Mass Deception on Mass Violence: The Case of Serbs

Piotr Bein, paper prepared for the International Comparative Genocide Research project of the Hiroshima City University, 2009

Introduction

Croatia: Ustaša tradition

Neo-Ustaše

Operations Storm and Lightning

Double standard for Holocaust deniers

Bosnian Islamism

Srebrenica

Political pressure and NGOs

250,000 “dead”

“Gendercide”

Kosovo: old race hatred

From Illyria to Greater Albania

Operation Allied Force

March 2004 pogroms

Justice

Justice politicized

Judicial murder

ICTY and the term genocide

ICJ ruling

Infowar

Information Operations

Dehumanize and criminalize

Compromised journalism

Biased scholars

Other instruments

Covert action and economic sanctions

Military support

Holocaustianity

PR firms and NGOs

Conclusions

Balkan case

Cross-case and research-related

………………………………………………….

Keywords Bosnia,  covert action, Croatia, demonization, ethnic cleansing, gendercide, genocide, Holocaustianity, infowar, intervensionism, Kosovo, legalistic warfare, neocons, NGO, Srebrenica, Yugoslavia

Notes

a. Date convention: x.y.z, where x = day, y = month, z = year. Example: 24.3.1999 = March 24, 1999.

b. Phonetic equivalents of Serbo-Croatian letters: ć = soft ch, č = ch, š = sh, đ = dj, ž = zh.

c. Titles of references are truncated.

Acronyms

BiH              Bosnia and Herzegovina

BND             Bundesnachrichtendienst (German secret service)

D&FA          Defense & Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy (publication)

FYROM       Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

GWOT         global war on terror

ICJ               International Court of Justice

ICTY            International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia

ISSA            International Strategic Studies Association

JNA             Yugoslav National Army

JPC              Judeocentric Power Complex

KFOR          NATO-led international occupation forces in Kosovo

KLA             Kosovo Liberation Army

MEP            member of European Parliament

NGO            non-governmental organization

NYT New York Times

OSCE           Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

POW            prisoner of war

PR                Public Relations

SANU          Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts

SFOR           Stabilization Force (UN-NATO force in Bosnia-Herzegovina)

SS                 Schutzstaffel (German Nazi political paramilitary and elite troops)

UNMIK       UN Mission in Kosovo

UNSC          United Nations Security Concil

VRS              Serbian Republic Army (BiH)

Introduction

All sides of the Balkan conflicts have committed war crimes, but, unlike Croats, Bosnian Muslims and Kosovo Albanians,  Serbs haven‘t carried out ethnic cleansing on any of the lands they populated. Rather, Serbs have fought to keep their ancestral lands, without attempts to expand typical of the other warrying factions. Eventful history has scattered Serbs around the region, and their desire was to be in one country. Yugoslavia offered this. After WWII, Serbs generally lived in peace with their ethnic neighbours; by 1999, Serbia was the only former republic, where ethnic groups coexisted peacefully.

Despite these verifiable facts, Serbs, the least guilty, have received undeserved bad publicity, have been bombed, and their craddle Kosovo has been stolen for a mafia state, while one-quarter of ex-Yugoslavia’s Serb population has ended up in hostile new states, without the right to self-determination,[1] even though they wanted to remain in one state, Yugoslavia. UN-NATO proteges Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo have practiced racist purification that displaced over a million people, mostly Serbs. Unique human groups have become extinct in Western Slavonia, Krajina, Sarajevo, and Dubrovnik, while remnants of Kosovo Serbs are being cleansed..

Attempts by the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to redefine Serbian war crimes as genocide by relativization of the term, reveal problems with the concept and its formalization in the 1948 Convention on the Prevention of the Crime of Genocide. The International Court of Justice absolved (26.2.2007) Serbia from charges of alleged genocide and pursuit of Greater Serbia, but upheld ICTY verdict of Bosnian Serb genocide in Srebrenica. ICJ ruling indirectly refutes the Serbophobic barrage. While media demonized the Serbs for genocide and ethnic cleansing, tens of thousands of Croats, Albanians and Bosnian Muslims lived unharmed in Serbia. The culprits of the Balkan conflicts and sponsors of the Serb-hatred and violence should now answer before courts.

Evidence indicates at most hundreds of executed Bosnian Muslim POWs in Srebrenica, and few, if any, civilians, while Muslim military of UN-protected Srebrenica slaughtered thousands of civilians in systematic raids on Serbian villages. Though the ICTY has indicted persons from all three Bosnian ethnic groups, it mainly prosecutes Serbs. The extremist leaders of Croats, Bosnian Muslims and Kosovo Albanians haven’t stood comparable trials, even though they and their commanders have committed mass crimes, including instigation of hatred.

The US-NATO agression in the Balkans was officially explained as being what it wasn’t. A companion essay analyses the external and internal actors behind mass crimes of “humanitarian interventions” and “spreading democracy”.[2] Drawing on my Polish book,[3] this essay explores Balkan antagonisms, power instruments, role-reversal and demonization as a prelude to interventionism, with an eye on aggression, the supreme war crime according to the Nuremberg Tribunal.

To justify anti-Serbian interventions, the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC)[4] stirred animosities that had healed since WWII. UN forces commander in Bosnia, gen. Morillon said BiH ethnic groups acted not as much out of fear of domination by another group as by the hatred. Dormant hatreds were agitated in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo (sections 1 to 3), and consistently used military, legalistic (section 4), infowar (section 5) and other means (section 6) to conquer Serbs. The companion essay discusses diplomatic instruments and external actors, as they indicate JPC’s  Balkan agenda.

Croatia: Ustaša tradition

Serbs contributed to saving Europe from the Turks and the Nazis. 16th century Habsburgs invited Serbs into a buffer zone (German: Militärgrenze; Serbo-Croatian: Vojna Krajina) vacated before the invading Turks. Croat and Hungarian land owners resented that emperor Ferdinand expropriated them for the Serbs whom he exempted from socage in exchange for the defense. Croat (and Hungarian) anti-Serbism partly stems from this fact. After the Austro-Hungarian empire collapsed and Vojna Krajina joined Croatia in 1868, the Serbs constituted a quarter of Croatia’s population, and in 1991 only 12%.

Established by Ante Pavelić in 1929, Croat extremists Ustaše exterminated Serbs, dissenting Croats, Gypsies and Jews in WWII, with methods that terrified the Nazis.[5] Herman Naubacher, Hitler’s personal assistant for Balkan affairs estimated from own reports the number of Serbs victims at 750,000, reducing Ustaše leaders’ bragging about slaughtering one million Serbs (incl. children, women and the elderly).[6] Edmond Paris writes about some 750,000 Serbs, 60,000 Jews and 26,000 Gypsies murdered in 1941-1945 – “a gigantic holocaust”, WWII “greatest genocide” in proportion to total population.[7] Allan Ryan Jr. quoted Pavelić in Quiet Neighbours: “A good Ustaša is one who can use his knife to cut a child from the womb of his mother.” The Ustaše embraced the ideas of a 19^th century “Croat nation’s father”, Ante Starčević who refined Serbofobia: “The Croat nation deems Slav blood of Serbs to be foreign [...] Serbs must be liquidated.”

Two chapters censored by Tito authorities in a book on Ustaša crimes[8] document Roman Catholic Church’s anti-Yugoslav, pro-fascist stance in the first half of the 20th century.[9] Croat Catholic hierarchy and clergy incited laymen to Ustaše genocide and participated. Race and religion combined “a racist nationalism which aimed at a 100% ethnically pure state, and a fascist Croatian church with a parallel policy of a 100% pure Catholic Croatia.”[10] Catholic and Protestant newspapers published Aryan laws, accounts of the forced conversions, photos of Pavelić’s visits to seminaries and convents, and welcome speeches. Himmler’s deputy Reinhard Heydrich wrote (17.2.1942) about Slavs murdered by Croats “with the most sadistic of methods”: “the Croat-Serbian state of tension is not least of all a struggle of the Catholic Church against the Orthodox Church.”[11]

Hubert Butler[12] incriminates Ustaše and Croat Catholic Church. In 1950 three Balkan politicians in exile asked the UN members to take into custody some 120 Croat nationals, including many Franciscans, stating that a Franciscan commandant of Jasenovac had murdered the prisoners, while forced conversions and massacres centered at a Franciscan monastery in Herzegovina. A law student  from  a Catholic organization had won a 1942 competition by cutting the throats of 1,360 Serbs. French cardinal Tisserant remarked in March 1942 to Pavelić’s ambassador to Vatican, Rušinović: “even the Franciscans of Bosnia-Herzegovina behaved atrociously. Father Šimić, with a revolver in his hand, led an armed gang and destroyed Orthodox churches.” Pavelić later decorated the superior of the Franciscan monastery in Knin for his military activities. Tisserant denounced Rušinović’s lie that 200,000 of the Serb willingly returned to Catholic Church: “The Germans helped you kill all the priests and you got rid of 350,000 Serbs before you set up the Croatian Orthodox Church.” Against the Turks, Tisserant reminded, Serbs had done at least as much for Catholicism as Croats, but the Croats got the title of Antemurale Christianitatis.

Vatican helped CIA-identified Ustaše hide, flee and export valuables taken from their victims. Andrija Artuković[13] “the Himmler of Yugoslavia” whom Vatican helped hide in Ireland before he went to the USA, consulted archbishop of Zagreb, Alojzije Stepinac, on the moral aspects of every action he took. Stepinac loathed Orthodoxy and saw the Ustaša genocide as the “working of the divine hand”. He was sentenced for command responsibility in war crimes and mass murders, because he “played a role in governing the Nazi puppet Croatian state” and “many members of his clergy participated actively in atrocities and mass murders”, and collaborated with the Nazis.[14] In Vatican and Western propaganda, Stepinac’s 5-year imprisonment and a house arrest till his death (1960) are a Communist show.

Neo-Ustaše

Cruelty and Franciscan support re-appeared. Senator Joseph Biden (now US vice-president) caught virulent anti-Serbism from Croat Franciscan clergyman Ilija Živković in early 1980s. Having filtered out Vatican’s and Croat Franciscans’ WWII role, Catholic Biden initiated Serbophobic senate resolutions and motions, and gave hateful speeches and anti-Serb interviews. He said during 1999 debate on NATO aggression, “all Serbs should be placed in Nazi-style concentration camps”, and on CNN’s Larry King Live, “Serbs are illiterate degenerates, baby killers, butchers and rapists”. Živković boasted that Biden was in contact with ultra-nationalist Croat groups, but “what influenced him most was the speech I held […] before just-elected president Bill Clinton […] I explained why the bridges in Belgrade, Serbia, must be bombarded, how to stop Serb forces in BiH […] It was all clear to them, because we have engaged one former congressman back in 1987 to lobby for Croatia”, i.e. long before Yugoslavia breakup. Živković revealed that already in 1985 “the Serbian editors would cut out everything that was Croatian”. In 1985 there was no Croat state; neither Ustaše nostalgia nor Croat fanaticism was tolerated. Živković complained to senator Biden.[15]

In 1990, Croat neo-fascists organized demonstrations, civic intimidations and attacks on Serbs, calling for overthrow of the federation and expulsion of Serbs. Croat extreme nationalists led by future president Franjo Tuđman’s HDZ party won control of the Croat parliament (30.5.1990). HDZ had a neo-Ustaše military wing. Rightist organizations from the West that were absent in the Balkans since the end of WWII, channelled funds, weapons and mercenaries for separatists and terrorists. International neo-fascist CFIVA provided 2,800 mercenaries.[16] German and Austrian clandestine neo-Nazi publications[17] published appeals: “help our Croat brothers defend the white race”.[18] Dreading a repetition of WWII atrocities, Serbs in Croatia rose in defence.

Croat parliament adopted a constitution (22.12.1990) that deprived ethnic Serbs of basic rights. In a replay of 1941, when Nazis set up Croatia as a national state, the constitution relegated Serbs, Jews, Gypsies and Muslims to a second class  tatus. Serbs lost government  jobs, businesses and homes. Serb newspapers were closed down. A property tax applicable only to Serbs was introduced, and militia looted and closed down Serb shops. Serb were issued marked identity cards. Europe demanded (February 1991) that Yugoslavia hold elections. The Croat government attacked Serb civilians in Plitvice (31.3.1991), starting an armed conflict involving the Yugoslav Army, JNA. Even before Croatia‘s independence, its internal affairs minister, Martin Špegelj acknowledged a war against JNA and Serbs (“kill them all in the streets, in their homes, through hand grenades, fire pistols into their bellies, women, children”), promising to deal with the Serb town of Knin “by butchering”. On 5.5.1991, the deadline set by the US Congress resolution 101-513 on economic sanctions as an ultimatum for “democratic reform”, Croat militias attacked a JNA base. The new leadership wanted “to initiate conflict against Belgrade and Serbs, to begin the process of rolling Serbian and BiH borders back to the WWII borders, and to seize JNA military assets.”[19]

HDZ won the first multi-party election. Slovenia and Croatia declared independence (25.6.1991). Europe refused to recognize the secessions. Maastricht Treaty negotiations were on the way, and Germany agreed for the UK to opt out from euro currency, provided the other member states approve the breakup of Yugoslavia. By December 1991, the European Community supported the secessions and encouraged the other republics to separate. Germany and Vatican were the first to recognize the new states. Croat radio (29.10.1991) gave the Serb minority 48 hours to leave homes. On 1.11.1991, 225 Serbs were killed, 36 Serbian churches destroyed, 250 Serbian villages raised and 58,000 Serbs expelled. This first major war crime set the stage for all others.[20]

Croat attacks on Serb-populated “UN Protected Areas” in Western Slavonia (Operation Lightning, May 1995) and Krajina (Operation Storm, August 1995)[21] were the worst ethnic cleansing in the Balkan wars.[22] US supported the planning, preparation, supervision and the combat.[23] A British journalist reflected on these, Croat “brutal military actions”: “the present day Croatian state shares the primary objective of the wartime Ustashe – a racist obsession to create a 100% ethnically pure Catholic Croatia.”[24] Celebrating Storm that drove out 250,000 Krajina Serbs, Tuđman told Croats: “there can be no return to the past, to the times when they, the Serbs, were spreading cancer in the heart of Croatia.”[25]

Operations Storm and Lightning

Croat repressions since 1990, and 1995 Lightning and Storm killed several thousand civilians and brutally expelled hundreds of thousands Serbs. European Community Monitoring Mission teams observed (7-22.8.1995) destruction-by-burning of 60-80% of Krajina Serb property, by Croat military at locations with Croat-controlled access. The systematic burning of whole villages was a co-ordinated ethnic cleansing approved at the highest level, to prevent Serb returns. The remaining Krajina Serbs (mostly the elderly) constituted 2-5% of pre-hostility total.[26] On the average six bodies were discovered daily, mainly of the elderly, many mutilated, shot in the back of the head, or throats cut.[27] Serbian villages, towns and homesteads were systematically destroyed to eliminate “every vestige of Serb occupation”; “one year after the event, the torture, harassment and slaughter of those too old, infirm or just too stubborn to leave continues” with international community’s full knowledge.[28]

ICTY found that the Croat forces had operated in “arson squads”, leaving complete destruction to prevent Serbian return, and hundreds of Krajina Serbs had been murdered or had disappeared after Storm.[29] But ICTY didn’t pursue Croat leaders vigorously. A Kosovo Albanian, gen. Agim Çeku commanded Storm. Canadian peacekeepers witnessed savagery of Çeku´s troops in the Medak Pocket (Croatia, 1993), where over 200 Serb civilians were slaughtered. ICTY had to indict Çeku, largely on the strength of the Canadian testimony.[30] Çeku’s forces massacred a Serb refugee column at Novi Varoš (2.5.1995), and targeted the UN “safe” city of Knin.[31] Later, with a blessing of the US state department, Çeku became KLA supreme commander during 1998-1999 Kosovo conflict. Throughout Operation Allied Force (24.3-11.7.1999), Çeku was portrayed as a loyal ally and attended NATO briefings with top generals. Albanians in Kosovo and Macedonia regard him a hero. He said before being elected Kosovo prime minister (10.3.2006): “I know I never acted, saw, ordered or did something that violates the customs of war.”

After Tuđman’s death, Croatia prosecuted 811 people for alleged crimes during and after Operation Storm. Several dozen, including Serbs, got jail sentences up to 20 years. Amnesty International criticized Croatia for inadequately investigating the crimes and encouraging impunity. ICTY indicted senior Croat commanders, Ivan Čermak, Mladen Markač and Ante Gotovina who had personal and command responsibility for war crimes against Krajina Serbs. Čermak and Markač were handed over to ICTY. Spanish police captured Gotovina in the Canary Islands (8.12.2005), and extradited him to ICTY’s trial of Gotovina, Markač and Rahim Ademi for “joint criminal enterprise” and planned military offensive aimed at ethnic cleansing of the entire Krajina Serbian population.

Regretting his previous lies on Storm in Milošević trial, former US ambassador to Croatia, Peter Galbraith testified before ICTY (23.6.2008) that Storm conformed to Croatia‘s policy. During numerous meetings with Galbraith before Storm, Tuđman called Croatia’s Serbs “a strategic threat”, and his advisor Hrvoje Šarinić – a “cancer on Croatia’s belly”. With a goal of ethnically clean state Tuđman planned that “up to 10 percent of Serbs can remain in Croatia”, and Krajina must be populated by diaspora Croats. He also advocated “moving the population” and dividing BiH. Galbraith witnessed Storm; the crimes weren‘t “isolated incidents”, as Croats refer to them, but massive action planned by Croat leadership. US state department man sitting behind ICTY prosecutor oversaw Galbraith’s testimony, to prevent divulging US role in Croat crimes.

Double standard for Holocaust deniers

Tuđman defended Ustaša genocide in The Wasteland of Historical Reality (1989), regarding the Serbs as “savages” who “must be exterminated”. He diminished the large number of Ustaše‘s victims. To him, genocide was humanity‘s universal characteristics, congruent with the “harmony of God’s world”, “recommended and commanded by the Almighty’s word”. Croatia hid its and Muslim 1990s genocide, as it controlled the outgoing satellite TV imagery. Images of the dead captioned “Croatian, or Muslims from Bosnia-Herzegovina” actually showed ethnic Serbs.[32]

At his inception, Tuđman declared “I’m happy my wife isn’t a Jew or a Serb”, renamed streets that carried antifascist partisans’ names, reinstated the genocidal fascist regime’s money and flag, and changed the constitution to run off the Serbs. He denied the Holocaust, but the West helped him “get his own country and ethnically cleansing 560,000 Serbs”; he was “invited to the UK celebration of the defeat of Nazism in Europe. Just as there are some Holocausts which may not be denied and some which may, there are clearly acceptable and unacceptable Nazis.”[33]

Tuđman’s regime dismantled over 3,000 anti-fascist monuments, including one at Ustaša death camp Jasenovac, eliminated a permanent exhibition there, and reduced the number of victims from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands.[34] The number of Jewish victims remains at about 17,000. Similar trends to Yad Vashem approval are observed for Auschwitz.[35]

In 1991, the new Croatia’s army damaged the 18th century Serbian Orthodox church of St. John the Baptist at the Jasenovac site. Rebuilt in 1984 from the ashes left by Ustaše in 1941, the church again succumbed to Croat official fascist forces. Tuđman forces‘ raid (1995) on Jasenovac desecrated, plundered and destroyed the church, and death camp museum and memorial centre.

Tuđman proposed (January 1996) that Ustaša remains be exhumed and brought to Jasenovac, to rest beside the graves of their victims, in an “act of reconcillation”,[36] making it Europe‘s only place where Holocaust victims would be buried alongside their oppressors.  A Jewish publicist, Slavko Goldstein, who lost five family members in Ustaša exterminations, urged Tuđman to leave the victims alone. Tuđman died in 1999, charged with “joint criminal enterprise” with Gojko Šušak (died in 1998), HDZ government members, and top military and police officials.

Bosnian Islamism

A communist Croat, Tito had a policy of weakening Serb power, and created the “Muslim” nationality to this end. Yugoslav Muslims are mostly Slavs (Serbs, fewer Croats) whose ancestors converted to Islam. In BiH comprising Muslims (43%), Serbs (31%), Croats (17%) and “Yugoslavs” (7%), Alija Izetbegović’s radical Muslim minority joined the Croats against the Serbs and unilaterally declared independence (6.3.1992).

The Islamist minority overpowered the Muslim moderates, and with outside support strove at secession. Izetbegović formed a militant, ultra-nationalist Islamic party SDA in 1990. Aided by the US, in August 1994  he attacked moderate Muslims in Bihac. With its intermingled population, dividing Bosnia was absurd.[37] The Muslims were mainly urbanites while the Serbs and Croats lived in the countryside. Bosnian Serbs didn’t invade the territories, but tried to defend their lands and establish transportation corridors. Bosnia could not be divided without a civil war and the external actors provoked it. Bosnia UN safe areas weren’t safe for Serbs nor Muslims. Nearly all Serbs were killed or driven out by 1993, according to UNHCR. Muslim-populated UN enclaves housed Muslim military that attacked surrounding Serb villages, provoking retaliation.

The 1995 Dayton “accords” imposed political entities on multi-ethnic BiH peoples and entrusted their fate to outsiders. Islamist minority domination over moderate Bosnian Muslims foreshadowed KLA in Ramboulliet and Kosovo “independence”. Izetbegović had US support since 1992 when following US ambassador Warren Zimmermann’s remark “Why sign it if you don’t like it?” he reneged on the Serb-Muslim-Croat accord in Lisbon.[38] The Bosnian issue could have been resolved peacefully if it was not for the US.

Dayton accords institutionalized US support to expulsion of Serbs – physically from parts of Bosnia, and as a group from the protection of international law. The US maneuvered the Bosnian Serb representatives out of Dayton, and set up president of Serbia Milošević to negotiate for them. Through the ICTY, the USA  has charged “war criminals” with genocide as an insurance policy against the Serbs who demand their rights. ICTY trials ensure that the public perceive NATO war a  justified humanitarian intervention. Dayton architects knew Bosnia couldn’t be a multi-ethnic state from the moment they scuttled the Lisbon accords. The Serbs want to join Serbia, the Croats Croatia, but Bosnian Islamists dominate. When the Bosnian Croats leave, the Serbs will become “submerged by Muslim majority.”[39]

Congruent with Islamist ambitions, JPC eyes the Green Corridor, an unbroken Muslim region, from Bosnia and Albania via Sandžak and Kosovo to Turkey. Acting on the Corridor plan, Ottoman army reached Vienna in 1683. A propaganda item issued by an Albanian émigré group and found in Ankara used-books store, “showed a mighty green arrow, emanating from Turkey, thrusting through the Muslim-populated parts of the Balkans […] victoriously heading to […] the heartland of Europe”.[40]

The Dutch report[41] ridicules Sarajevo satirical magazine Vox as if it was Milošević’s one and only source on Green Corridor. Actually, in its first edition, fundamentalist Vox expressed hate towards Serbs in Serbia, then threats and expectations of massacres of Bosnian Serbs. It also published documents based on Izetbegović’s Islamic Declaration. This 1970 Islamist manifesto was dusted off to stir hatred and civil war. Vox re-printed Declaration of Independent Bosnia-Herzegovina for the expected secession of Slovenia in the beginning of Yugoslavia break-up. As in the Islamic Declaration, the radicals sought to “restore the status quo ante 1878”,[42] when Bosnia was a province ruled by sharia and the Christian majority was subordinated in constant turmoil. Living in secular Yugoslavia was unacceptable to Islamists, for whom independence from infidel power was a religious imperative.

In the Muslim state “a good Serb would be a dead or obedient Serb, or one converted to Islam”, “the faith of his forefathers”. For each destroyed Muslim house, 10 Serbian houses would be demolished, for each Muslim fatality – 100 Serbs killed, and for each wounded – 10 to 15 Serbs. Serbs would work 12-hour days for wages 30% lower than Muslim wages and proportional to group loyalty. Serbs would lose jobs before Muslims, and would eat rationed food from designated stores. Serbs couldn’t have national parties, and could lose the right to associate and vote in case of disobedience. The initiators of the Islamist Bosnian state planned to defend Muslim interests in Sandžak, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Croatia and Serbia.

When the war broke out in Eastern Bosnia in April 1992, and Muslim majority opposed radicals (as earlier around Bihac), weapons and uniforms arrived at Izetbegović’s SDA party locales.[43] To intimidate and provoke conflict, Vox published a liquidation list of Serbian “war criminals”, former Tito partisans who had fought Bosnian Handžar SS. A year earlier, disguised as Serbian para-militaries of Arkan (Željko Ražnjatović), Muslim gangs, (e.g. Patriot League in Srebrenica area) threatened Muslim majority, igniting conflict and raising mutual fear,[44] while Serbs were being fired from jobs, as in Croatia. Inside October 1991 Vox issue were articles on the Handžar and future Fourth Reich, and on the cover – a Muslim in Turkish cap, one foot on severed Serbian heads. A similar photo, but not published by Vox, showed a foot on the severed heads of Bran Durić, Nenad Petković and Blagoje Blagojević. The villain, shown on another photo holding Blagojević’s head, was a dark-skinned mudjahedin. In the 1990s Kosovo, headhunters were KLA “soldiers” Sadik Cuflaj and his teenage son Valon, who were shown in Serbian press, holding severed head of Bojan Cvetković, while a comrade held another head.

Some 20 Muslim imams in Handžar SS inculcated a policy of extermination of Orthodox Serbs (“the communists”) and Jews. In October 1943, imam Abdulah Muhasilović spoke about two camps in “the entire world”:

“One stands under the leadership of the Jews, about whom God says in the Qur’an, “They are your enemy and God’s enemy”. And that is the English, the Americans, and Bolsheviks, who fight against faith, against God, against morality, and a just order.  On the other side stands National Socialist Germany with its allies, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, who fight for God, faith, morality, and a fairer and more righteous order in the world.”[45]

Srebrenica

In 1993, Muslim troops from UN-protected “safe area” Srebrenica raided Serb villages on the night of Orthodox Christmas 1993; gen Morillon: “There were heads cut off, abominable massacres committed by the forces of Naser Oric in all the neighboring villages.”[46] Orić’s men were driven by hatred, and slaughtered all encountered civilian and Bosnian Serb POWs. Morillon recounted Orić saying “One can’t be bothered with prisoners.” Orić showed videotapes of slaughtered Serbs.[47] Serb organizations compiled the names of over 3,000 Bosnian Serbs killed in Srebrenica region in 1992-1995.[48]

Orić’s troops retreated from UN safe area Srebrenica a week before the July 1995 massacre by Serb forces; French gen. Germanos: “Oric had widely declared that they had abandoned Srebrenica because [Izetbegović had] wanted Srebrenica to fall.” Morillon added that Izetbegović’s forces “opposed the evacuation of all those who had asked to be taken out […] Mladic fell into a trap”.[49] A massacre was plotted a year and a half in advance, when Kofi Annan’s UN report stated: “Izetbegović had learned that a NATO intervention into Bosnia was possible. But it would happen only if the Serbs forced their way into Srebrenica and massacred at least 5,000 people.”[50] A 1999 UN report added: “President Izetbegović has flatly denied making such a statement.”[51] A whitewash of NATO discounted the evidence of planned losses.[52] From the beginning Clinton administration referred to spy photos as evidence of Srebrenica massacre. When it was not forthcoming, the White House gave an excuse of secrecy. In an obstruction of justice, files relevant to Srebrenica at the UN headquarters weren’t available to the ICTY, by a decision of UNSC permanent members: USA, France and UK.

Inflated claims counter forensic evidence of 2028 bodies in ICTY judgement.[53] “8,000 Muslim victims” of the executions was a Red Cross estimate including “5,000 “missing”, thousands of which were later accounted for – having either reached safety or died in combat” with VRS; crimes concern “hundreds of executions, but not more”. Killed “civilians” had been “fully armed, 5,500-strong Bosnian Muslim Army’s 28th division” under “indicted war criminal Naser Oric”. According to chief EU negotiator Lord David Owen, “the main flaw to the concept of “safe areas” from the perspective of the UN military, was that the UN Security Council were allowing the Muslims to evade any demilitarization provision.” Until May 1992, Orić’s forces had committed some of the war’s worst atrocities, “murdering 1,200-2,500 Serbs in the Srebrenica area”, with the number of Serb casualties around Srebrenica “no less, and likely greater, than that of Muslims”; Bosnian Muslim leaders, incl. founder of the ruling SDA party from Srebrenica, Ibran Mustafić, “claimed that the Bosnian Presidency and Military High Command deliberately sacrificed the town in order to encourage NATO intervention”. US policy undermined UN and European brokered peace settlements “to pursue a military solution” by facilitating shipments of illegal weapons to Muslims, which helped turn safe zones into “staging areas for conflict and tripwires for NATO intervention”.[54] A BBC news item supports the military-only thesis:

“The allegations have been made by some of the three thousand soldiers who reached Tuzla today after fighting their way through enemy lines. They say that the Serbs ambushed their retreating column killing hundreds if not thousands of soldiers.”[55]

Having failed to prove Serb intent or acts of genocide or mass crimes, the powers lied about Srebrenica. Even ICTY judges indicated exaggeration, as the evidence only “suggests” that “a majority” of the 7,000-8,000 “missing” were executed, as opposed to dying in the fighting.[56] Propaganda and ICTY are certain that Muslim male victims were unarmed civilians, but question civilian status of Serb victims. As in JPC’s stance against Holocaust deniers, anybody who questions Srebrenica, the “greatest atrocity in Europe since WWII”, is a “holocaust denier” and “revisionist”. ICTY’s failure to label as genocide worse Croat atrocities against Serbs further compromises its impartiality. During the conflict in Croatia, Clinton administration inflated Srebrenica casualties and diverted attention from Croat attacks on Serb-populated “UN Protected Areas” in Western Slavonia and Krajina.

Political pressure and NGOs

When healing and reconciliation were needed, the ICTY shocked the public with the “Srebrenica” video (1.6.2005) of Serb para-military private security, Scorpions executing six Bosnian Muslims. ICTY promoted hatred, by demonizing an entire nation. ICTY censored and suppressed the war crimes and atrocities committed against Bosnian Serbs by Bosnian Muslim and Croat forces.[57] US resolution HR 199 (27.6.2005) blamed Bosnian Serbs collectively for Srebrenica. On the day of London attacks (7.7.2005) that were later linked[58] to Balkan Jihad, Europe followed on the 10^th anniversary of “the act of genocide”: “more than 7,000 unarmed Bosnian Muslim men are thought to have been killed by Bosnian Serb forces”.[59] Confess genocide, turn Karadžić and Mladić over to ICTY, and apply for admission to EU, bargained the resolution. Airing of Srebrenica video devoid of the proof became an extortion tool. European Parliament acted against reconciliation, too; no nation would admit to non-existent genocide. University of Berkeley professor emeritus of history noted: “media-wide cerebral terrorism or demonization of “the Serbs” for over a decade qualifies also as an act of genocide under the “mental harm” provision of Article 2 of the 1948 genocide convention.”[60] The video’s publicity  hinted NGO-politics ties. A “nightmare for Serb nationalists” and a “leading rights activist” on a “quest for justice”,[61] Nataša Kandić, working for Soros-sponsored Humanitarian Law Center, organized the airing that “proved” Serbs were responsible for Srebrenica genocide, but neither Kandić nor the ICTY proved Scorpions connection to Serb authorities, or the six victims – to the “8,000”; Scorpions may have been NATO death squads.[62] Loathing Serbs, Kandić supported NATO bombing, and was implicated in worldwide hoax about a refrigeration truck filled with dead Kosovo Albanians when NATO needed Milošević extradicted.[63]

To ICTY deputy prosecutor Nice and media, Humanitarian Law Center is “a very reliable human rights
organisation”. Kandić’s fellow Serbophobic sociologist Eric Gordy spoke at NGO conference in Serbia (27.6.2005) about the video: “Whatever limitations the film may have as evidence, however, it has had tremendous value as publicity.” Airing the video made Serbs realize that the anniversary was used to “nazify” them and “attach collective guilt”, to make them “feel guilty for all that has to come to pass in the Balkans.”[64] OSCE reprimanded (December 2004) Serb media for publishing photos of Haradinaj crimes, because recollection of crimes committed on Serbs sowed hatred and intolerance. Soros’s B92 station, Danas and Vreme, however, kept calling for “repentance” while publicizing the Scorpions video, as did Western media.

Under the threat of replacement of elected officials, Serb Republic (BiH) government “admitted” 7,800 persons missing (not murdered) from Srebrenica. Communicating to UNSC, ICTY’s Carla del Ponte distorted the statement to thousands murdered by Serbs. Observers warned the Serbian government that accepting the guilt would lead to monetary demands that would greatly exceed any apparent political benefits. Preparations for the Bosnian Muslim lawsuit for genocide, filed against Serbs in the ICJ, entertained US$ 100 billion indemnity.[65]

250,000 “dead”

Izetbegović admitted on his deathbed that Bosnian Muslim claims about Serb-run “extermination camps had been a hoax to precipitate bombing of Serbs.[66] An August 1992 story for ITN about Serb-run Trnopolje “concentration camp” was featured in JPC media as proof of Serb-run Auschwitz. NATO denounced Trnopolje, actually a refugee centre, providing moral basis for ICTY. “250,000 dead in Bosnia” was invented to justify the claim of genocide of Muslims. The claim stayed constant, despite continuing casualties on all sides. By August 1992, as an effect of the Trnopolje hoax, the UN authorized[67] the use of force in Bosnia and promised justice. International occupation began and the ICTY was initiated.

ITN’s edited video and falsified stills from Trnopolje fooled the world. Margolaine Martin from Zagreb office of International Red Cross denied the accusation.[68] When LM magazine exposed the hoax,[69] ITN sued them for libel. The court ruled that even though the footage wasn’t accurate, it was libellous to suggest ITN had done it deliberately.[70] Apologists of US-NATO Balkan policies cite the verdict as proof that the death camps existed. Worldwide Television News, connected to ITN, sold the footage with an interpretation[71] that, after a still showing a handshake of a thin man with ITN’s Penny Marshall, reads that a British reporting team has found the “first independent proof of death camps” run by Serb authorities in BiH. A Serbian TV footage filmed beside the ITN crew shows the British filming from inside a delapidated enclosure, and shaking hands with a group of men over the low fence; only one man is emaciated. They repeatedly correct Marshall who suggests they are not well treated in the camp.[72]

Funded by Norway and Bosnia, Mirsad Tokača, head of Sarajevo-based Research and Documentation Center, proved the 250,000 civilian death toll in Bosnia wrong. Pentagon reported, as of the date of Tokača‘s presentation (16.12.2005),  94,000 victims of known identity,[73] up 4,000 from July 2005, when Tokaca counted 70% Muslims, 23% Serbs, 5-6% Croats, and 1-2% others.[74] 1991 population census counted 4.3 million: 44% Muslims, 17% Croats, 31% Serbs and 8% others in BiH.[75] The apparently heavy Muslim losses resulted from three conflicts: Muslims and Croats against the Serbs, Muslims and Croats against each other, and Muslims against other Muslims. Heavy Muslim military casualties reslted from Izetbegović‘s sacrific of his troops against heavily armed enemy. Two ICTY-contracted researchers estimated 55,000 civilian deaths (54% of the total), including over 16,000 Serbs, in a total of 102,000 dead.[76] Yet, for the first 11 days beginning with Milošević death, the toll from the wars in BiH or in ex-Yugoslavia was said to be 200,000 or greater in at least 202 different items, and 100,000 in only 13.[77]

SkyNews release of Bosnian Muslim video (circa 1995)[78] shows Serbs being rounded up, tortured and shot, just like in WWII Bosnia the 20,000 Nazi-Muslim troops have liquidated tens of thousands of Serbs, Jews and Gypsies. It was an exceptional release after years of Bosnian Muslim “victimhood”. Muslim forces staged spectacular massacres against Muslims, to blame the Serbs. In the siege of Sarajevo, Serb forces committed war crimes, too, but Izetbegović forces stopped civilians who wanted to flee, and snipers regularly killed Serb inhabitants. In Mostar, after Serbs had been expelled, Croat and Muslim forces held deadly fights, but media presented the villainy as Serbian. A Western correspondent watched “in complete resignation” the image of a Serbian granny “wearing a black scarf and holding an Orthodox cross, in tears burying her beloved grandchild, the victim of “Serbian” shells in a suburb of Sarajevo”; the caption states: “A Bosnian child, a Bosnian woman, a typical Muslim burial service.”[79]

Pictures of Serb Orthodox graves were “Muslim cemeteries”. In Kosovo, mourning Serb women in black were “Albanian women”, and Serb funerals – “weeping Albanian refugees”.[80] The reality of Sarajevo, where Serb and Croat population suffered in the Muslim-controlled quarters, was different than the world public believed:[81] “the other Sarajevo, the one no one speaks about, is also being shelled […] civilians are also being ambushed and killed by snipers, hand grenades and other weapons.”[82] The report’s author, the president of the BiH association of journalists, had to leave Sarajevo, as the three warring sides threatened his life.

When the Bosnian war broke out, 160,000 Sarajevo immigrants from Sandžak became the driving force behind Izetbegović, aggravating the antagonism between the indigenous and the immigrant Muslims. Sarajevo’s image of  “the European and world capital of multi-cultures and multi-nationalities”, as the media and intellectuals like Bernard-Henri Lévy asserted, crumbles in Izetbegović speech (March 1994) of major impact on the BiH public, but unknown in the West: “We are self-sufficient! […] that our soldiers are dying for multinational coexistence […] is a lie!”[83]

“Gendercide”

On the systematic mass rapes, alleged to have been sanctioned by Serbian authorities, professor emeritus John-Peter Maher replied to Guardian about their 11.10.2000 story, calling it “a racist fraud”. During 1999 NATO attack on Yugoslavia, while propaganda broadcast “Serb rapes” in Kosovo, Albanian mafia was kidnapping girls and young women from refugee camps for European bordellos. Resisting victims were killed, as Western reporters witnessed on a few occasions.[84]

The mass rape idea came from BiH minister Haris Silajđić who accused the Serb forces of raping 30,000 Muslim females. Women’s magazine Ms published an article about Serb rapes featured in porno movies (that were never found), and Helsinki Watch and Human Rights Watch could not support the allegations. The media stories “have clearly involved carefully staged performances by non-Muslims dressed up as Muslims”. Rape (on all sides) is a conflict byproduct, but Croat staging of these events “has been significant”.[85]

Roger Boyls (NYT 23.12.1992) didn’t verify anonymous interviews by the World Council of Churches (WCC), but called for prosecution of “rapists”, citing WCC investigator Brenda Fitzpatrick who was convinced that although all warrying parties had committed rapes, only the Serb side had “a policy of rapes and impregnation of detained Muslim women”. Allegedly, victims were told they would be raped until they became pregnant and gave birth to an “ethnic Serbian child”, to fulfil a goal of creating “a generation of hating children”. Also based on speculation was a story on a rape camp, where allegedly 70 women were exploited. After killing one, the next innocent was brought in. Reportedly, pleasure was not the only purpose of the camp, unlike in the Japanese and Nazi WWII establishments: when a Muslim female became pregnant with a “Serbian” child, the Serbs consider it a “tactical victory”.[86] Ottoman Turks took Serb children, jennisaries. Taught to hate Slavs, they surpassed their educators‘ cruelty. WWII Muslim extremists in Bosnia and Croat Ustaše did similar things. Several of the worst villains were brought up this way.

Without mentioning Serbian victims, media preemptied earlier Serb accusations of rapes by Croats and Muslims, and reported on Serb implanting of canine fetuses into Muslim females. A Bundestag member, Stefan Schwarz stated that Serbs were copying the “Nazi monster, Josef Mengele”; the allegations came from Croat female doctors who treated fleeing Muslim women and demanded to “stop this genocide”.[87] Interviews with 28 women suggested 50,000 rapes on Bosnian Muslim females.[88] The figure was extrapolated from the proven cases with ratios of reported to actual number of rape cases, as the victims don’t usually report. 119 documented cases before a UN commission reduced the estimate to 2,400 raped woman, but Serbian and Croat, not Muslim females.

On 15.1.1993, months before the war in Bosnia was nine months old, NYT wrote about a two-month old baby of a Muslim teenager who was allegedly raped in a Serbian prison. Also in January 1993, the Warburton Report, approved by the European Community and quoted as authoritative and independent, estimated the number of Muslim females raped by Serbs at 20,000. Simone Veil, a member of the investigative team, former French minister and the chairwoman of the European Parliament, revealed that the report was based on interviews with only four females.

