through the German Gehenna. (p. 311).

From the beginning, Nazi attitudes towards Jews and Poles had overlapped considerably. For instance, while everyone knows that the Nazis thought of Jews as vermin, and as bearers of typhus, it is a little-known fact that the Nazis also thought of typhus as a Slavic disease, as pointed out by editors Balinska and Schneider. (pp. xxxii). Hirszfeld notes that the Germans were driven by lebensraum (p. 252). He realized that, after the Jews, the Fuhrer hated the Poles the most, and that Poles were next in line for extermination after the Jews. (p. 247).

Russian reactor for Iranian oil

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 00:32

Russia may build us reactor in exchange for oil

Haaretz: Intra-Jewish fissure over Israel bubbles to the surface

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 00:22

Intra-Jewish fissure over Israel bubbles to the surface

What it means to ‘be at odds with Israel’ is an increasingly vague measure, yet it seems to be more important to Jewish communal gatekeepers than ever before.

Haaretz

On top of the recent canceling by the Washington, D.C. JCC of a talk by an author the organizers didn’t deem kosher enough when it comes to Israel, this week’s New York Times profiled a handful of observant American Jews who have gone public with their opposition to Israeli policies. Or is it to Israel itself? It certainly isn’t to Judaism: One subject who was profiled gets a thrill when the ark is opened at synagogue; another is an acclaimed Talmud scholar; another is a rabbi, and still another keeps the laws of kashrut and the Sabbath.

What it means to “be at odds with Israel,” as the headline declares, is an increasingly vague measure. And yet it seems to be more important to Jewish communal gatekeepers than ever before.

To receive a communal seal of approval, must an individual actually love Israel, simply “like” Israel, or even merely tolerate Israel’s existence? Maybe it is about supporting Israel, but feeling free to criticize its policies. But what if policy opposition runs to Israel’s denial of the Palestinian “right of return,” its maintenance of the basket of discriminatory laws against Arab Israelis, the existence of the Jewish National Fund’s Jewish-only land-leasing policies, and Israel’s Law of Return, the sine qua non of Israel as a Jewish refuge?

Certainly there may be those who think the founding of the State of Israel was a mistake, but support the existence of Israel given that the country already exists. These non-Zionists likely keep their heads down, since for them, the debate is academic and philosophical at best.

But what of Jews who believe that the Zionist political project was fundamentally flawed and are vocal about their view? One might say that any political ideology – even one that has been so intimately tied up with the notion of Jewish safety – should be fair game for criticism. If you agree with this assumption, but still believe that the “red line” of speech should be support for Israel as a Jewish and democratic state (as both Rabbi David Wolpe and Rabbi Eric H. Yoffie have declared their red lines to be when it comes to who should be heard and who ignored), does this mean you believe in checking one’s intellectual faculties at the door of our Jewish institutions?

There are those who are passionate about the practice of Judaism but who are deeply critical of Israeli policies. There are those who, like in the NYT article, are passionate about the practice of Judaism but are deeply critical of Israel’s political identity. There are those for whom the practice of Judaism is anathema but who may be passionate, secular Zionists. And there are Jews who identify as Jewish by heritage but are neither practicing Jews nor Zionists.

If there are many ways to be Jewish, as they saying goes, then there are many ways to relate to Israel as Jews.

The JCC which I frequent (and, full disclosure, on whose board I am vice-president), includes one mention of Israel in its mission statement, which aims to promote “connection to Israel.”

With a love for the knowledge and transmission of Hebrew language and Israeli culture, and an intellectual appreciation of Israeli politics, I have understood the term “connection” to Israel to be both natural and inclusive for a Jewish institution’s mandate.

But now with debate about Israel swirling at a fevered pitch, I’m wondering how elastic a word like “connection” is actually understood to be by Jewish communities across North American. One of the figures profiled in the New York Times piece expressed his dislike for what he sees as the worshiping of a military state. Another dislikes the melding of religion with nationalism. Yet another is active with Jewish Voice for Peace, a prime mover of the BDS agenda.

Certainly there are many who would seek to ban these individuals from the podium of Jewish institutional conversation. But I would also venture a guess that each of these individuals, plus anyone who has ever talked about Israel at the dinner table, or written about it, or joined an organization seeking policy change, feels some sort of connection to Israel. If they didn’t, why would they care? And if I’m wrong, and they don’t personally feel a connection to Israel, then their intellectual positions will at least force the kind of dialogue that is becoming more and more necessary.

While it is Zionists who understandably feel besieged right now with the “delegitimation” campaign gaining ground, it is arguably the anti-Zionists on whom the burden of argument will fall: how to ask a country to deconstruct itself and reconstruct its core identity, when we all know that there is another solution in arm’s reach that could circumvent this more-than-painful demand, while still forging a path of dignity and compassion.

Takifiris in Syria threaten global security

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 00:21

Takifiris in Syria threaten global security

 

U.S. Jewish leader: BDS is ’21st century form of 20th century anti-Semitism’

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 00:01

U.S. Jewish leader: BDS is ’21st century form of 20th century anti-Semitism’

17/02/2014

Italy’s PM-to-be is tough on Iran, empathetic to Israel

Filed under: Uncategorized — grypa666 @ 23:56

Italy’s PM-to-be is tough on Iran, empathetic to Israel

puppet

Matteo Renzi supported the 2009 ‘Green Movement’ against the ayatollahs, and has urged ‘more careful consideration of Israel’s stances’

Times of Israel

The man expected to become Italy’s next prime minister is known to be friendly toward Israel and to take a tough line on Iran.

Matteo Renzi, currently the mayor of Florence and the secretary of the Italian center-left Democratic Party, is the top candidate to succeed Prime Minister Enrico Letta, who resigned last week.

“Sometimes Israel exceeds its defense [actions], and we need to say it, but it is time that the left state unequivocally that Israel has a right to live without threats,” Renzi, who has visited the country, has been quoted as saying. “Israel is a country that is surrounded by organizations that wish its destruction, starting with Iran,” he said on a different occasion.

A government led by Renzi would probably imply a “few variations to the traditional pattern of Italian foreign policy,” according to Michele Di Donato, an Italian scholar focusing on European left-wing politics. “A slight pro-Atlanticist swing may be expected, as well as a more careful consideration of Israel’s stances in Middle Eastern policy.”

Renzi has called Iran the “mother of all challenges” in the Middle East, Di Donato noted, not only because of the regime’s nuclear ambitions but mostly because the 39-year-old politician supported Iran’s opposition “Green Movement” in 2009. “On the same occasion he expressed reservations about the Italian approval of the bid to upgrade Palestine’s UN status on November 2012: a rather isolated position in the center-left, traditionally quite sympathetic to the Palestinian cause,” Di Donate noted.

In 2012, Renzi attended a demonstration entitled “For the Truth, for Israel,” during which Israeli and Italian flags were waved.

“I don’t really know why, but he has always shown very pro-Israel ideas the few times he talked about foreign policy,” said Nathan Servi, a Jewish native of Florence who has been following Renzi’s political career closely over the years. “It seems we may [get] a European center-left prime minister who doesn’t hate Israel after all.”

« Previous PageNext Page »

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 681 other followers