British Lord Hylton appealed for suitable means to restore basic rights and freedoms in Bosnia, where the “government of Serbia” was guilty of atrocities “worse than anything known in Europe since 1945”, i.e. “genocide”: a “deliberate policy of killing young men, raping women and expelling the elderly”. Six years before 1999 NATO campaign, Hylton reminded the world powers about a duty to prevent a spread of “atrocities to Kosovo”. JPC people knew the regional plans in advance.

An actvist pointed to a landmark process at the ICTY that “for the first time” in the history of UN was devoted to war crimes of rape and sexual enslavement.[89] She referred to dozens of war sex factories on all sides of the conflict in Bosnia and quoted old, by then debunked, propaganda figures of 20,000-50,000 female victims. She postulated systematic rapes be regarded crimes against humanity, quoting Kelly Askin, an American female lawyer and author of War Crimes Against Women, who considered the ICTY lawsuit a great legslative progress, thanks to women in the prosecution and defense. JPC propagandists thus exploited women as spin subjects and objects of the fabrications.

An alleged victim of Serb rapes, Jadranka Cigelj was to testify in US Senate hearing (7.5.1997). She vice-chaired Tuđman’s HDZ party and was a member of ISHR, an organization whose predecessor had been linked to WWII Nazi authorities. Later, IHSR with other Slovenian and Croatian separatists and BND had worked to break Yugoslavia up. The ICTY rejected Cigelj testimony due to her multiple identities and inconsistent statements; then a Serbian American brought to US Congress‘ attention 800 legal depositions[90] of female and male Serb victims of rape, and reminded that many “Senators and Congress persons continue to conceal the homosexual rapes of thousands of Serbian POWs”.[91] “Serb prisoners were forced to circumcise their fellow Serb prisoners as a form of torture”,[92] leading to sexual disfunction. Serbian men had broom handles and the fists of their perpetrators shoved into their anus which damaged the internal organs, as documented by Dr. Ljubica Toholj, Belgrade University gynecology professor and Yugoslav War Crimes Commission director. She wasn‘t allowed to testify before US Senate.

Western media fabrications of Serb mass rapes and death camps have originated with Roy Gutman. In a request to visit the Omarska Camp, he referred to Jadranka Siget, one of her phony identities. In his article 10 days later he called her Cigelj. ISHR brochure “God’s Forgotten Children” contained a witness statement by Jadranka C., undobtedly Cigelj, as it was identical to that in Gutman’s article.

Serbian forces caught a British mercenary, Robert Allen Lofthouse, in Northern Bosnia in January 1993. He confessed to supplying false information about concentration camps, rapes, ethnic cleansing and similar “Serbian atrocities” to Roy Gutman, US Newsday and BBC. Lofthouse kept sending reports and falsified TV recordings. By 1993, Gutman won a Pulitzer prize jointly with John Burns. The same media never published findings on thousands of Serbian POWs, documented by Toholj.

Kosovo: old race hatred

Kosovo is the craddle of Serbs, with over a thousand Serbian Orthodox churches and monasteries, some on the UNESCO list. Albanians see Kosovo as an ethnically pure prelude to Greater Albania. First created under Hitler, this entity would now comprise 8 million Albanians in Albania, Serbia’s  Kosovo and Preševo Valley, Greek Chameria, Southeastern  Montenegro, and Western FYROM.[93] Kosovo Albanian extremists destroyed Christian churches in sight of NATO, UN and EU. A quest for Kosovo “independence” goes on, on lands of sovereign Serbia, for a group that already has a state and harbours organized global crime. In her book The Hunt former ICTY prosecutor del Ponte describes KLA-KFOR-UNMIK’s Kosovo as blood feud land ruled by mafia who present themselves as heroes of the “suffering Albanian people”; UNMIK, KFOR and even ICTY officials fear for their lives if connected to sporadic investigations that meet insurmountable difficulties. Among Serbs missing since 1998 (and other nationals, incl. sex slaves), are hundreds slaughtered in macabre live organ extraction and trade. UNMIK thwarted investigation attempts (e.g. by del Ponte, Council of Europe); high-ranking officials, (e.g. Kouchner, gen. Clark, Javier Solana) may be implicated,[94] tying the operation, like Afghan opium transfer via Camp Bondsteel, to JPC and Kosher Nostra who control global organized crime.[95]

“Ben-Gurion of Kosovo”, Thaçi admired Israel and described war criminal Ariel Sharon as a “great leader”,[96] but a reference to the mafia and Islamist connection was absent. Ben-Gurion authored the July 1954, false-flag bombing attacks in Egypt to damage Egypt-West relations.[97] Israel blamed the attacks on the Egyptian Islamist Muslim Brotherhood,[98] but in March 2005, officially honoured the nine Egyptian Jews involved in the bombings.[99] Thaçi’s gang is creating Greater Albania by terror, too, but he assured that Kosovo wouldn’t be Islamic. As the Zionist terror did under criminal leaders, so, too, under Thaçi’s leadership, JPC-supported KLA has murdered Serb civilians to terrorize hundreds of thousands into leaving. He killed moderate Albanians to toe his party line, and murdered the leaders of political opposition. After “disarmament” by NATO-UN since June 1999, the KLA continued destroying churches and monasteries. Haaretz explained that Thaçi’s assertion was significant for those Israelis who feared an independent Kosovo and potential Greater Albania could be an Islamist outpost, an argument that made Israel support Milošević during the 1999 bombing.[100]

UN special envoy Martti Ahtisaari’s plan (2.2.2007) for Kosovo final status received unconditional support of four of the 15 UNSC Council members (4.4.2007). China, and several non-permanent UN members shared Russia’s concerns. Acting under legally and politically unprecedented, self-created mandate based on the failed Ahtissari plan, the EU is trying to impose Eulex, a mission of 2,000 police, customs officers and judicial personnel in place of UNMIK. In failed states, governments “can no longer provide adequate public services, physical security or economic livelihood to their inhabitants”, attracting “terrorist organizations as safe havens and as staging grounds for attacks”.[101] Kosovo Albanian mafia deals in drugs, sex slaves, weapons, and money-laundering.[102] Kosovo independence removes even a minimal interference with a criminal Muslim state in Europe, making mockery of GWOT.[103]

From Illyria to Greater Albania

Greater Albania concept relies on the axiom of national roots in Illyrian antiquity, but there is no archeological confirmation in Kosovo. Claims that Serb Orthodox buildings rest on Illyrian foundations are groundless, while ethnology and historiography reject the Illyrian roots. Prior to the Great Migration even the largest (and older) European nations have not yet formed.[104] Homogeneous Slav population inhabits Kosovo since the early Middle Ages. The Slavs took over the land from the Byzantine empire and the local, Romanized population, not from Albanians. Kosovo was part of a Serbian state from early 13th century to its fall to the Ottomans (15th century). Throughout the Middle Ages, a very small Albanian population lived in Kosovo, mostly in its western part. Serbian documents from that period don‘t exhibit negative stereotypes of Albanians, while Greek documents do.

Turkish rule created Muslim Albanian majority in Kosovo. Proclamation of an Albanian state by the European powers (1913) intended to curb Serb and Montenegrin re-settlement of ancestral lands. Albanians constituted at least half of Kosovo’s population of 497,000 then. A 1929 census showed a decline of 58,000, due to war (the largest among Serbs) and re-location of Muslims to Turkey and Albania. No Albanian state formed during five centuries of Turkish rule, even though converted Albanians were the Ottomans’ “iron fist” in a “holy war against the infidels”. Many Kosovo Serbs receded before the Islamization, fled Turkish revenge after rebellions, or run away from the Albanian terror. Albanians infiltrated Serb villages and farms, followed by a flood of next-of-kin. Forced Albanization and Islamization further reduced the Kosovo Serb population. The Islamic Turkish state tolerated Albanian brigands. Only between year 1878 and the 1912 liberation, about 150,000 Serbs fled Kosovo.

When nation-forming radicalism took a lead in early 19th century, Edith Durham explained (1905) the Albanian goal in Kosovo: “The Christian [whom] the Albanian persecutes is the Slav Christian, and this is the old, old race hatred.”[105] Isa Boletini, Kosovo Albanian politician said in 1913: “When spring comes, we will manure the plains of Kosovo with the bones of Serbs.”[106] Mustafa Kruja, Nazi-fascist prime minister of Greater Albania, said in June 1942: “The Serbian population of Kosovo should be removed as soon as possible. Serbian settlers should be killed.” Ferat-bey Draga, Nazi-fascist Kosovo Muslim politician said (1943): “The time has come to exterminate the Serbs.”[107] The „spring“ motto and racism recurred in March 2004 pogroms of Serbs.

Nazi Albanians cleansed more than 150,000 Serbs from Kosovo. In 1945, Tito forbad them to return and gave their land to Albanians. When Albanians received autonomy in 1974 they began to purge Serbs by banning the Cyrillic alphabet. They removed Serbian books on history, religion and music from schools and libraries. Albanian authorities burned some 2 million books.  Serb nuns and young girls were raped by the hundreds. Farms and crops were burned forcing more than 120,000 Serbs to flee. In 1939, Muslims constituted 65.6% of 645,000 Kosovo population, Serbs and Montenegrins – the remainder. Albanian population increased from 498,000 (1948) to almost 1.6 million (1991), and the population of Serbs and Montenegrins from 200,000 to 214,000.[108] Albanians owned two-thirds of Kosovo’s private land in 1999. Since June 1999, a million illegal Albanians entered Kosovo, and quarter million Kosovo non-Albanians, mostly Serbs fled from KLA terror, as KFOR and UNMIK emphatically watched “Albanian revenge”. About 3,000 civilians were murdered or are missing. By comparison, twelve months of fighting of KLA with Yugoslav forces resulted in about 2,000 fatal casualties, mostly military and police, not civilian.[109]

Anti-Serb propaganda devised a nation, Kosovar, but US policy is to create Greater Albania.[110] The media made illegal KLA into “freedom fighters”, while the West provided financial, diplomatic and military support. Once Yugoslav forces defeated the KLA, “genocide and ethnic cleansing of Kosovo Albanians” were invented. The only cleansing Yugoslav forces committed was liquidation of Kosovo terrorism. Operation Allied Force pushed civilian Albanians out of Kosovo under KLA orders[111] to fake an exodus under Yugoslav terror. US-NATO interventionism on Kosovo 2,000 fatalities are incredible, given inaction on Rwandan genocide. Minority rights guaranteed by UNSC resolution 1244 became a mockery, with a risk of ethnic cleansing, even genocide.[112] Like Bosnia, Kosovo is also a global Jihadist nest, becoming a Muslim society, determined to wipe out Christianity:

“Spokesmen for the EU laud this Muslim colonization as Europe and the Muslim world as coming together, ignoring its utter one-sidedness. Criticism of these trends is stifled as “racism””.[113]

Operation Allied Force

Former Nuremberg prosecutor, Walter Rockler called NATO 1999 Operation Allied Force bombing a “most brazen aggression since Nazi attack on Poland to prevent Polish atrocities”. NATO bombers killed more civilians than was the tally of civilians and uniformed men on both sides in the 18 months of fighting between Yugoslav forces and the KLA. US department of state communications director admitted that NATO war was due to “Yugoslavia’s resistance to the broader trends of political and economic reform – not the plight of Kosovo Albanians.”[114] Former Canadian ambassador James Bisset testified before ICTY that war against Yugoslavia, “no threat to its neighbors”, was illegal.[115] NATO charter commits the allies to settle any international dispute peacefully. As in NATO bombing in Bosnia, Allied Force violated UN and NATO charters and NATO member state constitutions.

Operation Allied Force “bombed the Serbian will” to install a US-friendly regime. The air raids reminded Serbs of Hitler’s “shock and awe” bombing of Belgrade (6.4.1941). Chabad Lubavitcher senator Joseph Lieberman said after two months’ bombing,: “We’re trying through the air campaign to break the will of the Serbian people.”[116] NATO airforce commander Michael Short contradicted NATO generals who presented the war as being “against Milosevic” and civilians (“the bridge on which you held your rock concerts […] needs to disappear at 3 o’clock in the morning”) [117]. Pulitzer Prize laureate Thomas  Friedman proposed after 12 days “of surgical bombing” to show “what 12 weeks of less than surgical bombing does”, urging NATO war crimes, and pressuring Yugoslav government (“Every week you ravage Kosovo is another decade we will set your country back by pulverizing you”); infrastructure was disrupted (“NATO began its second month of bombing against Yugoslavia today with new strikes against military targets that disrupted civilian electrical and water supplies”).[118]

The Albanian refugee crisis made some commentators declare the “humanitarian bombing” a failure, but media continued to focus on Serb abuses. Serb exodus under KLA terror was ignored. NATO killings were not mentioned or were reported as errors. Failure of diplomacy, the reason of humanitarian bombing, was also a lie that Serbs had refused to negotiate in Ramboulliet, where NATO had effectively imposed rights to occupy Kosovo and Yugoslavia, and then had issued an ultimatum unacceptable to any sovereign state.

Only an imminent genocide could have justified an air war that was not even discussed by UNSC. James Rubin said at a US state department’s briefing (19.4.1999) that up to 500,000 missing Kosovo Albanian men might be dead. US secretary of defense, William Cohen alleged 100,000 victims (16.5.1999), and Clinton tens of thousands (25.5.1999). Tony Blair expected irrefutable evidence of “yet unknown” number of tortured and killed victims. The claim stopped at 11,000. Mass-grave frenzy began after the bombing. US-NATO officials reported that many bodies had been hidden in Trepca mine shafts, or had been dissloved in acid. Estimates began at 1,000 dead, but ICTY investigation found no bodies.

Frustrated and angry at the deception, Western forensic teams found only some 4,000 bodies, including unknown numbers of fighters, and victims of NATO and KLA. Adding 2,400 missing,[119] some of whom the KLA might have abducted, the total didn’t match the 11,000 claim. Media didn’t question it, nor the hysteria.

ICTY initially indicted Milošević for his “superior authority” and “command responsibility” for 344 deaths in Kosovo, all but 45 of which occurred after NATO bombing started.[120] The number of bodies found in Kosovo could not sustain a charge of “genocide”.

March 2004 pogroms

Albanian extremists talk about the start of a “hunting season” against Serbs every spring. In Spring 2004 pogroms of Kosovo Serbs, the mob sprayed graffitti UCK! Allah Akbar! Morto Serbi! and UNMIK go home! on the ruins of Serb churches and houses. Busloads of Albanian hordes destroyed and burned everything Serbian, including more than 30 churches and monasteries (bringing the total to over 150 since the occupation began), under UNMIK, KFOR and police protection while truck-delivered trays of sandwiches and Molotov cocktails nourished the hordes. Typically a mob marched on a Serbian object or village, KFOR provided security, KPS police arrived and evacuated Serbs into awaiting buses, ostensibly to protect them. KFOR retreated “helplessy” before the hordes. The mob then finished plundering and burning. Women and children with sticks and stones shielded the mob from UN-NATO men. According to Visoki Dečani Monastery cyber-monks, ethnically cleansed Serbs were put in KFOR shelters. Asked by an elderly Serb if he could do anything to get Serbs back to their homes, a police commander replied, “I can’t do anything even if you die here like animals”.[121]

Before the pogroms, Kosovo Albanian leader Hashim Thaçi welcomed the return of Serbs to Kosovo.[122] Four months later, his hordes set torches to houses prepared for the returnees, funded from tax and private contributions of Westerners. On the eve of the pogroms (16.3.2004), the European Parliament held hearings on abysmal human rights violations by the Kosovo extremists. According to UNMIK press report at the time, Thaçi visited the US deputy assistant secretary for Europe and Euro-Asia, Kathleen Stephens who appreciated Thaçi’s “effort for creating necessary conditions for the well being of the citizens in areas such as the rule of law, the fight against crime and corruption, the dialogue, the returns, freedom of movement, economic development and privatization”. After the visit, Thaçi appealed to his cohorts to stop “protests and violence”, pretending a surprise, but his regime’s daily Epoka e re published a story titled “Serbs drowned three Albanian children”, starting the pogroms. The falsehood triggered Albanian demonstrations in Mitrovica, certainly not as spontaneously as media suggested.

Kosovo Serb Orthodox Church authorities recognized (17.3.2004) that international community’s story of the Albanian leaders’ multiethnicity and democracy “has been and remains pure deception” to buy time for “complete rearmament and creation of paramilitary forces”. The “international community” had long lists of KLA war criminals, commanders and soldiers alike, but did little to prosecute them. After the attempts at pogroms in Čeglavica, based on their own intelligence, the church authorities unmasked “a general campaign by Kosovo Albanians organized by extremist groups in progress whose purpose is to destabilize the Province and expel the remaining Serbian population”.[123]

Some Western spokesmen, intelligence sources and strategic analysts, also from NATO and UN, concurred. US troops sat in Camp Bondsteel during the pogroms. A Kosovo Albanian journalist Veton Surroi of Koha Ditore daily said that Albanians had organized the “orchestrated phase” of violence in Kosovo in order to expell the Serbs. This required cooperation with KFOR and UNMIK accomplices in a “series of unrest, guerilla warfare and terrorist activity planned by radical Islamist leaders in Bosnia, Albania, Iran and in the Islamist areas of Serbia, and directly linked with the various al-Qaida-related mujahedin and terrorist cells in the area.”[124]

In preparation for the pogroms, the National Albanian American Council (NAAC) called for “recognition of independence” of Albanian Kosovo and “resolving Kosova’s final status in accordance with the will of the people”, and blamed Belgrade in advance.[125] After the pogroms, NAAC blamed Serbian intelligence. The violence reflected growing impatience of Albanians, whose leaders and parliamentarians used the self-created “opportunity” to call for independence. US neocon Morton Abramowitz, anti-Serbian since the beginning Yugoslavia break-up, blamed Serbia, NATO and EU for delaying independence and thus causing the violence.[126] “Moderate” president Ibrahim Rugova believed only independence would cure extremism.

Serbia-Montenegro army’s gen. Mladen Cirković in charge of intelligence accused UN and NATO of ignoring his advance warnings of pogroms. General secretaries of NATO and UN condemned the pogroms as if KFOR and UNMIK didn’t know. Based on Serbian intelligence, Koštunica could point to the perpetrators, including KLA veterans and their comrades in Southern Serbia, all of them tied to KFOR, UNMIK, KPS, KPC paramilitary, and political parties.[127] Those responsible for Kosovo security knew about Albanian pathological hatred of Serbs, but didn’t intervene. KFOR security was even relaxed at the checkpopints at Serb villages and at the Serb Orthodox Patriarchate in Peć, as if inviting the extremists. KFOR-UNMIK forces were unable to provide such basic service as a timely passage of an ambulance with a dying child to a hospital.

Justice

Balkan conflicts have demonstrated politization of justice to support the chief actors’ objectives. In partitioning Yugoslavia and supporting the rights of the other groups, the actors violated the rights of Serbs. NATO powers’ creation, ICTY invented rules, procedures and concepts in trials of disproportionately more Serbs than the others. ICTY prosecution reached a tally of 93 Serbs, 31 Croats, 14 Bosnian Muslims, 8 Albanians and 3 Macedonians indicted, and 699 Serbs, 36 Croats, 8 Bosnian Muslims], and 3 Albanians convicted as of 14.4.2008.[128] But USA has refused to recognize the International Criminal Court, allegedly because of its “politicization”. ICTY politicization included its organization, staffing, funding, and vetting of top personnel by NATO who also controlled information and served as ICTY police arm; JPC influences every step. ICTY didn’t indict Bosnian Muslim leaders, war criminals Izetbegović and Ejup Ganić, but has been frantically appealing to have Karadžić and Mladić arrested and sent to Hague before elections. The arrests would amount to a humiliating spectacle of “decapitating” Bosnian Serb leadership, thus further serving to dehumanize the nation.

David Owen described how the outgoing US secretary of state, Lawrence Eagelburger achieved world media coverage (16.12.1994) when he named Karadžić, Mladić and Milošević “war criminals”, seven months before Serbs took Srebrenica, before there could have been evidence on satellite photos. The charge of Srebrenica genocide effectively silenced Karadžić and Mladić. At the expense of the interests of Bosnian Serbs, and eventually all Serbs, Milošević complied with US demands out of fear of being charged with genocide. He was kidnapped anyway, against Yugoslav law, and was delivered to Hague on charges that grew with the on-going anti-Serb campaign. Another JPC-dependent entity, the ICJ went along ICTY’s construct of Srebrenica genocide without investigating independently because it would demolish JPC‘s scapegoating of Serbs.

Justice politicized

ICTY was illegaly established under UNSC; permanent members could veto investigations of their own and their client states’ crimes. Madeleine Albright was most active in establishing ICTY and blocked UN resolutions condemning Croat and Muslim atrocities. NYT portrayed ICTY as “the epitome of Western justice”, and the prosecutors’ point of view as largely that of NATO and “its American leadership.”[129] NATO members have provided “the finance to set up the Tribunal […] we want to see war criminals brought to justice […] when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslavia nationality and I don’t anticipate any others at this stage.”[130] Soros has been co-financing ICTY, with Time Warner Corporation and Disney who might have provided expertise in shaping public opinion to ICTY specs. Soros’ Human Rights Watch supplied “evidence” against “Milosevic”, whose opposition and “independent” media and political parties in ex-Yugoslavia  Soros had funded since 1991 at $100 million annually.[131] According to former US state department lawyer, ICTY was “little more than a public relations tool,” useful to “isolate offending leaders” and “fortify the international political will to employ economic sanctions or use force”.[132]

ICTY opposed the peace process and justified military interventions. US officials used alleged Serb criminality to subvert peace plans in 1992 and 1993, and “to justify their intention to go to war, collateral damage and all, by branding their proposed enemies as Nazis”.[133] US and Izetbegović scuttled Lisbon peace agreement, and through Vance-Owen and Owen-Stoltenberg initiatives jeopardized peace.[134] ICTY downplayed an internal report on Croat massacres on Krajina Serbs leaked a few days before NATO 1999 bombing, but eventually murdered[135] Milosević because his accusers had started the Balkan conflicts, the ultimate war crime. Former Nuremberg prosecutor Walter Rockler quoted the head of the US prosecution justice Robert Jackson: “launching a war aggression is a crime” and “no political or economic situation can justify it”.[136]

In July 1995, ICTY indicted Mladić and Karadžić, including the charge of genocide for conduct of subordinates at camps in 1992. In November, a second count of genocide at Srebrenica effectively excluded them from Dayton peace process, well before ICTY verified the facts. ICTY president Antonio Cassese divulged a political objective: “Let us see who will sit down at the negotiating table now with a man accused of genocide.”[137] Fearing genocide charges, Milošević complied with US demands. Even after Srebrenica, the ICTY found no evidence for war crimes against Milošević, the key participant in the Dayton Accords that ended the war. In June 1998, as US-NATO planned for the Kosovo campaign, ICTY denounced Serb actions in Kosovo.[138] ICTY chief prosecutor Louise Arbour declared the Račak “killings” (15.1.1999) a “war crime” that precipitated NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. A week after the bombing began, Arbour publicized a sealed, September 1997 indictment of Arkan, but an indictment of Milošević and four others was tabled (22.5.1999), distracting public attention from the bombing. According to Albright, the indictments “make very clear to the world and the publics in our countries that [NATO policy] is justified because of the crimes committed.”[139]

Arbour assured that ICTY would not rely on “unsubstantiated, unverifiable, uncorroborated allegations.”[140] Yet, the indictment was prepared on unverified information from the US and UK. Arbour indicated politicization: “the evidence upon which this indictment was confirmed raises serious questions about [the indictees'] suitability to be guarantors of any deal let alone a peace agreement.”[141] She immediately acted upon unverified Račak crime, but it took her and successor Carla del Ponte a year to consider NATO crimes. Del Ponte finally declared there was no basis for opening an investigation; 495 dead victims of NATO were “no evidence of the necessary crime base for charges of genocide or crimes against humanity” but Račak 45 dead were.[142] Del Ponte’s expert in dropping the investigation had relied on press releases as “generally reliable”,[143] contrary to Arbour’s assurances.

NATO suppressed the Finnish forensic investigation of Račak as soon as it indicated a hoax. I called the head of the Finnish team, Dr. Helena Ranta (3.5.2000). She said she just returned from a meeting at NATO in Brussels that had told her to classify the report. The leaks from her suppressed report[144] hinted conclusions like those she publicized at a press conference,[145] where, she told me, she had felt the same pressure to testify against Yugoslavia as she did at the NATO meeting. Ranta’s team found the “executed” had been moved from elsewhere and had had bullet holes from multiple directions, i.e. they had been combatants. Body mutilations, “a Serbian atrocity”, meant animals feeding on the dead.[146] Naturally, a medical forensic study could neither re-construct the events nor confirm whether the victims were peasants or soldiers, but it found the bodies were transferred between different locations before deposition at the scene. Serbian media, Serbian and Byelorussian forensic teams,[147] OSCE observers[148] and reporters[149] were right.

Judicial murder

After the 1999 Kosovo indictment had misfired for insufficient evidence, and several months after Milošević’s kidnapping (28.6.2001), the ICTY charged him for Bosnia and Croatia[150] to keep a living proof of the need for “humanitarian interventions”. Media didn’t question why this happened several years after his admitted positive role in Dayton. For “not even investigating NATO’s war crimes“, critics concluded ICTY, “a well-oiled propaganda machine”, was politically subordinated.[151] The murder of Milošević (11.3.2006) further incriminated ICTY. August 2005 withdrawal of the “Greater Serbia” charge meant the case turned bad for prosecution[152] and implicated NATO country leaders. Milošević’s knowledge of their crimes became threatening but the JPC complex has been alleging his nationalism and ethnic war calls. His “notorious” speech at Kosovo Polje stressed “equal and harmonious relations among Yugoslav peoples” as necessary for Yugoslavia existence;

“Serbia has never had only Serbs living in it […] Yugoslavia is a multinational community and it can survive only under the conditions of full equality for all nations that live in it.”[153]

JPC media called the speech “stirringly virulent nationalist”, “fervent speech [that] galvanized the nationalist passions that two years later fueled the Balkan conflict”.[154] Holbrooke called the speech “racist” and “inflammatory”, and labeled Milošević a liar for denying the media lies.[155] In his strife for equal rights for Serbia within federal Yugoslavia, in 1999 Milošević “refused to give autonomy to Kosovo”, according to politicians like Holbrooke. Actually, Kosovo enjoyed one of Europe’s most extensive autonomies since 1970s, but extremist Albanians wanted independence by terror. Milošević tried to defend Serbs who were stranded in hostile secessionist states. He wanted to keep Yugoslav Federation with all the Serbs. This is called “Greater Serbianism” – “Orwellian political rhetoric that transforms a weak (and failed) defense into a bold and aggressive offense”.[156]

Under German presidency, a proposal for an EU directive outlawed denial of mass crimes.[157] Hinting German stakes, the draft refered to crimes of the last 20 years, including war crimes and alleged genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and extended the idea of Holocaust denial to “gross minimisation of genocide out of racist and xenophobic motives”. The crime of abusing the term and interventionist demonization based on it, aren’t in. Anti-war lawyer Christopher Black likened the Rwanda and Yugoslavia tribunals; Hutu regime leaders are labelled war criminals to justify Tutsi dictatorship and cover up US, British, Belgian and Ugandan role in the genocide.

Like Milošević, Europe’s most wanted man for more than a decade before his capture in July 2008, Karadžić represents himself. He refused to enter pleas to charges, including Srebrenica genocide and crimes against humanity, since the  prosecution still didn’t have an indictment against him. Former advisor to Milošević called ICTY “a killing machine” for murder of a dozen Serbs; Milošević “was denied medical treatment when he needed urgent medical assistance”, so any Serb who gets there “must be afraid for his life”, also Karadžić.[158] A secret deal with Holbrooke[159] offered Karadžić immunity if he disappeared after the war, which he did. The Americans didn’t keep their promise. Karadžić‘s extradition was a condition for Serbia’s  EU membership, but Serbs expect only humiliation.

ICTY and the term genocide

ICTY has relativized “genocide”, thus degrading the term, denying WWII events for which Lemkin created it, and injuring the memory of the victims; “no national legal system […] will withstand the pressure of such a totalitarian judicial system”.[160] Srebrenica Research Group wrote several years later:

“The term genocide, once reserved for the most horrific crime, the planned extermination of a particular group, was manipulated by the ICTY to justify indictments that preceded any serious investigation of events related to the capture of Srebrenica.” [161]

ICTY found Bosnian Serb gen. Radislav Krstić guilty of genocide on contradicting evidence. If the Serbs intended genocide in Srebrenica, then why: they transported Bosnian Muslim women and children to safety by busses; didn’t surround the town before its capture to prevent thousands of males from escaping to safety; the Muslim soldiers willingly left their women, children and wounded to the mercies of the Serbs; and 10,000 mainly Muslim residents of Zvornik sought refuge in Serbia?[162]

The ICTY suggested a Serbian PR show-off with the busses. Srebrenica Research Group commented: “failing to do some criminal act despite your desire is called “not committing a crime”.” Killing many males in a group to reduce its future population, endangers its viability in that area, i.e. it is genocide, ICTY ruled. Judges can make genocide of any case of killing enemy soldiers. The Serbs killed Muslim military war criminals to prevent future killings of Serbs. After separating the criminals, Serb forces let free thousands of captured soldiers and suspects disguised as civilians. The released men were transported to safe Muslim areas. Perhaps the Serb crime of liquidating the war criminals was “a crime to protect humanity”, but first, the BiH killer force commanders should be tried.

Were the Serbs trying to eliminate all the Muslims in Srebrenica or Bosnia? ICTY judges suggested that pushing them out of the Srebrenica area was itself genocide, thus equating genocide with ethnic cleansing. Then ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo should be tried, too. ICTY‘s arbitrary interpretation created “a new precedent and new standards, […and] a new international definition of the term genocide.”[163] Key to ascertaining genocide are target group identification, villains intent and crime substantiality. ICTY has adjusted the factors to fit the genocide definition:[164]

- Target group: “Bosnian Muslim men of military age at Srebrenica” (§197) were soldiers of the 28th Division of the Bosnian Muslim army, and had left Srebrenica under arms before the VRS arrived. Bosnian Serbs bussed to safety women and children, the easiest target of genocide, but ICTY ignored it and chose the ambiguous men-of-military-age term. ICJ felt compelled to justify ICTY re-definition: “The Court observes that the ICTY Trial Chamber has indeed indicated the need for caution, lest this approach might distort the definition of genocide” (§199).

- Intent: Failing to find genocidal intent, ICTY posited that the plan had crystallized at a later stage (§292). This is a re-definition of the term, i.e. genocide could be spontaneous. The fact that women and children had been spared (a contradiction of the genocide claim) proved to ICTY that “some members of the VRS Main Staff intended to destroy the Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica”. Hence, killing armed Muslim soldiers was an “act of genocide”. ICTY ruling that VRS “targeted for extinction” 40,000 Srebrenica Muslims, a group “emblematic of the Bosnian Muslims in general” (§293), was also contradictory. Moving Muslims from the fallen “UN safe areas” Goražde and Zepa produced no allegation of genocide.

- Substantiality: ICTY limited the alleged genocide area to the town of Srebrenica (§199), the nest of Bosnian Muslim forces. Regardless of the manner in which the soldiers perished, ICTY assumption inflated the casualties relative to Srebrenica’s pre-attack population, rather than to Bosnia’s Muslim population.

SFOR first arrested Orić in Tuzla where he lived since 1995 evacuation from Srebrenica. Many Bosnian Muslims consider him a hero. Orić was indicted in 2003, for killing 7 persons, atrocities on 10 persons, and destruction and pillaging of “at least 50 villages and hamlets with Serbian ethnic majority”.[165] Orić’s murders number over 3,000 people.[166] ICTY cliché of Bosnian Muslim victims proved double standard of military versus civilian casualty. In 1996, Serb Republic (BiH) submitted the evidence of Orić’s crimes, but to ICTY, he had engaged in “defense” and “self-defense”, while VRS killing Muslim soldiers in combat and execution of criminal POWs was genocide. In her reaction to 2005 publication of the number of Bosnian Serb killed by Orić forces, Florence Hartmann of ICTY’s Office of the Prosecutor, called the civilian victims “Military or Police casualties from combat”.[167] For ICTY, the Croat ethnic cleansing of 250,000 Krajina Serbs was not genocide. either, even though women, children, the elderly and infirm were killed in a cleansing on a much larger scale.

ICJ ruling

International Court of Justice cleared Serbia of all counts of Bosnian Muslim charge of “committing, conspiring, helping, instigating and collaborating in genocide” in the Bosnian war (1992-1995). The court irrevocably ruled (26.2.2007) that Serbia wasn’t responsible for acts of genocide,[168] clearing Serbia of the Srebrenica massacre and war reparations to Bosnia. Will the Western leaders and media that had been dishonest, rabidly Serbophobic and wrong since 1992, face charges for instigation of hatred and wars? ICJ effectively exonerated former president Milošević who had been maintaining until his death that neither Yugoslavia nor Serbia had commanded the Bosnian Serb army, nor had pursued “Greater Serbism” (a charge ICTY dropped in 2005 for lack of evidence). ICJ ruling derails ICTY rationale for the show case. The ruling belies military interventions to stop genocide in the Balkans, indirectly blaming the other actors, external and internal, for the civil wars. A professed failure to intervene tough enough in the Balkans has partly justified interventions in other regions; the ICJ ruling undermines the interventionism. The Nuremberg Trial court has ruled that initiation of war of aggression is “the supreme international crime deferring only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.” A former Nuremberg prosecutor quoted justice Robert Jackson, the head of the American prosecution at that trial, that “launching a war aggression is a crime” and “no political or economic situation can justify it.”[169]

ICTY had convicted Bosnian Serb army officers Krstić and Blagojević for Srebrenica genocide by re-defining the term.[170] Without an independent investigation, the ICJ copied ICTY’s decision and blamed the Serb Republic, Karadžić and Mladić for “an act of genocide”, inviting reclassification of most conflicts as “genocide” or where “act of genocide has occurred”. Equally irrational ICJ ruling found Serbia guilty of not punishing and extraditing alleged villains, as if Serbia had knowledge of their whereabouts and means to do it. ICJ deemed Belgrade guilty of “failing to prevent” Bosnian Serbs from overtaking Srebrenica and committing genocide there. NATO Rapid Reaction Force and UNPROFOR were in a better position to know and act, but ICJ ignored it. Riding on this, Bosnian Muslims sued the Netherlands for $1.3 billion because “Dutch troops were actively assisting“ VRS units.[171] When Yugoslavia questioned (1996) ICJ jurisdiction over the Bosnian Muslim lawsuit, ICJ explained it lacked adjudication power. When Yugoslavia askedto order NATO states to “cease immediately” the 1999 bombing and to “refrain from any act of threat or use of force”, ICJ rejected the case, for lack of “prima facie jurisdiction” for eight NATO members, but invoked lack of consent from the USA and Spain, as if the prima facie rationale was not sufficient.[172] A UN court can’t adjudicate breaches of UN Charter?

ICJ deemed massive killings throughout BiH to be beyond its jurisdiction, since intent of genocide wasn’t proven. By contrast, protracted exterminations of Serbian villages around Srebrenica (the “protected group”) by Orić’s forces indicate the intent. Protection of Orić’s forces in the “UN safe area” and arming them incriminates the “international community” as helping and collaborating in genocide, or failing to prevent genocide. Arguably, all warring parties could sue their adversaries, including the non-radical Bosnian Muslim majority against Izetbegović’s regime.

ICJ accepted ICTY findings “as highly persuasive”, without an independent investigation of the alleged Srebrenica genocide. The relaxation of the standard of proof contrasted with the requirement of “fully conclusive” evidence regarding alleged genocide by Serbia in Bosnia, and “proof at a high level of certainty appropriate to the seriousness of the allegation” regarding prevention of genocide and punishment and extradition of perpetrators. ICJ’s confirmation of Srebrenica genocide, and its ruling on NATO bombing, prove politicization through methods ranging from arbitrary setting of jurisdictional base, to selective standards of proof. Of all the post-WWII killings, ICJ focused on the Balkans, as JPC did. Other conflicts had produced millions of civilian victims, yet ICJ focused on the case of Bosnia, where about 50,000 civilians died on all sides, of which a number much smaller than the alleged 7,000 attracted attention at Srebrenica.

ICJ revisionistically accepted ICTY judgments, while Germany proposed a European law against genocide denial. An analyst asked:

“Who will be the guardians of the “official truth” and what is to stop them (as we see with the ICTY and ICJ rulings) from effectively revising history themselves? It then becomes a political minefield, let alone a threat to those historians who have no ax to grind when researching historical events.”[173]

ICJ performance in the first application of adjudication of the Genocide Convention to war crimes, doesn’t support genocide policing nor prosecution. Guilt can be arbitrarily attributed with selective justice. As clearly as they have provided cover for the “supreme international crime”, the ICJ and ICTY courts have manufactured “genocide” where some interests needed it for interventionism and cover-ups of own crimes. This is a variation of JPC’s political exploits of Holocaustianism.

Infowar

Muslim, Croat and Albanian extremists engaged in atrocities and war crimes, but accused their Serb victims. Croats and Albanians conspired to take Serbs‘ territory, yet, with Slovenians they accused Serb leaders of Greater Serbianism. The media co-created “an elite-sanctioned false “reality” tailor-made for the masses”, by withholding facts contradicting the “politically correct” view, “using labels without precise definition, and adhering to certain “authorised” versions of historical events which are frequently not borne out by the facts.”[174]

Western journalists compromised ethical code for US-NATO campaigns, failed to verify information and seldom reported from the other side. It means military Information Operations’ control of the media. Berkeley University history professor emeritus alluded to the interventionist control in “a decade of carefully nurtured Serbophobia”, “a “patriotic mutuality” of government and media” that “never loomed as large in peacetime as in the last decade”.[175] Keeping appearances is part of the deception. With insignificant own losses[176], Yugoslavia resisted US-NATO attack in Kosovo, and significantly hurt the agressor[177] who denied the Serbs any credit. NATO  boasted  about  “kills”  of  Mig‑29.  Just  before the  withdrawal  and  two  days  after  NATO  said  that  four Mig‑21  survived,  12  MiG‑29  and  29  Mig‑21  emerged from  bunkers.  NATO  changed  previous  dispatch  of  11  Mig‑29  saved  ,  to  11  less  advanced  Mig‑21.  The  actual number  of  saved  aircraft  agreed  with war-time Yugoslav  reports. [178]

Information Operations

Employing behavioural science and mass media, Information Operations,^[179] target foreign nations, groups and governments. Pentagon actions “convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning; and to intelligence systems and leaders at all levels”.^[180] Perception management “combines truth projection, operation security, cover and deception, and psychological operations.” NATO PsyOps are “planned psychological activities in peace and war directed to enemy, friendly and neutral audiences in order to influence attitudes and behavior affecting the achievement of political and military objectives”. PsyOp’s Public Affairs provide “objective reporting without intent to propagandize”, by disseminating information via press releases, media briefings and statements.[181] NATO spokesman on Kosovo conflict Jamie Shea told a Swiss forum “he won the war” with daily briefings in a PR style.[182] News brokers send so-prepared information to media outlets, where infowar operations subtly control chief editors.

Serbo- and Islamophobia are PsyOp creations. A deep control of the global media, a JPC domain, to demonize the Serbs was perhaps the most “successful” aspect of the Balkan wars. Propaganda has prepared for US-NATO wars in the Middle East and the Balkans by demonizing the leaders and their people, “based on projection of truths and credible message [that serve to discredit] adversary propaganda or misinformation against the operations of US/coalition forces [which] is critical to maintaining favorable public opinion.”[183]

US Special Operations is a joint command that can assemble teams of experts in different fields to mission requirements: PsyOp, special operations units (such as British SAS, US Delta) and co-opted militants, such as KLA, e.g. in the staging of Račak massacre. As in the anti-Serb Bosnian Muslim campaigns, Pentagon and NATO colluded with mainstream media, effectively shaping public opinion. Reduced to a handful of conglomerates, corrupted[184] media mold public mind. Except for a few large enough to maintain own reporters, the media depend on the chains for news and then speak with a single voice. The newspapers set the trends and guidelines, and originate the news for the others to copy. In a joint venture with NYT, Washington Post publishes International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily, with regional and national versions. The bankers call in their loans if the media disagreez with them. Going against the system could affect one’s career.[185]

References to “military sources”, “senior administration officials” and “Pentagon analysts” indicate Washington Post has government insiders. Standard phrases in the press agree with the official position. Military censors vet an article before the press publishes it: “This article was discussed extensively in recent days with several senior civilian and military Defense Department officials.”[186] Opinion polls are manufactured to meet government specs. White House aides have indicated that the media lend themselves to “selling” the war to America. Military control of the media extends to the battlefields. On a given day, a few selected out of hundreds of reporters go escorted to scenes deemed fit for the public. Pre-approved by the military, the coverage is shared and the global media disseminate a single version. This “embedding” of reporters in Gulf War 2 compromised journalistic ethics.[187] Pentagon press briefings would black out or distort any incriminating leaks from independent reporters. Should independent sources fail to observe this censorship their facilities are targeted with US precision-guided munitions, as were Serbian Radio and TV facilities, consistent with Special Operations integration of services.

Dehumanize and criminalize

Newsweek (19.4.1999) cover featured Milošević‘s “Face of Evil”, and Time (5.4.1999) showed it with an assassin’s crosshairs centered between his eyes. A US state department official has acknowledged that “the demonization of Milosevic is necessary to maintain the air attacks”.[188] Labeling Milošević “the Butcher of the Balkans”, “the Balkan Hitler”, and “Europe’s Saddam Hussein” resembles the demonization of Hussein. In Gulf War 1 the media called him “the Butcher of Baghdad”, “the Raper of Kuwait” and “the Middle East Hitler”[189] to make Americans support US interventionism. After Milošević’s death (11.3.2006), the demonizing terms appeared “hundreds of times in the US media alone”.[190] Milošević’s death prompted a pursuit of Karadžić and Mladić. But Sharon, whose 1982 invasion and killings in Lebanon ICTY cited as “genocide”,[191] remains an honored “man of peace”.

Media reduce foreign conflicts to “good guys – bad guys” cliches. The personal attacks on the enemy leader slip into stereotyping of an entire people, totally misrepresentating and generating hatred. Calls to “bomb Milošević” evolved into “bomb the Serbs”.  Calls to “bomb Saddam” became “bomb Baghdad”. The Nuremberg Tribunal included into war crimes the Nazi propaganda that drove Germans into war. The US-NATO spread interventionist propaganda to “justify”  bombing of civilians, embargos and political blackmail.

The criminalization and dehumanization of Serbs has taken root in the mass psychology, with the implication that Serbs are inferior. The infowar has been falsifying Serbian image into Nazi-like villains:

“role reversal continues today, with the Croatian state and many of it citizens claiming they were the true allies of the west, and the Serbian people, collective Nazi Allies and collaborators.”[192]

German media joined Croat propaganda that the “civilized world” must “stop the uncivilized Serbs by military means” because,

“news has been filtering out of Croatia, from Catholic bishops and the clergy, that the Serbian army […] are carrying out brutal mass murders in the territories under their control.”[193]

The media fooled the public that Yugoslavia was involved militarily in the Bosnian conflict. Bosnian Serbs, Muslims and Croats took weapons from disintegrating JNA units. JNA withdrew from BiH (19.5.1992), but “the media in the West keeps accusing us of participating in the armed conflict outside our country.”[194] A historian captured media‘s priming of US involvement: “the story of “genocide in Bosnia” (and later in Kosovo) was manufactured from scraps of fact that had only the most tenuous relationship with the truth.[195]

Western public accepted a suspected “Serb” crime as a certitude. The criminalization required suppression of evidence of anti-Serb crimes, leaving Serbs without a recourse to have their rights respected. The media rarely mentioned mass crimes on the other sides, despite evidence.[196] Human rights organizations spoke of Croatia “retaking” and “liberating” Krajina and Western Slavonia, as if Serbs came there recently. Similarly Serbs had “seized the land from the majority Muslims”. Bosnian Serbs, mostly farmers, had inhabited over 60% of Bosnia. Muslims had been town dwellers, so Serbs had “occupied” more territory.

German Nazi mass crimes have had at he base the Übermensch concept of the German and Nordic race, who have surpassed the sub-human (Untermensch) Slavs, Gypsies and Jews.[197] The present demonizers retain a clear conscience by dehumanizing and projecting the planned subjugation or genocide on the victim. Among anti-Serb quotes[198], Peter Ustinov compared the Serbs (“criminals and renegades” in need for “enemies rather than friends”) to creatures who were in arrear with the “human race”. They were so lowly that dealing with them jeopardized own “honour”, “decency” and “self-respect”.[199]

In the British House of Lords, fantasies on mass rapes and unbelievable atrocities fueled racist rhetoric. In April 1993, Lord McNair alleged that Serb psychiatrists manipulated emotions of the Serbs, examined target cultures, and worked out “the psychology of terror”. Then supposedly Serb forces sieged a Muslim region and carrid out public rapes to defile local women. To finish the fiction, McNair added that the Muslim community felt defiled and readily left, for a far-away camp with rape and other maltreatment.

Compromised journalism

ICTY accused the Serbs of pursuing Greater Serbianism, concocted by Balkan and Western media from Memorandum, a 1986 draft by SANU, that warned of the civil wars. Nine years after publication, SANU commented[200] on the falsifications of Serbian cause that covered up Slovenian and Croat illegal secessions and crimes. Comparisons of Memorandum to Mein Kampf failed to prove Milošević’s nationalism. Similarly, few have read his speeches, not even the most often cited (but not quoted) 1989, Kosovo Polje speech.[201] He meant equal rights for Serbia within federal Yugoslavia. In 1999, he “refused to give autonomy to Kosovo”, but Kosovo enjoyed one of Europe’s best autonomies since 1970s; extremist Albanians abused it and fought for independence. Milošević tried to defend Serbs who were stranded in secessionist states, and “he wanted but did not fight very hard to preserve a shrunken Yugoslav Federation that would have kept all the Serbs in a successor common state”; labelling this Greater Serbianism is “Orwellian political rhetoric that transforms a weak (and failed) defense into a bold and aggressive offense”.[202]

Editors and journalists succumbed to political agendas,[203] treating Western aid to Bosnian Muslims an unquestionable benefit. They played a central role in calling for arming Bosnian Muslims and Western intervention. Reporters shunned Iranian and mujahedin role in Bosnia; “One Dutch journalist discovered the arms shipments in Zagreb airport but chose not to report it because he felt very warmly towards the Bosnian Muslims.”[204] An international collection of 15 critiques[205] exposed many news reports on the war in Bosnia as distorted or untrue; Peter Brock’s article in the American Foreign Policy magazine “is considered to have provoked a debate on the quality of Western reporting on the Balkans.” The volume’s editor, Klaus Bittermann diagnosed that Nazi methods have been attributed to Serbs, and “secessionist war has been compared with Auschwitz”; “facts have been forged, fictitious stories about massacres have been launched, and events have been misrepresented”.[206]

Bosnia became a mission to many journalists covering the Bosnian war. They accepted Bosnian and US government versions “instead of independently verifying evidence”; US Army an intelligence officer in Sarajevo from April to August 1994, John Sray called them (October 1995) the “pawns of the propaganda structure”, to whom job security depends on “obtaining thirty seconds of good video footage accompanied with appropriate sound bites from Muslim officials or their populace.” He noted that US European allies had “more in-depth, professional, and probing journalism and better reporting from their embassies” and ignored propaganda from the Bosnian Muslim government and the PR firms.[207]

The “decision-making elites, media pundits, and many academics” have displayed “a bias in Balkan affairs which goes beyond any one piece of deliberate policy, and which falls outside the parameters of rational debate.”[208] No analysis relates how the media diffuse “the political aims of governments”.[209] US Balkan experts William Dorich,[210] Alex Dragnich[211] and David Binder[212] spoke at the National Press Club (17.3.2006). When Peter Brock came to Doritch to publish Media Cleansing: Dirty Reporting, Doritch was aware that it “was submitted and rejected by every major publisher” in the USA. Dragnich submitted 42 articles to the NYT at the height of the Bosnian war. Not one was reproduced. Doritch received death threats for daring to defend and publish Serbian views. He said that during Yugoslavia’s dismemberment, the major US papers hadn’t published one article by a Serb intellectual or politician:

“Serbs were simply muzzled into silence. Thanks to Madeleine Albright and Richard Holbrooke Serbs were also made Persona non grata here on The Hill and denied the right to appear before any House and Senate hearings on Bosnia including the Council on Foreign Relations.”

Binder reported on the Sarajevo market massacre (28.8.1995), a pretext to post-WWII Europe’s largest war operation. Banned from publishing in NYT, Binder wrote in Nation (2.10.1995) that the explosion took place a day after Holbrooke announced an escalation of air raids. Doritch attended a panel discussion where Merlino said:

“All journalists in Bosnia are required to submit their articles to Bosnian censors in Sarajevo […] any reference to conflicts between Croatians and Muslim forces are heavily edited, visual images of these conflicts are forbidden.”

The publisher of Brock’s Dateline Yugoslavia organized an accountability session where, facing a roomful of media “pit bulls”, Brock (and Binder) restated his findings about the co-belligerent Western pack journalism. Critics harangued Brock as a “holocaust denier”. In preparation of Media Cleansing, Brock confronted his colleagues. They complained to his superiors at his newspaper, and even threatened him with lawsuits. For writing about Binder and Brock’s exposing fraudulent journalism,[213] a CNS reporter was fired, following a government official’s complaint.

Biased scholars

Some genocide scholars still believe spins, begging scrutiny in light of the ICJ ruling (26.2.2007) on alleged Serbian genocide in Bosnia. Yale University history professor Benedict Kiernan has affirmed “Serb perpetrators of Bosnian genocide”.[214] He directs Yale’s Genocide Studies Program, co-funded by Open Society Institute of Soros who also funds ICTY and NGOs that chant anti-Serbism. Relying on Norman Cigar’s Genocide in Bosnia, Kiernan wrote (p 88):

“Other genocidal regimes have also portrayed themselves as protectors of peasant life against urbanites and rural rivals. The perpetrators of the Bosnian genocide of 1992-94 saw their Muslim victims as city dwellers, in contrast to the rural Serb peasantry.”

The “perpetrators” “saw” what actually was there: Serbs lived in the countryside, and their adversaries were urbanites. As absurdly, Cigar-Kiernan charged expansionism mixed with racist and religious motives (p 92):

“As in the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, Cambodia, Bosnia and Rwanda, the tragedy of East Timor demonstrates the virulent, violent mix of racism, religious prejudice, expansionism, and idealization of cultivation […] their deadly combination is a persistent feature of twentieth century genocide.”

In one sentence, Kiernan names unproven Bosnian genocide, attributes to Serbs their adversaries’ chauvinism, and confuses expansionism with protecting Serbs from being forcefully incorporated into Serbophobic states. Bosnian Serbs certainly didn’t invade the lands with the fall of Yugoslavia and their defense had little to do with “idealization of cultivation”. Kiernan cited double falsehood (p 82), following Slovenian-Croatian spin:

“The 1986 Serbian Memorandum which prepared much of the ideological basis for the genocide in Bosnia, urged “the establishment of the full national integrity of the Serbian people, regardless of which republic or province it inhabits.””

ICJ absolved Serbia from all counts of genocide in Bosnia. ICTY had to drop the charge of “Greater Serbianism” in 2005 for lack of proof. Bosnian Muslims indeed faced “disappearance” after Tito, the creator of this religion-based “nationality” to reduce the percentage of Serbs, had died. He had delineated the republics to weaken the Serbs (“the weaker the Serbs, the stronger Yugoslavaia”), by dividing them between five Yugoslav republics. Two illegal secessions in 1991 violated the right of Serbs to stay in the Yugoslav federation, and it was appropriate for Serb leaders to agitate consolidation across the federal borders.

A British Academy research fellow and member of Cambridge history department, Marko Attila Hoare wrote nonsense on the late Milošević:

“deliberately promoted the break-up of Yugoslavia and the independence of Croatia and Slovenia […] waged wars against sovereign independent states without a mandate from the UNSC […] …was the leader of a secessionist Serbian rebellion against a Titoist Yugoslavia that had kept Serbia in check.”[215]

Hoare co-drafted ICTY indictment of Milošević. OpenDemocray.net that published his misleading text is an “alternative media” outlet, funded by Soros’ Open Trust, Rockefeller Foundation and others.[216] In charge of OpenDemocracy.net are big business executives, a warhawk professor at New York University, and a philosopher known for “Advocating Tobacco, On the Payroll of Tobacco”.[217]

The scholars forgot to mention Croatia. If ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, why not the Croat crimes? Acquiring land and properties by expulsion was the object of Operations Lightning and Storm, as were previous intimidations and terror in Croatia. It’s a perversion to pin the cited characteristics on the defenders of their land. What is genocide research woth, if politics and prejudice influence it so easily?

Yale’s Adam Jones presented Milošević’s media, a “well-known” case beside Hitler’s, as being “under most effective control”.[218] But,

“the Croatian Administration has purged all of the Croatian media of any opposition (let alone Serbian) elements, at the same time that the Western media were led to believe that the Serbian media were universally controlled by […] Milošević. And yet in Serbia most television and press would consider itself to be freely in opposition to, or at least critical of, the current leadership.”[219]

To Jones, Serb media warnings about mass violence is “extremism”. Serbs had feared neo-Ustaše, and Jones acknowledged this in the context of Operation Lightning. As mass violence anticipators, Serbian media and academics performed better than the “genocide scholars”. Wikipedia disproves Jones’s thesis that exploitation of folk music proves Milošević’s Volk ideology (p 148). “Turbofolk tactic” didn’t target the “peasant constituency” (p 140); it had “a considerable following among the urban youth, with no parallels in its Balkan commercial folk predecessor”:

“turbo-folk was equally popular amongst the South Slavic nations during the brutal wars of the 1990s, reflecting perhaps the common cultural sentiments of the warring sides. Milošević “abused” turbo-folk no more than post-Milošević regimes that saw its comeback as pop-folk”.[220]

“Traditional folk perceptions” were hardly “redeployed to buttress Serb hegemony” in Kosovo (p 140). One can examine Milošević’s most cited but least read speech.[221] As ridiculously, Jones (p 188, 194) alleged “gendercide against civilian males” in Srebrenica. The evidence points neither to genocide nor gendercide. Execution of war criminals is not gendercide because soldiers are men (from age 15 in Muslim armies).

Failing to notice that mass Serbian rapes had been a hoax, Hiroshima City University history professor Yuki Tanaka compared sexual oppression of the “comfort women” and “the rape victims in BiH”.[222] Over a decade after the anti-Serb allegations, an Amnesty International report[223] didn’t mention any rapes by Serbs in Bosnia. Tanaka didn’t notice that Serb females in Bosnia and Kosovo had fallen victims to terror rape,[224] and NATO, UN, and international aid staff, the clientele of Balkan  sexual slave industry, had been acccomplices in gender-specific mass violence.[225]

Other instruments

In the Balkans, as in Iraq and Pakistan, covert operations, terror and failed-by-design diplomacy and justice accompanied economic sanctions, while infowar matched ferocious US-NATO attacks on Yugoslav civilians in absence of military success. The “civil wars” covertly supported separatists in Bosnia, Kosovo and Macedonia, aiming to cause “regime change”. The sanctions, although not as genocidal as in Iraq, have contributed to Yugoslavia break-up, devastating the Serbs.

Covert action and economic sanctions

In 1984, three years before Milošević came to power and six years before Yugoslavia’s breakup, the White House had issued “US Policy Towards Yugoslavia”, a blueprint for a new Balkan order.  In 1986 Yugoslavia began to examine CIA exploitation of Slovenian youth’s nationalist emotions to break the country up. Later, CIA intensified its activity. After US-NATO Kosovo campaign, CIA acted almost openly.[226] The 1990, US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) referred to Balkan human rights, predicting Yugoslavia’s breakup within 18 months and civil war. “Prophetically” it had scapegoated president of Serbia Milošević as the instigator. NYT (28.11.1990) wrote that a law had barred US loans or credits for Yugoslavia, except for a republic “which has held free and fair elections and which is not engaged in systematic abuse of human rights.’“ The speculative time until Yugoslavia’s breakup later coincided with the military actions by the Croat extremists to initiate secession of Croatia.

As US military was aiding Croat and Muslim forces, US defence secretary William Perry lied (June 1995) to congress about US impartiality in Bosnia. A month earlier, UAV were launched at Brac in Croatia, to spy on Serbian military. A Croat attack on Serb locations under UN protection in Sector West killed 5000 Serb civilians according to Serbian Orthodox Church, 1000 according to UN, including several UN soldiers. US was involved and issued no criticism.

Albright blocked French and British efforts to embargo Croatia, but US defence and state departments approved (November 1994) MPRI contract with Croatia. “Retired” generals — former head of DIA Edward Shoister, former deputy chief of operations in central Europe Richard Grifit, and Carl Vuono – advised Croat ethnic cleansing in UN-protected Krajina. Operation Storm jammed Serbian communications with US equipment. US Navy planes out of Aviano knocked out Krajina Serb military facilities. NATO intelligence director Charles Boyd confirmed US help with Storm. Vuono met with Croat counterpart before Storm that used Desert Storm’s rapid attack on many fronts. EU refugee commissioner Emma Bonino announced 10,000 Serb civilians missing among Storm refugees. 90% of Storm’s mass graves were nameless. Three state department sources told NYT’s David Binder that US envoy Holbrooke who flew to Zagreb to meet Tuđman (ostensibly to prevent Storm), gave green light for Storm. In his memoirs he acknowledged he had encouraged it.

To expel Bosnian Serbs, Clinton administration fostered Storm-like Croat-Muslim military offensive, despite UN and European peace-making. Slated by Holbrooke, Bosnian Serb cities were attacked before Dayton, creating an unknown number of mass graves and refugee waves as Storm’s. Bosnia war’s largest Serbian mass grave was found in Mrkonjic Gral (1996). 90% of US financing aid went to Bosnian Muslims, while ICTY US-dominated staff prosecuted Serbs. US Information Agency reported (December 1995) that Serbs were most likely to have lost a family member.

NIE 2005 predicted a “Yugoslav-like fate” for Pakistan, due to “economic mismanagement”, i.e. IMF-World Bank prescriptions[227] that invariably precipitate hyperinflation. In December 1989, IMF imposed austerities on already troubled Yugoslavia; World Bank dismantled the banking system, laid off over half a million employees, and ordered two-thirds of jobs eliminated. As in Pakistan, IMF froze federal fund transfers in January 1990, leaving Yugoslav republics stranded financially, leading to mass poverty and heightened social divisions”, and fuelling “secessionist tendencies that fed on economic factors as well as ethnic divisions, virtually ensuring the de facto secession of the republics”.[228] US Congress resolution 101-513 (5.11.1990) threatened to cut off all aid, commerce, credits and loans to Yugoslavia, if each of its republics didn’t hold free elections within six months. The 1990 NIE “prophecy” and the money-for-democracy bill have guided US Balkan policy. The “economic warfare” unleashed extremism and nationalist hatreds among the leaders of the republics, whom the federal government could no longer finance and who received Yugoslavs’ blame. The embargo was expanded during Bosnian civil war, after the Dayton accords, and again after the 1999 bombing. To bolster pro-US opposition, Albright said free and fair elections in Serbia would end most of the sanctions.[229]

Sarajevo marketplace (Markale) false-flag massacres fooled the West thrice, by declaring Serbs guilty for Izetbegović’s sacrifice of Muslims to secure Western support. Each Markale explosion happened before an important meeting to justify: anti-Serb embargo in 1992, NATO bombing of Serb military and civilians in 1994-1995, and a final US-NATO offensive in 1995. A French[230] and a British investigation confirmed that the Bosnian Muslims were guilty of the last massacre, but a US officer overruled the findings. The US air force started to bomb Serbs. Bypassing UNSC, US command had already picked up Bosnian Serb targets with Muslim help. Media created tolerance if not enthusiasm for the intervention.

Borisa Starovic in Chronicles relayed the only trauma he found in victims of the first attack was to the lower extremities, i.e. due to pre-planted charges, a ploy to blame the Serbs, according to UN commander Satisha Nambijar’s classified report leaked to Independent. Holbrooke denied US involvement. The next explosion killed 68; Albright and senator Dole declared Serbs guilty, Dole visited Markale, but UN and NATO obtained evidence of Muslim villainy. NATO’s Boyd and a new commander in Sarajevo, Michael Rose concluded Muslim hoax to elicit NATO bombing Serbs. Owen in Balkan Oddysey wrote the shell came from Muslim positions. Two months after the massacre, Bosnian Muslims had NATO intervene in Goražde. With US advisors, Muslim forces attacked Serb villages. To drive out 12,500 Goražde civilian Serbs, Muslims had faked ham radio reports that were broadcast by US TV.

US media presented Serb response as an unprovoked attack on UN safe zone Goražde. Washington and Sarajevo urged UN to authorise air strike, but Rose called off bombing, as Muslims had manipulated casualty damage reports. By December 1992, Bosnian Muslim government estimated the number of dead at 17,000, two months later at 200,000, even though the fighting practically ceased. In NYT Sunday Magazine in Fall 1994, former state department’s George Kenney criticized the media-inflated numbers, while International Red Cross counted 20-35,000 (1994), and US military 60-80,000. British intelligence accused CIA of anti-Serb bias. A CIA study limited to areas held by Bosnian Serbs, reported 90% of ethnic cleansing was by Serbs in Bosnia. Serbs cleansed from Bosnia and Croatia, voluntary refugees according to CIA, were excluded, while international agencies stated 40% of refugees were Serbs. Similarly, Sarajevo claims of 30-50,000 Muslim females raped by Serbs, dropped to 2400 raped on all sides of the conflict, according to UN investigation.

Military support

Injustice to Palestinians and Muslims takes an exception in JPC support to Balkan Islamists. UN Resolution 713 (25.9.1991) suspended the delivery of all weapons and military equipment to Yugoslavia. Lifting the embargo for Muslims and Croats against the Serbs was in Clinton’s 1992 election campaign, and US entered the war after his inauguration. US allowed Iran to provide weapons and mujahedin, thus helping create an Islamist state and giving Iran greater influence in the Balkans. National security advisor Anthony Lake outlined the US policy: “arms going to Bosnian Croats and Muslims and air power to stop Serbian interference with these shipments”. Saudi intelligence urged Clinton to lead military aid to Bosnia, and US ambassador to Germany, Holbrooke drew up covert plans.[231] As assistant state secretary he persuaded (August 1994) his department to license MPRI to train the Croat army.[232] Urged by the US, Bosnian Muslims and Croats stopped fighting and formed their federation (13.3.1994). CIA was pressured to blame Bosnian Serbs for the ethnic cleansing. Its 1995 report on this proved distorted: using various “styles, approaches, and emphases”, PR firms in Bosnian employ, media pundits, and “sympathetic elements of the US State Department” had attacked anti-interventionists as pro-Serb or pro-Nazi.[233]\

Key military personnel and UN staff previously stationed in Croatia and Bosnia went to Kosovo. MPRI was also on contract with the KLA. Gen. Jackson, while commanding IFOR in Croatia, had not rushed resettlement of Serbs, ostensibly to avoid conflicts with the Croats and the land mine threat.[234] KFOR commander Jackson tolerated KLA terror that had the same “land mine” effect. War criminal from Croat bloody ethnic cleansing operations, gen. Çeku was later nominated KLA commander. NATO officials, Western heads of state and UN and ICTY officials knew of Çeku’s war crimes.

Iran started secret airlifts of arms to Bosnia via Croatia. By late 1993, Iran and Turkey armed and equipped 30,000 BiH soldiers, Croatia received up to 50% of the imports in transit fees, and the US adopted “a blind eye” policy. After Croat-Bosnian federation was formed, ambassador Galbraith passed Croat question, how the US would respond to smuggling resumption, onto deputy secretary of state Strobe Talbott and national security advisor Anthony Lake. Conscious of Iran’s influence in the Balkans, but for the advantages of arming the Muslims, they decided with Clinton (27.4.1994), “to give a green light to the arms supplies from Iran to Croatia”.[235] US administration was officially hostile to Iran at the time, often criticising it for “sponsoring radical political groups and terrorists around the world”, and for arming Hezbollah and Hamas,[236] but by early 1995 “Iranian cargo landed in Zagreb three times a week”;[237]

“Turkey and Saudi Arabia were very willing to deliver weapons and to lure Izetbegovic away from Iran, but the orientation of the Bosnian government was far more towards Iran.”[238]

UN observers and others reported (February-March 1995) frequent airlifts of arms to Bosnia, allegedly by Turkey with “the assent of parts of the US government”.[239] Tim Ripley of Jane’s Intelligence Review blamed NSC and state department “covert warriors” and “freelance operatives” brought in by senior members of the Clinton administration. NATO’s admiral Leighton Smith was careful to only ambiguously deny US military involvement. US officers threatened a UN official to keep silent. On state department instructions, the US embassy pressured and threatened reporters. The administration’s duplicity staggered senior US military and CIA officials. According to Wiebes, CIA or DIA weren’t involved, and Pentagon special operations budget paid for the operation “with the complete assent of the White House”.

Western security and intelligence services supported secede-by-terror Bosnia and Kosovo; Serbs fought thousands mujahedin, who established Balkan bases.[240] Iran, and other Muslim states brought mujahedin (1992 – January 1996), some suspected of links with al-Qaeda, from Afghanistan, Chechnya, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and Algeria. According to Sray, 4,000 mujahedin, “supported by Iranian special operations forces, have been continually intensifying their activities in central Bosnian for more than two years”. UN put the number at about 600. After 1995 the US claimed 1,200 – 1,400.[241] Training camps were set up “possibly for hundreds of volunteers.”[242] Kept away from the front, they played an important role as shock troops, in surprise attacks etc., but the local Muslims found them arrogant and extremist. Wiebes believes “everyone was aware” of mujahedin in Bosnia, “as they killed a British soldier early on”.

In 1994, Albania’s president Sali Berisha helped bin Laden set up a network through Saudi charity fronts. Albanian terrorists and mafia became a dominant regional economic, political, and military force. On his regime’s collapse in 1997, Berisha turned his family farm into a KLA base. Al-Qaeda and other criminals looted 10,000 heavy weapons and 100,000 passports. Thousands of Albanians had to hide, escaping vendettas and blood-feuds, but even the police and army couldn’t intervene. Berisha became Albania’s prime minister in 2005.[243]

Albanians received support of Islamic states, Germany and US. BND played a key role in preparations for Yugoslavia’s breakup, but since the early 1990s, Germany and the USA have co-operated to divide the Balkans. JPC puppets US, Germany and UK triggered national Islamic liberation movements in Bosnia and Kosovo, and supported international Jihad there. German parliament’s overseer investigated media allegations that BND infiltrated EU monitoring that aimed at ceasefires and humanitarian aid. Head of the German EU monitors in Zagreb, Christoph von Bezold allegedly smuggled munitions across enemy lines to the Muslim-controlled Bihac pocket. US state department released terrorist organisations from its list, such as Hezbollah, to operate in Bosnia.[244] This fact alone undermines the credibility of GWOT.

By mid-1990s, CIA, BND and MI6 provided covert support to al-Qaeda-supported KLA. In 1998, US state department removed KLA from an official list of terrorist groups, in violation of UNSC resolution 1160 (31.3.1998). An October 1998 Islamic conference in Pakistan called KLA struggle “Jihad”.[245] On 23.2.1998, US special envoy to Bosnia, Robert Gelbard called KLA an Islamic terrorist organization.[246] An Islamic organization cannot espouse secular values. Yet, US and NATO provided KLA with arms and training. By 1999, US and British special forces and MPRI trained KLA in its Northern Albanian bases.[247]

Renamed Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) in the wake of 1999 war, KLA received UN status that granted sources of funding, including direct US military aid. Using UN resources and equipment, KPC-KLA assaulted Southern Serbia and Macedonia, where the Islamist militants and NATO joined hands in 2000-2001, again contradicting the official claim that Jihad, Western intelligence asset has “gone against their sponsors!” In June 2001, 500 KLA had captured Aracinovo in FYROM, but Macedonian forces cut them off and could kill them off. NATO brokered a deal under the threat of economic sanctions. NATO (incl. 16 MPRI members) evacuated the trapped KLA, only to release them to fight again.[248] At an event for Kerry’s election campaign his senior foreign policy advisor by 2004, Holbrooke, and Wesley Clark socialized with KLA gun-runner and fundraiser Florin Krasniqi, an illegal Albanian immigrant.[249]

Holocaustianity

JPC propaganda obscures any connection of Zionism with Nazism, and ignores genocides other than Shoah, a unique Holocaust of the Chosen People. “Anti-Semite”, “hater”, and “Nazi sympathizer” labels, personal ruin and imprisonment, guard JPC’s Holocaustian dogmas. Many Orthodox and secular Jews reject Holocaustianity, as Holocaust Industry’s corrupt base.

A Serbian-American historian Carl Savich shows that, to further JPC support to Kosovo secession by terrorism (that JPC abhors in Palestinian “Islamofascists”), a Polish-American Jew, Harvey Sarner has used the Albanians-rescued-all-Jews spin in Rescue in Albania (1997),[250] endorsed by a famous Holocaust survivor from Hungary, US congressman Tom Lantos. The book doesn’t tell that Hitler has included Kosovo into Greater Albania, and it whitewashes the liquidation of thousands of Serbs, Gypsies and Jews and the expulsion of at least 100,000 Serbs from Kosovo by Albanian SS. The “rescue of Jews” had to do with a small number of Jews and a refusal of the Italian occupant to implement genocide. Hundreds of thousands of Poles, including children and Catholic clergy, saved thousands of Jews, despite Nazi death penalty for doing so, while themselves facing terror, hunger and annihilation.

Lantos hid behind Holocaustianity, while destroying and killing with others’ hands. Before and during WWII, the Zionist elites destroyed nations, including their own, with the Nazi German hands. Unlike the Nazis, Lantos had at his disposal Holocaust Religion. In 1992 after Enver Hoxha’s Communism collapsed and all Jews from Albania emigrated to Israel, Sarner published a broshure, and played a significant role in Jewish emigration. Savich believes the brochure had been a “thank you” note for Albania for 300 Jewish immigrants.

By 1997, Joe DioGuardi’s Albanian American Civic League (AACL) began to use Sarner’s book as propaganda before terrorizing Kosovo. Rejected by US voters in his 1988 re-nomination bid for US Congress, DioGuardi turned to Kosovo Albanians, the citizens of foreign country Yugoslavia. Founded in 1989, AACL aims to revive the 19th century idea of racially pure Greater Albania that Nazis have implemented in 1943. AACL supports this campaign “to liberate the seven million Albanian people in the Balkans from hostile Slavic domination”. What Hitler and the Albanian SS have started, JPC and KLA will finish. In the Balkan fascist mafia connection,

“against Serbia and Serbs are those receiving money from DioGuardi’s PAC [...on] both sides of the aisle but are mostly members of the House or Senate foreign relations committees: Joseph Lieberman and Jesse Helms, Benjamin Gillman and Tom Lantos”.[251]

At AACL request, Gillman and Lantos endorsed Rescue in Albania, thereby denigrating the honour of hundreds of thousands of real rescuers, and trampling the memory of Kosovo Jews and millions of other Holocaust victims. This made Lantos’ pretentious survivorship and monopoly on human rights advocacy a joke. Zionist elites helped Nazis annihilate Lantos’ brethren. AACL distributed 10,000 copies of Sarner’s propaganda to influential US Jews. Congressman Gillman and James Traficant sent copies of the book with a cover letter to all congressmen, but with personal letters to each Jewish one. Traficant was later found guilty of bribery and corruption, and a House of Representatives panel voted to expel him from the Congress. According to Savich,

“the Albanian apologists will say and do anything to support Greater Albania, even break the law [...] Bribes can buy a lot of propaganda, or PR or spin. And the goal is to get people to kill other people and to take their land.” [252]

DioGuardi announced that in 1998, “when we had problems with Milosevic”, John McCain, the 2008 presidential candidate and recipient of AACL “Balkan Award for Peace”, must get support, as “he did everything we asked of him”, i.e. supporting KLA and Kosovo secession. In a draft Senate resolution written by McCain, he thanked the Albanians for “saving all the Jews who lived in Albania or who sought shelter there during the Nazi Holocaust”.
Three weeks into the 1999 bombing, he announced US was in danger of losing the war to the Serbian Army (which had “antiquated machinery” and “absolutely no military air power”), unless infrastructure was massively attacked (“We all regret civilian losses, as well as our own, but they cannot be avoided”).[253] MacCain, a JPC pawn in 2008 elections, advocated nuclear war with Iran.

Would a gain of a few hundred Israelis be worth the support to bloody Balkan wars? The Albanians “have bought” propaganda and spin, prompting Julia Gorin[254] to cover for the neocons, as before.[255] She complained unconvincingly, Holocaustian-style, “Jews used again!”. Albanians “learned early on—starting with the Bosnian and Croatian wars followed by the Kosovo war—that selling the Jews on your version of an ethnic rivalry can open doors”. Not even Balkan Islamists could “sell the Jews”. Israel is an accomplice in the case Gorin complains about. Wikipedia says Yad Vashem is “Israel’s official memorial to the Jewish victims of the Holocaust”. Albanian Lobby and Yad Vashem seek to revise history by proclaiming that all Jews were rescued from WWII Albania.

PR firms and NGOs

Fascist Croats, Bosnian Islamists, and Kosovo Albanian extremists have paid a US, PR firm Ruder Finn to demonize Serbs with the “death camp” hoax. The firm flooded the media with stories of Serbs’ genocide and mass crimes. The US intervention after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait employed a PR firm Hill and Knowlton’s “Kuwaiti baby” fraud; [256] a 15-year old daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA lied before the Congress that she saw Iraqi soldiers cut off food and oxygen in a nursery, killing dozens of Kuwaiti babies. President Bush cited it repeatedly, garnering public support for Gulf War 1, before CBS exposed the fraud. Lantos prepared this hoax[257] with Citizens for a Free Kuwait and the Congressional Human Rights Foundation that he chaired. Both organizations were set up by Hill and Knowlton, the agents of Indonesia’s and Turkey’s cruel dictators. Later the firm worked for the Saudis to neutralize criticism of Osama bin Laden’s sponsors.

Ruder Finn used the Trnopolje hoax to “sell” the Bosnia story to US Jewish organizations. Equating Serbs with Nazis, and the Bosnian war with genocide, followed. Once the Jewry protested, the rest of the world believed. An April 1993 interview by Jacques Merlino, French TV 2 associate director, with Ruder Finn director James Harff, explained the firm served the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of BiH and the parliamentary opposition in Kosovo, “to put Jewish opinion on our side.” Knowing the deadly anti-Semitism of WWII in the Balkans, Harff foresaw that intellectuals and Jewish organizations would be hostile to Croats and Bosnian Muslims, whose present leaders were also racist. The firm reversed this, by exploiting Newsday (2-5.8.1992) story on the Serb camps, to convene major Jewish organizations. Harff suggested that they advertise in NYT and demonstrate outside UN, causing association of Serbs with Nazis in the public mind:

“A clear change took place in the press’s language as emotional terms such as ethnic cleansing and concentration camps appeared, all evoking Nazi Germany, the gas chamber at Auschwitz […] no one could go against it without being accused of revisionism.”[258]

There was no proof of the death camps, but the goal was “to accelerate the circulation of news items which are favourable to us and [to] aim [them] at carefully selected targets.” Responsibility did not enter Harff‘s picture. According to a justice department report, Rudder Finn campaign “served to heavily misinform the Bush administration”. USA Today headline said it: “Fax and Dollars are the Weapons of War Used by Public Relations Firms”. For tribalism, money, or for both, Ruder Finn’s Jewish[259] president David Finn aided JPC warmongering via Holocaustianity. According to Harff, from a list of several hundred names, a computer connected to a fax selects those journalists, politicians, humanitarian associations and academics who are likely to respond to an issue:

“Our craft consists in disseminating information […] as fast as possible so that the opinions favouring our cause are the first to be expressed […] the first assertion is the one that really counts. All denials are entirely ineffective.”[260]

When the hoax was exposed, US Jewish community refused to straighten the record. A University of Florida activist[261] unsuccessfully sought ADL‘s support against an anti-Serb book.[262] A US professor of political science observed: “Using the Jewish Holocaust as their exclusive domain and forgetting the holocaust of the Serbs, the American Jewish Congress has gone overboard in their calls to bomb the Serbs.”[263] By the time the hoax was exposed, the Jewish community refused to stop supporting a false cause. It is unlikely JPC couldn’t have known. During 1995, US-NATO bombing of Bosnian Serb Republic, Yugoslavia’s chief rabbi Cadik Danon addressed the American Jewish Committee that even American Jews were unable to withstand “unrestrained anti-Serbian propaganda” nor „recognize the Nazis and racist nature of the Serbophobic dogma [...nor] identify Serbophobia as a twin sister of anti-semitism.”[264]

The Bilderberg Group has discussed in 2005 that NGOs may acquire an increasing role in the world government, [265] creating a “carrot” for unprofessional NGO executives, who can then manipulate the grassroots and the public. Some NGOs support JPC policies. The American Enterprise Institute, Open Society, European Policy Center, the International Crisis Group, and others, have rallied for the amputation of Serbian territory. Linked to the US state department and CIA, they’re hardly NGO. The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) distorts and manipulates Balkan facts: “ethnic nationalists caused the wars”, nationalist forces of Tuđman, Karadžić and Milošević “made a difficult situation […] much worse”, but not the leader of Slovenia and Izetbegović, whose “agenda favored modernization through commitment to Islam and through the work ethic he saw bringing success to the West.”[266]

Islamist bias is seen in calling “hostility” the UN peacekeeping reaction toward the Bosnian government, disputing proven claims “that the Bosniaks were shelling themselves” and blaming VRS for Bosnian false-flag attacks, while upkeeping Srebrenica myth that “VRS units massacred up to 7,800 men and boys in a well-coordinated operation directed by General Ratko Mladić”. The USIP brief by more than 250 international scholars doesn‘t document the alleged Srebrenica crimes, but for well-documented, crimes against Serb civilians, “further research is needed”. In Kosovo, where “the belief [sic] that Belgrade intended an extensive campaign of ethnic cleansing in its southern province, motivated Western intervention in 1999”, USIP is silent that alleged Operation Horseshoe to cleanse Kosovo was a fabrication.[267] According to German intelligence[268] and ICTY testimonies, KLA prompted the refugee exodus by driving Albanians out. NATO bombed a few refugee convoys who decided to head back home; it could not have been a mistake.[269]

In USIP brief, “belief” also ruled the illegality of NATO aggression in Kosovo: “There was a clear belief among the NATO Allies that the intervention was legal, but no agreement on a single legal basis.” NATO members violated its statutes, international law and constitutions, and member state laws. ICTY has “appropriately addressed and dismissed” “all questions about the conduct of NATO operations”, but criminals don’t prosecute themselves, not through institutions they‘ve created; ICTY has rejected cases of violations of the laws and customs of war during NATO bombing. [270]

Conclusions

Balkan case

All sides of recent Balkan conflicts have committed mass crimes, but propaganda prays on Serbs. Mostly Serbs have lost ancestral lands, incl. their Kosovo craddle. Because no group could claim exclusive territorial jurisdiction, Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia violated constitutional provisions for lawful secessions. A million Serbs in Croatia, Sarajevo, Dubrovnik, Kosovo and in other places, and significantly fewer persons on the other sides, were expelled, suffering also the largest religious losses of all groups. Mosques were built on territories conquered by Bosnian and Albanian Muslims. Damaged and destroyed Orthodox churches were converted to Catholic in Croatia. Still unpunished anti-Serb mass crimes are more severe than Serb crimes. Tens of thousands civilians died on all sides. Bosnian Muslims‘ civilian and military casualties were the largest since they faught other Muslims beside heavily armed Serbs and Croats. The radical Muslim regime sacrificed own civilians and military false-flag style, to gain Western support. Bosnian Muslim military committed significantly more violence on Serb civilians than Bosnian Serb military did on Muslim civilians, partly due to incorporation of mujahedin and silence of JPC media.

External actors (US, Western Europe, global radical Islam and Vatican) cover up the hostilities they have covertly supported and steered with economic sanctions and fail-by-design diplomacy and justice. They helped agitate pent-up hatred, provided covert military aid despite embargoes, and fuelled the confrontations, resembling the death squad policy in other regions. Neo-fascism, radical nationalism and militant Jihad, as if resurrected from WWII, turned against Serbs, albeit with lesser casualties. No comparable ideology can be identified as the cause of Serb violence. “Greater Serbianism” is a fabrication; Serbs defended their rights in ancestral homelands, but were coerced into admission of genocide.

JPC-orchestrated, Western military interventions, and selective support to Serb’s enemies, tested “Balkanization of the globe”. The West didn’t win Balkan “humanitarian interventions”, but diplomatic, economic, and propagandist warfare effectively exploited false humanitarian pretexts: death camps (Trnopolje) and mass rape, inflated (Srebrenica) and falsified massacres (Račak), non-existent ethnic cleansing (Kosovo Albanians), and alleged threat to own nationhood (ethnic cleansing of Krajina and Western Slavonia). Since the other hoaxes have collapsed, the Srebrenica “genocide” is the most abused case.

Politicized ICTY trials unsuccessfully charged Serb genocide and ethnic cleansing. The villains and backers manipulated the evidence and obstructed justice, jeopardizing reconciliation. Lacking proofs for other allegations, the “international community” pressured the Serbs to confess Srebrenica. Muslim “victims” claimed indemnity through ICJ, whose ruling (26.2.2007) exonerated Serbia from genocide and ethnic cleansing charges, effectively disproving interventionist rationales. Pro-interventionist politicians and professionals who demonized the victims and covered up the villains, should be prosecuted, also for harming the Serb nation mentally via demonizations and indirectly via attacks on civilians. Expelled Serbs may litigate for personal and property losses, once Balkan states join EU, who may react with revisionism and justice manipulation.

Infowar demonized Serbs, suppressed a debate, and assassinated opponents’ characters, legitimizing crimes. It reversed the victim-villain roles and re-directed guilt to cover up own crimes, escape responsibility, draw material (territory, money) and moral gains, and prepare for more violence. International institutions for peace and justice participated: ICTY, UN, OSCE, and NGOs, all funded by JPC and lesser vested interests. Propaganda brushed aside anti-Serb mass crimes: repeated ethnic cleansing in Croatia; expulsion from Sarajevo; Orić’s massacres around Srebrenica; bombing Serbia’s civilians and infrastructure; NATO use of radioactive[271] and other illegal weapons[272] (bunker busters[273], cluster bombs[274] graphite bombs[275]); and, NATO-UN-EU-supported ethnic cleansing of Kosovo and failure to protect Kosovo population under UNMIK-KFOR-Eulex, incl. extraction and trade in human organs from kidnapped Kosovo persons and sex slaves.  Abundant and clear evidence shows intent, plan and execution of mass crimes in NATO Operation Allied Force and Croat Lightning and Storm, and cleansing of Kosovo non-Albanians. Pogroms and expulsions of Serbs, NATO bombing “to the stone age” and releases of chemicals, and use of illegal weapons fall under humanitarian law[276] and Article 2 (c) (Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part); and (d) (Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group).

Cross-case and research-related

JPC-designed and -supported Balkan policy have harmed Serbs and their Orthodoxy as much as Western Christianity and civilisation. Support to Jihad against GWOT policy, creation of Islamist states and harming Orthodoxy in the Balkans threaten regional stability and prepare for destabilisation of Europe, like the biased immigration policy, instigated Muslim riots and Operation Danish Cartoons[277] do. A vestige of Christianity still uncorrupted by JPC, Orthodoxy is a Judeocentric target since Bolshevik genocide on Russians and Ukrainians, and Young Turks’ genocide on Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks. It mirrors the WWII hate of Orthodox Jews that Zionists have annihilated in Shoah with Nazi hands.

IMF and World Bank prescriptions prior to destabilisation of a target country induce hyperinflation and harshen poverty, hightening inter-group tensions. Then selective covert arming, death squads and false-flag terror enter to precipitate civil war. Superiority ideology. and the hate it bears, underpin mass violence. Dehumanization and demonization legitimize crimes under consent of public opinion. Post-crime propaganda reverses the victim-villain roles – to cover up own crimes, escape responsibility, draw material and moral gains, and prepare for more crimes.

Academics and professionals in public information, administration, law enforcement and justice are ethically responsible for upholding truth, but they support criminal policies. By making decisions based on deceptions, statesmen act as revisionists and instigators of mass violence. International institutions promoting peace and justice engage in the deceptions that hinder, if not close reconciliation opportunities. Young generation will not rid itself of hatred if it is fed lies and negative revisions to own history, or if it receives positive feedback about the crimes committed. Infowar and political manipulation entrench pre-conceptions and bias; grants and peer review processes make academia toe the line. Genocide research needs enforcement of objectivity. Research into external control and support by power centres such as JPC, is instrumental in mass violence prevention. Those who influence media and evidence, are behind mass violence planning and support.

Negative revisionism is effective when the ex-villains are in power and call a truth-teller “revisionist” and “denier”. Shifts in regional and global power structures spell historical revisionism. Regime changes rearrange power relationships, often re-defining past mass violence issues, some of which (victim-villain role reversal, negative revisionism, restitutionism and retributionism) call for re-examination of the process framework of the International Comparative Genocide Research. An objective mass crime watch must monitor diplomatic and propaganda developments, since current JPC policies create future conflict and mass violence potential globally, but academics and activists are powerless against JPC. Mass violence needs a better definition, exploration and prosecution. Does it include: (a) material, religious and institutional conquest and subjugation; (b) multi-generational stigma of a group harmed physically; (c) moral and psychological violence imposed on a victim nation by revisionism and role reversal; and (d) “legalistic violence” through politicized justice institutions, e.g. ICTY and ICJ?

---

[1]Constitutional provisions for an orderly secession, see: Ministry of  Information of the Republic of Serbia The Creation and Changes of the Internal Borders of Yugoslavia 1994

[2]Bein, Piotr “Judeocentrics and Mass Crimes” in Scherrer, Christian (ed.) Genocide and Mass Violence in Eurasia. Comparative Genocide Studies 3. Moers: IFEK‑IRECOR 2008

[3]Bein, Piotr NATO na Bałkanach self‑published 2006  ISBN 0‑9780543‑0‑X

[4]“Judeocentrics and Mass Crimes” op cit

[5]Dedijer, Vladimir The Yugoslav Auschwitz and the Vatican NY:  Prometheus 1988; (banned by Vatican) Manhattan, Avro The Vatican’s Holocaust Springfield: Ozark Books 1986 at www.srpska‑mreza.com/library/facts/manhattan‑vatican.html

[6]Naubacher, Herman Sonderauftrag Südosten 1940-1945 Gottingen 1956 p 31

[7]Naubacher, Herman Genocide in Satellite Croatia 1941-1945

[8]Novak, Victor Magnum Crimen Zagreb 1948

[9]Politika 21.02.2006

[10]Byrne, Johnny at www.srpska‑mreza.com/Croatia/great‑Nazis.html

[11]Savich, Carl “Another Side of the Pope” at www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=523

[12]Butler, Hubert Independent Spirit NY: Farrar Straus & Giroux 1996 at  www.archipelago.org/vol1‑2/butler.htm

[13]Gaffney, Starchevitch and McHugh citted by Butler op cit

[14]“The Case of Archbishop Stepinac” Washington: Yugoslav  Embassy 1947, quoted in Carl Savich, “Another Side of the Pope” 9.4.2005 at www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=523

[15]27.8.2008 at www.byzantinesacredart.com/blog/general/

[16]www.cfiva.org/cfiva/history/index.cfm

[17]E.g. Der Freiwillige at www.vho.org/D/Freiwillige

[18]San Francisco Chronicle 5.4.1994

[19]Copley, Gregory in ISSA Balkan Strategic Studies Special Report  31.12.1992

[20]Dorich, William to Washington Post 15.2.2002 at www.mail‑archive.com/news@antic.org/msg02232.html

[21] www.veritas.org.yu

[22]Byrne op cit

[23]D&FA July‑August 1995; Independent 8.8.1995; Daily News 5.8.1995; Ivo Pukanić in Nacional 24.5.2005 at http://cryptome.org/us-op-storm.htm

[24]Byrne op cit

[25]Broadcast on Croat Radio 26.8.1995

[26]Liborius, Soren in Victims of Croat Agression to the Republic of Serb  Krayina at www.veritas.org.yu/publikacije/Oluja/Tekstovi/oluja.htm

[27]Early September 1995 classified report cited by Fisk, Robert in  Independent 4.9.1995

[28]Byrne op cit

[29]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Storm

[30]Taylor, Scott in Halifax Herald 10.9.2001

[31]Operation Storm at www.veritas.org.yu

[32]Copley, Gregory in ISSA Balkan Strategic Studies Special Report  31.12.1992

[33]Craig, Neil to Scotsman 24.2.2006

[34]BBC Monitoring 21.12.2005 from Croatian Radio 19.12.2005

[35]Bein, Piotr and Pągowski, Stefan “Revisonism, Role‑reversal and Restitutions” in Scherrer op cit

[36]Washington Post 10.3.1996

[37]1910 Austro‑Hungarian ethnic map at http://lazarus.elte.hu/hun/maps/1910/nepek.gif

[38]Interview with former Canadian ambassador Bissett, Joe 5.5.2006  at www.electricpolitics.com/podcast/2006/05/peace_practitioner.html

[39]www.serbianna.com/columns/Joksimovich/002.shtml

[40]Trifkovic, Srdja at www..pogledi.co.yu/english/192.php

[41]Netherlands Institute for War Documentation “Srebrenica” 2002  at http://193.173.80.81/srebrenica/

[42]Sherman, Alfred international conference America’s Intervention in the Balkans, Chicago 1997 at www.srpska‑mreza.com/library/hague/sherman‑97.html

[43]Ljiljan 21.8.1996

[44]De Groene Amsterdammer 13.3.1996; Ibisević, Hata testimony in  “Report about Case Srebrenica” Banja Luka: Bureau of Government of Republic of Srpska for Relations with ICTY, September 2002 p 14

[45]Quoted in Savich, Carl “Srebrenica” at www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/065.shtml

[46]French National Assembly Srebrenica Vol 2 p 140‑154 in Collon,  Michel at http://news.serbianunity.net/bydate/2006/March_13/29.html

[47]Washington Post 16.2.1994; Toronto Star 16.7.1995

[48]Večernje Novosti 30.6.2005

[49]Both quotes: French National Assembly op cit

[50]UN report 28‑29.11.1993 quoted by Collon op cit

[51]Report of the Secretary General Pursuant to General Assembly  Resolution 53/35, A/54/549, 15.11.1999 p 33

[52]Netherlands Institute for War Documentation op cit Part III Chapter 7 Section 16

[53]ICTY, IT‑98‑33‑T 2.8.2001 p 25

[54]Srebrenica Research Group Srebrenica and the Politics of War Crimes 11.7.2005 at www.srebrenica‑report.com/conclusions.htm

[55]www.yugofile.co.uk/qt/1995071‑_22Bull.mov

[56]Mandel, Michael How America Gets Away With Murder Pluto Press  2004 p 152‑160; www.electricpolitics.com/2006/05/milosevics_death_in_the_propag.html p 155‑156

[57]Savich “Srebrenica” op cit

[58]Petković, Milan, Federation of American Scientists 1998 at www.fas.org/irp/world/para/docs/980000‑kla‑petkovic‑terror.htm ; D&FA 2.5.2005, 20.6.2005, 11.7.2005; D&FA Special Report July 2005

[59]http://europa‑eu‑un.org/articles/lv/article_4886_lv.htm

[60]Kent, Raymond open letter to Congress 5.7.2005

[61]Associated Press 26.6.2005

[62]Wilcoxson, Andy 5.6.2005 at www.slobodan-Milosevic.org

[63]Johnson, Ian June 2005 at  www.artel.co.yu/en/izbor/jugoslavija/2005‑07‑05.html

[64]Borojević, Boba “Srebrenica” at  www.serbianna.com/columns/borojevic/023.shtml

[65]Politika 27‑28.2.2006. At 20,000 Bosnian Muslim civilians killed by  Serbs (90,000 dead, 70% Muslims, 1/3 in the hands of Serbs), the  average claim would be  several million US dollars per victim.

[66]Kouchner, Bernard Les Guerriers de la Paix Paris:  Grasset 2004

[67]UNSC resolutions  770 and 771 13.8.1992

[68]Profil 10.8.1992

[69]LM (97) 1997

[70]Guardian 31.2.2000

[71]LM (102) July‑August 1997

[72]www.emperors‑clothes.com/film/judgment.htm

[73]http://usinfo.state.gov/eur/Archive/2006/Jan/03‑735048.html ;  total figure was about 98,000 by early 2007

[74]Scherrer, Christian “Options for Transitional Justice in Bosnia-Herzegovina” 2005 p 46

[75]ISSA Balkan Strategic Studies Special Report  31.12.1992

[76]Tabeau, Ewa and Bijak, Jakub in European J. of Population Vol 21 June 2005 p 187‑215

[77]Herman, Edward and Peterson, David “Milosevic’s Death” at www.electricpolitics.com/2006/05/milosevics_death_in_the_propag.html

[78]www.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,91134‑bosnia_p3705,00.html

[79]Razumovsky, Dorothea in Bittermann, Klaus (ed.) Serbia Must Die Belgrade 1996 p 91

[80]Muslim women wear white scarfs at mourning.

[81]Skewed reporting was called Potemkin’s Sarajevo. 18th century Russian marshal Potemkin organized Catherine II inspection of lands. Villages  were decorations being moved ahead of the Empress‘ entourage.

[82]Vuković, Željko in Serbia Must Die op cit p 159‑160

[83]Quoted in Vuković op cit p 158

[84]Ridder, Knight of Reuters (22.5.1999) reported ten boats nightly leaving Albanian port Vlore to Italy with a daily bounty of Kosovo women.

[85]“Hiding Genocide” op cit

[86]Mail on Sunday 3.1.1993

[87]Daily Mirror 4.1.1993

[88]Newsweek 4.1.1993

[89]Alexander, Shana in Capital Times 23.3.2000

[90]UN document S24491 18.12.1992

[91]Dorich, William open letter to US senator Dianne Feinstein 30.4.1997 at www.balkan‑archive.org.yu/kosta/pisma/dorich.30iv97a.html

[92]Olsen, Jane at Santa Monica College, California 31.3.1993

[93]Albanian view: Vesilind, Pritt in National Geographic February 2000.  Serb view: Terzić, Slavenko “Kosovo, Serbian Issue and the Greater Albania Project” SANU

[94]Search for “organs” at www.byzantinesacredart.com/blog/general/ and http://de-construct.net/

[95]Johnson, Raphael in Culture Wars January 2009

[96]Haaretz 17.2.2008

[97]http://ariwatch.com/OurAlly/TheLavonAffair.htm

[98]NYT 11.12.1954, 30.3.1975; Hirst, David The Gun and the Olive Branch.

[99]Reuters 30.3.2005

[100]http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/8172

[101]Bissett, James at SANU conference Kosovo and Metohija  16‑18.3.2006, summary by Boba Borojević at www.serbianna.com/columns/borojevic/029.shtml

[102]Limanowska, Barbara “Trafficking in Human Beings in South Eastern Europe” UNDP March 2005; National Criminal Intelligence Service  (UK) 2003 Report; UN Office On Drugs and Crime World Drug  Report 2005; Sunday Times 9.4.2006

[103]Admiral Lyons, James in Washington Times 9.5.2006

[104]Luković, Miloš Kryzys kosowski oczyma Serbów Belgrade: Todra 2000 p 44‑45

[105]Durham, Edith The Burden of the Balkans Edward Arnold: London  1905, quoted in Savich, Carl “Kosovo and the Holocaust” at  www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/

[106]Savich, Carl at www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/

[107]Ibid

[108]Luković op cit

[109]Chomsky, Noam in Al Ahram 18‑24.5.2000 based on data in NATO, OSCE and UN reports

[110]Savich, Carl at www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/073.shtml

[111]Junge Welt 24.4.1999

[112]Baldwin, Clive “Minority Rights in Kosovo under International Rule” Minority Rights Group International 2006

[113]Sherman op cit

[114]Norris, John Collision Course Praeger 2005, quoted by Deliso, Chris at www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=540

[115]Dow Jones Newswires 23.2.2006

[116]Fox News 23.5.1999

[117]Short’s statement 12.5.1999 in International Herald Tribune 14.5.1999 after seven weeks of bombing

[118]NYT 6.4.1999, 9.4.1999, 23.4.1999, 4.5.1999, 11.5.1999

[119]ICRC News 9.3.2006

[120]ICTY, IT‑99‑37‑I Kosovo Schedules A–G, 22.5.1999

[121]ERP KiM 20.3.2004, 10.4.2004

[122]Christian Science Monitor 17.11.2003

[123]ERP KiM 4.11.2003

[124]Copley, Gregory in D&FA 19.3.2004, D&FA 15.10.2003

[125]D&FA 15.10.2003

[126]NYT 18.3.2004; Reuters 18.3.2004; Washington Times 19.3.2004;  Tanjug 5.4.2004

[127]Beta 27.3.2004; Glas Javnosti 27.3.2004

[128]http://blog.srpskinacionalisti.com/2008/08/icty-reconciliation/

[129]Herman, Edward and Peterson, David at www.coldtype.net/Assets.04/Essays.04/YugoTrib.pdf

[130]NATO spokesman Shea, Jamie in Federal News Service 17.5.1999

[131]http://globalresearch.ca/articles/TAL307A.html

[132]Scharf, Michael in Washington Post 3.10.1999

[133]Mandel, Michael How America Gets Away With Murder Pluto Press 2004 p  126, 152‑160

[134]Owen, David Balkan Odyssey NY: Harcourt Brace 1995 p 112‑120

[135]Collins, Mick at http://cirqueminime.blogcollective.com/blog/_archives/2006/5/3/1930975.html ; ww.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/140306_b_Milosevic.htm

[136]Chicago Tribune 23.5.1999

[137]ANP English News Bulletin 27.7.1995

[138]Mandel op cit p 132‑134

[139]CNN transcript 99052703V54, 27.5.1999

[140]UK Ministry of Defense Briefing 20.4.1999

[141]ICTY, JL/PIU/404‑E, 27.5.1999

[142]ICTY, PR/P.I.S./510‑e, 13.6.2000

[143]Mandel op cit p 189‑190

[144]Berliner Zeitung 17.1.2001

[145]Ranta, Helena, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland 17.3.1999 at http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/eur/balkans/kosovo/racak.htm

[146]Rainio et al in Forensic Science International (116) 15.2.2001

[147]E.g.: LID (special edition) at www.srpska‑mreza.com/ddj/Racak/Tiker/RacakFile.html; Dunjić, D. in abstracts 26.4.1999 Serbian Anthropological Society and Belgrade City Library at www.computec‑int.com/bsc/war/archives/victims.htm#abuse

[148]Guardian 21.1.1999

[149]Le Figaro 20.1.1999; Le Monde 21.1.1999

[150]ICTY, IT‑01‑50‑I Croatia 8.10.2001; ICTY, IT‑01‑51‑I Bosnia and  Herzegovina 22.11.2001

[151]“Milosevic’s Death” op cit

[152]Widell, Jonathan and Steijnen, Nico at www.serbianna.com/columns/widell/004.shtml ; ICTY Milošević trial transcript p 43227 at www.un.org/icty/transe54/050825IT.htm

[153]“Speech by Slobodan Milosevich” NTIS, US Department of Commerce at www.balkanpeace.org/cib/kam/kams/kams19.shtml

[154]Economist 5.6.1999; NYT 28.7.2006

[155]Holbrooke, Richard To End a War 1999 p 29

[156]“Milosevic’s Death” op cit

[157]Telegraph 2.2.2007

[158]Russia Today 29.8.2008

[159]http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=65316&sectionid=351020606 ; http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/19/newsid_4521000/4521063.stm ; http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/kurir080108.htm ; http://de-construct.net/?p=6919

[160]Pumphrey, George at http://globalresistance.com/articles/pumphrey/Srebrenica.html

[161]www.srebrenica‑report.com/conclusions.htm

[162]ICTY prosecution witness Jović, Borisav

[163]Pumphrey op cit

[164]ICJ Judgement of 26.2.2007 at www.icj‑cij.org/icjwww/idocket/ibhy/ibhyjudgment/ibhy_ijudgment_20070226_frame.htm

[165]ICTY, IT‑03‑68‑I

[166]UN document A/46/171 S/25635, 2.6.1993 at http://srpska‑mreza.com/Bosnia/Srebrenica/UN.html

[167]Quoted in Savich “Srebrenica” op cit

[168]ICJ Press Release 2007/8 at www.icj‑cij.org/icjwww/ipresscom/ipress2007/ipresscom_2007‑8_bhy_200702026.htm

[169]Rockler, Walter in Chicago Tribune 23.5.1999

[170]See section ICTY and the term genocide

[171]SRNA 2.3.2007 in BBC Monitoring at http://serbblog.blogspot.com/2007/03/bosnians‑to‑sue‑holland‑for‑13bn.html

[172]ICJ Press Communique 99/23 2.6.1999 at www.converge.org.nz/pma/icj.htm

[173]http://byzantinesacredart.com/blog/2007/03/serbia‑cleared6.html

[174]Strachan, Graham at www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/14/reality.htm

[175]Kent, Raymond “Nationalisms and the absolute corruptibility of imagined absolute power” 7.10.2000

[176]Newsweek 8.5.2000

[177]Yugoslav data: NATO lost 61 planes, 7 choppers, 30 UAVs and 238 cruise missiles, excl. machines that crashed outside Yugoslavia, e.g.  RAF C‑130K Hercules transport plane crashed in Albania (11.6.1999) with British SAS unit onboard to beat Russian paratroopers to Slatina: www.aeronautics.ru/nws002/natolosses‑review01.htm ; sightings of downed NATO machines, official statements by NATO and Yugoslavia, and loss‑related classified and unconfirmed reports, at www.aeronautics.ru/analysis‑pdf.htm

[178]www.aeronautics.ru//nws001/countingmigs.htm

[179]Headquarters, Department of the Army Field Manual 100‑6: Information Operations Washington: USGPO 27.8.1996

[180]Joint Chiefs of Staff JCS Publication 1, Glossary Department of Defense Military and Associated Terms, Department of Defense 1987

[181]Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Publication 3‑53, Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations Washington DC: USGPO 10.7.1996

[182]Neue Zürcher Zeitung 30.3.2000

[183]Joint Chiefs of Staff op cit

[184]www.heall.com/medicalfreedom/mediablackout.html

[185]www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/chapter14.htm

[186]Washington Post 10.11.2002

[187]“War Spin” CBC series With Passionate Eye 25.5.2003

[188]San Francisco Chronicle 30.3.1999

[189]Kellner, Douglas quoted by Kesić, Obrad in Bittermann, Klaus (ed.) Serbia Must Die Belgrade 1996 p 99

[190]“Milosevic’s Death” op cit

[191]ICTY case IT‑98‑33 versus Krstić, Radislav

[192]Byrne op cit

[193]Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 18.1.1992

[194]Gen. Panić, Yugoslav military chief of staff, in ISSA  op cit

[195]Malic, Nebojsa at www.antiwar.com/Malic/?articleid=8179

[196]Expulsions of Serbs from Croatia: Serb Western Slavonia and Serb Krayina Cetinje: Svetigora 1998; Ivić, Pavle and Krestić, Vasilje (eds) Persecution of Serbs and Ethnic Cleansing in Croatia 1991‑1998 Belgrade: Serbian Council Info. Centre 1998; www.veritas.org.yu

[197]A 1942 pamphlet for those responsible for the selection, by the Race and Settlement Head Office of the Third Reich.

[198]A collection by Piročanac, Zoran Petrović, large sample in Polish at www.gavagai.pl/nato/zniszczy.htm

[199]European 10.6.1993

[200]Mihailović, Kosta and Krestić, Vasilije Answers to Criticisms Belgrade: SANU 1995 at www.balkan‑archive.org.yu/kosta/memorandum/contents.html

[201]“Speech by Slobodan Milosevich” op cit

[202]“Milosevic’s Death” op cit

[203]Hammond, Philip and Herman, Edward (eds) Degraded Capability London and Sterling: Pluto Press 2000

[204]Wiebes, Cees quoted by O’Neill, Brendan 23.1.2004 at www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CA374.htm

[205]Serbia Must Die op cit

[206]Deichmann ibid p 198, 202

[207]Srebrenica Research Group op cit

[208]Trifkovic, Srdja Ustaša London: Lord Byron Foundation for Balkan Studies 1998 p 6

[209]Serbia Must Die op cit p 199‑200

[210]Author of five books on the Balkans, publisher of GMBooks (who published Peter Brock’s Media Cleansing: Dirty Reporting).

[211]Thomas Jefferson Award for Outstanding Scholarship recipient at Vanderbilt University where he taught for several decades, a diplomat in Belgrade after the Holocaust, and the author of ten books on the Balkans.

[212]In NYT Washington bureau 1973‑retirement in 1996, Balkan reporting until 2004. 1989 finalist nominee Pulitzer Prize competition for Public Service, Southern Journalism Award for Investigative Reporting (Duke University), Washington Journalism Center’s Thomas L. Stokes Award for Environmental Reporting and 15 other distinctions.

[213]Gossett, Sherrie in CNSNews.com 22.3.2006

[214]Kiernan, Benedict in Scherrer, Christian (ed.) Genocide and Mass Violence in the 20th and 21st Centuries. An Introduction Hiroshima/Moers: IRECOR 2005

[215]Hoare, Marko Attila at  www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article.jsp?id=2&debateId=42&articleId=3355

[216]http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/pen‑l/2002m05.3/msg00040.htm

[217]NYT 23.3.2002 and ibid

[218]Jones, Adam in Scherrer (ed.) op cit p 138

[219]“Hiding Genocide” op cit

[220]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbofolk

[221]“Speech by Slobodan Milosevich” op cit

[222]Tanaka, Yuki in Scherrer op cit p 207‑208, 212

[223]http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGACT770752004

[224]Serbian Council Information Center 15.1.1993 at www.balkan‑archive.org.yu/kosta/bosna/b‑rape_of_serbs‑150193‑Serbian_council.html

[225]Mendenhall, Preston at www.msnbc.com/news/667790.asp; National Criminal Intelligence Service 2003 Report Section 4.30;  Guardian 23.12.2002; BBC 14.6.2002; Insight Magazine 14.1.2002; Washington Post 24.4.2000; Seattle Times 24.3.2000

[226]Lopusina, Marko at www.serbianna.com/columns/lopusina/084.shtml

[227]Perkins, John Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

[228]Chossudovsky, Michel at http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7705

[229]NYT 3.11.1999

[230]Le Nouvel Observatuer 31.8.1995

[231]Wiebes, Cees Intelligence and the War in Bosnia, Lit Verlag 2003

[232]Scotsman 2.3.2001.

[233]Sray, John in Daily Telegraph 2.6.1995.

[234]Jane’s Defence Weekly 14.2.1996

[235]Wiebes op cit p 159-162, 166-167

[236]US House Republican Policy Committee 26.4.1996

[237]Wiebes op cit p 176

[238]Wiebes quoted by O’Neill op cit

[239]Netherlands Institute for War Documentation op cit

[240]Chossudovsky, Michel at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8055; National Post 15.3.2002; Wall Street Journal 1.11.2001; BBC Monitoring International Reports 17.1.2005 after Dani 14.1.2005; Kohlman, Evan Al‑Qaida’s Jihad in Europe 2004; Times 31.8.2000;  AFP 24.9.1999; Tanjug 16.12.1997; US Senate Republican Policy  Committee,16.1.1997; Bodansky, Yossef and Forrest,Vaughn,  Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, House  Republican Research Committee 1.9.1992

[241]Wiebes op cit p 207

[242]Wiebes quoted by O’Neill op cit

[243]NYT 9.6.1998; Ottawa Citizen 15.12.2001

[244]Netherlands Institute for War Documentation op cit

[245]Wall Street Journal Europe 1.11.2001

[246]BBC 28.6.1998

[247]Daily Telegraph 18.4.1999

[248]Taylor, Scott Diary of an Uncivil War Esprit de Corps 2002 p 120‑121

[249]Scotland on Sunday 24.10.2004; Washington Post 26.5.1998

[250]“Kosovo and the Holocaust” op cit

[251]Works, Ben at www.FreeRepublic.com/forum/a377cf8ed23c1.htm

[252]“Kosovo and the Holocaust” op cit

[253]Michaletos, Ioannis at http://serbianna.com/blogs/michaletos/?p=270

[254]Front Page Magazine 31.1.2008

[255]Raimondo, Justin at www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=3669

[256]USA Today 16.6.1992

[257]Madsen, Wayne in CounterPunch 15.2.2003

[258]Merlino, Jacques in Serbia Must Die op cit

[259]National Post 23.11.1998

[260]Ibid

[261]LaPorte, Erin at www.agitprop.org.au/stopnato/20000105crimlapo.php

[262]Stover, Eric and Peress, Gilles The Graves: Srebrenica and Vukovar Berlin: Scalo 1998

[263]Thomas, Raju at www.srpska‑mreza.com/WarCrime/dehumanizing.html

[264]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbophobia

[265]Estulin, Daniel in CounterPunch 27.5.2005

[266]www.usip.org/newsmedia/releases/2006/0105_narrative.html

[267]Retired German general, an advisor in OSCE, Loquai, D. Heinz in his book The Kosovo Conflict

[268]“Keine Anhaltspunkte für Verfolgung” op cit

[269]“The Dakovica Case” at www.aeronautics.ru/archive/ekke

[270]E.g. ICTY ruling cited at www.aeronautics.ru/archive/ekke

[271]Bein, Piotr and Zorić, Predrag at international conference Facts about Depleted Uranium, Praha 24‑25.11.2001 at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du‑watch/files/DUPraha.doc

[272]Morales, Jose Luis in Articulo 20 14.6.1999

[273] At least one type of bombs with uranium metal shields was tested in Montenegro: Williams, Dai at www.eoslifework.co.uk/du2012.htm

[274]NATO dropped anti‑personnel bomblets BLU‑97B on civilians in Niš and other locations. The bomblet possibly contains uranium metal; www.fas.org/man/dod‑101/sys/dumb/cbu‑87.htm

[275]Bomblet BLU‑114B short‑circuits electrical installations with graphite  fibres; www.fas.org/man/dod‑101/sys/dumb/blu‑114.htm

[276]In the context of uranium weapons: Bein, Piotr and Parker, Kaeren in  Politics and Environmental Policy in the 21st Century Faculty of Political Sciences, U. of Belgrade at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du‑watch/files/Beograd6.rtf

[277]Bein, Piotr “Operation Danish Cartoons” at www.wirtualnapolonia.com/kresy/opinie.asp?opinia=322

Judeocentrics and Mass Crimes

Piotr Bein

A paper prepared for the International Comparative Genocide Research project of the Hiroshima City University, 2009, being updated until a book publication expected 2012.

Introduction…………………………………………… 2

Power and ideology………………………………….. 2

Conquest and prevention………………………….. 2

Secret power…………………………………………. 4

Messianic cults……………………………………… 5

Power, racism and rabbinic prophecies………….. 7

Sacrifice and scapegoating…………………………. 9

Secret society geopolitics………………………… 10

God’s chosen and genocide………………………. 11

Judeocentric Power Complex…………………….. 13

Neocons and Christian Zionists…………………. 13

Roadmap to NWO………………………………… 15

Exploit Islamism………………………………….. 16

US-Israel-Turkey nexus…………………………… 17

Opportunistic hatred………………………………. 18

Interventionism……………………………………. 20

The puppets…………………………………………. 22

Globalist aims?……………………………………. 23

Islamist Trojan Horse…………………………….. 24

European Union…………………………………… 30

Vatican……………………………………………… 36

Conclusions………………………………………….. 38

Keywords

Armenian genocide, Bilderberg, Bolshevism, Communism, Dönmeh, Frankists, ethnic cleansing, gendercide, genocide, infowar, intellicide, interventionism, Judaism, Judeocentric Power Complex, Lubavitchers, messianism, neocons, NWO, Palestine, PNAC, Rothschilds, scapegoating, secret societies, terrorism, Turkey, GWOT, Yugoslavia.

Definitions

Anti-Semitism: bigoted prejudice vs. Jews.

Anti-Zionism: opposition to Zionism on various grounds – from Judaic religious to secular Gentile opposition, to brutal colonization of Palestine and genocide (the latter issue is dealt with in this essay).

Dönmeh: crypto-Jewish converts to Islam in the Near East, followers of the 17th century Ottoman Jewish messiah Sabbatai Zevi.

Frankist: a follower of 18th century radical Jewish religious leader Jacob Frank, who claimed to be reincarnate of self-proclaimed messiah Sabbatai Zevi and of King David.

Holocaust (this essay): WWII genocide on more than twenty groups, Slavs being the most numerous.

Judeocentrism: serving narrow, often partisan and extreme pro-Israeli, pro-Judaic and/or pro-Zionist interest, without regard for the rights of others; also espoused by non-Jewish Christian Zionists.

Masonic: of or relating to the international secret order of Freemasons.

Messianism (in this essay): belief in the promised deliverer of the Jewish nation prophesied in the Hebrew Bible.

Neoconservative (neocon): an Israel-first, US political orientation of Judeocentric politicians and public servants.

Shoah: the annihilation of Jews in WWII.

Zionism: a movement for (originally) the reestablishment and (now) the development and protection of Jewish nation in Palestine or elsewhere.

Judeocentric Power Complex (Judeocentrics)): a global web of powerful individuals and organizations who advocate for, support and carry out radical Israel-first and Judeocentric policies; JPC includes Zionist Christians and moderate Jews.

Notes

Date convention: x.y.z, where x = day, y = month, z = year. Example: 24.3.1999 = March 24, 1999.

Phonetic equivalents of Serbo-Croatian letters: ć = soft ch, č = ch, š = sh, đ = dj, ž = zh.

Reference at paragraph’s end refers to the whole paragraph, unless other references occur in it.

Acronyms

9/11          September 11, 2001, attacks in the USA

BiH          Bosnia and Herzegovina

D&FA      Defense & Foreign Affairs Strategic Policy

DPG        “Defense Planning Guidance”

FYROM  Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

GWOT     global war on terror

ICTY       International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia

JPC          Judeocentric Power Complex

KFOR      NATO-led international occupation forces in Kosovo

KLA        Kosovo Liberation Army

MEP        member of European Parliament

NAU        North American Union

NGO        non-governmental organization

NYT New York Times

OIC          Organization for the Islamic Conference

OSCE      Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

PNAC      Project for a New American Century

PR            Public Relations

SFOR      Stabilization Force (UN-NATO force in Bosnia-Herzegovina)

UNMIK   UN Mission in Kosovo

UNSC      United Nations Security Council

WMD      weapons of mass destruction

Introduction

20th century saw an increasing number of civilian victims of mass crimes: 1915 Armenian genocide, Bolshevik genocide of Russian Orthodox Christians and others, two world wars, the Holocaust of tens of millions of Slavs, millions of Jews and others in WWII, post-WWII persecution of patriots in Communist Eastern Europe and in the European colonies, and genocide of Palestinians. Having destroyed Iraq and Afghanistan, the present GWOT might become nuclear. This essay presents the common power thread behind the mass violence and terror, understanding of which is key to prevention. The essay draws on the under-reported Balkan case. Power over others is accomplished with arms, infowar, ideological instruments (political and religious infiltration, transformation of traditional values, religious conversion), economic subjugation, financial control (as seen in the Fall 2008, “bail-out” crisis), selective justice, and procreation to outnumber “them”. A companion essay examines the instruments and local animosities and actors in the Balkan context,[1] while this essay overviews the conquest ideology (section 1), definition of the powers responsible (section 2), and synergies with external actors (section 3).

Power and ideology

Successful interventions require “justice on the part of the intervening party” and “a deep concern for human security rather than just national security.”[2] Both were missing in recent interventions. Formal institutions, media and NGOs use absurd explanations, politicization and degenerate processes to excuse the perpetrators. The individuals employed in these activities compromise themselves, unpunished. Scholars, universities and think-tanks are key in propaganda, beside media people. Once published, the sheer critical mass of “scientifically” re-packaged spin silences critics. Biased researchers empower the mass crime actors whom they seek to expose, thwarting research and prevention. Analysts tend to focus on interventionist instruments or target groups, losing the long-term sense of the powers behind the conflicts. The process is too slow to identify, expose and stop “the mega-perpetrator”. Intimidation and control impede exposing the controllers.

Conquest and prevention

Over time, antagonistic ethnic groups learn to live with each other.[3] Ethnic and religious animosities do recur in bloody conflicts. Is it fallible human nature and short memory, or is there a transcending force? Shibutani[4] explains participation in genocidal structures, and siding with demonization and mass violence, conditioned by mass misinformation; individual behaviour depends on the reactions of the group for which one is performing. Group-think explains the behaviour of civilian and military leaders responsible for mass violence crimes: the leaders are caught up in a self-justifying logic that generates illusory morality, demands conformity, accepts high risk strategies and demonizes enemies and dissenters. Tribal or civilizational think supplements Shibutani’s argument.

The survival of a group in times of war and mass violence depends on the existence and integrity of its “brain” – the leaders and intelligentsia, and its material and spiritual base. Genocide first targets them and the group’s land, economic, religious, cultural and historical assets. This aspect highlights the relative effectiveness of mass violence. Russians lost the bulk of their intelligentsia to Bolsheviks, Armenians – to “Young Turks” secretly steered by Dönmeh, Poles[5] and Serbs – to Nazi and Soviet WWII and Communist post-WWII intellicide. Accusation of Bosnian Serb leaders in the Bosnian war served a similar purpose, by eliminating them from negotiations.

“Ethnic conflict” eliminates a contender from a disputed territory. This label is the aggressor’s justification, but at the base is a superiority attitude, seeking to win the moderates and neutrals in the conquest process. Extremists pervert religion to sow hatred and violence against an “enemy” or opposition. External and local actors nurture radicalism, irredentism and extremism as a proxy force. Balkan wars tested this strategy for US-NATO before expanding aggression into Asia. Partitioning of Yugoslavia tested the divide-and-conquer US geostrategy[6] envisaged for Russia,[7] Asia and the globe.

The Western interventionist purports national or group security, democracy and human rights (“our values”), while internal aggression is expressed by domination of the underlying ideology (“if you are not with us, you are against us”), repression of political opponents, limitations to civil liberties, and lies and deception. Before mass violence begins, “they” are severed from humanity, their struggle for rights being “ethnic”, “fascist”, “extremist”. The only solution offered in the Balkans was the elimination of contenders via definition of Serb inferiority. In GWOT. the undesirables are “Islamists”.

NATO and Pentagon textbooks list “instruments of power”: combat, diplomacy, economic sanctions, and special operations (covert action and infowar).[8] A conquest integrates them with “legalistic warfare” of ICTY-like tribunals that impede conflict resolution and legitimize war (“an acceptable solution”), ensuring “that the “horror of war” is not an argument against war itself.”[9] Analysis of brewing infowar could identify actors, and violence targets and methods. Preventive analysis would rely on the knowledge of power politics, group relations and conflicts – factors often analysed by intelligence service of the threatened group. Some defence and intelligence publications accurately represent the developments, while those of the culprit deceive and misinform. Forced conversions of Serbs in Croatia to Catholicism, as in WWII, remain perhaps the only covered-up type of Balkan conflict warfare.

Scores of journalists and diplomats provide objective information from “the wrong side”, by timely analysis and publication. The challenge for an independent predictor of mass violence is to reject the demonization, de-humanization and lies. Infowar’s significance was marked when bombing killed 16 and wounded 130 RTS Belgrade TV studio staff, because they had “filled the airwaves with hate and with lies”; RTS would be an acceptable media if Milošević provided “equal time for Western news”, “without censorship”.[10] Pressured by NATO, Serbian puppet regime convicted RTS director Dragoljub Milanović, for not heeding air raid warning. Milanović escaped death by being late to an interview arranged at the studio by CNN. RTS programs showed civilian victims, an unwelcome action for the bombers. In fact, Serbs watched BBC, and Sky News, and took advance warning of air raids from CNN, while the West restricted access to dissident media.

Secret power

Many secret elite power clubs[11] are being exposed;[12] opinions vary as to which one is at the top. Bilderberg Group seems to influence global power most effectively. A Polish Jew émigré, Mason and Zionist, Józef Retinger initiated it.[13] He was the leading advocate of the Council of Europe that now holds power over EU members. Bilderberg meetings routinely withhold information,[14] even though two Economist reporters attend every year. Similarly, the non-attribution rule impedes media reporting from Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) meetings. Some media CEOs, news anchors and influential members of the press fill CFR seats. Guarded by government security services, Bilderberg’s secret meetings invite statesmen, royalties, businessmen, bankers, academics and media. Executives of world’s leading multinational corporations meet with national politicians to consider policies, claiming private attendance. Western constitutions forbid statesmen’s participation in secret meetings on national and global matters. Constitutions of Western Europe’s democratic monarchies ban members of their royal families from involvement in the process, yet some are active Bilderbergers. Following a leak of the 1999 meeting minutes, European Greens and Parliament disapproved of EU commissioner Bilderberg engagement.[15]

Some observers claim that the Rothschilds are in charge of a secret world government. They set the agenda for Bilderberg meetings and have final say on participants. David Rockefeller mediates the agenda, and Henry Kissinger may also act as a direct mediator. The meetings presumably brainstorm all participants (30-person steering committee and about 90 invitees picked for their knowledge, standing and experience). Then the steering committee meets in private to make decisions. Numerous Bilderbergers or invitees are in the Trilateral Commission, CFR and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (UK). Together with Bilderberg, these apparently national bodies play a crucial role in directing policy, moulding establishment consensus and probing for likely opposition. Bilderberg isn’t a world super-government, but “part of an increasingly dense system of transnational management” which bypasses the democratic process by inter-governmental executive agreements.[16]

Accusations against Bilderberg are dismissed as conspiracy theories – it’s a “private discussion club”. Leading media were among the critics. In 1977, Times wrote about a Bilderberg meeting: “a clique of the richest, the economical and political most powerful and influential figures in the West meeting secretly to plan events that later on just happen by chance”. Financial Times columnist Lombard noticed: “If the Bilderberg Group is not a conspiration of some kind it acts as an exceptional good imitation of one”.[17] A British economist and a former Bilderberg delegate, Will Hutton compared the Group’s meeting to the annual World Economic Forum: “the consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide”.[18] Critics charge that Bilderberg considers itself supra-governmental, manipulates global finances, establishes monetary rates, selects political figures for rulers, targets those whom it wants removed from power, and decides which countries shall wage war on others.[19]

In 1974, US Congress reported that Chase Manhattan Bank, one of Federal Reserve’s[20] 300 shareholders, held at least 5% stock in 28 broadcasting firms; a mere 5% significantly influences the media. The bankers call in their loans if the media disagrees with them. Going against the system could affect one’s career.[21] Financial advisor and international journalist Joan Veon[22] noted that media don’t report “orchestrating the whole global economic, environmental, military, and political infrastructure of the world”. At the 1991 Bilderberg meeting, David Rockefeller thanked Washington Post, NYT, Time and “other great publications” for promulgating NWO and undermining nationhood:

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”[23]

The 1999 Bilderberg meeting assessed NATO Kosovo campaign (“a gigantic success”, “subject of a broad understanding in the eyes of the public”), and deemed it appropriate to go for Hussein and Milošević to deter others. Kissinger said that NATO was in danger of replacing old empires in the row of permanent protectors. Critics thought that several of the passages on Kosovo, marked “must not be quoted”, were approving of Russia’s intervention in Chechnya. Yugoslav papers Politika and Vojska alleged that Bilderberg decided on NATO interventions.[24]

Rothschild leadership at Bilderberg would explain placing Bush in power to bring US into GWOT and debt, only to blame Gentile government for the harm extreme Jews are “deliberately causing Americans and the non-Jewish peoples of the Middle East”; Jewish elites unburden themselves from their guilt, and bring Gentile governments into mutual wars, furthering the ambitions to replace Gentile governments with “world-wide Jewish rule”, after making “the Gentile nations so weary of war that they will gladly surrender their sovereignty to a Jewish World government”; “It will instead result in extermination camps, the likes of which the world has not yet seen.”[25]

Messianic cults and bankers

Some cults of world’s most powerful people worship God through the seed of King David passed on through reincarnation of the Messiah. Radical Jewish converts into Islam in Turkey, Dönmeh descended from 18th century cult by Baruchyah Russo, who was believed to have God’s soul of the 17th century false messiah Shabbatai Zevi, whom ancestors of Dönmeh-ousted sultan had shamed. Hassidic Jews descend from these cults. A Polish Jew, Jacob Frank declared himself Shabbatai’s successor and joined Dönmeh. Frank warred with rabbis who believed that Jews mustn’t precipitate Messiah’s arrival nor emigrate to Palestine. His followers, the Frankists hold similar beliefs as do Illuminati, Bolsheviks and Communists, whose leaders have been disproportionately Jewish. The powerful Frankist Jews believe their reincarnate King will restore Biblical Israel and destroy Gentiles and their religions. Total evil and suffering, incl. anti-Semitism, will precipitate the “Redemption”.[26] Young Turks have had as intimate relationship with Dönmeh as did Hitler’s Nazis with Frankists: Hitler’s Hungarian Jewish patron Moses Pinkeles (Ignatius Trebitsch-Lincoln) and Adam Alfred Rudolf Glauer (Rudolf Glandeck Freiherr von Sebottendorf) who helped Hitler to power.

To Frankists, the Messiah would have to be crypto-Jewish tormenter of other Jews.[27] Many top Nazis were Jewish Zionists,[28] aided by the banker Jewry who also had financed the Bolsheviks, [29] most of whom were extreme Jews.[30] International Zionist elites collaborated with the Nazis,[31] and colluded in extermination of Jews unwanted in Palestine.[32]

Jacob Frank exchanged his wife and daughter for sexual favours to gain converts and influence. To gain politically, he accused Jews of ritual human sacrifice, and appealed to Moslem and Christian leaders. Frankists have corrupted Gentiles with Communist, Masonic and Illuminati leaders, who inoculated government, education and the press with Frank’s mythologies, and implemented them. “Frank’s ultimate goal was to destroy life on Earth, and the means to accomplish that end today exist. The Nazis and the Communists, the latter under crypto-Jewish leadership, inflicted terrible harm to humanity. For the Frankist Jews, there is still worse evil yet to be done”. Frankists provided revolutionaries nonstop, through Marxists to modern Zionists. They have been subverting Christian and Muslim religions and societies, while strictly adhering to a code of silence about their faith in the abolition of all law.[33]

Some Judeocentrics believe that God’s soul dwells in the Rothschild dynasty, making one of them the Jewish King. Rothschilds planned to buy Palestine from Ottoman sultans who ruled it, and whom the Rothschilds indebted for that purpose. When this failed, Palestine was to be conquered, with a view on world domination, through downfall of the Turkish Empire, and a “conflict of nations for the possession of Palestine and dominion of the East and the world”, i.e. “a general Asiatic, European, and African struggle, with Jerusalem as the objective”.[34] The plot evaded Christian and Muslim retaliation to Rothschilds’ purchase of the Holy Land. By tiring the world with wars, Judeocentrics could emerge as the ones proposing eternal peace, while taking Palestine. The “Rothschild formula” is also manifest in the destructive policies of the Federal Reserve,[35] US dominant financial power that is “entirely private-owned, although it seeks to give the appearance of a governmental institution. It has the right to print and issue money, the traditional prerogative of monarchs. It is set up to provide financing for wars. It functions as a money monopoly having total power over all the money and credit of the people.”[36]

Banker Mayer Amschel Rothschild allegedly wanted (1770)[37] to modernize Lucifer worship (Illumininati,  “the Enlightened ones”) towards world domination, and to impose it “upon what would remain of the human race” after an orchestrated cataclysm.[38] He presented (1773) a plan to, “Make the Goyim destroy each other so there will only be the proletariat left in the world, with a few millionaires devoted to our cause, and sufficient police and soldiers to protect our interest. Call it The New Order. Appoint a Dictator”.[39] Freemasons were allegedly infiltrated to implement the satanic plan under the guise of “peace on earth” in which all existing governments and religions would be destroyed, by “dividing the masses into opposing camps in ever increasing numbers”; people would “fight and weaken themselves and gradually destroy national governments and religious institutions”.[40] Masons, terror, media, demoralisation and economic-political manipulation were specified as tools.

Carr’s book, the source for the alleged plan, doesn’t specify its source, but others reach similar conclusions: Bjerknes on Judeocentric cause of major upheavals, Sutton on Jewish bankers’ aid to Nazi and Bolshevik regimes, Irving on Jewish bankers manipulating Churchill to perform in WWII as pre-planned,[40a] Makow on Illuminati,[40b] or Pinay on Masonry.[40c] G.E. Griffin and Mullins chronicle the Rothschild forces behind US historical developments; in addition, Des Griffin reveals the power of the bankers’ City of London over British politics. Consequently, it is likely that Illuminati became the instrument of the House of Rothschild towards One World Government, and it’s them who fomented major wars and revolution since then. A 1969 lecture[40d] is also congruent with the alleged plan. At least since 1990, some VIP speeches and elitist conferences mention NWO explicitly.[40e] US geostrategist Robert Strausz-Hupe drew a roadmap to NWO after WWII.[40f]

Many recent developments point to gradual realisation of a NWO plan: de-nationalisation in EU and plans for other continental unions, “war on terror” against the Arab world and against civil liberties in the West; financial and economic “crises”, AH1N1 “pandemic” of 2009; cover-up of the Fukushima disaster (bigger than Chernobyl). A One World Government is in the making, with a powerful secret group behind it, commandeering the media, politics, religions, finance and institutions such as UN, WHO, IAEA, NATO, international tribunals and NGOs. Foster Gamble’s movie Thrive at www.thrivemovement.com [40g] outlines how the elites control money, energy, technology, food and water, health and healing, indoctrination and dissent. One aspect seems debatable among the NWO “conspiracy theorists”: whether Rothschilds (alternatively, with other banker and elitist clans) commandeer the Illuminati or vice versa. Talmudic rabbinate of terror may also be at the helm.

Power, racism and rabbinic prophecies

Referring to Babylonian Talmud, one of the world’s largest Orthodox Jewish groups, Hasidic Lubavitchers, list “sins of “Jesus the Nazarene””, and await rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (their Moshiach, i.e. Messiah, called “the Rebbe”) to resurrect.[41] German historian Wolfgang Eggert believes Lubavitchers are the nexus of secret global power in a Cabalistic plot, from Zionists through to Illuminati:

“We may start at any historical point (even with the American revolution or more far back Oliver Cromwell) […] the maker (or profiteer) of all this is Cabalistic Judaism. All serves their plan, to implement biblical prophecy.”[42]

Unlike for other Hasidim, “forcing God’s hand” for Lubavitchers isn’t a crime, and  racism is central in their cult. In 1797, rabbi Shneur Zalman of Lyadi founded Lubavitch forerunners, the Hasidic Chabads. He radicalized medieval Jewish ideas that had defined Jewishness racially rather than religiously. Zalman believed only Jewish souls were Godly. To Hasidim also goyim bodies are inferior. Chabad hasn’t renounced Zalman’s racism.[43] To Schneerson, an example for brotherliness and compassion according to Lubavitch-friendly US presidents, “the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all other nations of the world” and everything “exists only for the sake of the Jews.”[44] Lubavitcher rabbi Naftali Estulin said: “the world is waiting for us to fulfill our role in preparing the world to greet Moshiach”.[45]

Also without Moshiach’s coming required in Orthodox Judaism, rabbi Kook justified Jewish return to Palestine, a Zionist way to rabbinical salvation that would annihilate all except Zionists.[46] First-ever in Palestine, Kook’s yeshiva has hatched ultra-racist settler movement that Lubavitchers fund and support. Kook encouraged his students to fight for the West Bank and participated himself.[47] An ideological spine of WWII Zionism and Palestinian subjugation, Lubavitcher rabbis lead Israeli neo-Sanhedrin and wield an astounding power in America. They had immediate access to president Bush through his press secretary, Ari Fleischer, a Reform Jew. Senator Joseph Lieberman, an Orthodox Jew backed them. Senate Armed Services Committee’s chairman Carl Levin has commended his Lubavitch “ideals” to senate. Jewish members of Congress regularly attend a Lubavitcher rabbi’s seminars. Former deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz, Pentagon’s comptroller Dov Zakheim (ordained Orthodox rabbi, implicated in the disappearance of trillions of dollars during 9/11), and former deputy treasury secretary Stuart Eizenstat (proponent of fraudulent restitutionism in Eastern Europe), are Lubavitchers, “a movement of monumental importance” that commands “immense world-wide financial resources” and power; “its rabbis dominate or are poised to dominate Jewish communities in a startling number of countries”.[48]

Leading radical Israeli politicians consult Lubavitchers. The Rebbe is a “hidden ruler of Israel”: “No Jewish statesman on a visit to the US, no matter if Likud or Labor, could get around a private audience.” The sect (“mental disease” to former Berlin rabbi Walther Rothschild) promotes its political aims via Israeli diplomacy, Mossad and lobbying.[49] Nobody is more “widely respected and warmly received” in Washington than Levi Shemtov, Lubavitcher chief representative, “the unofficial rabbi of the Capitol”.[50] His Washington “embassy” features photos of associated politicians, e.g. “former Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, a close personal friend […] President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore, and former prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu”; NSC and state department adopt Shemtov’s interests and Lubavitcher lobbyists liaise with a few dozen ambassadors.[51]

Wolfowitz led into Gulf War 2, assisted by Zionist Christians.[52] On the war’s eve (21.2.2003), he convened a meeting with “Bible code specialist” Michael Drosnin, attended by a head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Operations Directorate and leaders of military intelligence, e.g. DIA’s gen. Lowell Jacoby, and Pentagon’s command, control, communication and intelligence “nerve centre” head, Dr Linton Wells. Of special interest was the prophesized date of Iraq’s demise. US and Israeli intelligence analysed the meeting’s outcome; the Americans “took it very seriously”[53] and started Operation Iraqi Freedom on the prophesized date. Beside Bush and Cheney, national security advisor Rice and other presidential advisors, justice secretary Ashcroft, many Congressmen, and DHS’ Chertoff, assisted Wolfowitz, each tied to the apocalyptic network. They promote war with Iran, eyeing Russia for  “Gog versus Magog” battle on Middle East’s Armageddon field. Bible-inspired Masonic and quasi-Masonic orders strive to “fulfill the book” and support their members’ delusions of being among the chosen few. Eggert‘s avert-the-frenzy petition cautions that Iran’s president Ahmadinejad, “a believer in the coming of a heavenly Messiah” after nuclear WWIII, may join the cabal.[54]

Pharisee control, through medieval rabbis’ grip on Jews, to Bolshevik, Nazi and Israeli terror in Palestine, all stem from Talmudic ideology.[55] Rabbinic terror aims at the Jewish masses in order to manipulate them for rabbinic goals, as much as it targets a designated current external enemy. GWOT continues the ancient rabbinic terror brought out onto global stage, like the two world wars have been. Lubavitcher leaders engage in[56] and have been convicted of money laundering, mafia connections and drug trafficking. Yet, Lubavitchers have seized most of Jewish (Reform, Conservative and Orthodox) chief rabbinates world-wide. Extreme US Judeocentric, Alan Dershowitz urged Lubavitchers at their global conference in New York (June 2006) to have at least one emissary at each university in the world. After the adversaries disappear, the Messiah will convert all survivors to Hasidism. The military will help, just as 9/11 planes were used with North American Aerospace Command’s consent. The attacks were blamed on Muslim terrorists to start GWOT. Levin allowed gen. Richard Myers (13.9.2001), vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a former NORAD commander, and the then commander of NORAD gen. Ralph Eberhart (25.10.2001) to lie about 9/11. Levin’s committee promoted Myers to Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman.[57] Levin’s actions helped advance Judeocentric domination.

9/11 coincided with prophetic timetable and Lubavitch goals, as in Gulf War 2.[58] Shortly after 9/11, Lubavitchers “foretold” attack on Iraq to the day, but their rabbi had done it 10 years in advance, for the feast of Purim, on the eve of which Gulf War 1 ended. Lubavitcher magazine Emes News (24.10.2001) wrote that even though media don’t foresee it and state department denies plans for invasion of Iraq, those close to the Lubavitcher rabbi know about his conviction about it happening regardless. IsraelNN (26.3.2003) illuminated the attack’s coincidence with sages’ teachings, noting that Jews “are the lead actors”, the goyim have “supporting roles” and “the evil-doers are props and background scenery”; God created the world for the sake of Jews “and it is our responsibility to implement the Torah.” Cabalistically, the article shows God’s miracle in the Nuremberg Trials, while “Saddam Hussein, Yasser Arafat, Bashar Assad, Osama Bin-Laden, and the other dictators, terrorists and mullahs of the region, are the modern day Hamans and Hitlers. Great things are yet to come.”

Sacrifice and scapegoating

Gulf War 2 broke out on Wolfowitz’s machinations. Lieberman revealed that the conflict strategy followed a plan imposed on Congress by him and senator John MacCain, by pushing through the Iraq Liberation Act. MacCain’s endorser in 2008 elections, Lieberman calls Schneerson “the greatest Jewish religious person in my life”.[59] Judeocentrics sacrifice millions of lives and inflict suffering on hundreds of millions Gentiles and Jews, on false messianic grounds. Life and suffering are worthless to them, for redemption of few. David Ben-Gurion, the father of the Zionist State declared (7.12.1938) that if he faced a choice of saving all German Jewish children to England or taking only half of them to Israel,

“I would choose the second solution. For we must take into account not only the lives of these children but also the history of the people of Israel”.[60]

The cultist sacrifice in Shoah to push the survivors to populate Israel produced not even a million immigrants. Greater Israel is central to extreme Judaic beliefs; wars will not cease until the goal is reached and the cultists reckon with sacrificing Jewish masses.[61] Zionists have been taking Arab land by force. In May 1948, Ben-Gurion re-stated his “machine gun” expansion strategy:

“The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria, and Sinai.”[62]

Via crypto-Jews and friendly Gentiles, Rothschilds have been furthering messianism and supremacy myths, undermining Gentile sovereignty and cultures, and leading Gentiles into self-destructive revolutions and wars. Rothschilds have manipulated Jews of the opposite extremes: “international capital marches under the banner of Rothschild, and international labour under the flag of Karl Marx – Jews both, and irreconcilable”.[63] Marx was devoutly anti-Christian and anti-Gentile.[64] Marxist Jews strive to replace national sovereignty with a world rule, relying on Communists and “international” bodies under Judeo-Masonic control: League of Nations, UN, EU, and soon NAU. 2000 years of Judeocentricity has preached liberalism to Gentiles, “to remove barriers against Jewish access to immigration, then government, commerce, higher education and the media”. Once in control, Jews institute “the most tyrannical and illiberal of regimes” and overwhelms a society “to accumulate the wealth of the nation and corrupt its media, government and universities”.[65]

Torah book of Leviticus, chapter 16, and Talmud book of Yoma justify scapegoating, a Judeocentric way of removing guilt. Jews sacrificed one goat to God on atonement day. They placed all their sins on another goat and sent it into the wilderness. Judeocentrics scapegoat their victims in the media. Using anti-Serbianism, they have conditioned the public for bloody interventions and covertly agitated ancient Balkan hatreds, to attack the Serb nation and scapegoat it for the crimes. Judeocentrics scapegoat Hezbollah and Palestinians; Israel overrates Hezbollah’s strength to have a pretext for the complete destruction of ancient Lebanon Jews planned in Torah book of Ezekiel. Mass murder of Lebanese children in the second Lebanon war dashed false hope for the ending of Zionist aggression; the victims were scapegoated, “to again attack Lebanon and steal from the Lebanese people the Land of Lebanon. They are again attacking defenceless Palestinians in Gaza.”[66]

Secret society geopolitics

Rothschilds promoted anti-Semitism to force assimilated Jews’ migration. Jews resisted; e.g. Dr. Israel Abrahams of the League of British Jews said that non-Zionist Jews couldn’t assent to Israel as a racist Jewish state, because citizenship and nationality had nothing to do with religion. Jewish diaspora does’t constitute a nation, since Jews belongd to many nations and are divided by nationality; Jews could neither control Palestinian politics nor be controlled by it.[67]

Jewish masses were struggled for autonomy or assimilated, except when Zionist instigated terror to make them flee to Palestine. Zionist Nazis first attacked assimilated German Jews, then went after the Eastern Europe’s assimilated and Orthodox Jewry. The Rothschilds’ plan came true only after (mostly) Eastern European masses under Zionist Nazi occupation had been terrified by annihilation of their brethren in the Shoah. Burnt offering to God, holocaust of sacrificial animals has been Judaic tradition since antiquity, but Jews true to Torah, the first five books of Hebrew scriptures, reject its Zionist use and the claims to Palestine, by rejecting Zionism. Once Israel is recognized as “a Zionist state which is not guided by the teachings of the traditional Jewish faith, Jews worldwide will be able to live in peace”.[68] Bjerknes (p 349-368) lists some 260 Zionist hate references instigated by Cabalists, dating from 1597-1897 and advocating world wars, universal destruction, overthrow of current “Anti-Christs” (the pope, the Ottoman sultan and the Russian tsar), and destruction of their and the German and French empires and the Catholic and Islamic faiths. Cries for world war and Battle of Armageddon accompanied advocacy for “restoration of the Jews to Palestine” and for a world government.

The false messiahs have led millions of treacherous Jewish followers who infiltrate Gentile cultures. They have also deceived billions of Christians and Muslims, by pretending to be Gentiles and clinging to the faiths’ leaders, but secretly remaining loyal to their cult. Nihilistic passions of the Bolsheviks and Nazis who both sought to replace all religions with the promise of secular bliss (Hitler’s 1000-year Reich, Bolsheviks’ international proletarian rule), derived from the Reformation as a revolution against Catholic corruption, often justified from the Scriptures. Apart from revolution, Illuminati sought to eliminate private property and religion, prime Bolshevik and Communist goals. Covertly behind the other revolutions, Jewish reformatory Frankists were even more nihilistic and encouraged their members to join and infiltrate other religions in order to destroy them, to infiltrate governments to subvert nations, to practice the mafia creed of silence in face of law, and to lie and deceive.[69]

Dönmeh derive from Italian Masonic lodges that spread to terrorist-revolutionary Salonika in Turkey, through Sephardic Jew Emmanuel Carasso, the grand Masonic master and Zionist who headed the Committee of Union and Progress whose Young Turks leaders (Djavid Bey, Mustafa Kemal “Ataturk”, Dr. Nazim and others) were Jews, crypto-Jews and Masons. The Committee recruited conspirators into, and picked their leadership from Freemasonry. Masonic lodges planned the anti-sultan coup. Dönmeh also co-masterminded Balkan Wars, Bolshevik revolution, and WWI. They were instrumental in establishing the League of Nations to control nations to Zionist benefit. Similarly, the UN was created in 1945 with Rockefellers’ generous donation.[70]

Carasso worked with Jewish Zionist terrorist revolutionary Vladimir Zhabotinsky, and Israel Lazarevich Helphand (Alexander Parvus) who inspired crypto-Jewish Bolshevik Leo Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) to “permanent revolution”. Helphand brought Lenin (1917) from Switzerland to Russia.[71] Carasso and Helphand profiteered from Young Turks revolution, in arms and grain trade. In Turkey, Zhabotinsky propagandized for world Jewry, after Dönmeh took over.[72] He founded anti-Semitic Revisionist Zionist Movement, and anti-Arab, anti-West terrorist Irgun, to steal land from Nile to Euphrates. Carasso-Parvus terror succeeded:

“Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is always done by a Jew, and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire Empire [...T]he massacres that have shocked the universe, and occurred so frequently that the name ‘pogrom’ was invented to describe them, were organized and managed by the exasperated police authorities in retaliation for crimes committed by the Jewish revolutionists”.[73]

God’s chosen and genocide

Judeocentrics regard Jews as God’s chosen, loathe Gentiles and usurp a license to kill them. In Judaism, Torah records God-revealed law, but Talmud perverts it into civil and ceremonial law and legend; e.g. Christians “who accept the so-called divinity of Jesus” are “idolaters according to the Torah, punishable by death”.[74] Talmud restricts the duty to save life to Jewish lives; it quotes rabbi Simon ben Yohai: “Even the best of the Gentiles should all be killed”.[75] Every year on the feast of Purim, Israelis go on a pilgrimage to the grave of ben Yohai who advocated extermination of Gentiles.[76] In Talmud, Gentiles aren’t human. Biblical proof for the assertions is allegedly Ezekiel 34:31 and 23:20, but it doesn’t support the claim that only Jews are human.

Judaic books are replete “with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles”, and “explicit attacks on Christianity and Jesus (after whose name the author adds piously, “May the name of the wicked perish”)”.[77] Talmud and Cabalah present Jews as God-given masters whom Gentiles must serve and submit to Judaic laws. This attitude persists in the words of Israeli prime ministers, Ariel Sharon (“We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it”) and Menechem Begin who said:

“We are divine gods on this planet […] as different from the inferior races as they are from insects […] other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best […] considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races.”[78]

When Christian symbols are being removed and democracies preach state-religion separation, US Senate honoured (26.3.1991) Rebbe’s birthday. As first-ever religious person, he received Congressional Gold Medal post-humously for contribution to “global morals”. Rebbe’s 1983 speech obliges “every Jew” that “all the peoples of the world observe the Seven Noahide Laws”. Rebbe compares the world to a ship on stormy seas, steered by state governments, seeming “true arbiters”  “only because of the darkness of the exile”, but world’s fate “is in the hands of the Jew”. Jews engage in “loftier things”, Torah and good deeds – “the true determinants”. “The governments of the world steer the ship, the Jew charts the course.”[79] Actually, Talmud and the Noahide Laws are rabbinic corruption of Torah, but US public law 102-14 acknowledges the Rebbe and “Seven Noahide Laws”, one of which prescribes beheading for “idolatry” of Jesus,[80] as humanity’s moral base. Noahide Laws are a fraud, a racist justice for goyim, while Talmud teaches to hate, abuse, exploit and kill, particularly Christians. Schneerson taught: “Jews are the pride of creation, the Goyim are the scum”, but have a role in serving the Chosen Ones. The Jews are the Priests while the Noahide Laws is “a religion for the rank and file”. Masons have called themselves “Noachids” and incorporated the statutes into their 1723 constitution.

Rabbi Estulin wrote about “Rebbe’s 2001 revolution” that gave Bush-junior “the opportunity to complete that which his father began: eradicating evil from the world as a beginning and foretaste of the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies”, as the Rebbe has “arranged things”. In 9/11 aftermath, Hasidim “see that the US is being pushed toward fulfilling its historic role of teaching the [Noahide Laws] to the world.” Estulin idicates Lubavitch vested interest in GWOT:

“all world events are for our benefit. Jews have been fighting Arab terrorism for fifty years […After 9/11] the nations finally began to see the justice in [Jerusalem’s] stubborn war against terrorism.” [81]

Apocalyptic, God’s-Chosen mentality has guided Judeocentric genocide. The crypto-Jewish Zionist Ataturk promoted Turkish nationalism and anti-Imperialism on the corpse of Turkish Empire, ending Islamic solidarity and power. Dönmeh murdered 1.5 million Armenians to trigger the Balkan Wars and WWI – the “Battle of Armageddon” Jews had been expecting for millennia.[82] With Jewish bankers’ help, WWI was to destroy the empires and monarchies, and pit Christians against Muslims, Slavs against Teutons, and give Palestine to Jews.[83] 19th century top Zionist politician, Moses Hess forecast a “race war” and the “last catastrophe” (Armageddon) in Rom und Jerusalem (1862). Jews themselves became Judeocentrics’ victims in Shoa, for fake Zionist prophecies.

To Dönmeh, Armenians were “Amalekites” whom God wanted exterminated. Talaat Pasha and Dr. Nazim’s orders mirrored Judaic commandments to “blot out” the Armenians. Palestine’s colonisation required the downfall of the Turkish Empire that ruled over Jerusalem. Intellicide of Armenians dominant in Turkish elites, guaranteed the empire’s demise[84] and eliminated competition to Turkish Jews, clearing the way for the King of Jerusalem. Armenian Christian lives was a sacrifice thrown “into the fires of Moloch in order to artificially create the “End Times” of Jewish mythology”.[85] In 1911, Times of London urged world Jewry to rescue Armenians, but leading Jews lied about it, implicating world Jewry in the genocide.

1890-1930s referred to Christian genocide as “holocaust”.[86] Zionists in Turkey murdered Armenians to petition a conference planned after WWI, to reduce empires to “racially” segregated nations that would justify the creation of Israel.[87] US Zionist rabbi Stephen Wise cynically honoured fellow Jews in Russia and Armenian Christians, demanding “justice to the little peoples” who will be free, but  “we must see that they live until tomorrow”.[88] JPC’s “justice to the little peoples” has been supporting Islamism and Jihad in the Balkans. Kosovo unilateral declaration of “independence” post-facto legitimizes terror-stolen Palestine and opens new avenues to pursue Jewish state Judeopolonia in Central-Eastern Europe.[89] The “justice” is a step towards NWO, through weakening Europe and Christian opponents, supplying new vassals to EU, and driving a wedge into Europe.

Judeocentric Power Complex

Under the umbrella of Judeocentric and Christian Zionist loyalty, thousands of Jewish and Gentile politicians, pundits, media moguls, journalists, editors and publishers, bankers and businessmen, professors and intellectuals, as well as PR firms, think tanks and organizations have influenced policy internationally. US critics call them the Israel Lobby,[90] and a subset of the Lobby – neoconservatives (neocons).[91] “The Congress, the Executive branch, state and local governments, and national and local media have all come under the influence of the Jewish “lobby’s” pro-Israel agenda to the point that none or few dare to criticize Israel or its US representatives.”[92] Petras calls the lobby globally the international Zionist Power Configuration,[93] but more precise term, Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC) is adopted here, since Zionism has historical and geographical limits, while millennia-old Judeocentrism rapidly spreads its conquests globally.

In Judeocentric mentality, Israelis and Kosovo Albanians have the right to independence, but neither Palestinians, Kurds nor Serbs”.^[94] JPC conquest of Palestine[95] resembles Albanian conquest of Kosovo, where, after two centuries of terror and “demographic conquest” worsened by Tito and JPC policies, neo-fascist aliens overtook Serbs’ cradle, with majority disapproval at the UN. Before Israel was proclaimed (15.5.1948), Zionist forces had seized 75% of Palestine, expelling 780,000 out of 1,300,000 Palestinians. Koenig Report (1976) urged to “use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population”.[96] UN majority resolutions have condemned Israel, but Israel has been defying them. US-Israeli think-tank’s Clean Break (1996) advised the right-wing incoming Israeli president Netanyahu to “engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism” such as: the downfall of Syria and Iraq by exploiting Arab states’ internal and external tensions, Israel-Turkey-Jordan ousting of Hussein to foil Syria’s ambitions, and close ties with the US.

Neocon Richard Perle, also involved in the Balkans, co-authored Clean Break.[97] External actors stirred Balkan hatreds and added their own. Some empty fuel tanks dropped from NATO bombers over Yugoslavia in 1999 bore an inscription “Do you still want to be a Serb?” At times, NATO planes waited after bombing a civilian target before hitting it again, killing rescue workers and wounded survivors. Serbian interference with his ambitions also enraged Hitler; he manipulated Yugoslavs with inter-ethnic hatred to eliminate Serbs.

Post-9/11 institutions (DHS, Patriot Act) evoke memories of Gestapo secret police and Nazi legislation against political opponents. Michael Chertoff, a US-Israeli citizen is at the helm of the DHS with former high KGB officers; it’s a genocide alert. Chertoff guarantees safety to Kosher Nostra, Israel-based Jewish Russian mafia that surpasses and controls global organized crime.[98]

Neocons and Christian Zionists

US neocons, “a complex interlocking professional and family network centred around Jewish publicists and organizers”, recruit both Jews and non-Jews to exploit ”the wealth and power of the United States in the service of Israel [...] a semicovert branch of the massive and highly effective pro-Israel lobby.”[99] Neocons “tend to be Jewish” Their personal relationships with Israeli leaders extend to US and global Jewry, and their priorities, “from strong support for Israel to vehement opposition to affirmative action, are heavily influenced by the values, interests and collective historical memory of the Jewish people”.[100]

MacDonald observes: “the special moral claims of Jews and Israel might be more fairly viewed the intended result of Jewish ethnic activism”.[101] But JPC is not exclusively “Jewish”. Neocons exploit Jewish[102] and Zionist Christian masses who believe Israel must exist for Christ’s Second Coming. Zionists had funded a US pastor Cyrus Scofield who defrauded the old Authorized King James Version of the Bible with annotations by 1908, and subverted Christianity with mythologies by 16^th century crypto-Jewish Jesuits.[103]

Christian fanatics[104] enable the apocalyptic annihilation. Eggert exposes Christian Evangelists close to White House who want al-Aqsa mosque destroyed and Third Temple restored; they believe in 144,000 Chosen Ones rising to heaven, Armageddon battle, and mass death of Israelis before the Second Coming. It is a matter of “life eternal and death” for people who believe this, e.g. “some of the most powerful men in America. John Ashcroft, the attorney general [who before taking office anointed himself in homage to King David], is a true believer, so are several prominent senators and the House majority leader, Tom DeLay.”[105] Timothy LaHaye, author of apocalyptic bestsellers, founded and first presided over secretive Council for National Policy, an umbrella organization with right wing Christian agenda of Middle East foreign policy towards expediting Second Coming. Leading Christian Zionists and neocons are among its secret membership of “a few hundred of the most powerful conservatives in the country”. Apart from Evangelical pastors like LaHaye, CNP includes Bush who usurped Messiah’s role (“I trust God speaks through me”), Cheney, Wolfowitz, Chertoff, Rumsfeld, top DIA and CIA people and former UN ambassador John Bolton; these “Protestant right-wingers” believe that Armageddon will take place soon”. [106]

Israel Lobby has created a “tyranny of Israel over the US”[107] that threatens “world peace and stability, the global economy, and the very future of democracy in this country”.[108] With neocons in CIA, DIA, state department, and National Security Council, the super-secret National Security Agency (NSA) “is ripe for penetration by Israeli intelligence”.[109] JPC-influenced US security and intelligence engagement unfolded in support to illegal secessions.[110] In January 1999, neocon Morton Abramowitz outlined options in support of Kosovo independence: arming and training the KLA, removing Milošević, bombing Serbia, and making Kosovo a NATO protectorate via ground forces.[111] A Jewess rescued by Serbs with her family during WWII, Madeleine Albright legitimized KLA to a representative in Ramboulliet “negotiations” that bullied the Serbs into NATO invasion under the bombing threat. US-NATO-sponsored KLA terror in Kosovo became US-NATO terror bombing of Yugoslav civilians and infrastructure (24.3.1999). On the day air raids started, Europol was preparing a report connecting KLA and Albanian drug gangs.[112] When NATO members agreed to suspend bombing for Orthodox Easter, Albright opposed this “extraordinary sensitivity”, because it would be wrong and provocative to celebrate a Christian holiday in a Serb-Muslim war.

Americans and allies lost thousands of lives in US Israel-first wars. The US taxpayer gives Israel one-fifth of foreign aid. The USA vetoed almost all UNSC resolutions against Israel. US interventionism set up confrontations with faith groups and nations who seek to prevent US hegemony: the Slavic world, especially Russia and allies, and the Islamic world’s Sunni insurgents and Shiite Iranians. In the Balkans, the JPC pushed the US to intervene into preventable civil wars that weakened America’s greatest civilizational ally Europe, turned away the Slav sympathizer, and established the Jihadist Trojan Horse against the West. The neocons will “remain an influential force well beyond Iraq.”[113]

Roadmap to NWO

Years ahead of 9/11, GWOT, and the “liberation” of Iraq (but with similar reference to genocide and mass murder), US Balkan interventionism originated from an alliance of neocons and liberal “hawks” who with the US Right and Left supported the KLA under Clinton. Accordingly, neocons Lawrence Kaplan and William Kristol believe in The War Over Iraq (2003) that “American power, which had liberated the Balkans from Serbian aggression, should be redeployed against Iraq. Once again, morality was the key”. Liberal hawks adopted the rhetoric.[114] Clintonians pushed for necessary demonstration of US power, an occasion to “crush Serb skulls” (Kristol), while crying “Genocide! ” The bellicosity infected Hillary Clinton, whose vote authorized the 1999 bombing. In March 1999, after eight months’ silence following Lewinsky affaire, Hillary demanded Bill bomb Yugoslavia. The next day he “was informing his NATO allies that he was recommending a bombing campaign.” Coincidentally, Warsaw Ghetto survivor Marek Edelman appealed from Warsaw to stop genocide, as he smelled “Albanian blood”. He inspired two German Greens, Joschka Fischer and Daniel Cohn-Bendit. Hillary and Bill joined. The hysteria excused “collateral damage” of the “smart” bombs, and fired up bellicosity.[115]

Hillary Clinton and JPC media still approve of Kosovo interventionism to stop genocide. As a nation-building and democracy-inspiring tool, the Clintonian version, though proportional to Kosovo’s smaller scale, has been as disastrous as the Republican version in Iraq. The international community has accepted KLA’s ethnic cleansing as a fait accompli. As in ethnic cleansing of Serbs by the Croat army and neo-Nazi mercenaries in Western Slavonia and Krajina,[116] JPC instruction to editors was to keep silent or be selectively anti-Serbian during March 2004 pogroms in Kosovo. The National Albanian American Council, a JPC tool like the other Balkan extremist lobbies in the US, blamed Belgrade. JPC propagandized for Albanians, their pawn in the destruction of Christians, saying that the violence reflected growing impatience of the Albanian majority. Abramowitz blamed Serbia, NATO and EU for delaying independence and thus causing the violence. Future US ambassador to Belgrade, Michael Polt lied that thanks to KFOR intervention, the extremists hadn’t achieved the terror goal.[117] Croat, Kosovar and the Middle Eastern, Shiite product of interventionism are regional destabilizers. The West and the Islamist states have been supporting Kosovo and parts of Montenegro, Macedonia and Greece in future Greater Albania, against Serbs divided between US-NATO-EU vassals. A Shiite super-state in Balkanized Middle East is “US national interest”, too.

Berlin Wall gone, pre-neocons found a new enemy, the Islamic world, to wage GWOT for NWO. US geostrategist Robert Strausz-Hupe wrote in Geopolitics (1942): “Many nations will be locked in a few vast compartments. But in each of these one people, controlling a strategic area, will be master of the others.”[118] In his inaugural article in Orbis (April 1957), he advocated “unitary world rule” antidote to “the explosive forces on the loose in Asia” and the “a multiple balance of nuclear power”; US leadership against USSR and for NWO would require UN replacement by expanded NATO, “the nucleus of the world federation-in-the-making”. From an alliance of 16 countries in 1994, without partners, having never conducted a military operation, expanded NATO and partnerships assure military presence from Africa’s Atlantic coast, through Persian Gulf and Asia, to the Pacific region. Former Soviet and Yugoslav republics are in NATO Partnership for Peace, except Russia; 49 African not-yet-partner countries are targeted for NATO integration.[119] Welcoming “operational cooperation in peacekeeping in the Balkans and Afghanistan”, UN and NATO declared (23.9.2008) “expanded consultation and cooperation”.[120]

NWO wouldn’t arrive peacefully because “upon all revolutionary ages followed the establishment of a universal order in the image and under the domination of one power”. Strausz-Hupe hinted Americans would do the dirty work. The most “retrogressive force of this century”, national power (“the school for violence and dictatorship […] narrowly parochial; it negates the promises and requirements of modern technology; it impedes the exchanges of goods and ideas […] stunts economic and cultural growth”), must be “checked by “superior political power”).[121] In Protracted Conflict (1959), Strausz-Hupe charted a road to NWO via benevolent American Empire; Western Europe had to unite first. It did, swallowing the post-Soviet states that were lured by promises that turned into imposed sacrifices. Most EU nations oppose NWO measures,[122] e.g. Poland wouldn’t petition for NATO and EU membership, wasn’t it for JPC-Masonic propaganda of quislings entrenched since the Judeo-Communist post-WWII times.[123] USSR had to accept reunification of Germany, as Strausz-Hupe’s 1965 In My Time had predicted, but this meant re-militarization and revisionism of Germany’s and Judeocentrics’ WWII genocide. Reunification was essential for “European integration”, before uniting with North American Union where totalitarian measures are also being implemented on GWOT excuse.[124]. The ideas are similar to Marxist; Jews will “attain world dominion”, “everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship” and furnish “all the leaders without encountering opposition” in NWO. Then Jewish rulers will “abolish private property” and use all state resources: “when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands”.[125]

Neocon mentor, former University of Chicago and RAND guru Wohlstetter also loathed USSR and Communism, believing USA had to win a nuclear war to deter the USSR. Wohlstetter and Strausz-Hupe inspired Perle-Wolfowitz anti-Soviet nuke-them doctrine.

Exploit Islamism

JPC’s Balkan Islamophilia contrasts with anti-Islamism in GWOT terror. Zionists have been exploiting Islamism and anti-Islamism for state terror, just like they have used Nazism and anti-Semitism to establish Israel.[126] Congruent with Nazemroaya’s concern,[127] “Highly unethical Jews” are orchestrating “nuclear World War III in the false hopes that it will kill off the Gentiles and leave only “righteous Jews” alive”. Zionists subvert “Moslem nations with crypto-Jewish leaders and Jewish agents, who rise to power on an anti-Zionist platform”; Jews also “artificially create sectarian strife and divisions among Moslem Peoples”.[128]

Israel had supported Hamas to counterbalance PLO with a competing religious alternative. Israel’s right-wing believed that “Hamas and the other groups, if they gained control, would refuse to have anything to do with the peace process and would torpedo any agreements”. US state department counterterrorism official Larry Johnson stated that Israelis “do more to incite and sustain terrorism than curb it”. In a journal for Judaism and Zionism,[129] Oded Yinon’s “Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties” advocated exploitation of Arab states’ internal tensions rather than striving for peace. In 1983, UD Democratic congressman Charlie Wilson, on behalf of an Israeli arms maker, secretly negotiated a major weapons deal with Pakistan in support of anti-Soviet Jihad. Mossad agent Menashe ran (1984-1989) an Israeli arms network, supplying weapons to Iranian Islamist regime for the Iran-Iraq war; “no less than $160 million was funneled to Shamir’s [Likud] faction”. The money went to Mossad-controlled Palestinian terrorists “who would commit crimes in the name of the Palestinian revolution” but usually unwittingly.[130]

USSR-Afghanistan war exploited Muslim militants. Carter’s national security advisor, geostrategist Zbigniew Brzezinski favored a “de facto alliance with the forces of Islamic resurgence, and with the Republic of Iran” after Shah’s fall (1978). The idea came to fruition in Brzezinski’s American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (the latter changed to “Caucasus”), i.e. for “peaceful resolution of the Russo-Chechen war”.[131] Pro-Jihadist ACPC included neocon associates and promoted support for Chechen rebellion viewed as national liberation rather than terrorist movement linked to international Jihad and resented by Russia. Islamists helped defeat USSR, only to replace Cold War “Communist threat”. In the Balkans, the neocons were pro-Islamist while fighting “Jihad” elsewhere. The war against Saddam became war on Islamist terror nine days after 9/11. The neocon think-tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC) urged US president: “any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power”. Kaplan and Kristol used similar mendacious rhetoric in The War Over Iraq (“the putative link between Osama and Saddam”), showing JPC target at any excuse.

JPC “proved” Saddam-Osama link and Iran’s nuclear weapons. Michael Ledeen,[132] a hardcore Zionist, passed on “evidence” on Iran’s nuclear program via Iraqi terrorists whom Mossad trains for attacks on Iran. Ledeen, an associate of Ahmed Chalabi (Saddam’s political opponent with ties to PNAC neocons, provided “proves” for Saddam’s WMD and ties to al-Qaeda), is implicated in other covert operations for wars (Iran-Contra affair, Niger yellow cake forged documents). Ledeen, a believer in fascism without anti-Semitism, was associated with Italian fascist Gladio[133] terror that manipulated public opinion. Ledeen is a “prime candidate as one of the principle organizers of the 9/11 parallel attack operation”. Former defense secretary Caspar Weinberger has named Ledeen, Wolfowitz, Feith and Perle in the X Committee that allegedly passed top secret intelligence to Israeli spy, Pollard.[134]

US-Israel-Turkey nexus

Israel and Turkey collaborated with Iran-Contra affair. By 1985, unmarked Israeli and US planes loaded with weapons flew from Israel over Cyprus into Eastern Turkey, sometimes stopping over at new US bases in Turkey. US congressional hearings only indirectly addressed this, and JPC media were silent, despite a low in Turkish-Israeli relations. Turkey-Iran-Balkan affair arose in 1992-1995. Later, Perle said arming and training Bosnian Muslims was US “vital interest” and NATO member Turkey was “number one candidate for the job”.[135] Israeli and Pakistani diplomats held secret meetings in Washington, arranged by Turkish ambassador.[136] Wilson, who had brokered Israel-Pakistan arms deals for the Afghan War, was involved.[137] Pakistani ship with arms for Bosnia was intercepted (January 1993). Pakistan airlifted guided missiles (March 1992 – May 1993) to Bosnian Muslims, according to Pakistan’s ISI head.[138] Iran, with Turkish involvement, opened a weapons pipeline to Bosnia via Croatia. US C-130 transport planes and AWACS were involved. In March 1992, a radical Bosnian Muslim mafioso tied to Bosnian intelligence, negotiated arms deals between Turkey and Bosnia. In collaboration with him, US special forces constructed an airfield in Bosnia for secret US arms pipeline.[139]

Israel has befriended Turkey in its survival strategy. Perle and US ambassador to Turkey Strausz-Hupe fathered the US-Israel-Turkey nexus. Instrumental were Jewish-US groups inside the US and Israeli defense establishments, supported by “conservative Jewish-American groups” working with Turkish diplomats in Washington and Turkish-US businessmen connected to Turkish and Israeli Jews.[140] Using neo-fascists, ultra-rightists and mafia, the Turkish military, CIA and Gladio secretly ran 1970s terror that killed tens of thousands and destabilized Turkey,[141] confirming revelations on the rightists (and Islamists) in JPC state terror service.[142] A pro-US military coup in Turkey responded (September 1980) to “the breakdown of order and security and the rise of terrorism and widespread random violence” that “threatened to undermine” US support”.[143] After the coup, several hundred thousand leftists were jailed and tortured for years without trial. Turkey-Israel accord (23.2.1996) revitalized the 1950s, US-prodded Jerusalem-Ankara axis that produced a 1958, secret military pact. The accord complements a secret one (18.9.1995), both subject to a secrecy agreement (31.3.1994), proving deep Israel-Turkey relations, despite downplaying the significance of the accord and occasional thawing of the relations. Beside the rise of Kurdish nationalism, Turkey faces vindication of Armenian genocide. During the 1982 campaign against Palestinians in Lebanon, Israeli forces overran Armenian bases and passed captured intelligence to Turkey. Israel-US support suggests a presence of neo-Dönmeh in the Turkish elites. Israel’s anti-Armenian actions cover-up Armenian genocide, a great JPC taboo.

Opportunistic hatred

Crypto-Jewish Nazis fuelled German hate for Jews, fulfilling Zionist sacrifice of Jewish suffering for Israel: “I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. The anti-Semites […] will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews”.[144] Zionist puppets ascended to power and ruined Germans by promising a 1000-year Reich, to be achieved through self-destructive unending wars. Nazi Zionists taught Germans that Hitler was 1000-year Reich’s Messiah. Today, Judeocentrics focus on Israel and promise NWO, a perpetual bliss through “wars without an end” that exploit Gentile soldiers and resources and pit Christians against Muslims. Radical “Jewish God” mega actors have infiltrated the full spectrum of US politics, aiming to defeat America, the equivalent of Ottoman Empire for Dönmeh, by manipulation of phobias, a precursor of interventions and mass crimes.

The “change” of US leadership after 2008 elections shows that JPC cameleon doesn’t change its nature. Vice-president Biden, state secretary Clinton, chief of staff Emanuel, and several senior advisors are Zionists. Most of the rest are also Zionists or NWO proponents tied to CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg. Defense secretary Gates replaced Rumsfeld under Bush, was CIA director under Bush Senior, co-chaired CFR task force with Brzezinski and was- Involved in the Iran-Contras Affair. US policy will wave anti-Russian and anti-Serbian flags. Former chief US negotiator at Dayton, slated for a key role in Hillary Clinton’s state department, Holbrooke hinted this with former Bosnian high representative Paddy Ashdown, in widely published “The Bosnian Powder Keg” (22.10.2008). Anticipating Obama’s victory, it pleaded that US renew its committment to “Bosnia’s survival as a state, by maintaining an effective troop presence and […] finding ways to untie Bosnia’s constitutional knot”, i.e. liquidating Serbian Republic. The interventionist narrative continues to dominate the discourse, as in NYT (13.12.2008) analysis “Fears of new ethnic conflict in Bosnia”, actually a pro-Muslim plea for more US intervention to “unify” BiH in order to avoid another war. Claiming that “leaders across Bosnia” hoped for more US engagement, NYT is preparing the political and ideological ground, as such hopes are exclusively radical Muslim. US media feed spin: “Bosnia is in deep crisis […] There is even talk of a new war.” [145]

Albright defeated Serbs with infowar, “diplomacy”, covert action and ICTY. Hillary Clinton follows suit. Vice-president Joseph Biden, an avid Zionist (“I’m a Zionist.  You don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist”)[146] and Serbophobe, is also committed to Muslim BiH. Mladić and Karađić will replace Milošević in ICTY dock, and genocide-in-Bosnia mantra will become “Serbian Republic’s genocide on Srebrenica Muslims”. Since Dayton, JPC-steered West has been questioning Serbian Republic legitimacy and striving to reduce authority of this “genocidal creation”” unworthy of existence, “a product of a Serbian ethnic cleansing campaign”.

After Soviet disintegration, neocons called for confrontation despite Russia’s weakness, Pentagon memo “Defense Planning Guidance” (DPG 1992) by neocons Wolfowitz and Lewis Libby, advocated total US-NATO war against Russia, should Moscow threaten US security and nascent democracies in former Soviet bloc. DPG asserted Russia would not likely go atomic, but as soon as Yeltsin’s “cooperativeness” was over, Russia flexed its nuclear muscle in the Baltic region, the one DPG had emphasized. The neocons regard Serbia as Russia’s appendage, to be broken apart for US hegemony in Europe. Anti-Russism has been reverberating in neocon rhetoric for Kosovo secession, and shortly after, in condemnation of Russia’s defence of Caucasian sovereignties. Jews deeply hate Russians whose forefathers had destroyed the Khazar empire, the fatherland of ancestors of many neocons. Russian tsars controlled most of the lands on which Jews lived in Europe, including tsarist annexations of Poland. Zionists in Russia wanted to appropriate Russia’s riches and force Russian Jews out to Palestine.

Red Terror turned Russia “into a desert populated with white niggers”. Trotsky promised to “shed rivers of blood” that would “surpass all defeats of capitalist wars”; the “biggest Western bankers will cooperate with us. Shall we win the revolution, we will establish a Zionist rule on its cemetery remains and will become such a power that the whole world will fall on its knees […] Through terror and bloodbath, we will sink Russian intelligentsia into complete stupor, idiocy and debasement”. He appealed to Jews in Russia to “splendidly and joyfully” “hate everything Russian!” and with a “zeal” to “annihilate Russian intelligentsia – officers, engineers, teachers, clergy generals, academics and writers!”[147] He delivered on his promises.

Christian-hating Bolsheviks have carried out genocide on Christian Slavs, mostly Russians. They preached Communist revolution, by replacing the divine with state authority. Extreme Jews were prominent among the Bolsheviks, and the majority of Soviet Jews participated and sympathized with the Revolution. Bolshevik 1917-1921 press documents that out of 514 posts in the Bolshevik state, Jews held 437 (85%) and Russians only 21.[148] In 1921, Bolshevik interior security Cheka staff of 250,000 executed more than 140,000 people.[149] Alexander Solzhenitsyn was branded anti-Semite and liar for exposing Jews in the revolution and Soviet purges.[150]

In the 1930s, the secret police NKVD “was one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions”.[151] Jews directed the Gulag in the worst period of the Soviet terror (1930-1938) that claimed millions of lives. Stalin was a disposable facade behind his deputy in the Communist party, Lazar Kaganovich, and his cousin Lavrenti Beria, the head of the secret service, both Khazar Jews. Kaganovich ordered the destruction of the majestic Church of Christ the Saviour in Moscow,[152] and the 1932-1933 genocide by starvation of 5 million people in Ukraine.[153] The systematic destruction of Russia’s, and later Eastern Europe’s Christians by the Bolshevik terror killed 600 bishops, 40,000 priests, 120,000 monks and nuns, and millions of lay people in five decades after 1918.[154] In 1918–1938, the number of churches that remained open in the USSR dwindled from 54,000 to under 500.

Jewish bankers have financed Bolshevik Revolution and Soviet economy.[155] Today, they orchestrate US and global affairs through the US Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank and scores of investment banks. Old hatred destroyed the Russian Empire, the tsar (anti-Christ for Jews), and Russian Orthodox Christians. Jews have for centuries pitted Western Christians against Orthodox Christians, to prime Jewish domination; Crypto-Jews and Israeli government “promote religious hatred of the Russians in America”, indoctrinate American Evangelicals “with the false belief that Russia is the “Gog and Magog” [nations under Satan’s domination] of the Jewish book of Ezekiel”, and teach US Christians that “America must wage nuclear war against Russia in order for Jesus to return, though these Jews hate Jesus and Russian Christians”.[156] Crypto-Jewish “Jesuits manufactured the myth of the “Rupture”, which crypto-Jews have been teaching to Christians ever since in order to lull Christians into the false belief that they will not suffer the consequences of their ungodly attack on humanity.” Zionist Jews have subverted US Christians “to breed hatred of Moslems” and wars against Moslem nations, and use “their control over these churches to foment a nuclear war against Russia”.[157]

Interventionism

Perle and Wolfowitz enthusiastically supported US interventions on behalf of Bosnia and Kosovo Islamists. After Perle’s complaint that Izetbegović was underfunded, the US with 13 others collected contributions for a “train and equip” program.[158] A former NSA collaborator reported that Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, Brunei, Jordan, and Egypt “deposited millions of dollars into US coffers to buy weapons for the Bosnians”. The fund’s law firm “was none other than Feith and Zell, the firm of current Pentagon official and leading neo-con Douglas Feith”. His one-time boss and current member of Rumsfeld’s Defense Policy Board, Perle assisted the operation.[159]

JPC Balkan engagement stems from intervention ideology, asserted in DPG: the US right to “retain the preeminent responsibility for addressing selectively” threats to own and allies’ interests, or which could “seriously unsettle international relations”, especially in the former Soviet bloc. DPG expected ad hoc coalitions, “carrying only general agreement over the objectives to be accomplished [...T]he sense that the world order is ultimately backed by the U.S. will be an important stabilizing factor”. To Wolfowitz, Serbia was “Russia’s potential asset that can and should be brutalized and fragmented” to assert US hegemony in Europe. In mid-1990s Wolfowitz with Abramowitz set up the Action Council, a Soros-funded, Serbophobic think-tank that criticized the US administration for not arming the Muslims and striking the Serbs in Bosnia, not bombing Serbia in 1998 (as the neocons demanded in a full-page NYT ad), and for not pursuing a victory in Kosovo once the bombing had started.[160] Neocons’ unrealistic demands frustrated Pentagon experts. Land invasion would spell a disaster for NATO troops. Surface-to-air missiles and pre-emptive Yugoslav air raid on Rinas airport destroyed Apache helicopters sent to the theatre against expert advice.

An open letter (11.9.1998) by 33 PNAC members reads like the “international community’s” strategy based on media “facts”. It urged Clinton to “actively support in every way possible [Milošević] replacement by a democratic government committed to ending ethnic violence”, after “seven years of aggression and genocide in the Balkans”, including Kosovo Albanians, “many thousands of whom, having been driven from their homes and farms by the latest Serbian offensive, now face the possibility of a winter of starvation. Over 15 percent of the Kosovo population is already homeless.” The urgent need to stop “the carnage in Kosovo” led PNAC to an “inescapable conclusion”: “There can be no peace and stability in the Balkans so long as Slobodan Milosevic remains in power.” He “started the Balkan conflict”, caused “untold suffering to millions” and “severely damaged his own country”.[161]

Acknowledging Milošević’s occasional “cooperation in carrying out the Dayton settlement”, the signatories believed their ““pact with the devil” has outlived whatever usefulness it once had”. At a minimum, PNAC urged US-led “international effort” towards “an agreement on a new political status for Kosovo” with “massive Western pressure on Milosevic”, “substantial increase in funds for supporting the democratic opposition within Serbia” and tightening “the economic sanctions on Serbia”. Diplomatic and legalistic sanctions should accompany the economic ones, and the USA should “vigorously support The Hague tribunal’s investigation of Milosevic as a war criminal”.[162]

On the background of Strausz-Hupe’s NWO via US-NATO and Wohlstetter’s nuke-them anti-Serbism, the letter should have alerted to imminent JPC-instigated mass crimes. It indirectly revealed the ideology of targeting millions of Gentiles and scapegoating the victims. It named the Judeocentric tools of conquest: harnessing “Western” and “international” Gentile forces against Gentiles, applying the bankers’ “economic sanctions”, letting the JPC “diplomats” apply conniving pressure (while “democratic forces” of NGO fifth column and Soros-paid “opposition” and media did their bit), and institutionalizing a Holocaustian tribunal to rubber stamp the scapegoating of the “war criminal” (all Serbs by extension). The letter underscored Kosovo “independence”, a key element in Islamization of the Balkans as a prelude to destabilizing Europe.

In 1991-1997, to guide post-Cold War US policy, president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP), Abramowitz established commissions headed by policy elite, including Albright, Richard Holbrooke, Perle and James Schlesinger. The latter two resigned. Counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke considered Abramowitz his “boss and mentor” at the state department. Under Abramowitz’s instructions, former Reagan appointee developed a public support campaign for CEIP work. Candidate Clinton supported US engagement in Bosnia,[163] heeding CEIP’s “Self-Determination in the New World Order” by Morton Halperin (state department official under Albright) and David Scheffer (Albright’s envoy for war crimes issues), who proposed unilateral humanitarian interventionism in the wake of the USSR break-up. CEIP’s Changing Our Ways’ Role in the New World asserted that “the destruction or displacement of groups of people within states can justify international intervention” and the US should “realign” NATO and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) for that.

The Bush administration was split over military intervention in Bosnia, an idea of neocons, headed by Perle and Wohlstetter, and “liberal humanitarianists”. Opponents agreed to interventions only where US strategic interests were directly threatened.[164] By November 1994, US pressure for NATO air strikes in Bosnia led to the worst crisis within the Pact since 1956, according to NSC Bosnia policy coordinator Ivo Daalder’s Getting to Dayton. The differences between Albright, Lake, and Holbrooke on the one hand, and Pentagon on the other, were aired on 7.8.1995. Shadowing Strausz-Hupe’s doctrine of NWO through US leadership of NATO, Albright’s group wanted a firm commitment to military intervention in Bosnia, since “the issue was US credibility” as a world leader. Pentagon wanted to avoid a sustained military involvement, but Clinton was for it. Paris-based US columnist, William Pfaff mocked (30.8.1995) European “failure to lead Europe”. Holbrooke’s To End a War recalls: “Press and public reaction was highly positive” to the bombing of Bosnian Serbs.

The puppets

Slovenian, Croat and Albanian separatism, religious extremism of the latter two, and Bosnian Islamism have joined against the Serbs in the Balkans. They couldn’t have succeeded without JPC-led support by external actors such as US, UK, Germany and Vatican. The military defeats of the local powers in fights unaided by the external actors, prove this. Even US-NATO bombing in Kosovo was ineffective, and Serbs were defeated by other instruments under JPC influence or control: diplomacy, infowar, covert military support and actions, economic sanctions, justice and NGOs.[165] International globalism and external national interests, notably German militarism and neo-colonialism, are exploited in externalizations of JPC power. JPC manipulates radical Islam and Christian fundamentalism, and has subverted Vatican. Alliances develop from confluence of goals and historical precedence, such as Vatican-German support to Croatia.

JPC Middle East policy has antagonized the Islamic world.[166] Observers claim that US support of Bosnian Muslims fits a plan of offsetting this, and co-opting the Islamic world to offset European, Chinese and Russian power.[167] US wasn’t concerned about Arab markets when it attacked and occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, supported Israel’a crimes in Palestine, or declared GWOT. By 1994, neocon scheming to subdue Serbs was in an advanced execution stage. Even if there was an Arab pressure to boost Balkan Islam, JPC had the power to prevent it, were it to JPC benefit. In 1994, Pentagon reportedly reminded a US professor about “incredible pressure from the Saudis and others” to help Bosnian Muslims:

“They remind us that the Islamic world provides us with all the oil we want […] Islamic states have billions of petrodollars to invest in “friendly states” and offer a potential market of over one billion people […and] the peace process between Israel and the Islamic world should go better if Israel’s main friend was also a friend to Islamic countries.”[168]

US Balkan policy re-asserted influence in Europe, aiming to stop the emergence of a post-Cold War superpower, Europe. With its purpose re-defined from defensive to aggressive, NATO re-established itself as an interventionist policeman. On the surface, it looks like genuine American national interest, except US-NATO interventions in the Balkans preceded JPC wars in the Middle East and Central Asia, both contrary to US national interests. Besides, what is the sense of undermining EU if plans are already in place to merge it with NAU in the making?

JPC’s orchestration explains why Western powers have supported the same Jihad in the Balkans that backfired on 9/11, and later in Madrid, London and Mumbai. It also explains why neo-fascist Croatia that has cleansed hundreds of thousands Serbs and denies returns of the expelees, is considered for membership in the EU, as is BiH federation run by Muslim radicals who deny independence to Bosnian Serbs and Croats. Serbs returning to Croatia and Kosovo meet hostility and murder. Their properties are being taken over, with the assistance of international institutions.

Globalist aims?

Longer-range JPC plan in the Balkans was to destabilize Europe, and much misinformation covers up this agenda. Western powers sought to dissolve Yugoslavia and her public sector, social security, and opposition to multinationals: “Milosevic was unable to grasp the political message of the fall of the Berlin wall. Other communist politicians accepted the Western model, but Milosevic went the other way.”[169] Communism, an antithesis of “the Western model”, is a creation of secular Judeocentrics: Marx, Bolsheviks and Communists. JPC targeted Yugoslavia because she had a model different from the JPC-orchestrated, overnight Communist matamorphosis into capitalists. US has no national interests anywhere in former Yugoslavia. NATO wasn’t meant to project power into civil wars outside of NATO members.

US has prepared for next wars by moving military bases from Western Europe to Albania, Hungary, Kosovo, Macedonia, Bulgaria and Romania, ostensibly to guard oil transport routes. Friendly US-Saudi relations guarantee oil supply security, despite Saudi support to Wahabbi terror that GWOT supposedly fights. Russia has secured desirable corridors in the region without firing a shot. Most revealing, the much-talked-about US corridor doesn’t even run close to Kosovo, and Camp Bondsteel, a base without an airport or harbour, thus inadequate to “encircle Russia”, transfers Afghan heroine and shelters Kosovo Albanian criminals.

Not the Big Biz but Israel Lobby drives US imperialism, and “Israel does not, contrary to leftist orthodoxy, help the US control the oil.”[170] Others claim that Arab petrodollars grease the US policy into supporting Balkan Islamists. In fact, US Federal Reserve in Judeocentric hands has an infinite supply: creating money out of debt. Top 10 shareholders of Federal Reserve are the Rorhschilds (London and Berlin), the Lazard Brothers (Paris), Israel Seiff (Italy), Kuhn-Loeb (Germany), the Warburgs (Amsterdam and Hamburg), Lehman Brothers (New York), Goldman & Sachs (New York), the Rockefellers (New York).

Judeocentric bankers are now able to create global money. G20 meeting (April 2009) started the “revolution in the global financial order”. Previously dormant, synthetic paper currency (SDR) issued by IMF would inject billions into the world economy and increase global liquidity: “the G20 leaders have activated the IMF’s power to create money and begin global ‘quantitative easing’ […] putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body.” Shortly after Western “bailouts”, as part of a $5 trillion “global stimulus” to be disbursed from global taxpayers by 2010, the G20 meeting gave away $1 trillion for the so-called struggling/developing/emerging/Third World nations. “In time, SDRs are likely (to) evolve into a parking place for the foreign holdings of central banks, led by the People’s Bank of China.”[171] An observer opinioned that to make it appear that it was a Chinese idea, the Rothschild Cabal secretly brought the Chinese “on board to state the need for revitalization of the SDR […] the Chinese and the G20 approved the Rothschild SDR plans for the future.”[172]

In Spring 1999, Clinton stated that Yugoslavia-like ethnic turmoil potentially awaited Ukraine, Moldova, Southern Russia, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbeijan, threatening US goal of “stability, wealth and freedom” of former Communist countries. Was there this purported benevolence, or a commercial or military-strategic goal that truly looked after national benefit to Americans, then US statesmen would represent such interests. Holbrooke, the future architect of Dayton accords and the 1999 bombing to neocon scheme, was a Wall Street banker and became an adviser to the Hyundai Group in the 1980s. His appointment as US ambassador to the UN was mired in allegations that he had used his diplomatic positions for his private business. He stained his diplomatic record by his role in “the 1980 massacre of an estimated 2,000 unarmed students and workers in Kwangju, South Korea”, and 1970s Indonesian occupation army’s mass murders in East Timor that killed “at least 200,000 people, a third of the East Timorese population”.[173]

US diplomat William Walker helped stage the Račak “massacre” when he headed OSCE monitoring mission in Kosovo. Hashim Thaçi admitted to BBC (24.3.2000) that a KLA unit operated at Račak and many soldiers died in fights with Yugoslav forces. KLA covertly killed Albanians to win Western sympathy for the separatist cause. Albright admitted that Račak incident was vivified in order to keep pressure on European leaders to intervene. US servants Holbrooke, Albright and Walker served the JPC. US ambassador to El Salvador in 1989, Walker covered up the murder of six Jesuit priests by a Salvadoran death squad, recruited, trained, and deployed by US military to commit the war’s worst atrocities. Walker was the right-hand man of Oliver North and neocon Elliott Abrams in illegal arms shipments in the Iran-Contra scandal. Earlier, he was deputy chief at the embassy in Honduras when US authorities were recruiting officers from Somoza’s deposed National Guard to establish the Contras, and forming death squads that murdered hundreds of Honduran workers, labor organizers and students.[174]

The international community appointed Ashdown in Bosnia (2002-2006). He dismissed that Izetbegović strived for an Islamic Republic and provided a safe haven to al-Qaeda. On a tape shown at ICTY, Ashdown was caught inspecting KLA weapons in Albania, promising that he will “do his best” to procure assistance, and inform Blair. He testified (14.3.2002) that he saw Serbs shell Kosovo from Albania during NATO bombing. Serb gen. Delić proved that Ashdown couldn’t have seen the villages from the location, and couldn’t have been in sealed Kosovo.

Germany was taking control of Slovenia, Croatia and later Bosnia. US policy in Bosnia apparently weakened Germany’s gains, and divided and weakened EU. In exchange for support of a Muslim state, US put pressure on Izetbegović not to sign any peace agreements proposed by Europe, thereby prolonging the suffering of all ethnic groups of Bosnia. Had the Clinton administration not rejected four peace proposals, the 42-months’ Bosnian war would be over sooner. With comparable diplomatic effort of a different than JPC kind, the US could have secured loyalty if not dependency of the nascent republics or intact Yugoslavia, given brutal German-Austrian history in the region, and general Slavic liking of the USA.

Commercial interests expand to and colonize ex-Yugoslavia. Some observes attribute the theft of Kosovo to its riches. Any real estate is expensive when assessed at Western market values. Kosovo real estate is worth around $220 billion.[175] World Bank estimates the value of mineral reserves at $19 billion, incl. the precious metals in Trepca mines, supposedly the reason for stealing Kosovo. Was it all worth the bloody, protracted terror, war and etnic cleansing of a quarter million non-Albanians? The 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia alone inflicted material damage of comparable value (at what US-NATO military cost?). “International investors” took over the bulk of Poland’s national assets without bombing. Neither is Serbia and its Kosovo on indispensable transportation routes, e.g. Via Egnatia from Turkish border through Greece and on to European freeways bypasses Serbia.

Islamist Trojan Horse

Islam and Christendom have been in conflict since 7th century; “practically the entire Islamic world” had been Christian lands, but  the Christian communities “have all been eradicated through institutionalized discrimination, violence, or pressure”.[176]

Reminiscent of the WWII alliance between fascism and Islam, local and external radical Muslims supported and carried out ethnic cleansing and exterminations of Bosnian and Kosovo Serbs. After 1973 Arab oil blackmail, the European Community agreed to support the Arab anti-Israeli policy in exchange for wide commercial agreements. In the wake of the Mohammed cartoon scandal, EU reviewed politically correct terminology regarding Islam. To “defend the interests of the Muslim world, present the true image of Islam and combat the stereotype perceptions about Islam and Muslims”, the Organization for the Islamic Conference (OIC) and its 56 member states requested the UN and EU to ensure that the freedom of speech didn’t interfere with the “respect for cultural diversity, religious beliefs and religious symbols.”[177] Expecting silence on the West’s “ever-growing Muslim population who “harbor Jihad fighters ready to blow themselves up”,[178] Serb observers feared it would be a crime to “talk or write about the Islamization of Christian lands of Kosovo and Metohija by force, about the destruction of Serbian Christian monasteries and churches and about the terror that Christian Serbs have endured” under Muslim Albanians.

Support Jihad, spread anti-Islamism

Future 1994 laureate of the King Faisal Award and Islamic world’s 2001 Figure of the Year, Izetbegović set up a corrupt regime in Bosnia. He claimed he needed the war to accomplish an Islamic Republic. With US blessings, he called for assistance from Islamic states and international Jihad. The Iran-led, pan-Islamic coalition financed by petrodollar countries launched the Bosnian Jihad. After the Bosnian war, the mujahedin represented a threat to NATO troops. US demanded withdrawal, but about 3,500 of them stayed, some without an option to return to their countries. By the late 1990s the Clinton administration ostensibly found it difficult to restrain them, but thousands were allowed to come and go between the Balkans and the West. In 2000, US state department was concerned about a threat to the West from hundreds of Jihadists – Bosnian citizens after fighting the Serbs. US officials claimed that one of bin Laden’s top lieutenants had sent operatives to Bosnia, and that during the 1990s Bosnia had served as a “staging area and safe haven” for al-Qaeda and others.

800 Islamists who received Bosnian citizenship and 1,000 native Bosnians have terrorist links. CIA and MI6 pressured Izetbegović to force them out. He complied reluctantly, so SAS raided mujahedin camps, killing many (proving neutralisation possible from the beginning, was it the West’s choice). Some were forced to leave across the Croatian border and were then shot by Croat guards; “there were also car accidents and hit-and-run incidents, covert operations to get rid of some mujahedin.”[179] In Kosovo, al-Qaeda was again involved. Milošević told ICTY that during 1998 visit Holbrooke was told,

“that in Northern Albania the KLA was being aided by Osama bin Laden, that he was arming, training, and preparing the members of this terrorist organization in Albania. However, they decided to cooperate with the KLA and indirectly, therefore, with bin Laden, although before that he had bombed the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania [and] had already declared war.”[180]

Jihadists and KLA infiltrate and destabilize neighbouring areas,[181] with a view on Greater Albania. Balkan Jihad bases proved instrumental in 9/11 attacks in the US, and then in London and Madrid.[182] Slavic mujahedin look European. Western support to Izetbegović and the KLA resembled Brzezinski’s anti-Soviet “Afghanistan trap”.[183] US has been supporting terror in Kosovo, and since March 2001 in the FYROM from inside Kosovo; NATO has been “unwilling and/or unable” to disarm KLA, and decided to intervene only after “the wave of terror has been successfully exported into heretofore peaceful Macedonia, and the [KLA] have seized control of some 30 per cent of Macedonia territory.”[184]

Perle lauded Turkey-Israel military accord’s co-architect, US ambassador to Turkey, Strausz-Hupe, who, against his condemnation of nationalism that stood in the way of NWO, saw Zionism and revived Islam (state-religion chauvinism) as potential allies in the NWO project. Extreme Jews invented Communism, an ostensible solution to the exploitation of masses by “capitalists”, only to replace it with Judeocentric NWO concept to suit post-Cold War era, ostensibly to guard humankind against new threats. 9/11 and GWOT implemented this version of Judaic messianism, by inventing evidence of the “Asian threat” and WMD. US House speaker Newt Gingrich coined “Islamic totalitarianism” (8.2.1995). Just as Zionist Nazis taught Germans to hate and fear Jews, “the killers of Christ”, neocons teach Westerners to fear and hate “Islamofascists”. Rabbi Yaacov Perrin conveyed Judaic contempt for Arabs: “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”[185]

Neocon “fanatically hostile to Arabs” Daniel Pipes denounced academic leftist, anti-Zionist and pro-Islamist perspectives as anti-US.[186] He blacklists professors who “refuse to spout the pro-Israel party line”, and encourages students “to spy on their teachers and report miscreants”.[187] The “Islamic totalitarianism” logo accompanies escalating GWOT, turning a billion moderate Muslims into a global, mortal enemy, although Muslim immigrant majority rejects radicalization. Jihadist militancy supported by CIA, MI6 and Mossad was exploited in each GWOT and Balkan cases,[188] in “Danish cartoons” scandal,[189] and recently in Mumbai terror.[190] Truth was buried by bogus accusations of harbouring al-Qaeda, WMD and nuclear capability of “an axis of evil”, a JPC term. A process of self-fulfilling prophecy triggered a confrontational spiral of chaos and hate, Judeocentric modus operandi.

JPC ploy

The neocons and their German and British colleagues have been supporting Islamists in the Balkans, proving Gingrich’s “Islamic totalitarianism” is JPC ploy. Their intervention in Bosnia on behalf of Islamist minority (opposed by the Muslim majority) violated UN rules and international law, but the world accepted it because, ostensibly, it stopped the bloodshed. By 1999, however, the US-NATO air raid on Yugoslavia began propelling Putin to power. To deter the push for legally unprecedented Kosovo independence, he pointed to similar Caucasian ambitions. The West was furious:

“the Kremlin plays its own secessionist games in Georgia and Moldova [...] Putin has simply been using Kosovo as a handy stick to beat the West and to remind the world that Russia still wields a Security Council veto”.[191]

Invoking DPG, Holbrooke accused Putin of seeking “to reassert Russia’s role as a regional hegemon” and refuted suggestions that Kosovo status affects other territorial disputes; Kosovo “is a unique case and sets no precedent for separatist movements elsewhere […] because in 1999, with Russian support, the [UN] was given authority to decide the future of Kosovo.”[192] In fact, UN resolution 1244 guaranteed the “sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia” under interim UN administration. Russia has been insisting that Serbs and Albanians must negotiate a mutually acceptable settlement, in accord with the 1244 resolution.[193] To bypass legality in support of Balkan Islamists, UN’s Nicholas Burns also argued Kosovo‘s “unique situation”: “Milosevic tried to annihilate over one million Kosovar Albanian Muslims”, but UN, NATO and EU “have kept the peace there for eight-and-a-half years. And now, fully 94 or 95 per cent of the people that live there are Kosovar Albanian Muslims.”[194]

The Kosowo majority is a minority in Serbia as a whole, even though a million Albanians have entered illegally in the footsteps of NATO. More than 10% of Kosovo population are non-Albanian, and Kosovo Albanians (including non-Muslims) opposed to secession have been terrorized into silence. It isn’t certain that more than 50% percent of legal Kosovo Albanian Muslims support the secession. Rather, the “majority” are the minority extremists. Burn’s “genocide” is absurd, too. At its 1998-1999 peak, the confrontations between Yugoslav anti-terrorist forces and Western- and Jihad-supported KLA, killed some 2,000 people on all sides. This was as proportionate to the population, as the lethal crime in US capital during the same period. The numbers didn’t support the humanitarian intervention pretense. In comparable or much more severe cases, the USA and allies didn’t react or even increased their support to the offender, for example, in East Timor.[195]

Bosnian Islamist geopolitics followed OIC’s (1-2.2.1992): recognize independent Bosnia and Herzegovina, assist Kosovo Albanians into independence, recognize political autonomy of Sandžak (Raška), and steer FYROM into shared Muslim-Macedonian sovereignty. On 5.1.2004, the deputy director of the Center for Security and Investigation of Terrorism (CSIT) at the Belgrade Institute for Political Studies, Darko Trifunović said that the Bosnian Serbian Republic officials had given NATO-led SFOR and international organizations in BiH a chart which linked Islamic extremists and terrorists in the Balkans. The chart resulted from international experts’ investigation into war crimes by Jihadist units against Bosnian Serbs and Croats. US congressman Randy Cunningham supported it. Rohan Gunaratne, invited by Ashdown to investigate, was threatened with death as he confirmed al-Qaeda’s presence in Bosnia. CSIT proved that no-one in Bosnia had identified al-Qaeda members and no-one answered why six of them took part in 9/11, because international officials concealed the “war crimes against Serbs and Croats in the name of Allah” and the real reasons behind Bosnia war. [196]

CSIT also learned from Kyrgyzstan National Intelligence Service that a trans-national Islamist extremists in former Soviet republics of Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and in Chinese Xinjiang province have been trying to form a Green Corridor in Central Asia, under the sponsorship of al-Qaeda. Merged with its Balkan appendage, the Corridor would span from Xinjiang to Albania, Bosnia and Kosovo. Intelligence from a Wahabbi terrorist group in Bosnia showed Saudi-Iranian, anti-Russian government support in Chechnya and building a base for future operations in Turkish-occupied Northern Cyprus.[197] Ashdown has been denying that terrorist, or terrorist support organizations, exist in Bosnia, while supporting Islamist agendas and pursuing only alleged Serbian war criminals. This is to be expected from a former British politician and MI6 official. Labour MP, Michael Meacher revealed British government relationship with a wider Islamist terrorist network: “British intelligence had used the al-Muhajiroun group in London to recruit Islamist militants with British passports for the war against the Serbs in Kosovo”. Scotland Yard was interested in an alleged member of al-Muhajiroun, Haroon Rashid Aswat, who could have been behind the London bombings, but MI6 protected him.[198]

Haaretz editorial (18.2.2008 ) pretends that Jihad hasn’t been planted in Europe’s underbelly to weaken Western civilization. This merely continues destruction-from-within, using war-of-ideas and universalist instruments of immigration, multi-culturalism and neo-liberalism.[199] On its second anniversary, the “Danish cartoons” affair, ostensibly a battle of freedom-of-speech versus Muslim sensitivities, is clearly a JPC job in co-operation with Danish security agencies.[200] JPC’s Trojan Horse relies on stirring up Islamist radicals against the West, only to “prove” to us that not the Judeocentric but the Islamic civilization is the threat. The Cell (2002) by investigative reporters John and Chris Miller and Michael Stone alleges that the 7.8.1998 bombing of US embassies in East Africa that killed 224 and injured more than 4600 people, could have been prevented: “facets of the East Africa plot had been known beforehand to the FBI, the CIA, the State Department, and to Israeli and Kenyan intelligence services”. After 9/11, it came to light that three of the alleged hijackers had some involvement in the bombings and that the US intelligence was aware of this by late 1999 if not earlier.

Revealing Jerusalem-Washington concord, Haaretz states the absence of Balkan Islamism, something that JPC would sense on another planet. Troubled Israeli and Kosovar sovereignties have a common thread – one JPC, the other Albanian Islamist: “Israel, which was established in the wake of the Jewish people’s struggle for a national home, should stretch out a hand to other nations seeking self-determination.”[201] Was Kosovo in Palestine, the IDF and Mossad would be fighting Albanian terrorism. Because Kosovo is in Europe, as per JPC schematic, it is a friend in need.

Appeasement?

Why support Balkan extremism that aims at Western civilization, while fighting Islamists elsewhere? Purportedly, the US intervened to appease the Islamic world with an objectivity towards Balkan Muslim democracy as opposed to backward, tribal Serbian values, offsetting negative perceptions of GWOT and Israel’s conquest of Palestine – wars for democracy that the Islamic world can’t understand. Foreign Policy Committee’s leading Democrat, Biden expressed the policy:

“If we get Kosovo right, Muslims around the world will be reminded how the United States came to the aid of Kosovo’s Muslim population and helped them build a strong, independent, multi-ethnic democracy.”[202]

By 2005, Albanian ethnic cleanser, terrorist and mafia notoriety and inability to govern themselves was too obvious. Biden also meant to cover up JPC’s Trojan Horse. If the neocons didn’t wish Islamists to get ahead in the Balkans, they wouldn’t have orchestrated the support of Balkan Jihadists. US ambassador in Zagreb, Peter Galbraith confirmed an appeasement policy when the West sided with Bosnian Muslims, against Bosnian Croats who had been cornered into a federal position under radical Muslims. Even the Croatian Roman Catholic Church endorsed this appeasement against Bosnian Croat Catholics, dooming them to surrender ancestral lands as they left for Croatia.

The appeasement notion is groundless; intelligence agencies could have predicted its failure. Muslims hold the West in greater contempt because of GWOT, and are more convinced that their Allah is true and our God is false, since Albanian Muslims are allowed to destroy our God’s temples while our soldiers in Kosovo don’t react. The image repairing has failed. The Islamic Lobby has exploited it for Islam to advance into the Western world, to JPC advantage. To Muslims around the world, it proves Western inferiority and decadence.

Owing to US, British and German aid to Balkan Muslims, two Muslim states, Bosnia and Kosovo arose in Europe for the first time since the fall of the Turkish Empire. For a fee of US$250,000, Clinton unveiled (20.3.2003) a monument with Arabic inscriptions at the site of the 1995 “Srebrenica massacre” by Bosnian Serb forces.[203] Arabic is foreign to Balkan Muslims, and the site became a place of international Islamist pilgrimage. Bin Laden’s mujahedin participated in the most atrocious war crimes by Bosnian Muslim forces stationing in Srebrenica. The monument honours them.

JPC concealed Islamic contribution to the Balkan problem. Granted, oil-wealthy Saudi Arabia, the co-founder of OIC, has been pressuring the UN into accepting Kosovo secession, but JPC could defy the law. OIC initiated UN condemnations of Serbs, and pressured the West to introduce sanctions, bomb Bosnian Serbs and Yugoslavia and invade Kosovo. How OIC “convinces” the West where and when it suits the JPC, isn’t a mystery, knowing how “Muslim” crypto-Jews and masons, Dönmeh have manipulated Muslims in the Turkish Empire to its peril. OIC sees Kosovo as an exclusively Muslim question, yet NATO countries have allowed OIC to interfere with secularism when at the August 1992, London Conference on Yugoslavia, OIC became supervisory committee’s full member. Under UNMIK,

“Islamization and re-Islamization of Kosovo society is being implemented through external aid, originating both from radical Islamic institutions and from the most official Western sources […] EU institutions and UNMIK committed to building or repairing more than one hundred mosques at the very time when hundreds of Christian religious monuments were being destroyed in the province by Albanian nationalists.”[204]

Hundreds of mosques, built on territories taken from Orthodox Serbs and others, provide indoctrination centres for Islamists, while Christian Orthodox churches are in ruins or levelled. Islamic funding and interests support Muslim communities on said territories. In Kosovo, they serve hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants from Albania.

In seeking secular Albanian national identity for the last two centuries, Muslims prevailed over Orthodox and Catholic Christians. Albanian political leaders emphasize the nation has been forced into Islam, but they lie that it has never been accepted. Lantos, DioGuardi, Bob Dole and others advised the Albanians to rid themselves of the Muslim image. At publicized funerals, Albanians were advised to carry candles, like Catholics. They were told to celebrate Mother Theresa’s cult and attend a Catholic church in Priština at Christmas, while Catholics constituted less than 1% of Kosovo Albanians. A rumour was spread that Albanian Muslim masses were converting to Catholicism, but local imams debunked it. Ibrahim Rugova’s “baptism”, intended to impress the West that Albanians were Roman Catholics as opposed to Orthodox Serbs. OIC upheld the hoax when it sent condolences to Prishtina after Rugova’s death. Was the conversion true, OIC wouldn’t have done it, as Koran condemns to death the supporters of Muslim converts.[205]

European Union

Fighting alongside the Allies, Yugoslavia had lost 27% of total population in WWI and 30% in WWII. Rothschilds, Zionists and their Protestant supporters had agitated for both wars and had created and sponsored Hitler’s rise to power, but blamed Germans. Duplicity reigned in capitals of world power. To be elected, Zionist president Roosevelt, like Zionist president Wilson, lied that they were against US involvement in European wars. Since October 1939, Roosevelt secretly communicated to Zionist Winston Churchill that US would rescue the British, which enticed them to declare war.[206] Corrupt German leaders followed the plan of German-Slavic war with Rothschilds’ money. Slavs were targeted two years before the Wansee conference (20.1.1942) decision on extermination of Jews. Nazi-Zionist sporadic killing of Jews became genocide, in accord with global Zionist elites (“war criminals who contributed to the annihilation of 6 million of our brothers”);

“Zionist attitude that Jewish blood is an annointing oil required by the drive-wheel of the Zionist state is not a thing of the past, but persists to date.” [207]

Despite NATO ministers disapproval, NATO general secretary, former German minister of defence Manfred Worner stated NATO readiness to attack Serbia. UK was an obvious external Balkan culprit by virtue of alignment with US neocon Balkan policy, so analysts pointed to Germany as the major player. Now it is “EU”. The EU had acquired de facto control of BiH, when Wolfgang Petritsch took the UN representative office in 2002, in the name of Germany, France and UK.[208] Germany has been opposing peace in Kosovo,[209] while separating Kosovo from Serbia into EU, and guarding that neither US nor Albanian interests integrate Kosovo into Greater Albania.[210] In May 2006, Montenegro referendum decided to separate from the federation with Serbia. Germany and the EU had given “uninterrupted support to leading personalities in Montenegro for years”, despite their criminal activities.[211] EU could absorb the remaining mini-states as “a free trade area”.[212]

Germany

Germany led Europe against their WWII genocidal target, the Serbs (the “Nazis”, “Hitlerian Milosevic”), to prevent “Auschwitz” and “death camps” in Bosnia. After Croat neo-fascists embarked on expulsion of Serbs by intimidation, terror and brutal ethnic cleansing in the wake of Slovenian and Croat secessions, Bundeswehr 2000 magazine (1994) referred to WWII Blitzkrieg that “forced Yugoslavia to submission”:

“Our participation in AWACS flights over Bosnia and in the NATO mission, we see in light of that tradition [...] Society knows how important peace is to Germany. We had proven it twice in the current century […and] are present again!”

Germany was Croatia’s largest arms supplier, against German law and UN embargo.[213] The military hardware was East German, obsolete after Germany united. Unleashing Bundeswehr for the first time since WWII, Germany as the first recognized secessions, from Croatia to Kosovo. Laced with Holocaustian phrases and references to “European values”, German speak surpassed Clintonian mendacity. Internationalist, leftist intellectuals and leaders swayed public opinion to support interventionism, joining journalists “who have turned the conflict in Yugoslavia into a melodrama in which the lead roles are played by the Muslims, as innocent victims, and the Serbs, as genocidal villains.” [214] Cohn-Bendit urged: “Germany should not be kept forever in a forced anti-fascist quarantine”, hence “a right-winger is anybody opposed to military intervention in Bosnia”. He bordered on the insane: “NATO should bomb [Bosnian Serb town of] Pale”, which would “undoubtedly have terrible consequences”. Tageszeitung (Berlin) and Tages-Anzeiger (Zürich) published a petition from European intellectuals, with overtones strikingly similar to neocon rhetoric:

“sanctions throughout the entire territory of former Yugoslavia affected by the crisis should be tightened to such an extent that all offensive weapons will be destroyed or turned over to the UN. If this ultimatum is not met within a few days, air strikes will have to destroy all offensive weapons. “[215]

Humanism, human rights, civilization and the “European idea”, i.e. “the last idea worth fighting for”, according to Cohn-Bendit, were invoked to justify bombing in order to “safeguard human life”. German Press Council felt compelled to recall the basics of war reporting: “military language” should not dominate the media, and “euphemistic concepts like collateral damage” should be avoided.[216] Dormant militarism and media closed their ranks, whereby the most avid advocates of human rights and democracy supported NATO total war most absolutely; the users of “concentration camp”, “Auschwitz” and “genocide” terms, “contributed most effectively to the relativization of Nazi atrocities and the ongoing rehabilitation of German militarism.”[217]

German defence minister Rudolf Scharping feared in 1999 “a slackening of support by the media, warnings of a reversal of public opinion in favor of a halt to Nato’s bombing campaign and a return to negotiations. It is a catastrophe that my colleague Joschka Fischer would like to avoid at all cost.”[218] The head of the foreign section at German TV commented on Berlin’s entry “into a war consciously and with conviction”:

“I have never seen a Defence Minister […] as if he had to convince himself of what he was saying.”[219]

Foreign affairs minister Fischer suggested (11.10.2000) that to maintain “democracy and peace”, German businessmen as well as the military enter Serbia to teach Serbs to live in peace with their neighbours.[220] 3,800 Bundeswehr soldiers failed to protect Orthodox churches and monasteries in March 2004 pogroms. To justify Bundeswehr’s “preventive intervention”, German politicians and media maintained that Milošević had planned vast ethnic cleansing in Kosovo. Scharping promoted Operation Horseshoe, an intelligence fabrication[221] exposed by German ARD television program (8.2.2001) that featured NATO spokesman Jamie Shea who gave Scharping, Schröder and Fischer as “a grandiose example of leaders who didn’t “align themselves with public opinion but who know how to shape it” despite the “collateral damage and despite the length of the bombardments […] If we had lost the support of German public opinion, we also would have lost that of our partners.”[222]

Germany created own networks in Kosovo police and security. A German, Joachim Rücker in UNMIK was in charge of the “privatization” of Yugoslav state property.[223] When ICTY trial against former Kosovo prime minister Ramush Haradinaj for ordering and participating in torture and murders was drawing to a close, Rücker was under fire for helping intimidate witnesses due to testify against Haradinaj. Thaçi’s mafia structures extend to Germany, where government authorities have been preventing investigations of Kosovo Albanians.[224]

German government supports Hungarian irredentists in Vojvodina.[225] Federal Union of European Minorities promotes a re-definition of Vojvodina borders. German Ethnos-Nation wrote that prevention of a civil war in Serbia required “maximum autonomy” for Vojvodina.[226] The irredentists demand former Yugoslavia be partitioned, coincidentally with OIC maps. Germany supports the Albanian majority rights in Kosovo, while denying such rights to Serbs in Serbian Republic. In Vojvodina, where 28 minorities have been living in harmony since WWII, Germany acknowledges special rights to some minorities. In 2002, Vojvodina became a full member of the European Council’s Committee of the Regions, Germany’s intrusive “NGO”.

Bundeswehr involved military Psycho Truppe, secretly built on the legacy and continuity of Nazi personnel and structure. Truppe co-operate with German government agencies dealing with foreign media and secret services, aiming at “propaganda and disinformation for manipulating opinions”. Truppe’s 750 soldiers in 2002 included “operational editorial staff” deployed in Kosovo, BiH and Afghanistan. State broadcaster Deutsche Welle supported them with journalistic contacts whose connections to German intelligence BND contributed to Yugoslavia break-up.[227]

French connection

Serbs shrouded the monument of French-Serbian solidarity when French airforce joined the US-NATO bombing. During the 2004 pogroms, French KFOR watched a village of 130 houses burn to the ground, ostensibly because the troops were too busy keeping Serbs and Albanians apart (but actually stayed in their barracks).[228]

Anti-US under Chirac, Sarkozy’s France is aligning with “US” Middle Eastern and NWO policies. Petty personal scandals presented in media like Libération of Sarkozy’s friend, Édouard de Rothschild, tried to distract from criticisms, incl. accusations of Sarkozy work as a sayan (helper), “one of the thousands of Jewish citizens of countries other than Israel who cooperate” with Mossad, actually “the fourth high-ranking spy of Israel”, according to Le Figaro.[229] Sarkozy reminded of “the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as a second mother homeland?”[230] As France’s minister of interior, he developed with Netanyahu “a close friendship with similarities in their ideology and politics. If Netanyahu returns to Israel’s chief position it will be interesting to see whether their personal dynamic will lead to a fresh start for Israel and France and a more constructive European role in the region”.[231] On Sarkozy’s economic ideology and its criticisms, Netanyahu said Sarkozy reminds people of Netanyahu.[232]

Sarkozy’s family ties to the Rothschilds, Corsican mafia and CIA have helped him to power.[233] So did Chabad Lubavitchers, because Sarkozy believes in their Messiah, rabbi M.M. Schneerson. In a greeting letter publicized in France and abroad, Sarkozy referred to Schneerson as Moshiach (Messiah). Rabbi Dovid Zaoui worked hard to make Sarkozy elected: “I knew that the Rebbe wanted president […] In the end, even those leaders who thought they wouldn’t support him changed their minds, especially after they saw he was serious about fighting anti-Semitism.”[234] Sarkozy took US department of state training, thanks to his stepmother’s second spouse, Frank Wisner, who took over Pentagon’s political planning from Wolfowitz. Nobody commented on Wisner’s link with Sarkozy, the French government’s spokesman at the time. In the Gaullist party, young Sarkozy betrayed Chirac in favour of the Rothschild tendency that De Gaulle had successfully resisted. Lambertist Party was instrumental in Sarkozy’s elevation. This Trotskyite group, the equivalent of the SD/USA of Max Shatchman that which formed US neocons, worked for CIA against the Cold-War Stalinists. CIA also planted its agents: Lionel Jospin, who became prime minister, and Jean-Christophe Cambadélis, the principal adviser to Moroccan Jew, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, a candidate with the task of eliminating Sarkozy’s competitor. Strauss-Kahn had been on US payroll; he lectured at Stanford, taken on by provost Condoleezza Rice. As soon as he took office, Sarkozy and Rice thanked Strauss-Kahn with appointment to IMF head. Speaking in Madrid (15.12.2008) he urged all governments to immediately avert the economic crisis that otherwise could last long and trigger riots.

To Élysée Palace’s secretary general, president Sarkozy appointed Claude Guéant, former right arm of Charles Pasqua, a Corsican crook who became interior minister and established links in Saudi Arabia and Israel and became Mossad honorary officer. In 1982, Sarkozy married the niece of Achille Peretti, Pasqua’s buddy in Union corse, a secret Corsican criminal organisation that largely controlled Europe-America drug traffic, the famous “French connection”. Élysée assistant secretary general, Francois Perol was a managing partner of the Banque Rothschild. Sarkozy’s diplomatic adviser Jean-David Levitte is son of the former director of the Jewish Agency, who are co-responsible for condemning WWII Ghetto Jews to death. Chirac removed Levitte from French ambassadorship to UN, considering him too close to George Bush. Alain Bauer is in charge of intelligence and doesn’t appear in any directory. Bauer is grandson of the Grand Rabbi of Lyon, former Grand-Master of French principal Masonic obedience, Grand Orient of France, and former No. 2 of US NSA-Europe. Within Cheney’s Center for International & Strategic Studies, Sarkozy’s future minister of economy and finance Christine Lagarde co-chaired with Brzezinski a working group which supervised Poland’s privatisation. She organised lobbying for Lockheed Martin against French manufacturer Dassault. Frank Carlucci (CIA’s No.2 after recruitment by Wisner’s father) appointed Sarkozy’s half-brother Oliver the investment fund director of the Carlyle Group, the joint management company of Bushes’ and Ben Ladens’ portfolios. This, world’s 5th, dealmaker manages the principal assets of sovereign Kuwait and Singapore. Sarkozy spent 2008 holidays near Bush’s ranch, at the expense of  Robert Agostinelli, an Italo-New York merchant banker, a Zionist and a leading neocon who opinions in JPC’s Commentary.

Sarkozy said that referendum on EU constitution would “bring Europe into danger” due to “cleavage between people and governments”. UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage accused Sarkozy and British minister Gordon Brown of “an utterly cynical political plan”. “Not only does he stop his own people from having a say but he is trying to block Britain from having the referendum which our government promised”. Sarkozy intended to use his turn at the EU’s presidency in the second half of 2008 to call for new, federal EU powers.[235] After Irish and Czech referenda rejected the EU constitution (Lisbon Treaty 13.12.2007), a de facto subjugation of national sovereignities, Sarkozy sent JPC puppet, Polish crypto-Jewish president Lech Kaczyński (Kalkstein) to convince Czech president Vaclav Klaus to re-run the referendum. Sarkozy travelled to Dublin for a similar “convincing”.

Amidst the Fall 2008, bankster bailout crisis, i.e. creating a New World Financial Order, Sarkozy and Gordon Brown called for a “new international financial architecture for the global age” which would establish Rothschild global governance under the guise of “reforming and regulating” markets. Sarkozy’s conviction that policy should be based on the same precepts as Zionist, Illuminati, Freemason, Bismark, Bolshevik, Nazi and Communist ideology, proves how far JPC’s NWO idea has advanced. Following his bombing spree in “Kosovo”, US-NATO chief commander Clark stressed the obsoclescnce of ethnically pure states (except for Kosovo, of course).[236] Baptist Clark, Catholic Sarkozy and Catholic-turned-Episcopalian Albright “didn’t” know of their Jewishness, and Frankist-like participated in anti-Christian, anti-civilizational policies.

Bush apointee, special envoy for Kosovo independence, Frank Wisner, who took over Pentagon’s political planning from Wolfowitz, insisted that Baltic Jew, Bernard Kouchner become Sarkozy’s foreign affairs minister with a priority for Kosovo independence and termination of pro-Arab policy. With National Endowment for Democracy funding, Kouchner participated in Brzezinski’s anti-Soviet Afghan operations, alongside bin Laden and the Karzaï brothers. Under president Hamid Karzaï brother’s control, Afghanistan became world’s largest producer of opium. US Air Force transports the heroin to Camp Bondsteed, from where Thaçi’s mafia distributes it to the West. The profits finance CIA’s illegal operations. Karzaï and Thaçi are long-time personal friends of Kouchner, who “doesn’t know” of their criminal activities despite international reports on the subject.

In 1990s Kouchner worked with Izetbegović, and then was UN high representative in Kosovo (1999-2001). Kouchner and his Medecins sans frontieres (MSF) publicized (1995) in French press and on Paris walls a poster showing a “Serbian death camp” in Bosnia with an Auschwitz-like watchtower. With other Jewish intellectuals in France, Kouchner popularized the right to “humanitarian intervention” – “a humanitarian version of President Bush’s preemptive-strike doctrine – which justified European involvement in the Kosovo war to avert ethnic cleansing.”[237] A professed intervention failure in the Balkans partly justified more bloody interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. When JPC needed Gulf War 2 in face of US-Europe disagreement, Thomas Friedman (NYT 23.1.2005) quoted Kouchner as saying that Islamist terror was the biggest threat. Kouchner’s support countered French public who ill-wished Bush in Iraq. Philosophers such as Bernard-Henri Levy and Andre Glucksmann spent time on moralist comments about international affairs instead of philosophising, and supported war in Iraq. For joining French debate with Levy, Glucksmann, Kouchner, Alain Finkelkraut and Alexander Adler about Israeli-Palestinian and Iraqi conflicts, professor of Swiss and German universities, Tariq Ramadan became “anti-Semite”. For Ramadan, these “new philosophers” were pro-Israeli apologists.[238]

JPC’s willing executioner

EU resolution[239] on Srebrenica 10th anniversary catered to EU militarists. Urging international institutions to apply experience “from Srebrenica and the wars in the former Yugoslavia” and to be “truly prepared for future peacekeeping missions”, MEPs called for a strengthened EU foreign and security policy. EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana declared that Srebrenica partly resulted from the absence of a strong and united
Europe, but since then EU had a united foreign policy and “a management capacity to back it up.”

EUFOR replaced SFOR in BiH (2.12.2004), but remained under NATO command. Both forces abused the law. SFOR assailed the house of a priest (April 2004), clubbing him and his family, while “looking for war criminals”.. Media dismissed protests, and accepted SFOR’s excuse that forcible entry caused the injuries. SFOR also killed Bosnian Serb war crime suspects (“indicted war criminals”) and their relatives in “self-defense” or while the victims were “attempting to escape”. The media “has whitewashed these abuses”.[240]

German foreign policy indicates “JPC’s willing executioner” globally. German foreign and military policy’s most influential institution, Federal College for Security Studies (BAKS) develops models, first introduced in the US upon neocon definition of “Islamic totalitarianism”. Inevitable conflicts by young Muslims against poverty and foreign occupation can be best confined through military interventions. Such wars are useful and necessary and BAKS models increasingly appear in analyses of other political institutions.[241]

When JPC cry “nuclear Iran!”, German and other NATO specialists appeal for a nuclear first-strike policy, should the West’s global predominance be in jeopardy. Klaus Naumann, Bundeswehr former inspector general, and NATO policy chief on nuclear strategy and arms control, also chairs a German nuclear decontamination company that serves German and US governments.[242] In Afghanistan, Germany deploys combat troops and technical relief units, develops paramilitary units, and trains Afghan troops, also child soldiers. German-trained Aghan police is infamous for barbarity and child torure. Berlin and Brussels buttress escalation of GWOT to Pakistan with funds for military employment of civilians. [243] Bundeswehr trains, and supplies equipment for, Iraqi army logistics unit out of airforce base in United Arab Emirates (UAE), Germany’s most important partner in the Persian Gulf, coincidentally with neocon policy. Since 2003 Iraq invasion, Germany is in “strategic partnership” with UAE. France, too, planned to set up a base, to train Emirati soldiers, but preparations for Israel-NATO war with Iran might be the reason. Since the 1990s France has been the second largest arms supplier to UAE. Emirati Wahhabism is JPC’s Trojan Horse in GWOT. “Influential forces” suggest French subordination to German leadership.[244]

German forces eye “peacekeeping position” in the Middle East, without doubt to aid GWOT and pacification of Palestine. In January 2008, German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP) advised the government to consider naval deployment along Gaza Strip, based on “experience acquired off the coast of Lebanon”. German authorities already have police units in the Palestinian Autonomous Territory. DGAP cautioned not to directly serve Israeli interests,[245] but Berlin escalated the Tibet campaign, defying German business concerns and warnings of similarities to “operations by the 19th and 20th century colonial powers” who pitted China’s regions against each other “with bloody consequences”.[246] German government front NGO, Friedrich Naumann Foundation affiliated with FDP party, played a key role in anti-Chinese “protests” along Beijing Olympics torch route, while German media covered the uprising in Western China that started with pogrom-like attacks by Tibetan gangs on non-Tibetans, incl. Chinese Muslims. The pro-Tibet campaign was developed with US state department and self-proclaimed Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Neocon Paula Dobriansky, US undersecretary of state and special coordinator for Tibet, participated. Protestant Church suggested that German athletes denounce Chinese policy for the media.[247]

After March 2004 pogroms, Germany considered legalizing banned chemical weapons for mob control, for Bundeswehr to “react properly” in international missions.[248] Bundeswehr inspector-general urged (May 2004) that German soldiers and reservists be readily available “for frequent operations of long duration”, and Bundestag decided to indefinitely extend Kosovo occupation.[249] Leipzig Airport was made available (23.3.2006) to NATO for staging air transports, in violation of agreements against NATO presence. Public protests made German government postpone a “war engagement” in Congo. Prevention of possible revolts during elections explained EU police deployment there,[250] but actually Germany wanted to maintain contacts with a Congolese violator of arms embargo, and to control a German-run mine, an armed militias refuge.[251]

Despite accusations against president Kagame and the Rwandan government that “denounces and persecutes mercilessly every form of opposition”, Germany supports Rwanda and directly aids its police and judiciary. So aided, the Rwandan regime (responsible for the war in East Congo) has a large contingent of soldiers ready for interventions against Islamist Sudan. During his April 2008 visit, Kagame met with German defense minister. Rwandan military elite was allegedly involved in Rwandan genocide. EU has indicted for massacres during putsch attempts, and for military invasions into Congo that killed over a million people. Among the accused was deputy commander of the UN/AU troops in Darfur, stationed at the insistence of Western governments. Kagame is exempt from indictments. President Horst Köhler received him with military honours. During Köhler’s visit in Rwanda (February 2008), human rights organizations accused Kagame’s government of torture, extra-judiciary executions and other crimes.[252]

Shortly after the totalitarian push of EU constitution, Germany’s most influential political think tank Bertelsmann Foundation demanded disempowerment of smaller EU members in foreign and security policy. Only the seven countries with the largest military budgets would be permanent members of “EU Security Council”. A comprehensive arms programs called for “concerted propaganda measures and determined leadership”, as Europeans are “more concerned about the fight against poverty than the development of global power”.[253]

Dissolving the separation of military, police and intelligence agency powers, Berlin legalized (6.10.2008) “military means” in domestic affairs. Blending of the branches of German repressive organs, on the domestic and foreign fronts makes a flexible combat of potential civil disorders around the world possible.[254] This resembles adaptation of US combat troops for domestic use in place of National Guard, and reminds of the US-Canadian agreement to let the neighbours’ military in, in case of “emergency”.

Vatican

Judeocentrics identify Catholicism with Vatican in Rome, and Rome with Temple destruction and Diaspora exile, targeting Catholics and Vatican for: atrocities against Jews (Rome Ghetto, Inquisition); competition as God-chosen and obstruction to hegemony; and, the Crusades to Holy Land. Judeocentrics created Martin Luther’s Reformation, infiltrating the Church with Frankists to destroy and Judaize it. They have been infiltrating positions of authority in Poland and have influenced Poland’s adversaries since the 1700s. Since the early 1790s, Frankists caused Poland to suffer Russia’s tyrrany. Then they turned the Prussian and Austro-Hungarian empires against Poland until it ceased to exist. By the 1900s, Frankists dominated Poland’s structures and her Catholic Church. Some Jews used Masonry to convert Christians to Judaism. Crypto-Jews and Masons formulated the Jesuit movement and manufactured the Rupture myth to lull Christians into believing that they wouldn’t suffer the consequences of attacks on humanity. Rothschilds owned the pope and intended to make him King of Palestine. Rothschilds would become the King by proxy, and the pope – anti-Christ in the eyes of Protestants. Catholics gave their alms to the Rothschilds via popes, to finance own destruction through Protestants (Christians almost converted to Judaism), and to support anti-Christian press.[255]

To win converts, Judeocentrics in England fabricated prophecies to destroy Catholic Church and attack the pope and the Turks in a ploy to “restore Jews to Palestine”. In 1641, a pamphlet with prophecies of Ursula Shipton (Ursula Sontheil, 1488-1561) stated a few current facts purported to be from her lifetime. Numerous later editions appeared. In 1862, Charles Hindley added credibility to the hoax, but later admitted his forgery. A Cabalist Jew, Hindley conditioned Christians to welcome martyrdom for Jewish sake.[256]

Alignment with JPC explains Vatican’s support to Balkan wars. Veiled by diplomacy, ecumenism and other heresies, Vatican’s animosity towards Eastern Orthodoxy found an outlet in partitioning Yugoslavia – another opportunity to divide Orthodox lands. Vatican was the first to recognize Croat and Slovenian illegal secessions that instigated the Balkan wars, but cynically reassured Serbs that its anti-Serbian position wasn’t  “a hostile act” and pope’s representative would stay in Belgrade. In 20^th century Vatican and Germany’s attempts to control Eastern Europe and the Balkans, Orthodox Serbs and Yugoslavia, “an obstacle in their way”, was associated with Russia, “a major antagonist of Germany and the Vatican”; “Serbia would play the role of a surrogate for Russia and be a […] target for Germany and the Vatican, who sought to destroy or weaken Russia”.[257] John Paul II followed “international community” from day one of Yugoslavia break-up. Vatican aimed to take over Orthodox Christian areas for Catholic dioceses in former republics of Croatia and BiH. Neo-Ustaša ultimatum “be Croat or leave” converted Orthodox Serbs to Catholicism, on a smaller scale than in WWII. The civil wars left mosques and Christian churches destroyed, damaged, desecrated and looted. Orthodox churches were converted to Catholic in Croatia. When Croats suffered defeat from Muslim and Bosnian Serb forces, the pope requested US-NATO intervention in Bosnia. But he was indifferent to the fate of more than 350,000 Orthodox Krajina Serbs.

Croat Catholic bishops issued an open letter (1.2.1991) that lied that Serb Orthodox Church had opposed Western values which Croats, the anti-communist democrats, embrace. Croat propaganda provided a driving force behind US policy, and set the scene for anti-Serb reporting. A month before the secession, president Tuđman met John Paul (25.5.1991), just as Pius XII received Pavelić (18.5.1941). Pope’s visits to Croatia (10-11.9.1994, 2-4.10.1998 and 5-9.6.2003 – his 100th trip abroad) legitimized Tuđman regime. The 1994 visit gave moral support to ethnic cleansing in Krajina. The pope neither critiqued nor condemned Tuđman, a Holocaust denier who called the Israelis “Judo-Nazis” commiting genocide in Palestine, but denied Ustaša genocide and planned to annex BiH into Greater Croatia.

Former US state department official for Yugoslav affairs, who resigned in 1992 in protest of US Balkan policy, revealed that Vatican envoys urged for a military intervention in order to stop “the Serb agressor” whom they compared to WWII Nazis.[258] The approval of anti-Serb military actions by Croats and Muslims in Bosnia, and Vatican’s ambivalent statements on Kosovo indicate anti-Orthodox stance and acquiescence to Islamic conquest. Before secession, Croatia received (4.10.1990) a $2 billion loan from the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, a Roman Catholic order headquartered in Rome, likely directed from Germany. The loan, interest-free for 10 years, was conditional on its non-use for military purposes, but Croatia could re-shuffle funds and take military funding from social programmes. The Croat embassy in Washington denied the loan, but a copy of the agreement exists.[259]

Approval of the neo-fascist regime and cardinal Stepinac beatification (3.10.1998) signaled Vatican’s cover-ups of Ustaša crimes and colaboration with the neo-fascists. John Paul’s actions “exacerbated the animosity and conflict between Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians. He did not want reconciliation, but conquest”.[260] A lawsuit Alperin vs. Vatican Bank in San Francisco Federal Court sued (November 1999) on behalf of Serb, Jewish, and Roma survivors of concentration camps, their relatives and organizations, representing over 800,000 Holocaust victims of WWII Croatia. Pope’s private attorney admitted Vatican’s involvement in the genocide, but justified it by international law.

Vatican’s charity Caritas smuggled weapons to KLA, incl. mortars stolen from NATO bases in Germany. The consignee was a parish priest in Italy. One of three drivers of the convoy arrested by Italian customs had links to BND.[261] Before Kosovo “inependence” declaration, pope Benedict stated that Vatican would heed the international community. While using extreme Albanians to break Serbian-Orthodox influence, as Berlin did, high-powered Catholic clergy declared, “a new phase” can begin “with the independence” of Kosovo.[262]

Polish pseudo-Catholic hierarchs and clergy, e.g. philosemitic archbishop Józef Życiński (Reiffstein) and father Adam Boniecki (Aaron Ajngold), symptomize the Judaization. Their colleague Jesuit Obirek left his cassock for a marriage with a Jewess from Israel embassy in Warsaw. In Warsaw archbishop Wielgus’ case, internationalized by NYT, JPC-dominated Polish state has violated Catholic Church sovereignty. JPC media and polls have contributed to curtailing Catholic media and eliminating parties representing Poland’s anti-JPC majority in elections 2007. On a global scale, Vatican’s Judaization is evident in a document (11-13.3.2007) by a joint committee of Vatican and the Israeli Chief Rabbinate that promotes the rabbi-fabricated “Noahide Laws”. Heretically suggesting a Biblical basis of these laws, the document appeals for their adoption by Christians.[263]

Conclusions

Numerous power groups are responsible for millions of fatalities in 20^th century wars and genocides, but NWO-apocalyptic-messianic Judeocentrics seem to lead them all. Extreme Jews and Jewish bankers have instigated, supported and executed wars and revolutions. Judeocentrics had traded off a few hundred thousands new settlers in Israel for tens of millions dead in 20^th century wars, incl. Jewish masses opposed to Zionism. Human life means nothing to them, in accord with Talmudic hatred and fanaticism. Shabbataian Frankists and Dönmeh, and Zionists are still at play in world’s power centres. They are the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC), a global web of extreme Judeocentrics and Gentile supporters, not just the Zionists, all guided by “end time” ideology. Lubavitcher rabbinate leads, as the Talmudic rabbinate has done for millennia in terror against Jew and Gentile. The policies threaten war of Israel-NATO against Iran or India against Pakistan that might be nuclear WWIII, with an old Judeocentric target, Russia and Slavs scapegoated, as seen in the “Polish missile crisis”.

Extermination of Gentile and Jew could eclipse a nuclear genocide of troops and peoples in WWIII. JPC-linked Turkish elites resemble Dönmeh responsible for Armenian genocide, Turkish Empire downfall, WWI and co-developing Bolshevik Revolution that led to genocide of tens of millions of Orthodox Christians. JPC entrenched in Turkey and Pakistan is gaining influence in Iraq, Iran and among Kurds. JPC elite’s beliefs in total evil and destruction of Gentiles for redemption of Jews, have been driving Judeocentrics at the helm of global politics since the 17th century. The process manipulates global Jewry, including Orthodox Jews who oppose Zionism and NWO as contrary to Torah. Judeocentric policies follow Zionist, Bolshevik, Nazi and Communist traditions, coated in new phrases and rhetoric. JPC rhetoric, history, and recent developments point to advancement of the NWO ploy, e.g. 13.12.2008 constitution that robs EU members of sovereignty in preparation for totalitarian rule, and advanced work on NAU with an eye on merging the two Unions. US Patriot Act targets civil liberties in preparation for JPC’s apocalyptic plan, while the new EU constitution contains similar clauses. The two laws are a mass crimes warning reinforced by JPC politicians’ duplicity.

JPC pits Muslims against Christians and other Gentiles, with events like 9/11, Operation Danish Cartoons and Mumbai terror. In the Balkans, JPC has been supporting Islamism and international Jihad to this end. Declaration of Kosovo independence isn’t the end. Islamist Green Corridor from Western China to Europe’s underbelly invites exploitation, as does Turkey’s EU membership, and immigrant Islamism. JPC exploits Middle East Islamists, too. The Islamist Trojan Horse could be turned against the West to fulfil JPC power brokers’ apocalyptic goal of destruction.

Extremists exploit Christian, Islamic and Judaic religions to whip up hatred and violence against an “enemy” or Jewish opposition. JPC terrorize Jews, but blame Gentiles. Against Catholic „love thy neighbour“, Croat killers and extremists with Vatican’s blessing have slaughtered Serbs, Roma and Jews and, recently, ethnically cleansed their Christian Orthodox, and Muslim Slav brethren. Some Islamic states have a set of laws based on Koranic traditions that discriminate against non-Muslim dhimmi. Judeocentrics believe they are God’s chosen and regard goyim (non-Jews) lower beings. With anti-Semitism, Nazi-Zionists pitted Germans against Jews unwilling to emigrate to Palestine, only to annihilate them with help of international Zionist elites when the ghettoized Jewish masses refused emigration. Likewise, anti-Slavism, anti-Communism and anti-Bolshevism pushed Germans into Nazi-Zionist plan for Slav extermination. European and North American neo-Nazi mercenaries joined recent Balkan wars – against “Communist” Serbs. Crypto-Jewish leaders and agents subvert Muslims with anti-Zionism for GWOT pretext. JPC creates sectarian divisions and strife among Muslims, Christians and between the two. JPC 9/11 ploy has deepened Christian-Muslim animosity, and primed violence against selected Muslim states and denial of civil rights, hastening Bolshevization of the USA. A US-Israeli citizen heads the DHS with former high KGB officers, alerting of possible genocide.

GWOT and JPC terror in Palestine show JPC power, as do the Balkan conflicts. US neocons bear primary responsibility for all these interventions, but the fact is little known for the Balkan wars that follow JPC’s global script, involving JPC media, covert actions, international banks, courts, sanctions, and NGOs (JPC fifth column globally). IMF-World Bank prescriptions induced hyperinflation and harshened poverty, hightening Yugoslav inter-group tensions. US and European governments, global Islam and Vatican helped agitate pent-up hatred and fuelled the confrontations, resembling death squad policy in other regions. They also provided covert military aid despite embargoes. Under neocons, US state department took off its list some terrorist organizations, opening Jihadist supply to Bosnia. In 1992-1995, neocon “Turkey-Iran-Pakistan-Balkan” affair armed and trained Bosnian Muslims. With Turkey’s involvement, Iranian weapons pipeline led via Croatia. By late 1994, a US arms supply went through a secretly constructed airport in Bosnia. The affair bore JPC fingerprints, just like the Iran-Contra affair in which Israel and Turkey collaborated in illegal arms sales to Iran. In Kosovo intervention, neocons confronted Pentagon professionals and European leaders. Neocons implemented unilateral Balkan intervention policy under false pretences, years before PNAC applied similar strategy to GWOT. Anti-Russism (and by extension anti-Serbism) was argued from alleged continuing Russian threat to global security and from pre-destined US-NATO role to lead into NWO, with Zionism and “revived Islam” as potential allies.

US-NATO Balkan divide-and-conquer strategy has tested “Balkanization of the globe”, then has tried it in the Caucasus where Russia reacts decisively. The West didn’t win the “humanitarian interventions”, but diplomatic, economic, and propagandist warfare were effective. Interventionism pretends humanitarian reasons: death camps and mass rape, inflated and falsified massacres presented as genocide, non-existent ethnic cleansing, and alleged threat to own nationhood. JPC-friendly courts and media protect JPC interventionists. “Anti-Semitism, racism and xenophobia” legislation is invoked when JPC encounters opposition. Enforced politically with disproportionate, tough laws, JPC’s Holocaustian pretense slanders and ruins critics. JPC racists claim moral high ground, and hatefully and falsely defame target peoples and whistleblowers, while maintaining Holocaustian victimhood’s moral shield against prosecuting the villain. JPC expands this tactics to non-Holocaustian subjects such as Muslims to subvert the West with Islamism, distract critics from JPC mass crimes, e.g. Rwanda genocide, and justify JPC interventionism with events such as Srebrenica “massacre” and “Osama’s 9/11”. Major Jewish organisations have objected neither to Holocaustianity nor to WWII victim-villain role reversal.

Intelligence could have predicted that supporting Balkan Muslims to appease the Islamic world by offsetting the West’s harm to Muslims elsewhere, wouldn’t work. Muslims hold the West in greater contempt because of GWOT. They are convinced that their Allah is true since destruction of Balkan Christianity goes on in our forces presence, and we erect monuments to Jihadists on fraudulent claims that Muslim genocide has taken place. Obama’s “change” is deceptive. JPC cameleon has merely changed from neocon to “liberal” colours. Judeocentrics and NWO enthusiasts staff White House, Pentagon and intelligence leadership, and lead the banker elites responsible for recent “crises” and “bail-outs”. Some analysts fear this and other developments prove escalation towards a NWO plan that depends on annihilation of millions of people.

---

[1]Bein, Piotr “Mass Deception on Mass Violence” in Scherrer (ed.)  Genocide and Mass Violence in Eurasia. Comparative Genocide  Studies 3. Moers: IFEK‑IRECOR 2008

[2]Hiroshima Peace Institute “Humanitarian Crisis and International  Intervention”  2003

[3]Shibutani, Tamotsu and Kwan, Kian Ethnic Stratification NY:  Macmillan 1965

[4]Shibutani, Tamotsu Society and Personality 1961

[5]Bein, Piotr and Pągowski, Stefan “Revisionism, Role Reversal  and Restitutions” in Scherrer op cit

[6]Brzezinski, Zbigniew The Grand Chessboard 1997

[7]Steigan, Pål in Klassekampen 17.4.1999

[8]Bein, Piotr “NATO (Mis)Information” CADU International  Conference Against Uranium Weapons, Manchester November  2000 at www.stopnato.org.uk/du‑watch/bein/psyops.htm

[9]Skoco, Mirjana and Woodger, William in Hammond, Philip and  Herman, Edward (eds) Degraded Capability London and Sterling: Pluto Press 2000 p 30

[10]NATO air commodore David Wilby (8.4.1999) quoted in Herman, Edward and Peterson, David 31.5.1999 at www.zmag.org/ZSustainers/ZDaily/1999‑05/may_31herman.htm

[11]http://listverse.com/miscellaneous/top‑10‑secret‑societies/

[12]Van der Reijden, Joël 14.8.2005 at http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/1001_Club.htm

[13]Pająk, Henryk Retinger Lublin: Retro 2004

[14]Estulin, Daniel in CounterPunch 27.5.2005; www.bilderberg.org/2005.htm#breaking

[15]Kerte, Jens in Politiken 18.3.1999

[16]Thompson, Peter in Sklar, Holly (ed.) Trilateralism Boston: South  End Press 1980

[17]Both quotes in Kerte op cit

[18]www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/bilderberg.html#metatop

[19]Ibid

[20]Mullins, Eustace at www.apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm

[21]www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/chapter14.htm

[22]Cited by Lippmann, Walter 20.5.1997 at www.TheWinds.org ;  www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/14/mediatruth.htm

[23]Quoted by Rivera, David Allen at http://user.pa.net/~drivera/fw8.htm; www.bilderberg.org/2005.htm

[24]Kerte op cit

[25]Bjerknes, Christopher The Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians 2007 at www.jewishracism.com/Jewish_Genocide_Enlarged.pdf

[26]Biblical, Talmudic and Cabalistic references, ibid

[27]Bjerknes op cit p 421‑425, 430

[28]Bronder, Dietrich Bevor Hitler kam, 2. erweiterte Auflage, 1975, p. 211, 246-247 at www.forsite-verlag.de/ uploads/ media/ Dietrich_Bronder_-_Bevor_Hitler_kam__1975_.pdf

[29]Sutton, Antony Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler at http://reformed‑theology.org/html/books/wall_street/index.html; Sutton, Antony  Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution at http://reformed‑theology.org/html/books/bolshevik_revolution/index.html

[30]See section Opportunistic hatred

[31]Brenner, Lenni 51 Documents Barricade 2002; Weber, Mark at www.rense.com/general34/ZAND.HTM ; www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/nazisupport.cfm

[32]Shonfeld, Moshe The Holocaust Victims Accuse NY: Neturei Karta  1977 at www.jewsagainstzionism.com/resources/onlinebooks/holocaust victims accuse.pdf ; Weissmandl, Michael Ber Min Hametzar 1961 at www.jewsagainstzionism.com/antisemitism/holocaust/holocaustmillions.cfm

[33]Bjerknes p 425‑427; Commentary January 1971; Encyclopaedia Judaica NY: Macmillan 1971 Vol 7 Col 55‑71

[34]Chicago Daily Tribune 27.6.1880

[35]Griffin, G.E. The Creature from Jekyll Island American Media  2002 p 217‑234

[36]Mullins op cit

[37]Spingola, Deanna Before Rockefeller, There Was Rothschild, 2008 at www.spingola.com/before_rockefeller.htm

[38]Spingola op cit citing Hitchcock, Andrew The History of the House of Rothschild at  www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm

[39]Carr, William Pawns in the Game

[40]Fagen, Myron at http://100777.com/myron

[40a]O’Keefe, Theodore Irving on Churchill at www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p498_Okeefe.html

[40b]Makow, Henry Illuminati at www.cruelhoax.ca/ ; Illuminati2 at http://www.cruelhoax.ca/?illuminati2

[40c]Maurice, Pinay The Plot against the Church at www.catholicvoice.co.uk/pinay/

[40d]www.overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html and following

[40e]www.threeworldwars.com/nwo-timeline2.htm#90

[40f]See section Roadmap to NWO

[40g]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2346872/THRIVE%20-%20What%20on%20Earth%20Will%20it%20Take%20%282011%29%205.1%20AC3.mp4

[41]www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm accessed 26.3.2008.

[42]Eggert, Wolfgang Israels Geheim-Vatican Munich: Chronos 2001/2008

[43]New Republic 4.5.1992; Forward 19.12.2003; Foxbrunner, Roman Habad Northvale: Jason Aronson 1993 p 108-109

[44]Washington Report of Middle East Affairs March 2000 cited in Eggert, Wolfgang petition at www.apocalypse-no.net/en

[45]ww.beismoshiach.org/Moshiach/moshiach341.htm

[46]Quoted at http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2008/10/more-on-synod-rabbi.html

[47]Haaretz 7.3.2008

[48]Jerusalem Post 19.10.2001

[49]Focus 20.6.1994 cited in Eggert, Wolfgang Erst Manhattan, dann Berlin Munich: Chronos 2008 p 20-21

[50]Jerusalem Post 22.10.2000 cited in Eggert’s petition

[51]Washington Post 3.7.1999 cited in Eggert’s petition

[52]Section: Neocons and Christian Zionists

[53]NYT 8.3.2003 cited in Eggert’s petition

[54]Eggert’s petition

[55]Shahak, Israel Jewish History, Jewish Religion

[56]Recent case: JTA 13.5.2008 at http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/search/label/agriprocessors

[57]Resume of  article by Valentine, Carol at www.Public‑Action.com

[58]Der Spiegel 19.10.2007 cited in Eggert’s petition

[59]Apel, Rainer in Neue Solidarität 6.2.2003 cited in Eggert’s petition

[60]Yad Vashem Studies Vol XII p 199

[61]Nazemroaya, Mahdi 28.1.2008 at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7837

[62]Schoenman, Ralph at www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/ch04.htm

[63]Munsey Magazine January 1906 p 386

[64]Atlantic Monthly July 1921 p 107

[65]Bjerknes op cit p 236‑237

[66]Bjerknes op cit p 98

[67]London Times 17.6.1918

[68]www.jewsagainstzionism.com/about/mission.cfm

[69]Bjerknes op cit p 376, citing: Somers et al Vox populi, vox Dei London: Harrison 1709; Paine, T. Common sense Bradford: Philadephia 1776; Encyclopaedia Judaica op cit; Scholem op cit; Sabbatai Sevi Princeton U. Press 1973; Kabbalah NY: New American Library; Antelman, M.S. To Eliminate the Opiate 1974 Vol 1 Ch10; Graetz, H. Popular History of the Jews Vol 5, Hebrew Publishing  1937 p 254‑259

[70]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=‑4291770489472554607&hl=en

[71]Fahey, Dennis The Rulers of Russia 1940

[72]The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia 1941 p 2, 312

[73]National Geographic Magazine May 1907 p 313‑314

[74]www.mechon‑mamre.org/jewfaq/Gentiles.htm

[75]Jewish Encyclopedia Funk and Wagnalls 1907 p 617

[76]Jewish Press 9.6.1989

[77]Shahak op cit

[78]Sharon and Begin quotes, ibid

[79]www.noahide.org/article.asp?Level=478&Parent=88

[80]www.noahide.org/article.asp?Level=173&Parent=166

[81]www.beismoshiach.org/Moshiach/moshiach341.htm

[82]www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lOZMvzq4_k

[83]Berliner Tagesblatt 23.8.1914; NYT 4.5.1913 review of Baker,  Granville The Passing of the Turkish Empire in Europe 1913

[84]References in Bjerknes op cit p 66‑67

[85]Ibid p 87‑88

[86]E.g. NYT 10.9.1895; Churchill, Winston The World Crisis Scribner’s 1929 Vol 5 p 157

[87]Dearborn Independent 21.8.1920

[88]NYT 15.5.1916

[89]Bein and Pągowski op cit

[90]Mearsheimer, John and Walt, Stephen “The Israel Lobby” in London Review of Books 21.3.2006

[91]MacDonald, Kevin “Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement”; Understanding Jewish Influence Washington: Summit Publishers  2004.; Occidental Quarterly 3(2) Summer 2003, 3(3) Fall 2003,  and 4(2) Summer 2004

[92]Petras, James at www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=12606

[93]Petras, James The Power of Israel Lobby Clarity Books 2006;  review by Lendman, Stephen at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=LEN20061026&articleId=3604

[94]Collon, Michel 26.3.2008 at www.michelcollon.info

[95]Schoenman op cit

[96]Quoted by Al Hamishmar (Israel) 7.9.1976

[97]Washington Times 7.10.2002

[98]Johnson, Raphael in Culture Wars January 2009

[99]Understanding Jewish Influence op cit

[100]Noah, Timothy in NYT 13.1.2008 review of Heilbrunn, Jacob They Knew They Were Right, cited by Connelly, Edmund in Occidental Observer 22.1.2008

[101]MacDonald, Kevin “Stalin’s Willing Executioners”? 5.11.2005

[102]Petras, James “American Jews on War and Peace” 15.12.2007

[103]Canfield, Joseph Incredible Scofield and His Book.; O’Malley, J.W. The First Jesuits Harvard U. Press 1993; McDougall, D. The rapture of the Saints Artisan 1998

[104]Carlson, Charles at http://whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=1204

[105]Eggert’s petition cites: Rothschild, Matthew in Progressive, February 2003; Hill, Michael in CounterPunch 4.1.2003; Monbiot, George in Guardian 20.4.2004

[106]Eggert’s petition cites: Brubaker, Jack in Lancester New Era 16.7.2004 ; Kirkpatrick, David in NYT 28.8.2004; Lind, Michael Made in Texas

[107]The Power of Israel Lobby op cit.

[108]Lendman op cit

[109]Madsen, Wayne 24.5.2005 at www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/052405Madsen/052405madsen.html

[110]“Mass Deception on Mass Violence” op cit

[111]American Spectator June 1999

[112]London Times 24.3.1999

[113]Goldstein, Evan quoted by Connelly, Edmund in Occidental Observer 22.1.2008

[114]Heilbrunn op cit

[115]Raimondo, Justin 1.12.1999 at www.antiwar.com/justin/j120199.html ; 18.2.2008 at www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12378

[116]www.veritas.org.yu/srpski/publikacije.htm

[117]Beta 27.3.2004; Washington Times 19.3.2004; NYT 18.3.2004;  Reuters 18.3.2004

[118]http://web.mit.edu/mitmsa/www/NewSite/libstuff/Crane/Chap2.htm

[119]http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopnato/message/36421

[120]Chossudovsky, Michel 25.2.2008 at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8168

[121]Strausz‑Hupe, Robert in Orbis No. 1 1957

[122]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=‑4291770489472554607&hl=en

[123]Chodakiewicz, Marek in World Politics Watch 25.9.2006

[124]Chossudovsky, Michel 13.3.2008 at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8323

[125]Levy, Baruch to Marx, Karl in La Revue de Paris 574 1.6.1928

[126]Dreyfuss, Robert Devil’s Game 2005

[127]Nazemroaya op cit

[128]Bjerknes op cit p 99

[129]Kivunim, February 1982

[130]Menashe, Ari Ben Profits of War 1992

[131]Guardian 8.9.2004

[132]“Ex‑Reagan CIA Head” Al Jazeera 12.4.2005

[133]http://rasputin.gnn.tv/?page=2

[134]Chamberlin, Peter “Neoconservatism ‑ Fascist Zionism” 19.8.2007 at http://rense.com/general77/neneo.htm

[135]Daily News (Turkey) 22.1.1996

[136]Haaretz 18.2.2005

[137]Wiebes, Cees Intelligence and the War in  Bosnia

[138]South Asia Tribune 23.12.2002

[139]Scotsman 3.12.1995

[140]Evriviades, Marios 24.3.2000 at http://web.archive.org/web/20000612235740/http://www.idis.gr/people/evriv.html

[141]Komisar, Lucy in Progressive April 1997; Ganser, Daniele at www.buergerwelle.de/pdf/secret_warfare_and_natos_stay_behind_armies.htm ; Kurkcu, Ertugrul at http://mediafilter.org/CAQ/caq61/CAQ61turkey.html

[142]Chamberlin, Peter 5.2.2008 at http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8001; “Neoconservatism ‑ Fascist Zionism” op cit; Chossudovsky, Michel 20.1.2008 at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7718

[143]Perle, Richard in FPRI Wire September 1999

[144]Herzl, Theodore Diary Part I p 16

[145]E.g. Time 22.12.2008

[146]Shalom TV 4.4.2007 www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAZmO80dLfE

[147]Quoted in Młoda Gwardia nr 6 1991

[148]Fahey op cit

[149]www.britannica.com/eb/topic‑175358/Feliks‑Edmundovich‑Dzerzhinsky

[150]Guardian 24.1.2003

[151]Slezkine, Yuri The Jewish Century Princeton U Press 2004

[152]“Mother Russia is cast down” NYT 26.9.1995

[153]Koestler, Arthur The Thirteenth Tribe Random House 1976

[154]www.country‑data.com/cgi‑bin/query/r‑12521.html

[155]Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution op cit

[156]Bjerknes op cit p 68

[157]Ibid

[158]Arms Trade News 10.2.1997

[159]Madsen, Wayne in Counterpuch 18.9.2003

[160]Trifkovic, Srdja at www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=507

[161]www.newamericancentury.org/kosovomilosevicsep98.htm

[162]Ibid

[163]American Spectator June 1999

[164]International Security July/August 1999

[165]“Mass Deception on Mass Violence” op cit

[166]“The Israel Lobby” op cit

[167]NYT 30.12.1995

[168]Hatchett, Ronald at int‘l conference The Yugoslav Conflict,  Moscow
 16‑18.1.1996 at www.srpska‑mreza.com/nwo/Hatchett‑1996.html

[169]Washington Post 4.8.1996

[170]Neumann, Michael in Counterpunch 18.11.2005

[171]Pritchard, Ambrose in Telegraph 3.4.2009

[172]Bradshaw, R.D. at http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4822

[173]Cook, Mark at http://covertaction.org//content/view/86/75/

[174]Ibid/

[175]Tanjug 17.2.2008

[176]Trifkovic, Srdja quoted in Borojević op cit

[177]Goodenough, Patrick in CNSNews.com 21.4.2006

[178]Borojević, Boba at www.serbianna.com/columns/borojevic/031.shtml

[179]Ibid

[180]ICTY transcript of Milošević defence opening statement 1.9.2004 p 32262 at www.un.org/icty/transe54/040901IT.htm

[181]Taylor, Scott Diary of an Uncivil War Esprit de Corps 2002  p 191‑194

[182]D&FA 2.5.2005, 20.6.2005, 11.7.2005; D&FA Special Report July 2005

[183]Brzezinski, Zbigniew in Observateur 15‑21.1.1998

[184]Taylor, Scott in Halifax Herald 10.9.2001

[185]NY Daily News 28.2.1994

[186]De Atkine, Norvell and Pipes, Daniel in Academic Questions,  Winter 1995‑96

[187]Raimondo, Justin at http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8512

[188]Chamberlin, Peter “Unraveling the Myth of Al Qaida” 13.1.2008  at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7787; “Neoconservatism ‑ Fascist Zionism” op cit; “Ex‑Reagan CIA Head” op cit; “Al Qaeda and the “War on Terrorism”” op cit

[189]Bein, Piotr “Operation Danish Cartoons” 10.3.2008 at www.wirtualnapolonia.com/kresy/opinie.asp?opinia=322

[190]Rashtriya Sahara 26.11.2008 at http://ghulammuhammed.blogspot.com/2008/11/cia-mossad-hand-behind-sangh-parivars.html

[191]NYT 6.12.2007

[192]Ibid

[193]15.12.2007 at www.ruvr.ru

[194]Quoted by Szamuely, George in Counterpunch 15.2.2008

[195]Chomsky, Noam in Al Ahram 18‑24.5.2000

[196]www.kosovo.net/erpkiminfo_jan04/erpkiminfo08jan04.html

[197]D&FA October 2004

[198]Guardian 10.9.2005

[199]Hornbeck, Stanley review of The Culture of Critique in American Renaissance June 1999 No. 54

[200]“Operation Danish Cartoons” op cit

[201]Haaretz 18.2.2008

[202]Quoted on Voice of America 8.11.2005

[203]www.srpska‑mreza.com/Bosnia/Srebrenica/AlQaeda‑galery.html

[204]Del Valle, Alexander Guerres contre Europe Paris: Edition des Syrtes 2000 p 125

[205]Jevtić, Miroljub in Mihailović, Kosta (ed.) Kosovo and Metohija Past Present and Future, Belgrade: SANU 2006 p 305‑324

[206]Kallen, H.M. quoted in Hertzberg, A. The Zionist Idea NY: Harper Torchbook 1959 p 532; Bjerknes op cit p 430‑431

[207]Foreword to Shonfeld op cit

[208]European Foundation Intelligence Digest No. 141 2.5.2002

[209]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/33490

[210]“Imperial Consummation” op cit

[211]www.freenations.freeuk.com/gc‑61.html

[212]Ibid

[213]Daily Telegraph 20.4.1997

[214]Droste, Wiglaf in Bittermann, Klaus (ed.) Serbia Must Die Belgrade 1996 p  171‑189, 192

[215]Ibid

[216]German Press Council press release 19.5.1999 cited by Deichmann, Thomas in Degraded Capability op cit p 153

[217]Deichmann op cit p 159

[218]Quoted by Collon, Michel at http://lists.peacelink.it/balcani/msg01531.html

[219]Reinhard, Albrecht quoted by Deichmann p 153

[220]http://globalresistance.com/analysis/real.htm

[221]Retired German general, an advisor in OSCE, Loquai, D. Heinz in The Kosovo Conflict

[222]Quoted by Collon op cit

[223]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/55971

[224]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56126

[225]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/41717 ; other  Germany‑guided and ‑funded  irredentist NGOs: Reformist  Coalition of Vojvodina, German Southeast European Society,  European Center  for Minority Issues, Network of Danube Offices.

[226]Ethnos‑Nation 1 (1993) Vol 1 p 59‑68

[227]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/27092; *34956; *50324

[228]Agence France Presse 21.3.2004

[229]Nkrumah, Gamal in Al Ahram Weekly 3.11.2007 at www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7245; Iran-Daily.com 17.10. 2007

[230]Australian Jewish News 8.5.2007

[231]European Jewish Press 6.5.2007

[232]IsraelNN 8.5.2007

[233]Meyssan, Thierry  at www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/9143

[234]www.beismoshiach.org/_pdf/606.pdf

[235]Telegraph 15.11.2007

[236]CNN News 4.10.1999

[237]www.zcommunications.org/blog/writers/index.php/weblog/entry/bernard_kouchner

[238]www.zcommunications.org/blog/writers/index.php/weblog/entry/bernard_kouchner

[239]http://europa‑eu‑un.org/articles/lv/article_4886_lv.htm

[240]Malic, Nebojsa in Antiwar.com 12.1.2006

[241]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56132

[242]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56136

[243]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56137; *56195; *56187

[244]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56135; *56138

[245]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56128

[246]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56150

[247]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56145; *56176

[248]Der Spiegel 3.5.2004

[249]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/43564

[250]Others also use “humanitarian crises” for forward deployment.  Following the 1999 intervention, the US military established Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo. In the wake of December 2004 tsunami, US and Australian troops established military bases in Indonesia.

[251]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/55988

[252]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56130; *56149

[253]www.german‑foreign‑policy.com/en/fulltext/56125

[254]www.german-foreign-policy.com/en/fulltext/56190

[255]Bjerknes op cit p 67‑69, 265‑266, 287, 342‑343; Chicago Tribune 4.6.1887

[256]“The Prophesie of Mother Shipton” London, 1641, cited by  Bjerknes op cit p 368 ff

[257]Savich, Carl at www.rastko.org.yu/istorija/iii/cksavich-originsofwar.html

[258]Kenney, George in LM No. 99 1997

[259]Carr, T.W. at Symposium on the Balkan War, Chicago  31.8‑1.9.1995 at www.srpska‑mreza.com/nwo/carr‑s‑95.html

[260]“Another Side of the Pope” op cit

[261]Wilcoxson, Andy at www.freenations.freeuk.com/news-2004-11-15.html

[262]german‑foreign‑policy.com 21.12.2007 cited 4.1.2008 at www.byzantinesacredart.com/blog/general/

[263]http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/03/theyre-making-their-move.html

Ciemny Kontynent: Europejscy pomocnicy Hitlera w przeprowadzeniu Holocaustu

Ciemny Kontynent:  Europejscy pomocnicy Hitlera w przeprowadzeniu Holocaustu
Piotr Bein 27.05.2009
(Z  angielskiego tlumaczyl Stanley Sas, poprawki Piotr Bein 29.12.2009)

Czy niezalezni, miedzynarodowi dziennikarze zareaguja na jeszcze jedna manipulacje przez judeocentryczny kompleks wladzy (kompleks jot)?

Artykul Spegela www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,625824,00.html robi wrazenie judeocentrycznej kampanii propagandowej w duzej skali, ktora przypomina  inna akcje dotyczaca polskiej ‘wspolodpowiedzialnosci’  za Szoa i pogromy w czasie II wojny swiatowej.  Oczywiste jest, ze dobrowolny udzial w Holocauscie byl rozny wsrod narodow europejskich, ale wybor czasu w jakim propagandzisci Spiegla zdecydowali sie na swoja manipulacje jest nieprzypadkowy.
Ujawnienie tych faktow powinno miec miejsce wiele dziesiecioleci wczesniej.  Zastosowano taka sama taktyke jak w przypadku ‘polskich’  pogromow Zydow w Jedwabnem i w Kielcach.  Tym razem mowi sie o odpowiedzialnosci poszczegolnych nacji jak Ukraincy, Wegrzy, Rumuni, Slowacy lub narody baltyckie i zasugerowano odpowiedzialnosc grupowa, oskarzajac wspolnie ‘Europejczykow’ (chrzescijan?). Europe nazwano ‘ciemnym kontynentem,’ tak jakby osrodki wplywow zydowskich nie mialy swojego udzialu w sprowokowaniu obydwu wojen swiatowych, nienawisci i Holocaustu.

Anty-polonizm, podobnie jak demonizowanie Serbow przez media i politykow, bedacych pod wplywem kompleksu jot,  wskazuje, ze  judeocentryczne falszowanie historii i faktow poprzedza generalny atak na narod. Serbia  ulegla czystkom etnicznym oraz podzialowi pomiedzy kilka panstw, a ziemia rdzennie serbska zostala wzieta przemoca militarna.  Dla Polakow obecna judeocentryczna kampania propagandowa oznacza oszukancze wielomiliardowe roszczenia grup reprezentujacych ‘przemysl Holocaust,’
bezposrednia inwazje nacjonalizmu izraelskiego na polskie suwerenne terytorium (coroczne tzw. ‘marsze zywych’w Oswiecimiu-Brzezince) oraz falszowanie historii Polski w celu obnizenia poczucia dumy narodowej i tozsamosci Polakow, dalsza judaizacje spoleczenstwa polskiego oraz w rezultacie znaczne obnizenie wplywow narodowo-katolicko-patriotycznych osrodkow.

Strategia przyjeta w artykule Spiegla moze wskazywac na sluzenie wielu celom judeocentrycznym:
1.  Nieustannie przypominać cierpienia Zydow, przy rownoczesnym ukrywaniu roli syjonistow w Szoa.
2.  Przygotować opinię swiatową do zaakceptowania roszczen ‘przemyslu Holocaust’ oraz prawdopodobnej rekolonizacji panstw wschodnioeuropejskich w stylu Judeo-Polonii. Od ponad wieku istnieje koncepcja Judeo-Polonii jako panstwa zydowskiego we Wschodniej Europie, od Baltyku do Morza Czarnego.
3.  Wzmacniać UE, przy rownoczesnym oslabianiu panstw narodowych.
4.  Rozkladając winę ciążącą na Niemcach na inne narody europejskie, kontynuować judeocentryczną manipulację niemieckim ekspansjonizmem, rewanzyzmem i rewizjonizmem.
5.  Rozmiękczyć swiatową opinię publiczną wobec spodziewanych atakow Izraela na Arabow i muzulmanow.
6.  Dalej podważyć chrzescijanstwo poprzez prezentowanie go jako przyczyny antysemityzmu i utrzymywania sie nienawisci do Zydow, prowadzacej do Holocaustu.
7.  Kontrolowanie “prawdy” o Holocauscie we Wschodniej Europie, celem manipulacji narodami i podzialami dla osiagniecia judeocentrycznych,
antyrosyjskich celow w tym regionie.

Artykul Spiegla moze wiec sygnalizowac wiele dzialan, ktore moga przyniesc niepozadane rezultaty dla bezpieczenstwa i pokoju, nie tylko w Europie. Niezalezne organizacje polonijne (czy sa jeszcze takie?), we wspolpracy z osrodkami patriotycznymi w Polsce i w innych krajach tego regionu, powinny opracowac strategie zaradcze, np. demaskowac kłamstwa w niezaleznych mediach miedzynarodowych, zainicjowac badania porownawcze oraz sympozja niezaleznych historykow miedzynarodowych i naukowcow badajacych ludobojstwo.
Chcialbym tutaj zarekomendowac sprawdzona, niezalezna instytucje miedzynarodowa International Comparative Genocide Research (ICGR) pod kierownictwem Profesora Christiana Scherrera przy Uniwersytecie w Hiroszimie. Glownym celem ICGR jest zapobieganie zbrodniom masowym. Mimo klarownych dowodów propagandy  judeocentrycznych mediow glownego nurtu,  ktore demonizowaly Serbow od konca lat 1980-ych, nie zdolano zapobiec powtarzajacym sie falom przemocy skierowanej przeciwko rozmaitym balkanskim  grupom etnicznym. Nie dalo sie rowniez zapobiec  upokarzaniu i obrazaniu narodu polskiego w swiatowych mediach kompleksu jot, czemu towarzyszylo przejmowanie majatku narodowego przez obce osrodki tegoz kompleksu.

Na poczatek proponowalbym wspolna akcje naszych najlepszych, niezaleznych historykow i badaczy (J.R.Nowak, I.C.Pogonowski, S.Pągowski, J.Peczkis i in.),
ktorzy przygotowaliby wspolnie artykul polemizujacy ze Spieglem  w takich sprawach jak: falszowanie historii w celu uzyskania materialnych i/lub moralnych korzysci;  narodowy a judeocentryczny interes w czasie wojny; wspolpraca syjonistow z nazistami i poswiecenie mas zydowskich; denuncjownie Zydow przez Zydow;  dzialania Einsatzgruppen, zmuszajacych miejscowa ludnosc do wpolpracy;  kamuflowanie masowych zbrodni nazistowskich na Zydach i przedstawianie ich jako skutkow rewanzu lokalnej ludnosci za kolaboracje Zydow z sowieckimi okupantami; prowokacje i rządy wladz komunistycznych skladajacych sie glownie z Zydow po II wojnie swiatowej.

Polecam referat wspolny ze Stefanem Pągowskim na sympozjum naukowe, zorganizowane przez ICGR:

Revisionism, Role Reversal and Restitutions: The Polish-Jewish Case

http://www.polpatriot.com/html/polish_-_jewish_case.html

http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/revisionism-role-reversal-and-restitutions/

Wykorzystalismy w nim opracowania wspomnianych polskich autorow. Od s. 25 mozna przeczytac o judeocentrycznej propagandzie nt. pogromow  w Jedwabnem i Kielcach. Np. po inwazji armii hitlerowskiej na wschodnie tereny Polski w czerwcu 1941 r. przypisano polskiej ludnosci masowe niemieckie mordy na miejscowych komunistach i Zydach; Polacy mieli sie w ten sposob mscic za zbrodnie NKWD (zdominowany przez Zydow komunistyczny aparat bezpieczenstwa wewnetrznego) popelnione przy wspolpracy z miejscowymi Zydami na ludnosci polskiej po wkroczeniu armii sowieckiej na te tereny po 17 wrzesnia 1939 r.  Niemiecka zmyłka była skuteczna, bo Polacy nienawidzili komunizmu, natomiast wielu Zydow wspolpracowalo z sowieckim okupantem (Pinchuk Shtetl Jews under Soviet Rule, Blackwell Publishers 1990;  Eva Hoffman Shtetl, Mariner Books 1998). W referacie mozna rowniez przeczytac o prowokacji NKWD, ktore zorganizowalo ‘pogrom’ w Kielcach w 1946 r., w ramach szerszego programu, ktorego celem bylo przestraszyc Zydow i sklonic ich do wyjazdu do Palestyny, zgodnie z planem syjonistow dazacych do utworzenia panstwa Izrael. Zdominowany przez Zydow komunistyczny rzad polski po II wojnie swiatowej bral udzial w tej akcji, organizujac ‘pogromy’ oraz prezentujac jej swiatowej opinii publicznej jako przejaw polskiego antysemityzmu.

W artykule Spiegla czuc wplywy judeocentryzmu, np.

1.  Zupelne przemilczenie roli miedzynarodowego syjonizmu tzn. owczesnego kompleksu jot, w tym bankierow, w dojsciu do wladzy nazistow oraz w Szoa. Kompleks jot finasuje i manipuluje rządami dla swych judeocentrycznych celów podburzania jednego narodu przeciw drugiemu oraz stworzenia zydowskiej martyrologii (Szoa) jako podstawy moralnej dla utworzenia i istnienia panstwa Izrael w Palestynie. Zgodnie z koncepcja takich przywodcow ruchu syjonistycznego jak Herzl, dla tego celu nalezalo uzyc antysemityzmu oraz poswiecic wielu Zydow. Natomiast Spiegel przypisuje eksterminacje Zydow klesce armii hitlerowskiej na terenie ZSRR, w dwa lata po inwazji Hitlera na Polskę.

2. Ograniczenie pojecia Holocaust do Zydow, zgodnie z nowa judeocentryczna “religia” holocaustianska, wykorzystywana przez ‘przemysl Holocaust’; ustanawianie rasistowskich praw godzacych w nie-Zydow; konsolidacja dzialan zydowskich, przy stalym ostrzeganiu przed grozacym niebezpieczenstwem (zgodnie z zasadami talmudycznego rabinizmu) oraz uciszaniu jakiejkolwiek krytyki.

3. Sprowadzanie zydowskiej dominacji w totalitarnej machinie sowieckiej do ich wplywu w ‘niektorych obszarach sowieckiej biurokracji.’

4. Przypisywanie antysemityzmu międzywojennego  wylacznie motywom rasistowskim. W rzeczywistosci, wszystkie ugrupowania zydowskie w Polsce, jak rowniez miedzynarodowe organizacje syjonistyczne byly przeciwne utworzeniu niepodleglej Polski po I wojnie swiatowej. Czy Zydzi oczekiwali, ze Polacy beda ich za to kochac? Poza tym, Zydzi zdominowali handel, wiele profesji i innych sfer w czasach trudnych dla gospodarki. Rzad polski podjal pewne restrykcyjne kroki jak np. kwoty na uniwersytetach, biorac pod uwage procentowy udzial Zydow wsrod ludnosci Polski. Czy mozna sie mu dziwic? Tymczasem, fakty te przedstawia sie jako przyklad slepego, irracjonalnego polskiego antysemityzmu.

5. Porownywanie Polakow do patologicznych mordercow Zydow. Tymczasem Polacy byli, poza Serbami, jedynym narodem, ktorym za ukrywanie Zydow grozila kara smierci. Mimo tego wielu Polakow ukrywalo Zydow narazajac zycie swoje i swoich rodzin a nawet calych wsi, ratujac setki tysiecy Zydow przed niechybna smiercia. Tymczasem omawiany artykul chwali jedynie Dunczykow, ktorzy bez zadnego ryzyka przerzucili 5 tys. swoich Zydow w bezpieczne miejsca. Redaktorom Spiegla  mozna zadac pytanie, dlaczego wiec Polacy stanowia najliczniejsza grupe wymieniona na pomniku Yad Vashem w Jerozolimie, poswieconym tym, ktorzy ratowali Zydow w czasie II wojny swiatowej? Faktycznie takich Polakow bylo znacznie wiecej.

6. W artykule podkreslono denuncjowanie Zydow w Holandii i Francji (w rzeczywistosci marginalne zjawisko),  przy rownoczesnym przemilczaniu ratowania Zydow w tych panstwach. W Polsce sami Zydzi syjonisci donosili na innych Zydow nazistom, z ktorymi wspolpracowali na ulicach, w radach w ghetto i w policji zydowskiej.
Spiegel nie wspomnial o tym nawet slowa.

7.  Przypisywanie powojennych rzekomych pogromow (ktore w rzeczywistosci mialy na celu sklonic Zydow do wyjazdu do Palestyny) ambicjom tworzenia panstw narodowych. W rzeczywistosci, rezimy judeocentryczne (np. w Polsce i na Wegrzech) tlumily jakiekolwiek przejawy patriotyzmu wyjatkowo brutalnie i systematycznie, dbajac jedynie o pasozytnicze interesy zydowskie.

8. Celowo uzyto ogolnego okreslenia ‘panstwa balkanskie.’  Przy obecnej demonizacji Serbow, judeocentryczne media nie moga oskarzac chorwackich i albanskich ekstremistow, dlatego niedouczony czytelnik (czyli wiekszosc) pomysli o Serbach  jako o oczywistych winowajcach. Obecna judeocentryczna, antyserbska kampania propagandowa ma na celu wybielic albanskich ekstremistow, ktorzy mordowali Zydow, jak rowniez pomoc oczyscic sumienie chorwackich nacjonalistow z winy spowodowanej wymordowaniem setek tys. Serbow w czasie II wojny swiatowej, nie zmieniająjac liczby Zydow zabitych przez ustaszow.

The Dark Continent: Hitler’s European Holocaust Helpers

The Dark Continent: Hitler’s European Holocaust Helpers
Piotr Bein 27.05.2009

Will international independents also react to this, yet another manipulation of the Holocaust by the Judeocentric Power Complex (JPC)?

Spiegel article www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,625824,00.html looks like a large-scale, Judeocentric propaganda campaign, similar to one regarding Polish “co-reponsibility” for Shoah and pogroms around WW2. Granted, the degree of willing participation in the Holocaust has differed between the nations, but Spiegel’s propagandist manipulation is obvious from the timing of the campaign — decades after the facts could and should have been exposed. JPC has adopted the same tactics in the “Polish” cases of Jedwabne and Kielce massacres of Jews. This time, group responsibilities of Ukrainians, Hungarians, Romanians, Slovaks and the Baltic peoples are sought, and a joint “European” (Christian?) responsibility is suggested. Europe is called the Dark Continent, as if JPC has not instigated both world wars, the hatreds and the Holocaust.

JPC’s anti-Polonisms, and concurrent demonization of Serbs in JPC media and by JPC-inclined politicians, have demonstrated that Judeocentric distortions of history and fact precede a major assault on a nation. The Serbian nation has been ethnically cleansed and partitioned between several new states, and Serbian ancestral lands have been taken over by force. For Poles, recent Judeocentric campaigns meant fraudulent, multi-billion dollar restitution claims by the Holocaust Industry, direct invasion of Israeli nationalism onto Polish sovereign soil (annual Marches of the Living at Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial), and major falsification of Polish national history and identity with loss of national self-esteem, further Judaization of the Polish society and severe undermining of patriotic-Catholic-nationalist centres as a result.

The strategy signaled in the Spiegel article would serve several Judeocentric goals:

- Keep Jewish suffering in focus while de-focusing from Zionist masterminding and carrying out of Shoah.
- Prepare world public opinion for Holocaust Industry’s restitution claims and possibly Judeopolonia-type re-colonization in the remaining Eastern European countries. For a century, Judeopolonia has been a concept of a Jewish state in Eastern Europe, from the Baltic to the Black Sea.
- Strengthen the case for European Union and against nation states.
- By spreading German nation’s co-responsibility on other nations, continue Judeocentric manipulation of appeasing German revisionism, expansionism and revanchism.
- Soften world public opinion before next, major Israeli assault on Arabs and/or Muslims.
- Further undermine Christianity by presenting it as the cause of anti-Semitism and foundation of hatred against Jews in the Holocaust.
- Control “the truth” on Holocaust in Eastern Europe, eyeing manipulation of the nations concerned to Judeocentric divisive and anti-Russian goals in the region.

The Spiegel article might thus signal a number of significant assaults of international significance, with potential negative effects on peace and security not only in Europe. Our independent, Polonia leadership (do we have one?) together with patriotic circles in the countries concerned should work out a strategy of response, e.g. counter-propaganda campaign in independent media internationally, comparative research and a symposium of independent international historians and genocide scholars. Perhaps a proven independent scientific body under the direction of Professor Christian Scherrer, the International Comparative Genocide Research (ICGR) project at the Hiroshima City University, could take a lead in the latter. ICGR’s primary goal is mass crime prevention. Despite clear signals in Judeocentric mainstream media who have been demonizing Serbs since the late 1980s, repeated waves of violent mass crimes on different ethnic groups have not been prevented in the Balkans. The mass crime of intimidation of the Polish nation and taking their real estate assets have not been prevented, either, despite obvious, easily identifiable demonizations in the JPC-led, global media.

For starters, our best researchers and historians (JR Nowak, IC Pogonowski, S Pagowski, J Peczkis…) could prepare a (joint?) counter-article to Spiegel’s on points relating to, or similar to the Polish case (falsification of history for material-moral gains, Judeocentric vs. national interests in war time, Jewish Zionists as enablers of the Nazis and willing executioners of Jewish masses, Jewish denouncers of Jews, Einzatzgruppen forcing locals to co-operate under a gun, Nazi camouflaging the mass murders as revenge of local populations on Jews who had collaborated with the Soviets, post-war Jewish Communist regime collusion and cover-ups…).

My paper with Stefan Pagowski on the Polish case, prepared for the ICGR project, has used research results from the above mentioned Polish researchers:

Revisionism, Role Reversal and Restitutions: The Polish-Jewish Case

http://www.polpatriot.com/html/polish_-_jewish_case.html

http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2009/12/28/revisionism-role-reversal-and-restitutions/

Starting on page 25, you can read about Judeocentric spin on Jedwabne and Kielce massacres, e.g. that Germany’s June 1941 invasion of Eastern Poland began mass murders of local Communists and Jews, being disguised as Polish acts of revenge for NKVD (Jewish-dominated Soviet internal security apparatus) killings aided by local Jews during Soviet occupation since September 17, 1939. The spin worked, because Poles despised Communism and many Jews collaborated with the Soviets.[Ben‑Cion Pinchuk "Shtetl Jews Under Soviet Rule" Blackwell Publishers 1990; Eva Hoffman "Shtetl" Mariner Books 1998]. You will also find in the paper how NKVD masterminded and commanded the July 1946 Kielce “pogrom”, how it served Zionist policy of driving Jews out of Europe to Palestine, and how post-WW2 Poland’s regime led by Jewish Communists participated in the pogroms and then covered them up as Polish acts of hatred.

Spiegel article reeks of Judeocentrism, for example:

- Total silence on the masterminds and enablers of Nazism and the Holocaust — the international Zionists, i.e. the core of JPC at the time, including the bankers. The JPC has  financed and manipulated governments to Judeocentric goals of pitting goyim nations against each other and creating Jewish martyrology (Shoah) as a moral foundation for Israel’s creation and existence in Palestine, in accord with earlier pronouncements of Zionist leaders such as Herzl, on using anti-Semitism to achieve Zionist goals at the price of Jewish lives. Instead, Spiegel gives the advance into USSR as the Nazi motivation for extermination of Jews starting two years after the war began.

- Restricting Holocaust to Jewish suffering, as designed by the new, Judeocentric religion, Holocaustianity, for the purpose of the Holocaust Industry, anti-goyim racist laws, consolidation of Jewish action under constant reminder of a threat (as in Talmudic rabbinism), and silencing critics.

- Trivializing the Jewish dominance in the Soviet totalitarian machine to “some areas of the Soviet bureaucracy”.

- Attributing between-war anti-Semitism solely to racism. In fact, all Jewish groups in Poland and international Zionists have opposed Polish independence after WW1. Do Jews expect Polish love for that? On top of it, Jews have dominated commerce, professions and other spheres in difficult economic times, so the Polish government took measures such as restriction of university quota to the proportion of Jews in the Polish society. Anything wrong with that? Yet, this fact is given as an example of Polish irrational, blind anti-Semitism.

- Equating Poles with pathological killers of Jews. Poles, as the only ones besides Serbs subject to death penalty for doing so, have risked lives of own families and whole villages to save hundreds of thousands Jews. But the article praises Danes who without any risk have transported their 5000 Jews to safety. So why are Poles the most numerous national group distinguished by the Israeli Yad Vashem memorial in Jerusalem for saving Jewish lives in WW2? And not all Polish rescuers have been, or have wished to be, identified.

- Emphasizing denouncement of Jews in Holland and France (obviously a marginal phenomenon), but silence on rescuers in those countries. In Poland, Zionist Jews themselves have denounced other Jews to the Nazis with whom they co-operated on the street, in Jewish ghetto councils and in Jewish police. Not a word about it in Spiegel.

- Painting alleged post-WW2 pogroms (staged by JPC to drive Jews out to Palestine) as a by-product of quests for national states. In fact, Judeocentric regimes (e.g. Poland, Hungary) have suppressed any national-patriotic tendencies in a ruthless systematic manner, while assuring implementation of parasitic Jewish interests.

- Foggy naming of “Balkan countries” as culprits. After recent demonization of Serbs, JPC media cannot point fingers at extreme Croats and Albanians only, leaving Serbs as obvious suspects in the mind of uneducated reader (the majority nowadays). Recent JPC’s anti-Serbian propaganda campaigns have white-washed Albanian extremists’ crimes against Jews and helped clean Croat nationalist conscience of the guilt for hundreds of thousands Serbs murdered in WW2 while keeping the number of Jews killed by Ustashe unchanged.